Skip to content
Share
Explore
Study Matrix
Prepared by: learnloophq@gmail.com
Chapter: 05. Expansion Of The Delhi Sultanate The Khilji And The Tughlaq Dynasties
The Khilji Dynasty: Jalaluddin Khilji vs. Alauddin Khilji
Points of Comparison
Jalaluddin Khilji
Alauddin Khilji
Role & Title
Founder of the Khilji dynasty (captured the throne in 1290 CE).
Nephew of Jalaluddin; murdered him to declare himself Sultan.
Character & Personality
* Mild and pious person.
* Brilliant general.* Shrewd and far-sighted administrator.
Policy Towards Nobles
* Forgave rebellious nobles and treated them well.* Policy led to lawlessness and revolts.
* Bribed nobles with rich gifts initially, then blinded/killed those who betrayed Jalaluddin.* Imposed harsh rules to curb their power.
Literacy & Education
Not mentioned in text.
Did not know how to read and write.
End of Reign
Treacherously murdered by Alauddin Khilji.
Died in 1316 CE, followed by a period of political turmoil.
Key Rulers of the Tughlaq Dynasty: Ghiyasuddin, Muhammad bin, & Firoz Shah Tughlaq
Points of Comparison
Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq
Muhammad bin Tughlaq
Firoz Shah Tughlaq
Accession & Relation
Succeeded the last Khilji ruler in 1320 CE.
Son of Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq (Jauna Khan); succeeded him.
Cousin of Muhammad bin Tughlaq; nominated by ulemas and nobles.
Personal Character
* Efficient administrator.* Capable military commander.
* Deeply learned and accomplished scholar.* Gifted memory and keen intellect.* Lacked practical sense, whimsical, and unpredictable.
* Peace-loving, just, and benevolent ruler.* Kind and merciful.* Focused primarily on the welfare of his subjects.
Key Projects & Policies
* Introduced welfare reforms.* Suppressed revolts in distant provinces.* Restored peace and stability.
* Brilliantly conceived but poorly executed projects.* Heavy taxation in the Doab.* Shifting of capital to Daulatabad.* Introduction of token currency.* Unrealistic expansion schemes.
* Economic reforms (reduced Doab taxes, built canals/wells).* Public utility schemes (rest houses, charity department, hospitals).* Replaced torture with mild judicial punishments.* Policy of conciliation toward nobles.
State & Religion (Ulemas)
Not mentioned in text.
Did not allow the ulemas to influence the affairs of the state.
Ruled according to the shariah and was influenced by ulemas in administration.
Military Capability
Capable military commander.
Total failure as a military general.
Lacked basic qualities of a military leader; feeble attempts to recover provinces failed.
End of Reign / Legacy
Died in what appeared to be a deliberately planned accident.
Died in 1351 CE, leaving the Sultanate in decay and disintegration.
His death was followed by the rapid disintegration of the Delhi Sultanate.
Dynastic Comparison: The Khiljis vs. The Tughlaqs
Points of Comparison
The Khilji Dynasty (Alauddin Khilji)
The Tughlaq Dynasty (Muhammad bin / Firoz Shah Tughlaq)
Empire Building & Foreign Policy
* Aggressive but sensible foreign policy.* First Turkish sultan to build an empire extending south of the Vindhyas.
* Highly ambitious with unrealistic goals (“world empire”) under Muhammad bin, which failed.* Weak and ineffective policy under Firoz Shah.* Military failures led to disintegration.
Reorganization of the Army
* Created a permanent, large standing army.* Introduced horse-branding (dagh) and descriptive rolls (chehra).* Spies kept in every unit.
* Muhammad bin mobilized and paid a huge army in advance for failed expansion schemes.* Firoz Shah made military-administrative holdings (iqtas) hereditary.
Control Over Nobles
* Denied nobles the chance to conspire.* Prohibited intermarriage/parties without permission.* Used an efficient spy system and confiscated feudal land grants.
* Firoz Shah adopted a policy of conciliation.* Increased their salaries and allowances and made the iqta system hereditary, undermining sultanic power.
Mongol Invasions & Defense
* Built a strong defense system (repaired forts, stationed best generals).* Successfully repulsed five Mongol raids.* Executed captured Mongols.
* Muhammad bin shifted his capital to Daulatabad to escape the Mongol threat.* Shifting of the capital exposed Delhi to renewed Mongol attacks.
Enforcement of Schemes
Ruthless in enforcing rules, especially market control policies.
* Muhammad bin’s progressive ideas failed due to faulty execution.* Firoz Shah was forgiving toward corrupt officials and criminals.
State and Religion
Separated religion from politics; challenged the authority of the ulemas.
Firoz Shah aligned administration with the shariah and accepted the advice of ulemas.
System of Authority
Despotic; authority was absolute, and commands became law.
Despotic; authority was absolute, and commands became law.
Patronage & Welfare
* Patron of art, architecture, and learning (e.g., Alai Darwaza, Siri Fort).* Introduced market control to keep prices of essential goods low.
* Patrons of art, architecture, and learning.* Introduced numerous welfare schemes to improve subjects’ economic conditions.
The Late Delhi Sultanate: Sayyid Dynasty vs. Lodi Dynasty
Points of Comparison
The Sayyid Dynasty
The Lodi Dynasty
Origin & Background
Established after Timur’s invasion; overthrew the last Tughlaq sultan.
An Afghan dynasty that replaced the Sayyids.
Founder
Khizr Khan (appointed as viceroy by Timur in 1414 CE).
Bahlul Lodi (established in 1451 CE).
Duration of Rule
Ruled Delhi for 38 years.
Ruled from 1451 to 1526 CE.
Territorial Control
Not mentioned in text.
Confined to Punjab and the Doab area.
Notable Rulers
Khizr Khan.
* Bahlul Lodi.* Sikandar Lodi (the greatest of the Lodi rulers).* Ibrahim Lodi.
Last Ruler & End of Dynasty
Not mentioned in text.
Ibrahim Lodi; defeated and killed by Babur in the First Battle of Panipat (1526 CE), ending the Delhi Sultanate.
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.