New structure of the project essay

Check always what is deep systemic issue or like a more general issue here and whether our solution is solving it in a way?
GMO or new Tehcnology Risk management and adoption of new technology vs. Status Quo
Justice transition is wide egenral enough or are there any other mode broader issue that underlines here?
Introduction - 400 words
Почему нужны AltProteins актуальность темы, какие там есть сабсекторы, что это такое вообще и как работает? Проблематизация темы - какие факты есть по сектору и сабсекторам уже сейчас, потенциалу и т.д. КАкой есть эффект LIvestock agriculture and in what areas of world what effect is, red meat, white meat? Animal welfare, environment? How many people is involved in the sector? How many meat we eat etc
population growth and rise in demand for meat as another aspect of it
1. Establish the Facts (Ethical Case Analysis Framework)
Tool: Facts About the Problem/Situation
Identify Stakeholders: Farmers, corporations, policymakers, consumers, the environment, and future generations. Key Facts: Farmers face livelihood disruptions from reduced demand for animal agriculture. Alternative proteins promise environmental benefits but concentrate power in large corporations. Rural communities risk economic decline without active intervention.
Purpose: Ground the ethical analysis in the realities of affected parties and their competing interests.
Main body paragraph 1 - 600 words
Почему мы выбрали культивированное мясо как объект исследования? (transformative innovation) Ака и в чем тут основная этическая дилемма?
→ dusruptie technologies (transformative innovation) and their effect on conventional industry
Justice vs. Efficiency in transition and Animal Welfare and Sustainability (decrease of GHG)
Ends vs. Means Analysis
Purpose: Evaluates whether the benefits (ends) justify the harms (means).
Application:
Ends: Reduced environmental impact, global food security, and animal welfare. Means: Displacement of traditional livelihoods, cultural erosion, and potential inequalities. Key Questions: Are the means (farmer displacement) ethically justified by the ends (sustainability gains)? Are the means effective, or could alternative approaches achieve the same ends with less harm?
Reshaping the System: Encourages exploring alternative, less harmful approaches, such as inclusive transition models.
Conflict Mapping
Purpose: Identifies where values conflict (e.g., sustainability vs. fairness) and potential synergies.
Application:
Conflict: Environmental goals (sustainability) may conflict with farmers' livelihoods (justice). Synergy: Alternative proteins can be designed to integrate small-scale farming, benefiting both goals.
Reshaping the System: Resolves value tensions through innovative solutions, fostering alignment.
Наш подход к анализу этого кейса и дилеммы
Do startups with disruptive technolgies have moral obligations/responsibilities towards Just transition of conventional industry stakeholders in particular of cultured meat?
If yes, then what are those responsibilties/moral obligations? What risks they stem if not fulfilled? (Ethical Risk Assessment. What It Does: Identifies ethical risks (e.g., inequality, cultural erasure) and proposes mitigation strategies. Ethical Lens: Focuses on preventing foreseeable harms to farmers and communities.)
their responsibilities - ethical?philatrophic?sustianable?legal?economic?
And what they can specifically do to fulfill them?
How we approached this? What they will read below?
honest broker aka consultants
10. The Role of Experts in Innovation Discourses
Purpose: Frames decision-making roles (e.g., knowledge exponent, arbiter, honest broker).
Application:
Experts should act as honest brokers, presenting diverse options and facilitating discourse among stakeholders. Avoid advocating for a single solution without addressing its ethical trade-offs.
Reshaping the System: Promotes transparency and critical thinking, fostering trust and collaboration. Conclusion
Firms responsibilities - ethical?philatrophic?sustianable?legal?economic? what we focused on and why?
Principles of CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility):
Carroll’s Pyramid of CSR emphasizes economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities. These principles provide a hierarchy of responsibilities that companies can consider​
CSR for emergeing disruptive startups, how they can design their business models, processes, etc. to be justice-by-design idea from last lecture of Jan Melich
Justice-Based Approaches: These include distributive, procedural, and corrective justice frameworks, which can be used to assess fairness in the transition to disruptive technologies​
Justice-by-design, a concept for embedding fairness into processes from inception, is particularly relevant for startups​
what our advices then ? Decision to look for case from related industry or different industries even that can be applicable aka benchmarking but in CSR aka What we have decided our suggestion?
plant-based milk success what comopanies did there and how cultured meat can approach then this dilemma of transition
Casustry approach bottom-up ((Institute of Food Technologists Series) J. Peter Clark, Christopher Ritson - Practical Ethics for Food Professionals_ Ethics in Research, Education and the Workplace-Wiley-Blackwell (2013) 26 page)
Casuistry ( ) is a process of that seeks to resolve by extracting or extending abstract rules from a particular case, and reapplying those rules to new instances.[1] This method occurs in and . The term is also used to criticise the use of clever but reasoning, especially in relation to questions (as in ).[2] It has been defined as follows:
Study of cases of conscience and a method of solving conflicts of obligations by applying general principles of ethics, , and to particular and concrete cases of human conduct. This frequently demands an extensive knowledge of and , , ecclesiastical precepts, and an exceptional skill in interpreting these various norms of conduct....[3]
It remains a common method in .
Main body paragraph 2 - 1300 words
Disclaimers that this might happen only when there would be significant consumer shift, and that cultured meat still didn’t scale their operations and made it cheap enough
How cultured meat may negatively or positvely affect conventional livestock agirculture? Who would be most affected? Aka stakeholder mapping, affected parties (How to find them, my prompt?)
Employment effect, health effect, rural economy and ecology effect - Ruoqi
What are the current conditions on livestock labor - mental health, fair paymen?, health effect, etc.?
farmers from livestock challenges related to climate change or other environmental issues already and how they may struggle already regarding them and how they can mitigate or adapt for them shifting to supply cultured meat as well as conventional, or completely shift towards it
Ethical Matrix: A tool often used in food ethics to evaluate the impacts of decisions on various stakeholders. It provides a structured way to consider the interests of different groups (e.g., consumers, producers, and animals) alongside ethical principles like well-being, autonomy, and justice​. ((Institute of Food Technologists Series) J. Peter Clark, Christopher Ritson - Practical Ethics for Food Professionals_ Ethics in Research, Education and the Workplace-Wiley-Blackwell (2013))
Reshaping the System: Helps highlight trade-offs and potential win-win scenarios for stakeholders, fostering inclusive decision-making.
Stakeholder Salience and Management: The stakeholder model identifies which stakeholders are most affected by a business's actions. It considers attributes such as power, legitimacy, and urgency to prioritize stakeholder concerns​
What are the market global one on livestork farming, who are the players, how many small holder farms, family farms out there and how they are vulnerable in comparison to bigger farms?
What are responsibilties of the disruptive tehcnolgoy companies/startups in general + plus maybe specifically cultured meat companies?
Literature review: Do startups with disruptive technolgies have moral obligations/responsibilities towards Just transition of conventional industry stakeholders in particular of cultured meat? CSR for innovative disruptive companies
Disruptive Technologies’ Moral Obligations:
Literature suggests that companies introducing disruptive technologies have responsibilities to mitigate negative impacts on traditional stakeholders, particularly if they profit from these shifts​
If yes, then what are those responsibilties/moral obligations?
Aka What risks they stem if not fulfilled?
IUF or other orgs cases of labor unions settlements disputes for companies that disrupted their industry?
UN ILO?
And what they can specifically do to fulfill these responsibilties?
Just transition principles and what are possible trajectories of internventions?
CSR In supply chain management
What cultuted meat companies need farmers need to do to adapt cultured meat - Mohammed
Shared value apprach?
Incorporate the Capability Approach: Ensure solutions expand farmers' capabilities to adapt and thrive.
CSR for emergeing disruptive startups, how they can design their business models, processes, etc. to be justice-by-design idea from last lecture of Jan Melich
What are the plant-based milk success what comopanies did there and how cultured meat can approach then this dilemma of transition?
Conclusion - 250 words
Just summary of everything we have discussed, plus emphasizing again what we had come up to what kind of advices
References
Rawlsian Justice (Theory of Justice) ((Institute of Food Technologists Series) J. Peter Clark, Christopher Ritson - Practical Ethics for Food Professionals_ Ethics in Research, Education and the Workplace-Wiley-Blackwell (2013) + Anne Barnhill, Mark Budolfson, Tyler Doggett - Food, Ethics, and Society_ An Introductory Text with Readings-Oxford University Press (2016))
What It Brings: Emphasizes fairness and protecting the least advantaged members of society. Application: Analyze whether the transition to alternative proteins unfairly burdens farmers and rural communities. Use the "veil of ignorance" to imagine fair policies—e.g., would we design systems that marginalize small farmers if we didn’t know our social position?

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.