Explore

Project Management

Weekly review meetings

Marcus Devaney

Mike Thacker

Ian Singleton

Simon Dickinson

kenneth.barnsley@blackburn.gov.uk

22 March 2021

Finalising

Por11010 - ODI Social Prescribing work - Technical Review⁠

. - style and title (without the Por number? Keep where it is I guess)

DG’s executive summary

15 March 2021

Agenda

Review of highlight report

Any concerns about completing anything by end of this week?

Questions/issues to discuss

Finalising

Porism document⁠

(7 Ian, 2 Tim, 1 Marcus, 1 Kat points)

- comments to come

key recs - API, OA to OR conversions or roadmap to convergence?

- more pictures?

- styling

- agreeing with what Porism has said

- Use OA, OR and ORUK or full names?

Review

@Date last updated

⁠

strategies from user research and align to Mike’s document

Should we be reviewing the wording in

OpenActive & Open Referral UK attribute comparison⁠

We will have a read and comment back this week but i am sure it is fine

What other documents should Porism review?

I think it is wait now until we have completed deliverables by Friday 19th. If you can then have a read of them then we will tidy things up for final delivery on Wednesday 24th March

Has Ian chased Matthew Pike / Dominic Jones?

Dom has moved on, not heard back from Matthew. Got a response from Nick Parker who asked Toby to speak with us. Hoping he will soon.

Questionnaire and newsletter

Agree the workshop format drawing on

A. Workshop⁠

⁠

should tooling review be added to questionnaire following workshop?

8 March 2021

Agenda

Review of highlight report

Questions/issues to discuss

Application provider workshop planning

Structure of technical deliverable

What we need from Nicki

⁠

Mike's document⁠

⁠

Add Task

⁠

1 March 2021

Agenda

Questions/issues to discuss

Mike to ask Tim Hill about

schema.org⁠

and appearance of results in web pages

Confirm who uses Booking API -

@Marcus Devaney

⁠

to provide list of user research participants interviewed. Confirm with

@Tim Hill

⁠

- Kinetic insight and several other within MCR Active are contractually obliged to delivery Open Booking API -

@Andy Halliwell

⁠

from schools plus use the Playfinder platform

@Jamie Foale

⁠

How may orgs are using Open Sessions - do we know that? London Sport will know - ask

@oliver.sisman@londonsport.org

⁠

- There are 2,772 organisations signup up to

@Open Sessions

⁠

@Mike Thacker

⁠

Emerging technical strategies to be discussed with Tim at 1pm

“Overview of technical maturity of Social prescribing industry/sector” Are we able to provide this?

Do we know what Elemental etc use? Do we know how much the booking standard is deployed?

@Marcus Devaney

⁠

Going to provide a report including the digital maturity of social prescribing platforms

Structure of deliverables being worked on - Mike’s work will be pulled into DG structure

3 workshops this week - Managers, Frontline workers and Activity Providers

Activity providers and mixed workshop have low numbers.

Progress on reviewing taxonomy alignment

@nicki.gill@esd.org.uk

⁠

to provide update

22 Feb 2021

Agenda

Questions on or resulting from last week’s progress

⁠

slide 9 in SP and OA thinking⁠

and Mike’s clarifications

Does ODI have any governance on existing taxonomies?

Where might additional fields fit (

slide 4 in SP and OA thinking⁠

) into OA?

Where are we against the deliverables promised? Do the deliverables promised by Digital Gaps match those in the ITT? If not, do we care about the ITT? Just what DG promised which is in line with ITT and PID

Raising of any issues

Imin concerns and interviewing them (Nish and Nick)

Is there ODI guidance/policy on what is centrally/publicly funded and what is left to the commercial sector?

Mike has lots of questions for Tim Hill

We need a commentary on the field mapping don’t we? Yes

Do we need Nicki to look at mappings from LGSL to the Activity list? Nicki to do high level review initially

Questions on next weeks next steps

How would OA accommodate new fields to provide more information for SP?

Meeting notes

Included against about points

22nd Feb 2021 - Notes

Mike asked a question on the role of the ODI and where do they start and stop with standards & innovations. Tim - What is the scope of the innovators - no policy to define. The ODI role is to own the standards, and let other people creating and own the tooling. However that failed, due poor third party implementation and technical stack. There is no real competition to tooling and puts the whole OpenActive data at risk. No issue with commercial, but only having 1 tool to supply the market is risky to the whole project. ODI would be happy to have more suppliers providing tooling.

Key issue is the dichotomy between publicly funded infrastructure taken from say public health vs a commercial infastruce model. This is currently a wider agenda within Central Government and Sport England.

Potential standard recommendations

Last updated fields - OR assurance equivalent

SP ready fields - provide more info to understand activity is right one (see slide 4)

Add pathway (Target

15 Feb 2021

Agenda

Questions on or resulting from last week’s progress

Feedback on

Por11023 - Notes from meeting with Denys Rayner⁠

and

HSSF Essential & Desirable Proposed Criteria Final.pdf⁠

. Types of taxonomy required by HSSF - what is Snomed (which is not completely open), what is another shared vocabulary

Demographic information (about me)

Presenting need (what matters to me)

Social Prescribing Intervention (what I was offered)

Outcomes (what was the result)

Protected characteristics (https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/equality-act/protected-characteristics)

Health inclusion groups (people particularly at risk of poor health outcomes – see https://www.inclusion-health.org/).

Coding of long-term conditions e.g. mental health

Mike’s response in

Social Prescribing RFI Final.docx⁠

⁠

OpenCommunity as a platform for drawing together a community around multiple related standards

Raising of any issues

Questions on next weeks next steps

15 Feb 2021 - Notes

The

highlight report⁠

will be shared with attendees using MS Excel before end of Sunday 31st Jan. Hopefully this will work easily enough but we will see at 12:30 on Monday ;-) A PDF version will also available in

Highlight Reports⁠

Agenda

The following will be taken in order. Questions and issues can be raised in advance (add your name) or at meeting.

It is expected that people will have updated the highlight report by 10am Monday morning.

Questions on or resulting from last week’s progress

(Marcus/Mike) Are we looking at a social prescribing model that pushes scheduled sessions back to the ORUK structure (to be combined with other non-sports opportunities) and uses the OA booking structure for bookings? Step 1 is getting an understanding of what people are looking for . Step 2 to more detail. Step 3 booking

@Ian Singleton

⁠

Working on

@Create a initial Concept model for Findable services with bookable events

⁠

to review on next meeting

@Mike Thacker

⁠

@Marcus Devaney

⁠

has started this analysis in the

Social Prescribing applications⁠

page where he have assessed platforms against a set of

Capabilities⁠

- Further analysis will be done as project progresses.

(Marcus/Mike) Do we have good knowledge of how current social prescribing software (like Elemental) works? Does it involve booking an actual session or just referring someone to an activity/service that they might attend, do online, eg a home visit etc? Marcus is looking at social prescribing platforms. They differ. More work to come. - See above comment &

Social Prescribing applications⁠

(Marcus/Mike) Booking with payment is a big leap from a referral or just advising someone to take a look at a service. Is there a middle course?

@Mike Thacker

⁠

We have some thoughts on this, we can talk through. Some apps have booking others don’t. The front line worker fills the gaps, e.g. booking, making sure someone turns up. We aspire to both finding an activity and making a booking. We’re looking at what is a “

@Social-prescribing-ready-session

⁠

” This may impact on the data structure.

(Mike) How are we approaching use and misuse of terms from multiple of taxonomies? Do we need mappings and/or a superset? London Sport / UK Active mapping between activity types and conditions?

@Ian Singleton

⁠

will be speaking with London Sport.

@Marcus Devaney

⁠

set up a dedicated page for

London sport⁠

to add their research outcomes. Can also speak to Matthew from NHS Connect. London Sport have good accessibility data.

Activity types align with Services. Conditions align with Circumstances. We go from summary to detail eg Indoor Sports to Activity List. Map Snomed to these lists. Accessibility is the third. Different people have different specialist lists. LGA lists form high level

@Anchor points

⁠

- add Accessibility. Try to test this with OpenCommunity people. Tagging in Activity list eg might be useful, eg for rehabilitation. High level list helps people focus assigning terms to on lower list. High level allows for suggestions of things that people might not have thought of.

(Mike) Do we need any sharing with the

Open Data Services Coop⁠

work for Sports England on "Strategic Advice and Options Appraisal for the Future of the OpenActive Initiative"? Mike to

@Arrange get together. ODSC

⁠

will check with SE.

(Mike) Can Porism

@Create a skeleton technical report

⁠

and start to populate? Yes

⁠

@Marcus Devaney

⁠

@Create calendar invites for interviews and workshops

⁠

? Can we see the roles of each person being interviewed so Porism can make better informed decisions as to which meetings we should sit in on? Yes. DigitalGaps will show the schedule with each person and role.

(Marcus/Mike) Ways of working:

Can we link to

Standards and Tooling Review meetings⁠

from the weekly calendar invitation?

Can we put the highlight report in Coda

Slack channel for the project Marcus to

@Set up Slack channel

⁠

Interviews from Friday to 19 Feb.

NHS minimum dataset work - we’ve agreed we influence them. A dedicated

NHS Minimum data standard⁠

page has been set up for

@denys.rayner@swahsn.com

⁠

@martin.cattermole@nhs.net

⁠

to add early findings, notes, thoughts

Raising of any issues

Questions on next weeks next steps

1st Feb

Meeting notes

⁠

@Dominic Skinner

⁠

to review and finalise ODI initial

OpenActive & Open Referral UK attribute comparison⁠

and Porism initial review of Open Active data

Relevant Porism Files

⁠

@#r22

⁠

@#r21

⁠

@#r8

⁠

Early indications are that NHS and Social prescribing are leaning towards Open referral and a single taxonomy. Open Referral is the international standard

Open community⁠

sees itself as a Community of standards that are collection standards used by place-based working. This could include Open referral, Open Active,

SAVVI⁠

⁠

ESD Anchor taxonomy⁠

such as the

LGA Circumstance list⁠

that can be the higher level taxonomy that can be used within more granular taxonomies such as SNOMED, OA Concepts

Hub and spoke model of Base Taxonomies

Target audience

⁠

Open Active Accessibility aids⁠

⁠

LGA Service Type⁠

could map to

Open Active Activity Types⁠

⁠

LGA Circumstances⁠

Open Active Conditions/concepts⁠

⁠

Booking systems within social prescribing

Membership model that gyms prefer, what issues do they have without the service user having a membership.

Find out the Reality of Social Prescribing - Demand - Numbers.

Emerging thinking from Research

⁠

8 Feb 2021

Agenda

We will deal with the issue raised first as Simon and Marcus need to leave at 12:30 for next interview.

Questions on or resulting from last week’s progress

Activity provider interviews

Frontline worker interviews

Direction form ODI

Raising of any issues

Initial thinking on potential solution of OA fitting with Social Prescribing

Questions on next weeks next steps

How is it going with London Sports and Matthew from NHS Connect meetings. And the person Devika recommended?

Meeting notes

Ian Showed the initial draft data flow

Blackburn and Darwin uses IMIN - There could a a general way to query the data - in the same way that IMIN provide the tools.

Is there are use case to consume OR into OA. This could be useful for bookable events

Can we book a group session series for a course - for individual events - for say for 12 weeks

Can the OR aggregator be created for OA to have a combined SP aggregator / Harvester

Does the OA have a UID

Who uses the booking system - Can we ensure to interview them

Rob Redpath NHS - Follow Up

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.

Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (

CtrlP

) instead.