The assessment framework of the RCTH R-Score is developed based on the work of existing initiatives and our team members’ expertise on circular design. Our goal is to design a framework that measures how well a product supports repair throughout its lifecycle. This structured approach ensures a thorough evaluation that considers both technical design elements and practical consumer concerns.
There are five key aspects of repairability in the RCTH R-Score. Accordingly, each aspect contains specific assessment criteria. In total, there are 12 assessment criteria in our framework.
5.1 Five assessment aspects
Product design for repairability & upgradability → Evaluates how a product's physical design facilitates or hinders repair and extension of its useful life Repair support & services → Examines the manufacturer's and brand’s commitment to supporting product repair Documentation & information → Assesses the availability and quality of information that supports product repair Accessibility to spare parts → Evaluates how easily consumers or repair shops can obtain replacement components Affordability of product repair → Examines the economic factors that influence repair decisions 5.2 Twelve assessment criteria
Examples of research questions
This framework serves as the foundation for the detailed scoring methodology described in Chapter , which explains how these qualitative assessments are translated into the quantitative scoring. (Note: Not all assessment criteria will be used for the first assessment due to technical limitations at the moment. Please see the selected criteria for the first assessment in Chapter 7. )