2) So much so that @ericbahn and I did 700+ mtgs to raise our $11.5m fund. We asked *EVERYONE*. We asked my eye dr. Our lawyers. Our bankers. Ppl we met at friends’ houses and at parties.
We didn’t try to convince ppl who were not really bought in. We moved on & found new leads.
When I am talking to a GP, I'm also trying to assess how they make me "feel"? If I feel inspired or excited, it's easy to draw a line to this feeling passing to founders, other LPs, and co-investors. This does map back to authenticity.
Each year venture capitalists receive hundreds of investment proposals, but is every proposal received by a venture capitalist processed equally? In this study, we show how the source of a proposal and the available amount of investment capital, factors that are not contained within the pages of a proposal, may influence the investment decision-making process. Our results highlight the impact of being referred to a venture capitalist by a trusted source, as more time is spent evaluating these proposals and they proceed further along in the process. We also find that venture capitalists process proposals more quickly as the capital in the fund is invested over the life of the fund.
Highlights of the U.S. Venture Industry in 2022
- 4,825 companies raised first-time funding (the first round of equity funding in a startup by an institutional venture investor) and attracted $23.7 billion, with both metrics comparing favorably to 2021 records.
- First-time deals accounted for 31% of the total deal count and nearly 10% of the total deal value.
- Median fund size of $40.6 million was at a 13-year high and total AUM was at $1.1 trillion.
- Exits decreased precipitously, with a 36% drop in exit count from 2021 to 2022 and a 91% drop in exit values over the same period.
Their argument is that some startups simply raised too much, at valuations into which they will never grow, and that clean, well-planned exits are better for everyone than messy ones. After all, the money could be invested in something more impactful. Importantly, the founders’ time could also be focused on more productive endeavors, greatly improving their mental and emotional well-being.
The downturn inevitably draws comparisons to the dotcom crash of 2000-01, when deep winter set in and vc investments froze. Luckily for both founders and their backers, conditions are not so frosty today. Startups’ balance-sheets are stronger than they were 20 years ago; valuations are not quite so detached from revenues. In America alone, venture capitalists have about . Nonetheless, the industry that is emerging from the and into an era of dearer money looks different from the one that went into it. In many respects, vc is returning to the ways of decades past.
In evaluating a manager, LPs are thinking about the job of a VC: e.g. sourcing, picking, winning, and helping. A few questions LPs might ask are:
- Do you have interesting and unique deal flow?
- Do you have a thoughtful and differentiated point of view or thesis?
- Do you have a strong reputation for treating founders well and being able to add value?
- Are you an expert in a certain industry or business model?
- Are you able to win deals in a competitive market?
- Does the portfolio construction make sense for the strategy? Do you have sufficient bandwidth to support the strategy? How do you get leverage?
- How will this be at least a 3-5x fund?
