IELTS Writing Evaluator (Free)

Task 1, Honey bee, Cycles - 5

IELTS prep урок 7.pdf 2024-05-03 16-04-26.png

essay


Task Response

Score: 5
Evaluation:**
The essay provides a general overview of the life cycle of the honey bee, but lacks depth and clarity in its description. The writer attempts to summarize the information from the diagram, but the response is largely mechanical, focusing on listing the stages rather than highlighting key features and trends.
Strengths:
The essay provides a clear structure, dividing the life cycle into distinct stages.
The writer attempts to use some specific dates and times to describe the process.
Weaknesses:
The response lacks detail and clarity, with some stages described in a very general manner.
The writer fails to make meaningful comparisons between the stages or highlight principal changes or differences.
The essay does not present a clear overview of the life cycle, and the format is not entirely appropriate.
Areas for Improvement:
The writer should focus on selecting the most relevant and key features of the life cycle, rather than simply listing all the stages.
To improve clarity, the writer should use more precise language and avoid vague terms.
The writer should strive to make meaningful comparisons between the stages and highlight the main trends or differences.
Adherence to Word Count: The response meets the minimum word count of 150 words.
Overall Assessment: While the essay provides some relevant information, it lacks depth and clarity in its description of the life cycle. To improve, the writer should focus on selecting key features, making meaningful comparisons, and presenting a clear overview of the process.

Coherence and Cohesion

Score: 5
Evaluation:**
Upon reviewing the essay, I noticed that the candidate has attempted to organize the information in a logical sequence, but there are some issues with coherence and cohesion.
The candidate provides an overview of the topic, stating that the life cycle of a honey bee consists of 6 major stages that span across 34 or 36 days.
The organization of information is somewhat cohesive, but there are instances of faulty cohesion within and between sentences.
The use of cohesive devices is limited, and there is some inaccuracy and overuse of certain devices, which affects the overall coherence of the response.
Strengths:
The candidate attempts to organize the information in a logical sequence, which shows some understanding of the topic.
The use of simple cohesive devices, such as "then" and "during," helps to connect ideas within sentences.
The candidate provides some relevant details about the life cycle of a honey bee, which shows a basic understanding of the topic.
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate can improve the coherence of the response by using a clearer and more logical progression of ideas. This can be achieved by using transitional phrases and cohesive devices more effectively.
The use of paragraphing can be improved to group related ideas more logically. This will help to create a clearer structure and enhance the overall coherence of the response.
The candidate can work on using a more varied range of cohesive devices, such as pronouns, synonyms, and conjunctions, to connect ideas more smoothly.
Adherence to Suggested Paragraph Structure:
The response does not follow a clear paragraph structure, which affects the overall coherence and cohesion of the response. The candidate can improve by dividing the response into clear paragraphs that group related ideas logically.
Overall Assessment:
While the candidate shows some understanding of the topic, the response lacks coherence and cohesion due to inadequate use of cohesive devices and ineffective paragraphing. With improvement in these areas, the candidate can enhance the overall clarity and cohesion of the response.
Encouragement:
Keep practicing, and don't be afraid to take risks in your writing. Focus on improving your use of cohesive devices and paragraph structure to enhance the clarity and coherence of your responses. With dedication and effort, you can refine your IELTS Writing Task 1 skills and achieve your desired band score!

Lexical Resources

Score: 5
Evaluation:**
The candidate's Lexical Resource is limited, but minimally adequate for the task. The vocabulary used is simple and lacks variation, with some inappropriacies in word choice. The candidate demonstrates some ability to use general words accurately, but the range does not permit much variation in expression.
Strengths:
The candidate uses some basic vocabulary correctly, such as "eggs," "hatch," and "mature specimen."
The text demonstrates some awareness of style and collocation, evident in phrases like "life cycle of honey bees" and "stages in the life development."
The candidate attempts to use synonyms, such as "mature adult females" instead of "mature bees."
Weaknesses:
The range of vocabulary is restricted, with frequent repetition of words like "stage" and "days."
There are inaccuracies in word choice, such as using "brake" instead of "break" or "moults" instead of "molts."
The candidate does not demonstrate an ability to use less common lexical items or idiomatic expressions.
Areas for Improvement:
Expand vocabulary range by using more precise and nuanced words, such as "larval stage" instead of "third stage."
Improve accuracy in word choice by using dictionaries or thesauruses to ensure correct usage.
Practice using less common lexical items, such as "metamorphosis" to describe the transformation of a honey bee.
The candidate's ability to paraphrase language from the prompt is limited, leading to some repetition of words and phrases. To improve, the candidate should practice rewriting sentences using synonyms and alternative expressions.
Overall, the candidate's Lexical Resource is limited, but with practice and expansion of vocabulary, they can improve their writing skills and achieve a higher band score.

Grammar and Acurracy

Score: 5
Evaluation:**
Upon reviewing the essay, I noticed that the candidate has attempted to use a range of grammatical structures, including simple, compound, and complex sentences. However, the accuracy and appropriateness of these structures are often compromised by grammatical errors.
The essay lacks flexibility in sentence structures, and the majority of sentences are simple or compound. The candidate has attempted to use complex sentences, but these are often faulty, as seen in sentences like "Then, on third stage, it takes around 5 days for bees to finally brake that egg." (Subject-verb agreement error and incorrect use of "brake" instead of "break").
Furthermore, the candidate struggles with maintaining control over grammar and punctuation. Errors in grammar, such as subject-verb agreement errors, incorrect tense usage, and incorrect use of prepositions, are frequent and often impede understanding.
On the other hand, the candidate has demonstrated some ability to use simple and complex grammatical forms accurately, as seen in sentences like "Overall, the life cycles contains 6 major stages and spans across 34 or 36 days, showing the process of honey bees' development from eggs to mature specimen."
Strengths:
The candidate has attempted to use a range of sentence structures, including compound and complex sentences.
There are some instances of accurate and effective sentence construction, which convey meaning successfully.
The candidate has demonstrated some ability to use appropriate vocabulary related to the topic.
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate needs to work on improving the accuracy of grammatical structures, particularly in complex sentences.
Reducing the frequency of grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement errors and incorrect use of prepositions, is essential.
The candidate should focus on developing a more varied and flexible range of sentence structures to enhance the overall coherence and cohesion of the essay.
Ability to maintain grammatical control: The candidate struggles to maintain grammatical control, particularly in longer and more complex sentences.
Overall Assessment: The essay demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures, and the accuracy of these structures is compromised by frequent grammatical errors. While the candidate has shown some ability to use simple and complex grammatical forms accurately, the overall quality of the essay's Grammatical Range and Accuracy is limited. To improve, the candidate should focus on developing a more varied range of sentence structures and reducing the frequency of grammatical errors.
- Grammar and Spelling mistakes
After meticulously reviewing the provided essay, I have identified several grammatical errors and suggestions for improvement. Here's my feedback:
The given diagram illustrates the stages in the life development of a honey bee.
No issues with this sentence.
Overall, the life cycles contains 6 major stages and spans across 34 or 36 days, showing the process of honey bees' development from eggs to mature specimen.
Error: "life cycles" should be "life cycle" (singular) because it refers to a single life cycle.
Corrected sentence: Overall, the life cycle contains 6 major stages and spans across 34 or 36 days, showing the process of honey bees' development from eggs to mature specimens. (Note: plural "specimens" is preferred here)
At the first stage in the life cycle of honey bees' one or two eggs are laid every three days by mature adult females.
Error: "honey bees'" should be "honey bees" (no apostrophe) because it's a noun, not a possessive.
Suggested rephrase: At the first stage of the honey bee life cycle, one or two eggs are laid every three days by mature adult females. (Improved clarity and coherence)
After, at the second stage, it takes between 9 and 10 days for eggs to start hatch.
Error: "start hatch" should be "to hatch" (correct infinitive verb form).
Corrected sentence: After, at the second stage, it takes between 9 and 10 days for eggs to hatch.
Then, on third stage, it takes around 5 days for bees to finally brake that egg.
Error: "brake" should be "break" (correct spelling).
Corrected sentence: Then, at the third stage, it takes around 5 days for bees to finally break that egg.
And within next 7 days bees get free from eggs completely, at the fourth stage.
Suggested rephrase: Additionally, within the next 7 days, bees emerge completely from their eggs, at the fourth stage. (Improved clarity and coherence)
During the fifth stage, which takes around 9 days, nymph moults 3 times as it grow in size.
Error: "it grow" should be "it grows" (subject-verb agreement).
Corrected sentence: During the fifth stage, which takes around 9 days, the nymph moults 3 times as it grows in size.
By the end of the sixth stage, young adult specimen appears.
Error: "specimen" should be "specimens" (plural, as in the corrected sentence in paragraph 2).
Corrected sentence: By the end of the sixth stage, young adult specimens appear.
Finally, at the seventh stage, it takes 4 days for young bees to transform into mature creatures, and the life cycle starts again.
No issues with this sentence.
Summary of common errors:
Inconsistent verb tense and subject-verb agreement
Incorrect spelling and grammatical errors in sentence structure
Improvement opportunities in sentence clarity and coherence
Recommendations for improvement:
Practice using correct verb forms and subject-verb agreement.
Focus on improving sentence structure and clarity.
Review the rules for using plural and singular nouns correctly.
Remember, with practice and attention to these areas, you can enhance your grammar and spelling skills for IELTS essay writing. Keep practicing!

Task 1 Band Score: 5.0 / 9

Here is the most repeated words in your essay

0
Top 5 Most Repeated Words
0

Recommended Synonyms of the repeated words

Task 1, Recycling scheme, Diagram - 6

task
The diagram shows how a company called HB office Recycling recycles unwanted office furniture and equipment from other businesses. Write at least 150 words.
essay text
The given scheme showcase the process how HB Office Recycling reuse, remanufacture, recycle and damp unneeded office furniture and other items from businesses.
Overall, there are 9 steps in the process starting from collecting unwanted items and ending with various ways how to prolong lifecycle of items to save them from landfill.
The first step is that items are collected from companies. After they transported by vans to HB facilities. Then sorting starts that divide all items to 4 prioritised groups (items to reuse, items to remanufacture and repair, materials to recyle and non-recycables). Next, each group have their own steps.
Firstly, furniture and equipment in good condition are redistributed for reusal to charities, customers and schools. In second priority, items being remanufactured using new and repaired parts and then sold to customers. Thirdly, recycable materials sorted to plastics, metals and wood, and then being delivered to recycling centre. At last, non-recycables which comprises only 2% go to landfill sites.
chatgpt diagram description
The diagram outlines the recycling process managed by HB Office Recycling Ltd for unwanted office equipment sourced from businesses. This process is strategic, aiming to maximize the reuse and recycling of materials while minimizing waste to landfill.
The recycling process begins with the collection of unwanted office items, such as furniture and equipment, from businesses. These items are then transported to the HB Office Recycling facility for sorting. The sorted items are allocated based on three priorities:
1. **Reuse**: The first priority is to reuse the items. Usable items are either donated to charities and schools or sold directly to customers, promoting a circular economy by extending the lifecycle of products.
2. **Remanufacturing**: The second priority involves remanufacturing. In this stage, items are either repaired using new and reused parts or completely remanufactured to serve new functions. This process allows the recovery of value from partially damaged or outdated products.
3. **Material Recycling**: The third priority focuses on recycling materials that cannot be reused or remanufactured. This involves breaking down the items into core materials such as plastics, metals, and wood, which are then processed and sold for new uses.
Only a small fraction (2%) of the materials are deemed non-recyclable and are sent to landfill sites, indicating a high efficiency in material recovery and reuse.
The diagram visually represents a robust approach to waste management, prioritizing sustainability by reducing waste, recovering materials, and supporting community through donations. This model reflects a commitment to environmental responsibility and resource efficiency.

V.1 Please wait a few seconds until the evaluation appears - 6

Task Response

Score: 6
Thank you for providing the essay and the analysis tools. I will use them to guide my evaluation of the Task Response.
Initial Evaluation
Based on the analysis tools, I have identified some potential areas of improvement in the essay. Here are my initial observations:
The essay provides a good overview of the process, but it lacks specific details and examples to support the key features.
The writer has not made any comparisons or contrasts between the different stages of the process.
The format is mostly appropriate, but some sentences are a bit unclear or wordy.
There are some minor grammatical errors, but they do not significantly affect the overall meaning.
Task Response Evaluation
Based on the IELTS Task Response criteria, I will evaluate the essay as follows:
The essay covers the main requirements of the task, but it lacks some specific details and examples to support the key features. (Band 6-7)
The writer has not made any comparisons or contrasts between the different stages of the process, which limits the essay's ability to highlight the main trends or differences. (Band 6-7)
The format is mostly appropriate, but some sentences are a bit unclear or wordy, which affects the overall clarity and coherence of the response. (Band 6-7)
The writer has provided a good overview of the process, but it could be more fully or more appropriately illustrated or extended. (Band 6-7)
Justification
Based on the IELTS band descriptors, I have assigned a band score of 6 to this essay. The writer has covered the main requirements of the task, but there are some areas where the response could be improved, such as providing more specific details and examples, making comparisons or contrasts, and improving the clarity and coherence of the response.
Strengths
The writer has provided a good overview of the process, which shows a good understanding of the diagram.
The essay is well-structured and easy to follow, which helps to maintain the reader's attention.
The writer has used some good vocabulary and sentence structures, which adds to the overall coherence of the response.
Areas for Improvement
The writer should provide more specific details and examples to support the key features of the process.
The writer should make comparisons or contrasts between the different stages of the process to highlight the main trends or differences.
The writer should improve the clarity and coherence of the response by using more precise language and sentence structures.
**Adherence
e

Coherence and Cohesion

Score: 6
Evaluation:**
After carefully reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I analyzed the organization of information in the response. The essay provides a clear overview of the process, and the information is logically sequenced. However, there are some minor lapses in coherence and cohesion.
The use of cohesive devices is generally effective, but there are some inaccuracies and overuse of certain devices. For example, the candidate uses "firstly," "secondly," and "thirdly" to sequence ideas, but these devices are not always used correctly. Additionally, the candidate could improve the use of reference and substitution to avoid repetition.
The clarity and ease of understanding throughout the response are generally good, but there are some areas where the language is not precise, which affects the overall coherence.
Strengths:
The essay provides a clear overview of the process, making it easy to follow.
The candidate uses a range of cohesive devices, such as "firstly," "secondly," and "thirdly," to sequence ideas.
The essay has a clear progression throughout, with each paragraph building on the previous one.
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate should improve the use of reference and substitution to avoid repetition and enhance cohesion.
The essay could benefit from more precise language to enhance clarity and coherence.
The candidate should vary the use of cohesive devices to avoid overuse and improve cohesion.
Adherence to Suggested Paragraph Structure: The essay generally follows a logical structure, with each paragraph building on the previous one. However, the candidate could improve the use of paragraphing to group related ideas more effectively.
Overall Assessment: The response demonstrates a good understanding of the process, but there are some areas where coherence and cohesion could be improved. With some refinement in the use of cohesive devices, language precision, and paragraphing, the candidate could achieve a higher band score.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Revise the essay to improve the use of reference and substitution to avoid repetition.
Use more precise language to enhance clarity and coherence.
Vary the use of cohesive devices to avoid overuse and improve cohesion.
Review the paragraph structure to ensure that related ideas are grouped effectively.
By addressing these areas, the candidate can improve the Coherence and Cohesion of their essay and achieve a higher band score.

Lexical Resources

Score: 6
Evaluation:**
After reviewing the essay, I have analyzed the range and variety of vocabulary used. The candidate has demonstrated a general understanding of the topic and has used a range of vocabulary to convey their message. However, the vocabulary is not particularly sophisticated, and there is a lack of precision in word choice.
The candidate has used some topic-specific vocabulary, such as "reused," "remanufactured," and "recycled," which is appropriate for the task. However, there is a reliance on simple vocabulary, and the candidate could benefit from using more nuanced and precise language to convey their ideas.
The candidate has also demonstrated some ability to use less common lexical items, such as "prioritised groups" and "non-recyclables." However, these instances are infrequent, and the candidate could benefit from incorporating more idiomatic expressions and colloquialisms to enhance their writing.
In terms of conveying precise meaning, the candidate has generally succeeded in expressing their ideas clearly. However, there are instances where the language is vague or imprecise, which could be improved with more careful word choice.
Strengths:
The candidate has used some topic-specific vocabulary, which is relevant to the task.
The candidate has demonstrated some ability to use less common lexical items, which adds variety to their writing.
The candidate has generally succeeded in expressing their ideas clearly, despite some instances of imprecision.
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate could benefit from incorporating more sophisticated vocabulary to enhance their writing.
The candidate should work on using more precise language to convey their ideas, avoiding vagueness and imprecision.
The candidate could improve their writing by using more idiomatic expressions and colloquialisms to add variety and interest.
Paraphrasing and Repetition:
The candidate has generally paraphrased the language from the prompt effectively, although there are some instances of repetition. For example, the candidate repeats the phrase "items to" several times, which could be varied to improve the writing.
Overall Assessment:
The candidate's Lexical Resource is generally adequate for the task, but there is room for improvement. With more careful attention to word choice and a broader range of vocabulary, the candidate could enhance their writing and achieve a higher band score.

Grammar and Acurracy

Score: 6
Evaluation:
The candidate's essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but flexibility is limited. While there are attempts to use more complex structures, they are not always accurate, and the greatest accuracy is achieved on simple sentences.
The range of grammatical structures is somewhat limited, with a predominance of simple sentences and a lack of varied sentence structures. The candidate uses basic sentence structures, such as "The first step is...", "Next...", and "Then...", which, although correct, do not showcase a wide range of grammatical resources.
In terms of accuracy, there are some errors that do not impede communication, but they are noticeable. For instance, "items are collected from companies" should be "items are collected by companies" (passive voice error). Additionally, "non-recycables which comprises only 2%" should be "non-recyclables, which comprise only 2%" (subject-verb agreement error).
The candidate demonstrates some control over grammar and punctuation, but there are areas where improvement is needed. For example, the use of commas to separate clauses is inconsistent, and some sentences are quite long and convoluted.
Strengths:
The candidate attempts to use transitional phrases, such as "Firstly", "Secondly", and "Thirdly", to connect ideas between sentences.
The essay is generally easy to follow, and the candidate conveys the main points of the process.
There is an attempt to use descriptive language, such as "4 prioritised groups" and "various ways how to prolong lifecycle of items".
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate should work on varying sentence structures to showcase a wider range of grammatical resources. This could include using subordinate clauses, conditional sentences, or passive voice.
Attention should be paid to accuracy, particularly in areas such as subject-verb agreement, passive voice, and punctuation.
The candidate should focus on producing error-free sentences and avoiding errors that impede understanding.
The candidate demonstrates some ability to maintain grammatical control in longer sentences, but there are areas where improvement is needed. With practice and attention to detail, the candidate can refine their grammatical range and accuracy to achieve a higher band score.
Overall, the essay demonstrates a good attempt at conveying the process, but the grammatical range and accuracy are limited. With targeted practice and improvement, the candidate can enhance their writing skills and achieve a higher band score.
- Grammar and Spelling mistakes
I've carefully reviewed the provided essay and identified the following errors and suggestions for improvement:
Error 1: "The given scheme showcase" Correction: "The given scheme showcases" Explanation: The subject-verb agreement error is corrected by adding the -es suffix to the verb "showcase" to match the singular noun "scheme".
Error 2: "how HB Office Recycling reuse, remanufacture, recycle and damp unneeded office furniture and other items from businesses." Correction: "how HB Office Recycling reuses, remanufactures, recycles, and disposes of unneeded office furniture and other items from businesses." Explanation: The verb tense consistency error is corrected by changing "reuse" to "reuses", "remanufacture" to "remanufactures", and "recycle" to "recycles" to maintain the present tense. Additionally, "damp" is replaced with "disposes of" to convey the correct meaning.
Error 3: "Overall, there are 9 steps in the process starting from collecting unwanted items and ending with various ways how to prolong lifecycle of items to save them from landfill." Correction: "Overall, there are 9 steps in the process, starting from collecting unwanted items and ending with various ways to prolong the lifecycle of items and save them from landfill." Explanation: A comma is added after "process" to improve sentence clarity. The phrase "how to prolong" is corrected to "to prolong" to maintain grammatical accuracy.
Error 4: "The first step is that items are collected from companies." Correction: "The first step is to collect items from companies." Explanation: The sentence structure is improved by changing the phrase "is that" to "is to" to make the sentence more concise and clear.
Error 5: "After they transported by vans to HB facilities." Correction: "After they are transported by vans to HB facilities." Explanation: The verb tense consistency error is corrected by adding the auxiliary verb "are" to the sentence to maintain the correct grammatical structure.
Error 6: "Then sorting starts that divide all items to 4 prioritised groups" Correction: "Then, sorting starts, which divides all items into 4 prioritized groups" Explanation: A comma is added after "Then" to improve sentence clarity. The phrase "that divide" is corrected to "which divides" to maintain grammatical accuracy. Additionally, "prioritised" is replaced with "prioritized" to conform to American English spelling

Task 1 Band Score: 6.0 / 9

Here is the most repeated words in your essay

image.jpeg failed to upload
Top 5 Most Repeated Words
image.png failed to upload

Recommended Synonyms of the repeated words

Items:
Objects
Goods
Products
Then:
Next
Afterwards
Subsequently
Process:
Procedure
Method
System
Office:
Facility
Premises
Workspace

Rewriting your essay

The diagram illustrates the comprehensive recycling process undertaken by HB Office Recycling, which involves the collection, sorting, and subsequent reuse, remanufacture, recycling, and disposal of unwanted office furniture and equipment from various businesses.
The 9-step process commences with the collection of unwanted items from companies, which are then transported to HB facilities. The items are subsequently sorted into four prioritized categories: items suitable for reuse, those requiring remanufacture and repair, materials that can be recycled, and non-recyclable waste.
The highest priority is given to items in good condition, which are redistributed to charities, customers, and schools for reuse. The second priority involves the remanufacture of items using new and repaired parts, which are then sold to customers. Recyclable materials, including plastics, metals, and wood, are sorted and delivered to recycling centers. Finally, only a minimal 2% of non-recyclable waste is sent to landfill sites, highlighting HB Office Recycling's commitment to minimizing environmental waste.
Number of Words: 153

If you find this service helpful, you can support my efforts by buying me a coffee. ☕️ ❤️

V.2 Please wait a few seconds until the evaluation appears - 7

Task Response

Score: 9
Evaluation:**
Task Prompt Review: The task prompt asks the candidate to describe the process of HB Office Recycling, which recycles unwanted office furniture and equipment from other businesses.
Candidate's Response Analysis: The candidate provides a clear and concise overview of the 9-step process, starting from collecting unwanted items to reusing, remanufacturing, recycling, and disposing of non-recyclable materials. The response covers all the requirements of the task, and the content is relevant and accurate.
Strengths:
The candidate provides a clear and logical flow of information, making it easy to follow the process.
The response covers all the key features of the process, including the sorting of items into four prioritized groups.
The candidate uses simple and clear language, making the response easy to understand.
Weaknesses:
The response lacks depth and detail in some areas, such as the remanufacturing process.
There is no comparison or contrast of the different stages of the process, which would have added more value to the response.
The response could benefit from more cohesive linking between sentences and paragraphs.
Band Score: Based on the IELTS band descriptors, I would give this response a score of 7.
Justification: The response covers all the requirements of the task, and the content is relevant and accurate. However, it lacks depth and detail in some areas, and there is no comparison or contrast of the different stages of the process.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Provide more detail and examples to support each stage of the process.
Compare and contrast the different stages of the process to add more value to the response.
Use more cohesive linking between sentences and paragraphs to improve the overall coherence of the response.
Word Count: The response meets the minimum word count of 150 words.
Overall Assessment: The response provides a good overview of the process, but it could benefit from more depth and detail. With some improvements in these areas, the candidate could achieve a higher band score.

Coherence and Cohesion

Score: 6
Evaluation:**
The essay prompt is well-understood, and the candidate provides a clear overview of the process of HB Office Recycling.
The organization of information is generally logical, with a clear progression from collecting unwanted items to the final stages of recycling and reuse. However, the transitions between paragraphs could be smoother.
The use of cohesive devices is adequate, with some effective linking words and pronouns. However, there is room for improvement in terms of variety and flexibility. For example, the candidate could use more synonyms and transitional phrases to connect ideas.
The clarity and ease of understanding are generally good, but some sentences could be rephrased for better flow and coherence.
Justification: Based on the IELTS band descriptors, I would score this essay a 6 for Coherence and Cohesion. The candidate demonstrates a good understanding of the process and presents the information in a generally logical and clear manner. However, there are some minor lapses in coherence and cohesion, such as the need for smoother transitions and more varied cohesive devices.
Strengths:
The candidate provides a clear overview of the process, making it easy to follow.
The use of simple and concise language helps to convey the message effectively.
The candidate attempts to use cohesive devices, such as linking words and pronouns, to connect ideas.
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate could improve the transitions between paragraphs to create a smoother flow of ideas.
The use of cohesive devices could be more varied and flexible to enhance coherence and cohesion.
Some sentences could be rephrased for better clarity and flow.
Adherence to Suggested Paragraph Structure: The essay generally follows a logical structure, but the paragraphs could be more clearly defined and separated. The candidate could benefit from using more explicit topic sentences and cohesive devices to link paragraphs.
Overall Assessment: The candidate demonstrates a good understanding of the process and presents the information in a generally clear and logical manner. However, there are some areas for improvement, such as smoother transitions and more varied cohesive devices. With some refinement, the candidate can enhance the Coherence and Cohesion of their writing.

Lexical Resources

Score: 6
Evaluation:
Review of the essay prompt and the candidate's response: The candidate has provided a clear and concise description of the process of HB Office Recycling, covering all the necessary steps.
Analysis of the range and variety of vocabulary used: The candidate has used a range of general words accurately, but there is limited evidence of less common lexical items, idiomatic expressions, or subject-specific terminology.
Evaluation of the accuracy and appropriateness of vocabulary used: The candidate has used words and phrases correctly and effectively to convey meaning, but there are some minor errors in word choice and collocation.
Assessment of the candidate's ability to use less common lexical items: The candidate has not demonstrated a significant ability to use less common lexical items, idiomatic expressions, or subject-specific terminology.
Examination of the candidate's skill in conveying precise meaning: The candidate has expressed ideas clearly and specifically, but there is room for improvement in terms of precision and nuance.
Determination of the band score: Based on the analysis, I assign a band score of 6, as the candidate's resource is generally adequate and appropriate for the task, but lacks precision and flexibility.
Strengths:
The candidate has used a range of general words accurately, demonstrating a good understanding of basic vocabulary.
The candidate has expressed ideas clearly and specifically, making the text easy to follow.
The candidate has avoided repetition by using synonyms or paraphrasing.
Areas for improvement:
The candidate should work on using less common lexical items, idiomatic expressions, or subject-specific terminology to enhance the precision and nuance of their writing.
The candidate should focus on improving the accuracy and appropriateness of vocabulary used, particularly in terms of word choice and collocation.
The candidate should strive to use more sophisticated phrasing and sentence structures to convey complex ideas.
Paraphrasing and repetition: The candidate has made some effort to paraphrase the language from the prompt, but there is room for improvement in terms of avoiding repetition of words or phrases.
Overall assessment: The candidate's Lexical Resource is generally adequate, but lacks precision and flexibility. With practice and attention to using less common lexical items, idiomatic expressions, and subject-specific terminology, the candidate can improve their writing skills and achieve a higher band score.

Grammar and Acurracy

Score: 6
Evaluation:
Upon reviewing the essay, I notice that the candidate has attempted to describe the process of HB Office Recycling in a clear and concise manner. However, there are several areas where the grammatical range and accuracy could be improved.
The range and variety of grammatical structures used in the essay are limited. The candidate primarily uses simple and compound sentences, with few attempts at complex sentence structures. While the essay is generally easy to follow, the lack of variation in sentence structure makes it seem repetitive and lacking in depth.
In terms of accuracy, there are several errors that impede understanding. For example, "Next, each group have their own steps" should be "Next, each group has its own steps" to maintain subject-verb agreement. Additionally, "non-recycables which comprises only 2%" should be "non-recyclables, which comprise only 2%" to correct the verb form and add a comma for clarity.
The candidate demonstrates some ability to use complex grammatical structures, such as subordinate clauses, but these attempts are often marred by errors. For instance, "After they are transported by vans to HB facilities" is a dependent clause, but it lacks a main clause to complete the sentence.
One strength of the essay is its ability to convey the main steps of the process clearly, despite some grammatical errors. The candidate also uses transitional phrases, such as "Firstly," "Secondly," and "Thirdly," to connect their ideas.
To improve, the candidate could focus on increasing their range of grammatical structures, particularly complex sentences with subordinate clauses. They should also work on reducing errors in subject-verb agreement, verb form, and punctuation. Additionally, using more precise vocabulary, such as "remanufacture" instead of "remanufactured," would enhance the overall clarity and accuracy of the essay.
In terms of maintaining grammatical control, the candidate struggles with longer sentences, often resulting in errors that impede understanding. To overcome this, they could practice breaking down complex ideas into simpler sentences or using transitional phrases to connect their ideas more effectively.
Overall, the essay demonstrates a good understanding of the process, but its grammatical range and accuracy are limited. With practice and attention to detail, the candidate can improve their writing skills and achieve a higher band score.
- Grammar and Spelling mistakes
I'd be happy to help you with that! After carefully reviewing the essay, I've identified some grammatical errors and provided corrections and explanations to help you improve your language usage.
Error 1: Original sentence: "The given scheme showcases the process how HB Office Recycling reuses, remanufactures, recycles and damps unneeded office furniture and other items from businesses."
Corrected sentence: "The given scheme showcases the process of how HB Office Recycling reuses, remanufactures, recycles, and disposes of unneeded office furniture and other items from businesses."
Explanation: The word "damps" is likely a typo and should be replaced with "disposes of". Additionally, the phrase "process how" should be changed to "process of how" to ensure grammatical accuracy.
Error 2: Original sentence: "After they are transported by vans to HB facilities."
Corrected sentence: "After they are transported by vans to HB Office Recycling facilities."
Explanation: The sentence is a fragment and lacks a main verb. Adding "Office Recycling" to "HB facilities" provides more context and clarity.
Error 3: Original sentence: "Then, sorting starts, which divides all items into 4 prioritized groups (items to reuse, items to remanufacture and repair, materials to recyle and non-recycables)."
Corrected sentence: "Then, sorting starts, which divides all items into four prioritized groups: items to reuse, items to remanufacture and repair, materials to recycle, and non-recyclables."
Explanation: The word "recyle" should be corrected to "recycle". Additionally, the list should be formatted with commas and "and" before the last item, and the parentheses should be replaced with a colon.
Error 4: Original sentence: "Next, each group have their own steps."
Corrected sentence: "Next, each group has its own steps."
Explanation: The subject-verb agreement is incorrect. The singular noun "group" should be paired with the singular verb "has", and the pronoun "its" should be used instead of "their".
Error 5: Original sentence: "Firstly, furniture and equipment in good condition are redistributed for reusal to charities, customers and schools."
Corrected sentence: "Firstly, furniture and equipment in good condition are redistributed for reuse to charities, customers, and schools."
Explanation: The word "reusal" is likely a typo and

Task 1 Band Score: 7.0 / 9

Here is the most repeated words in your essay

0
Top 5 Most Repeated Words
image.png failed to upload

Recommended Synonyms of the repeated words

items:
Products
Goods
Assets
then:
Next
Afterwards
Subsequently
process:
Procedure
Method
System
HB:
(No suitable synonyms, as HB is an abbreviation for a specific company name)
office:
Facility
Premises
Workspace

Rewriting your essay

Here is a rewritten version of the essay:
The diagram illustrates the 9-stage process of HB Office Recycling, which efficiently reuses, remanufactures, recycles, and disposes of unwanted office furniture and equipment collected from businesses.
The process commences with the collection of unwanted items from companies, followed by their transportation to HB facilities via vans. Subsequently, the items are sorted into four categorized groups, prioritized according to their condition and potential reuse: items suitable for reuse, those requiring remanufacturing and repair, materials that can be recycled, and non-recyclable waste.
The first priority is given to reusing furniture and equipment in good condition, which are redistributed to charities, customers, and schools. The second priority involves remanufacturing items using new and repaired parts, which are then sold to customers. Recyclable materials, including plastics, metals, and wood, are sorted and delivered to recycling centers. Notably, only 2% of the waste, comprising non-recyclable materials, is sent to landfill sites.
Number of Words: 154

If you find this service helpful, you can support my efforts by buying me a coffee. ☕️ ❤️

V.3 Please wait a few seconds until the evaluation appears - 7

Task Response

Score: 9
Thank you for providing the essay and the analysis tool. I will use this tool to guide my evaluation and ensure that I provide an accurate and reliable score for the Task Response criterion.
Based on the analysis tool, I notice that the essay has some strengths, such as:
The writer has provided a clear overview of the process, covering all the 9 steps involved in recycling unwanted office furniture and equipment.
The writer has used simple and clear language to describe the process, making it easy to understand.
The writer has attempted to categorize the items into four prioritized groups, which shows an effort to organize the information.
However, the analysis tool also highlights some weaknesses, such as:
The writer has not provided sufficient detail to illustrate the key features of the process.
The writer has not made any comparisons or contrasts between the different steps or groups, which is a key requirement of the task.
The writer has not used any data or figures to support the description, which makes it seem like a mechanical description.
Based on these strengths and weaknesses, I will evaluate the essay using the IELTS Task Response criteria.
Justification:
The response covers the requirements of the task, but with some omissions and lapses in content. The writer has provided a clear overview of the process, but has not provided sufficient detail to illustrate the key features. The writer has also not made any comparisons or contrasts between the different steps or groups, which is a key requirement of the task. The format is appropriate, but the writer could have used more descriptive language and data to support the description.
Strengths:
The writer has provided a clear overview of the process.
The writer has used simple and clear language to describe the process.
The writer has attempted to categorize the items into four prioritized groups.
Areas for Improvement:
The writer needs to provide more detail to illustrate the key features of the process.
The writer needs to make comparisons or contrasts between the different steps or groups.
The writer needs to use more descriptive language and data to support the description.
Adherence to Word Count:
The response meets the minimum word count of 150 words.
Overall Assessment:
The response is a good attempt, but it lacks detail and comparison. The writer needs to work on providing more descriptive language and data to support the description. With some improvement, the writer can achieve a higher band score.
I hope this evaluation is helpful and provides a clear assessment of
f

Coherence and Cohesion

Score: 7
Evaluation:**
After reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I analyzed the organization of information in the response. The essay provides a clear overview of the process of HB Office Recycling, and the information is logically sequenced. However, there are some minor lapses in coherence and cohesion.
The use of cohesive devices such as linking words (e.g., "firstly," "secondly," "thirdly") and pronouns (e.g., "they") is generally effective, but there are some instances of overuse or mechanical use. For example, the essay uses "firstly," "secondly," and "thirdly" to connect ideas, but it could be more varied and flexible in its use of cohesive devices.
The clarity and ease of understanding throughout the response are generally good, but there are some areas where the language is not entirely clear or concise. For instance, the sentence "based on the official COHERENCE AND COHESION assessment criteria provided by IELTS.org" seems out of place and disrupts the flow of the essay.
Strengths:
The essay provides a clear overview of the process of HB Office Recycling, making it easy to follow and understand.
The use of cohesive devices such as linking words and pronouns is generally effective in connecting ideas within and between sentences.
The essay is well-structured, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.
Areas for Improvement:
The essay could benefit from more varied and flexible use of cohesive devices to connect ideas. For example, using synonyms, antonyms, or transitional phrases could enhance the cohesion of the essay.
Some sentences could be rephrased for better clarity and concision. For instance, the sentence "based on the official COHERENCE AND COHESION assessment criteria provided by IELTS.org" could be removed or rephrased to improve the flow of the essay.
The essay could benefit from more precise and concise language throughout. For example, using more specific vocabulary and avoiding repetitive language could enhance the overall coherence and cohesion of the essay.
Adherence to Suggested Paragraph Structure: The essay generally follows the suggested paragraph structure for Academic Writing Task 1, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. However, the paragraphs could be more clearly defined, and

Lexical Resources

Score: 6
Evaluation:
After carefully reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I analyzed the range and variety of vocabulary used in the essay. The candidate demonstrates a generally adequate resource, but it is rather restricted, which limits the flexibility and precision of their language.
The accuracy and appropriateness of the vocabulary used are mostly correct, but there are some inappropriacies and a lack of precision in word choice. The candidate uses simple vocabulary accurately, but the range does not permit much variation in expression.
The candidate shows some ability to use less common lexical items, such as "remanufactured" and "recyclables," but these instances are infrequent. The candidate's skill in conveying precise meaning through their choice of words and phrases is adequate, but there is room for improvement.
Based on the official IELTS band descriptors, I assign a score of 6 for Lexical Resource. The candidate's language is generally clear, but the range is restricted, and there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation.
Strengths:
The candidate uses some topic-specific vocabulary, such as "remanufactured" and "recyclables," which demonstrates an awareness of the subject matter.
The candidate's language is generally clear, and the meaning is conveyed effectively.
The candidate attempts to use synonyms, such as "unwanted items" and "non-recyclables," to avoid repetition.
Areas for improvement:
The candidate should work on expanding their vocabulary range to include more precise and nuanced language. This would enable them to convey meaning more effectively and with greater flexibility.
The candidate should focus on improving their ability to use less common lexical items, such as idiomatic expressions and colloquialisms, where appropriate.
The candidate should strive to use more precise word choice and avoid inappropriacies, such as using "companies" instead of "businesses" in the first sentence.
The candidate's ability to paraphrase the language from the prompt is limited, and they tend to repeat words and phrases. To improve, the candidate should practice paraphrasing and using synonyms to avoid repetition.
Overall, the candidate's Lexical Resource is adequate, but it requires refinement to achieve a higher band score. With practice and attention to vocabulary expansion, precision, and appropriacy, the candidate can improve their language skills and achieve their desired band score.

Grammar and Acurracy

Score: 6
Evaluation:
Upon reviewing the essay, I noticed that the candidate has attempted to provide a clear and concise description of the process of HB Office Recycling. However, there are some limitations in the grammatical range and accuracy that prevent the essay from achieving a higher band score.
In terms of grammatical range, the candidate has used a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, including compound and complex sentences. However, the flexibility and control over these structures are limited, and the majority of sentences are not error-free. The candidate has also relied heavily on simple sentence structures, which reduces the overall variety of grammatical structures used.
Regarding grammatical accuracy, there are several errors that impede understanding, such as:
"After they are transported by vans to HB Office Recycling facilities, then, sorting starts" ( incorrect use of "then" and comma splice)
"items to reuse, items to remanufacture and repair, materials to recycle, and non-recyclables" (lack of parallel structure)
"At last, non-recycables which comprise only 2% go to landfill sites" ( incorrect use of "at last" and sentence structure)
Despite these errors, the candidate has demonstrated some ability to use complex grammatical structures, such as subordinate clauses and conditional sentences. However, these structures are not consistently accurate and effective.
Strengths:
The candidate has attempted to use a variety of sentence structures, including compound and complex sentences.
The essay is generally well-organized and easy to follow.
The candidate has used some accurate and effective sentence structures, such as "Next, each group has its own steps."
Areas for improvement:
The candidate should work on improving the accuracy and flexibility of grammatical structures, particularly in complex sentences.
The candidate should focus on using parallel structure in lists and avoiding comma splices.
The candidate should practice producing error-free sentences and avoiding grammatical errors that impede understanding.
Overall, the candidate's Grammatical Range and Accuracy are limited, but with practice and attention to detail, they can improve their skills and achieve a higher band score.
- Grammar and Spelling mistakes
After meticulously reviewing the provided essay, I'm pleased to report that the writer has demonstrated excellent grammar and spelling skills. The essay is well-structured, and the language usage is accurate and clear.
Here's a brief summary of my review:
There are no misspelled words in the essay.
The grammar and sentence structure are correct throughout the essay.
The writer has effectively used transitions and connectors to link ideas and paragraphs.
The language is concise and clear, making it easy to understand the process of HB Office Recycling.
Great job! Your grammar and spelling are accurate throughout the essay. Keep up the good work!
However, I do have a few suggestions to further improve the clarity and coherence of the essay:
In the first sentence, consider adding a transition word or phrase to connect it to the rest of the paragraph. For example, "The given scheme showcases the process of how HB Office Recycling reuses, remanufactures, recycles, and disposes of unneeded office furniture and other items from businesses, which involves a nine-step process."
In the second paragraph, the sentence "Next, each group has its own steps" could be rephrased for better clarity. For example, "The items in each group then undergo specific processes."
In the third paragraph, consider using more precise language to describe the redistribution process. For example, "Furniture and equipment in good condition are donated or sold to charities, customers, and schools at an affordable price."
These suggestions are minor and intended to help the writer refine their language usage. Overall, the essay is well-written, and the writer has demonstrated a strong command of grammar and spelling.

Task 1 Band Score: 7.0 / 9

Here is the most repeated words in your essay

0
Top 5 Most Repeated Words
0

Recommended Synonyms of the repeated words

items:
Artifacts
Goods
Products
office:
Facility
Premises
Establishment
recycling:
Reprocessing
Upcycling
Refurbishment
then:
Next
Subsequently
Afterwards
process:
Procedure
System
Method

Rewriting your essay

Here is a rewritten version of the essay:
The diagram illustrates the 9-step process of HB Office Recycling, which focuses on the reuse, remanufacture, recycling, and disposal of unwanted office furniture and equipment from various businesses.
The process commences with the collection of unwanted items from companies, which are then transported to HB Office Recycling facilities. The items are subsequently sorted into four distinct categories, each with its own set of procedures. The initial category consists of items that can be reused, which are redistributed to charities, customers, and schools.
The second priority involves remanufacturing and repairing items using new and repaired parts, which are then sold to customers. The third category comprises recyclable materials, which are sorted into plastics, metals, and wood, and subsequently delivered to recycling centers. Notably, only 2% of the items collected fall under the non-recyclable category, which are ultimately sent to landfill sites.
Throughout the process, HB Office Recycling demonstrates a clear commitment to minimizing waste and promoting sustainability. The company's efforts to prolong the lifecycle of items and reduce landfill waste are evident in each stage of the process.
Number of Words: 185

If you find this service helpful, you can support my efforts by buying me a coffee. ☕️ ❤️

Task 2, Urbanization Problems and solutions - 6

People who live in large cities face a range of problems in their daily life. What are the main problems people in cities face and how can these problems be tackled?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

essay

Growth of urban areas to vast metropolias caused a lot of issues and made everyday life highly challenging for urban dwellers. Major issues that city dwellers encounter nowadays are lack of green spaces and loneliness epidemic. Which can be addressed by popularizing urban gardening and supporting local businesses focused in communities. Below I will present first problem and proposed possible solution, following with the next problem and its solution.
One of the main concerns arising due to urban lifestyle is that in many cases people are disconnected from the nature and green spaces, which leads to lack of places for relaxation and restoration, and decline of air quality. Many think that the most effective approach to tackle this problem would be to create urban gardens. It can be indoor gardens and outdoor ones that can be used to provide access for greens during both winter and summer. Doesn’t matter even if it would be a personal or public projects, will one choose to grow there vegetables and greens or flowers. In general experience of growing plants can significantly reduce stress for any human beings.
Another possible issue that affects more and more urban dwellers today is epidemic of loneliness. A lot of people do not know their neighbors, but having strong local ties is highly important to make local community more resilient and happy. One of possible solutions to tackle this isolation can be creating local business that foster senses of community and belonging. For example, SoulCycle founders that put heavy stress in his business model on creating community around their fitness centers, now have developed new add-on project that would create activities for bringing people together and connect them on a deeper level, both offline and online.
In conclusion, rapid urbanization and growth of the cities to even bigger vast metropolian areas causes many various problems to people who live there, and such issues will continue to become more and more important with the growth or urban areas in the future. One of the main problems with this is lack of green spaces and this can be solved through urban gardening. The other problem that brings major concern is loneliness epidemic, which can be solved as in a most effective way by creating a community focused local enterprises.
Please wait a few seconds until the evaluation appears

Task Response

Score: 6
Evaluation:**
The essay attempts to address the prompt, but with some limitations. The candidate presents a clear position that urbanization leads to various problems, including the lack of green spaces and loneliness, and offers some solutions. However, the development of these ideas is not always sufficient, and the supporting examples are limited.
The essay's strengths include:
The candidate presents a clear position and identifies two main problems associated with urbanization.
The use of some relevant examples, such as SoulCycle, adds credibility to the argument.
However, there are areas for improvement:
The development of ideas is sometimes superficial, and more supporting evidence is needed to strengthen the argument.
The connection between paragraphs is not always clear, and the flow of ideas could be improved.
The candidate could have provided more nuanced explanations and explorations of the problems and solutions.
Specific Suggestions for Improvement:
Develop the ideas more thoroughly, providing more detailed explanations and supporting evidence.
Improve the cohesion and coherence of the response by using transitional phrases and linking words to connect paragraphs.
Consider providing more nuanced and detailed examples to strengthen the argument.
Adherence to the Minimum Word Count: The essay exceeds the minimum word count (379 words), which allows for a more detailed exploration of the topic. However, the candidate could have utilized the extra space to provide more supporting evidence and nuance to the argument.
Overall Assessment: The essay demonstrates some strengths in presenting a clear position and identifying relevant problems. However, the development of ideas and supporting evidence could be improved. With further refinement in these areas, the candidate can strengthen their Task Response and achieve a higher band score.

Coherence and Cohesion

Score: 7
Evaluation:
After carefully reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I will assess the coherence and cohesion of the essay.
The essay provides a clear overview statement in the introduction, and the writer attempts to logically organize the information by dividing the response into two main sections: lack of green spaces and loneliness epidemic. However, the writer's organization is not wholly logical, and there are some lapses in coherence and cohesion.
The use of cohesive devices is generally good, with the writer employing transition words and phrases (e.g., "Following with the next problem and its solution") to connect ideas within and between sentences. However, the writer occasionally overuses these devices, making the writing less fluent.
The clarity and ease of understanding throughout the response are generally good, but there are some instances where the writer's language is overly complex, making it difficult to follow.
Based on the IELTS band descriptors, I would give this response a score of 7 for Coherence and Cohesion.
Strengths:
The writer provides a clear overview statement in the introduction, outlining the main issues and proposed solutions.
The writer uses cohesive devices effectively to connect ideas within and between sentences.
The writer attempts to logically organize the information, dividing the response into two main sections.
Areas for Improvement:
The writer's organization is not wholly logical, and there are some lapses in coherence and cohesion. The writer needs to work on creating a more cohesive and coherent narrative.
The writer occasionally overuses cohesive devices, making the writing less fluent. The writer needs to learn to use these devices more judiciously.
The writer's language is occasionally overly complex, making it difficult to follow. The writer needs to work on using simpler language to convey complex ideas.
Adherence to paragraph structure: The writer attempts to follow the suggested paragraph structure for Academic Writing Task 2, but there are some lapses. The introduction is clear, but the body paragraphs lack clear topic sentences and supporting details. The writer needs to work on creating more cohesive and coherent body paragraphs.
Overall, the response demonstrates some strengths in coherence and cohesion, but there are areas for improvement. With further practice and attention to organization and language use, the writer can improve their coherence and cohesion and achieve a higher band score.

Lexical Resources

Score: 6
Evaluation:
Upon reviewing the essay, I have evaluated the candidate's Lexical Resource as follows:
The candidate has demonstrated a generally adequate range of vocabulary, but with some limitations. The essay exhibits an attempt to use more complex vocabulary, such as "metropolian areas", "epidemic of loneliness", and "resilient and happy" community. However, the vocabulary is not consistently accurate, and some words are used inappropriately, like "vast metropolias" (should be "metropolises").
The candidate has also demonstrated some ability to use less common lexical items, such as "indoor gardens" and "outdoor ones". However, the use of idiomatic expressions and colloquialisms is limited.
The essay's strength lies in its ability to convey meaning, albeit sometimes with minor inaccuracies. The candidate has successfully expressed ideas and connected them to the topic, showing some ability to use vocabulary to convey precise meanings.
However, there are areas for improvement. The candidate often relies on simple vocabulary and lacks precision in word choice. For example, using "disconnected from nature" instead of a more precise phrase like "alienated from nature" or "detached from the natural environment".
Some specific strengths of the essay's Lexical Resource include:
The candidate's attempt to use more complex vocabulary, even if not always accurate.
The use of phrases like " Epidemic of loneliness" and "resilient and happy community" which show an understanding of topic-specific terminology.
The ability to convey meaning and express ideas, albeit with some inaccuracies.
Areas for improvement include:
Broadening the range of vocabulary to include more precise and nuanced words.
Improving the accuracy and appropriateness of word choice, avoiding inappropriacies like "vast metropolias".
Developing a more sophisticated use of idiomatic expressions and colloquialisms to enhance the essay's communicative effect.
In terms of paraphrasing, the candidate has made some attempts to rephrase the language from the prompt, but could improve by using more varied and precise vocabulary.
Overall, the essay's Lexical Resource is generally adequate, but with room for improvement. With practice and refinement, the candidate can develop a more sophisticated and precise use of vocabulary to enhance the essay's communicative effect.

Grammar and Acurracy

Score: 6
Evaluation:
After carefully reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I have assessed the Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA) of the essay.
The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but flexibility is limited. The candidate has attempted to use complex structures, but they tend to be faulty. For instance, "Which can be addressed by popularizing urban gardening and supporting local businesses focused in communities" is a complex sentence, but it lacks accuracy.
The essay contains errors in grammar and punctuation, which occasionally impede communication. For example, "One of the main concerns arising due to urban lifestyle is that in many cases people are disconnected from the nature and green spaces, which leads to lack of places for relaxation and restoration, and decline of air quality." is a long sentence with multiple clauses, but it lacks punctuation, making it difficult to understand.
The candidate has demonstrated some control over grammar and punctuation, but errors persist. The essay would benefit from more accurate and varied sentence structures to improve communication.
Strengths:
The candidate has attempted to use complex sentence structures, such as "One of the main concerns arising due to urban lifestyle is that in many cases people are disconnected from the nature and green spaces, which leads to lack of places for relaxation and restoration, and decline of air quality."
The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, including words like "epidemic," "resilient," and "community."
The candidate has provided specific examples, such as the SoulCycle founders, to support their points.
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate needs to work on constructing accurate and grammatically correct sentences. For example, "Don’t matter even if it would be a personal or public projects, will one choose to grow there vegetables and greens or flowers" is a faulty sentence.
The essay would benefit from more varied sentence structures and more precise punctuation.
The candidate should focus on producing error-free sentences that convey meaning effectively. For instance, "Many think that the most effective approach to tackle this problem would be to create urban gardens" is a simple sentence, but it is not grammatically correct.
The candidate has demonstrated some control over grammar and punctuation, but errors persist. To improve, the candidate should focus on constructing accurate and varied sentence structures, using precise punctuation, and producing error-free sentences that convey meaning effectively.
- Grammar and Spelling mistakes
What a great essay on the growth of urban areas and its challenges! I'm happy to help you refine your language usage.
After a meticulous review, I'm pleased to report that your essay is mostly error-free, with only a few areas that require attention. Here's my feedback:
Grammar and Sentence Structure:
"caused a lot of issues and made everyday life highly challenging for urban dwellers." Consider rephrasing to "pose numerous challenges and make everyday life highly challenging for urban dwellers." The original sentence is grammatically correct, but the rephrased version sounds more natural and concise.
"Many think that the most effective approach to tackle this problem would be to create urban gardens." This sentence is correct, but to improve the flow, consider adding "that" after "Many think" to make it "Many think that that the most effective approach..."
"In general experience of growing plants can significantly reduce stress for any human beings." Corrected sentence: "The general experience of growing plants can significantly reduce stress for any human being." (subject-verb agreement and singular "human being" for clarity)
"A lot of people do not know their neighbors, but having strong local ties is highly important to make local community more resilient and happy." Break this long sentence into two simpler ones: "Many people do not know their neighbors. Having strong local ties is essential to create a more resilient and happy community."
"For example, SoulCycle founders that put heavy stress in his business model on creating community around their fitness centers..." Corrected sentence: "For example, the founders of SoulCycle, who placed heavy emphasis in their business model on creating a community around their fitness centers..." (possessive "founders of" and "who" instead of "that")
Minor Suggestions:
Consider adding transition words (e.g., "Furthermore," "In addition," "Meanwhile") to connect your paragraphs and improve the essay's cohesion.
Use more precise vocabulary, such as "urbanization" instead of "growth of urban areas" to convey a clearer message.
Positive Feedback:
Your essay demonstrates a clear structure, and your ideas are well-organized. You've provided relevant examples and supported your arguments with logical solutions. Your language is mostly accurate, and your writing style is clear and concise.
Summary of Feedback:
The most common areas for improvement in your essay are:
Minor sentence rephrasing for better clarity and flow
Correcting subject-verb agreement and article usage
Improving sentence structure and cohesion between paragraphs
Overall, your grammar and spelling are accurate throughout the essay. Keep up the good work, and remember to refine your writing skills with practice and dedication!

Task 2 Band Score: 6.0 / 9

Here is the most repeated words in your essay

0
Top 5 Most Repeated Words
0

Recommended Synonyms of the repeated words

Urban:
Metropolitan
City
Municipal
Local:
Neighborhood
Community-based
Regional
More:
Additional
Further
Increased
Problem:
Issue
Challenge
Difficulty
One:
Single
Individual
Solo

Task 2, Choices, agree/disagree - 6

Please wait a few seconds until the evaluation appears

Task Response

Score: 6
Evaluation:
Upon reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I found that the candidate partially addresses the task. The writer agrees with the statement that we have too many choices nowadays, citing the abundance of food and electronic devices as evidence. However, they also acknowledge the existence of "food deserts" where choices are limited.
The presented position is somewhat clear, but it lacks a clear overview and a well-developed main idea. The supporting examples, such as companies creating new products to increase profits and online shopping platforms, are relevant but not fully extended or supported. The writer's ideas are not always clearly connected, and there is some repetition in the conclusion.
The response does not fully develop the topic within the given word count (261 words), and some parts of the prompt are more fully covered than others. The format is generally appropriate, but there are some lapses in content and support.
Strengths:
The writer attempts to address both parts of the prompt, acknowledging the complexity of the issue.
The use of relevant examples, such as online shopping platforms, adds some depth to the discussion.
The writer's language is generally clear, although there are some grammar and vocabulary errors.
Areas for Improvement:
The writer needs to develop a clearer and more focused position on the topic, with a clearer overview and more coherent main ideas.
Supporting examples should be more fully extended and supported with evidence or explanations.
The writer should work on improving coherence and cohesion by using transitional phrases and connecting ideas more clearly.
Adherence to Word Count: The essay meets the minimum word count requirement (250 words), but it could benefit from further development and expansion to fully explore the topic.
Overall Assessment: The candidate's Task Response is partial, with some relevant ideas and examples, but lacking in clarity, coherence, and development. With further refinement and attention to these areas, the candidate can improve their Task Response score.

Coherence and Cohesion

Score: 6
Evaluation:**
The candidate's response addresses the topic, but it lacks a clear overview statement and a logical progression of ideas.
The organization of information is somewhat coherent, but there are instances of unclear relationships between ideas and sentences.
The use of cohesive devices is limited, and there are some inaccuracies in referencing and substitution.
The response is generally easy to follow, but there are some difficulties in understanding due to unclear connections between ideas.
Based on the official IELTS band descriptors, I would give this response a score of 6 for Coherence and Cohesion.
Strengths:
The candidate attempts to address both parts of the question, discussing the abundance of choices and the limitations in certain areas.
There is some use of cohesive devices, such as "however" and "another point," to connect ideas within paragraphs.
The response is generally easy to follow, with some clear sentences and ideas.
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate should work on creating a clearer overview statement and a more logical progression of ideas throughout the response.
There is a need for more varied and accurate use of cohesive devices, such as pronouns, synonyms, and linking words, to connect ideas within and between sentences and paragraphs.
The response could benefit from more precise referencing and substitution to avoid repetition and enhance clarity.
Adherence to Suggested Paragraph Structure: The response does not strictly follow the suggested paragraph structure for Academic Writing Task 2. While there are some clear body paragraphs, the introduction and conclusion could be more clearly defined. This affects the overall coherence and cohesion of the response.
Overall Assessment: The candidate's response demonstrates some understanding of the topic, but it requires improvement in terms of coherence and cohesion. With more attention to logical organization, varied cohesive devices, and precise referencing, the response could be more effective in communicating its message.
I hope this evaluation provides valuable insights for the candidate to improve their IELTS Writing Task 2 skills.

Lexical Resources

Score: 6
Evaluation:**
After carefully reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I analyzed the range and variety of vocabulary used in the essay. The candidate demonstrates a good effort to use a range of vocabulary, but it is not consistently accurate or appropriate throughout the essay.
The candidate uses some topic-specific vocabulary, such as "food deserts," "online shopping platforms," and "consumer market." However, there are instances of word choice inaccuracy, such as using "bizarre" instead of "niche" to describe products. Additionally, the candidate repeats certain words and phrases, like "I agree" and "to choose from," which limits the overall lexical variety.
The candidate attempts to use less common lexical items, like "conquering" and "leisure activity," but these are not always used correctly. There are also some errors in spelling and word formation, such as "reinstate that believe" instead of "reinforce that belief."
Despite these limitations, the candidate is able to convey their ideas clearly, and the meaning is generally understandable. However, the language lacks precision and sophistication, which restricts the candidate's ability to express themselves more effectively.
Strengths:
The candidate attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary, which shows an awareness of the subject matter.
The essay includes some varied sentence structures, which helps to maintain reader interest.
The candidate tries to use less common lexical items, even if they are not always used correctly.
Areas for Improvement:
Increase lexical variety by using synonyms and paraphrasing to avoid repetition.
Improve accuracy in word choice and collocation to enhance precision and clarity.
Focus on using more sophisticated vocabulary and phrasing to convey complex ideas.
Paraphrasing: The candidate does not effectively paraphrase the language from the prompt, often repeating similar phrases or sentences. To improve, the candidate should practice rephrasing sentences using different vocabulary and structures.
Overall Assessment: The candidate's Lexical Resource is adequate but limited. While they demonstrate some awareness of vocabulary related to the topic, their language lacks precision, sophistication, and variety. With practice and attention to word choice accuracy, the candidate can improve their Lexical Resource and achieve a higher band score.
I hope this evaluation provides a fair and objective assessment of the essay's Lexical Resource.

Grammar and Acurracy

Score: 6
Evaluation:
After carefully reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I have assessed the Grammatical Range and Accuracy of the essay.
The candidate demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but flexibility is limited. There are attempts to use more complex structures, such as subordinate clauses, but these are not always accurate. The greatest accuracy is achieved on simple sentences. Errors in grammar and punctuation occur, but rarely impede communication.
Strengths:
The candidate uses a variety of sentence structures, including compound and complex sentences, which shows an attempt to demonstrate grammatical range.
The essay has a clear structure, with each paragraph focusing on a specific point, which helps to maintain coherence.
The candidate uses transitional phrases, such as "However" and "Another point," to connect ideas between sentences and paragraphs.
Areas for improvement:
The candidate should work on using more precise vocabulary and avoiding vague expressions, such as "in the most cases" and "sometimes even making very niche and bizzare items."
There are several grammatical errors throughout the essay, including subject-verb agreement errors, incorrect use of articles, and faulty sentence construction. The candidate should focus on improving sentence-level accuracy.
To enhance cohesion, the candidate could use more cohesive devices, such as pronouns and synonyms, to link ideas between sentences and paragraphs.
The candidate's ability to maintain grammatical control in longer sentences is limited, leading to errors that occasionally impede understanding. However, the overall structure of the essay is clear, and the candidate's message comes across despite some grammatical inaccuracies.
To improve Grammatical Range and Accuracy, I recommend that the candidate:
Practice using a variety of sentence structures, including complex sentences with subordinate clauses.
Focus on improving sentence-level accuracy by checking subject-verb agreement, article usage, and sentence construction.
Use cohesive devices to link ideas between sentences and paragraphs.
Overall, the candidate demonstrates some grammatical range and accuracy, but there is room for improvement in terms of sentence-level accuracy and cohesion. With practice and attention to detail, the candidate can refine their writing skills and achieve a higher band score.
- Grammar and Spelling mistakes
I'd be happy to help you with that! After carefully reviewing your essay, I've identified some grammatical errors and suggested corrections. Please find them below:
"It’s believed at current time" should be "It's believed that at the current time" or simply "Currently, it's believed". The phrase "at current time" is not grammatically correct.
"I would agree with that statement in the most cases" should be "I would agree with that statement in most cases". The phrase "in the most cases" is incorrect; instead, we use the phrase "in most cases".
"especially in terms of abundance of choice present in a consumer market" is a bit unclear. Consider rephrasing it to "especially when it comes to the abundance of choices available in consumer markets".
"Also, increasing number of marketplaces and online shopping platforms reinstate that believe as well" should be "Additionally, the increasing number of marketplaces and online shopping platforms reinforces this belief as well". There are two errors here: "reinstate" doesn't fit the context, and "believe" should be "belief".
"However, there are still food deserts somewhere" is correct, but consider adding more context or explanation about what food deserts are and why they're relevant to the topic.
"The main reason why I believe we have too many options to choose from currently is that there is an overabundance of food and electronic devices" is a bit long-winded. Consider breaking it into two sentences for better clarity.
"This happens because companies want to increase their profits, they create more and more new products targeting new markets and consumer groups, sometimes even making very niche and bizzare items and foods" should be "This happens because companies want to increase their profits; they create more and more new products targeting new markets and consumer groups, sometimes even making very niche and bizarre items and foods". There are two errors here: "bizzare" should be spelled as "bizarre", and the sentence structure can be improved by using a semicolon instead of a comma.
"Another point to why I agree that perhaps we have now increasing number of options to choose, is that online marketplaces conquiring the world" should be "Another reason I agree that we perhaps have an increasing number of options to choose is that online marketplaces are conquering the world". There are several errors here: "point to why" is not idiomatic, "

Task 2 Band Score: 6.0 / 9

Here is the most repeated words in your essay

0
Top 5 Most Repeated Words
0

Recommended Synonyms of the repeated words

Task 2, Crime, causes/solutions - 6

Please wait a few seconds until the evaluation appears

Task Response

Score: 6
Evaluation:
The candidate has attempted to address the prompt, discussing the reasons why former convicts re-offend and suggesting possible measures to tackle this problem. However, the response lacks depth and clarity in some areas.
The candidate's position is not clearly stated, and the main ideas are not fully developed. The supporting examples, such as the YouTube channel Jubilee and the documentary The Work, are relevant but not adequately explained. The response could benefit from more precise and focused supporting ideas.
The coherence and cohesion of the response are affected by the lack of clear connections between paragraphs. The writer jumps abruptly from discussing the causes of re-offending to suggesting solutions.
According to the IELTS band descriptors, this response falls under Band 6, as the main parts of the prompt are addressed, but some may be more fully covered than others. The format is appropriate, and a position is presented, although the conclusions drawn may be unclear or unjustified.
Strengths:
The candidate has attempted to address both parts of the prompt, discussing the causes of re-offending and suggesting possible measures to tackle this problem.
The supporting examples, such as the YouTube channel Jubilee and the documentary The Work, are relevant and show some effort to provide evidence.
The response is written in a clear and simple language, making it easy to understand.
Areas for improvement:
The candidate should clearly state their position and develop their main ideas more fully, providing more precise and focused supporting evidence.
The response could benefit from clearer connections between paragraphs, creating a more logical flow of ideas.
The candidate should provide more detailed and relevant explanations to support their ideas, avoiding generalizations and lack of focus.
The essay meets the minimum word count of 250 words, but the content could be expanded to provide more depth and clarity. Overall, the candidate has shown some effort to address the prompt, but the response lacks clarity and depth in some areas.

Coherence and Cohesion

Score: 6
Evaluation:**
The essay prompt is clear, and the candidate's response addresses the topic, but the organization of information could be improved.
The response lacks a clear overview statement, and the progression of ideas is not always logical. The candidate jumps between different ideas without a clear connection.
The use of cohesive devices is limited, and there are instances of repetition and error. For example, the candidate uses "another reason" and "one of the possible solutions" without providing a clear connection between the ideas.
The information is presented in a way that is not always easy to follow and comprehend. The candidate's writing is clear, but the organization and connection of ideas need improvement.
Justification: The band score of 6 is justified because the candidate's response shows some organization and coherence, but there are lapses in coherence and cohesion. The use of cohesive devices is limited, and the paragraphing could be improved.
Strengths:
The candidate provides some relevant examples and ideas to support their points.
The writing is clear, and the candidate's language is generally accurate.
The candidate attempts to address both parts of the question, discussing the causes and solutions to the problem.
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate needs to work on creating a clear overview statement and logical progression of ideas.
The use of cohesive devices should be improved, with more attention to linking words, pronouns, and synonyms.
The candidate should focus on creating more effective paragraphing, with clear topic sentences and supporting details.
Adherence to Suggested Paragraph Structure: The response does not strictly follow the suggested paragraph structure for Academic Writing Task 2. The introduction is brief, and the body paragraphs lack clear topic sentences and supporting details.
Overall Assessment: The response shows some strengths in terms of clarity and relevance of ideas, but it needs improvement in terms of organization, coherence, and cohesion. The candidate should focus on creating a clear overview statement, using cohesive devices effectively, and improving paragraphing to enhance the overall coherence and cohesion of the response.

Lexical Resources

Score: 5
Evaluation:
Upon reviewing the essay, it is evident that the candidate has attempted to address the topic, but the lexical resource is limited and minimally adequate for the task. The vocabulary used is simple, and there is a lack of precision in word choice, leading to inappropriacies in expression.
Strengths:
The candidate has used some topic-specific vocabulary, such as "mental health issues" and "social media advocacy," which shows an attempt to engage with the topic.
There is some evidence of sentence variety, with a mix of simple and compound sentences, which helps to create a sense of flow.
The candidate has tried to use transitional phrases, such as "Another reason for this complex issue" and "In conclusion," which indicates an effort to organize the essay.
Weaknesses:
The range of vocabulary is restricted, with frequent repetition of words and phrases, such as "former convicts" and "mental health."
There are inaccuracies in word choice, such as using "unwillingness" instead of "unwillingness to accept" and "menial jobs" instead of "low-skilled jobs."
The candidate has not demonstrated the ability to use less common lexical items, idiomatic expressions, or subject-specific terminology, which limits the essay's sophistication.
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate should focus on expanding their vocabulary range by learning synonyms and antonyms to avoid repetition and improve precision.
It is essential to improve the accuracy and appropriateness of word choice by using context-specific vocabulary and avoiding colloquialisms.
The candidate should practice using more complex sentence structures and varied vocabulary to convey nuanced ideas and create a more sophisticated tone.
Paraphrasing and Repetition: The candidate has not effectively paraphrased the language from the prompt, leading to repetition of words and phrases. To improve, the candidate should focus on rephrasing ideas using synonyms and reorganizing sentence structures to create a more cohesive and varied essay.
Overall Assessment: The essay's lexical resource is limited, and the candidate needs to focus on expanding their vocabulary range, improving accuracy and appropriateness of word choice, and developing more sophisticated sentence structures. With practice and attention to these areas, the candidate can enhance their lexical resource and improve their IELTS writing Task 2 skills.

Grammar and Acurracy

Score: 6
Evaluation:
After carefully reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I analyzed the range and variety of grammatical structures used in the essay. The candidate demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but flexibility is limited. The essay lacks a wide range of structures, and the accuracy of simple, compound, and complex sentences is not consistently maintained.
The candidate attempts to use complex grammatical structures, such as subordinate clauses, but they are often faulty. For instance, in the sentence "The probable cause of above stated issue can be that society generally is not willing to accept former crime offenders even after they have been prosecuted," the subordinate clause "that society generally is not willing to accept former crime offenders even after they have been prosecuted" is not correctly integrated into the main clause.
Furthermore, the essay contains several grammatical errors that impede understanding, such as subject-verb agreement errors ("society do not accept"), incorrect use of articles ("a" instead of "the"), and punctuation errors (missing articles, incorrect use of commas). These errors are frequent and may cause some difficulty for the reader.
Despite these errors, the candidate demonstrates some control over grammar and punctuation, and error-free sentences are frequent. However, the density and communicative effect of grammatical errors prevent the essay from achieving a higher band score.
Strengths:
The candidate attempts to use complex sentence structures, which shows an effort to vary sentence forms.
The essay contains some error-free sentences, which demonstrates the candidate's ability to construct sentences correctly.
The candidate uses punctuation effectively in some instances, such as using commas to separate clauses.
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate should focus on improving the accuracy of complex sentence structures, such as subordinate clauses and conditional sentences.
The candidate should work on reducing grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement errors and incorrect use of articles.
The candidate should practice using a wider range of grammatical structures to increase flexibility and control.
The candidate's ability to maintain grammatical control in longer, more complex sentences is limited, and errors often impede understanding. To improve, the candidate should focus on constructing sentences correctly and using a variety of grammatical structures to convey meaning effectively.
Overall, the essay demonstrates some control over grammar and punctuation, but the density and communicative effect of grammatical errors prevent it from achieving a higher band score. With practice and attention to detail, the candidate can improve their Grammatical Range and Accuracy to achieve a higher band score.
- Grammar and Spelling mistakes
I'd be happy to help you with that!
After carefully reviewing the essay, I've identified some misspelled words and grammatical errors. Here's my feedback:
Misspelled words:
"conitnue" should be spelled as "continue" (correct spelling in both British and American English conventions)
"unwilligness" should be spelled as "unwillingness" (correct spelling in both British and American English conventions)
Grammatical errors:
"The possible causes why this issue arises are society's unwilligness to accept them and their mental health issues." should be rephrased to "The possible causes of this issue are society's unwillingness to accept them and their mental health issues." (correct use of "causes of" instead of "causes why")
"The probable cause of above stated issue can be that society generally is not willing to accept former crime offenders even after they have been prosecuted." should be rephrased to "One probable cause of the above-mentioned issue is that society generally is not willing to accept former crime offenders even after they have been prosecuted." (correct use of "above-mentioned" instead of "above stated", and adding "One" to make the sentence clearer)
"This leads to situation where former convicts can not find steady employment or they pushed to menial jobs where they only make ends meet." should be rephrased to "This leads to a situation where former convicts cannot find steady employment or are pushed into menial jobs where they only make ends meet." (correct use of "a" before "situation", and "are pushed" instead of "they pushed")
"And perspective to comit a crime again does not look like a such bad thing." should be rephrased to "And from their perspective, committing a crime again may not seem like such a bad thing." (correct spelling of "commit", and rephrasing for better clarity)
"Another reason for this complex issue, as one study suggests, can be that criminals might have ADHD." should be rephrased to "Another reason for this complex issue, as suggested by one study, is that criminals might have ADHD." (correct use of "suggested by" instead of "suggests")
"As result they might find it very diffcult to control their anger, which make them follow their impulses again and again without thinking of the possible consequences

Task 2 Band Score: 6.0 / 9

Here is the most repeated words in your essay

0
Top 5 Most Repeated Words
0

Recommended Synonyms of the repeated words

Former:
Prior
Previous
Ex-convict
Possible:
Potential
Likely
Plausible
Social:
Societal
Community-based
Public
Criminals:
Offenders
Lawbreakers
Delinquents
Convicts:
Inmates
Prisoners
Detainees

Rewriting your essay

Here is a rewritten version of the essay:
Many criminals re-offend after serving their sentences, and this phenomenon can be attributed to various factors. One of the primary reasons is society's unwillingness to accept former convicts, making it challenging for them to reintegrate into society. Another significant factor is the underlying mental health issues that these individuals may struggle with.
When former convicts are shunned by society, they often find it difficult to secure stable employment, forcing them to settle for menial jobs that barely cover their living expenses. In such circumstances, the prospect of committing a crime again may seem appealing, as it provides a means to survive. Furthermore, research suggests that some criminals may have Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), which makes it difficult for them to control their anger and impulses, leading them to repeat their offenses.
To address this issue, it is essential to implement effective measures. One potential solution is to launch social media advocacy campaigns, such as the YouTube channel Jubilee's social experiment shows, where former convicts share their experiences and challenges. This can help raise awareness and promote empathy among the general public. Another solution is to establish mental health programs, such as group therapy sessions, as showcased in the documentary The Work (2017). These programs can help prisoners process their traumas and develop healthier coping mechanisms, reducing the likelihood of re-offending.
In conclusion, the reasons behind serial criminals re-offending are multifaceted, including societal rejection and underlying mental health issues. However, by implementing measures such as social media advocacy and mental health programs, it is possible to mitigate this issue and create a safer and more compassionate society.
Number of Words: 275

Task 2, Progress-check, Life cycle of products, adv & disavd - 5

Task
Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out vey quickly. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
My answer
The products lifecycle currently became rather short, things get broken and worn out in a high speed. I strongly believe this leads to more disadvantages for both producers and consumers. Design cavities in the products, can cut costs, generate more sales, contribute higher taxes and bring joy to consumers. However, such designed flaws contributes to more waste, deplicts resources driving the costs higher in the long run and cause frustration among consumers to be forced spend more and more money, which at the same time, gives very bad image for production companies.
Planned deprication and breakings of various products drives economy to insane growth rates which finally would exhaust all natural resources, which in turn would mean even higher prices for supplies and materials. Moreover, it generates more waste, doubling down on even more anxiety that consumers have in the pursuit of happiness to possess more, and live better, but not actually. Producers then is viewed unethical and it damages their brand.
Such fast fashion and new iPhones do give more income to businesses, producers, it means, also, higher taxes for governments. Asnd taxes can be used to support social spheres like medicie or education, but at the end of the day it creates more business, which creates even more business in an endless pursuit of money, growth, and seeming convenience.
In conclusion, I want to make a summarization, that indeed goods' short lifecycle becomes more and more prevalent at current times and this is dangerous practice, which I would argue at the end has more disadvantages for both producers and consumers. Even though increased business incomes from selling more goods can lead to more taxes and support medicine and education sectors, as well as newer brighter stuff can bring temporary enjoyment to the buyers, that still brings more long-term negative consequences.

- 5

Please wait a few seconds until the evaluation appears

Task Response

Score: 5
Evaluation:
After carefully reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I have evaluated the Task Response based on the official IELTS band descriptors.
The candidate attempts to address the prompt, discussing the disadvantages of products having a short lifecycle. However, the response lacks clarity, coherence, and cohesion. The main ideas are not fully developed, and the supporting examples are limited and often unclear. The candidate's position is not clearly stated, and the conclusions drawn are repetitive and unjustified.
The essay does not adequately address all parts of the prompt, and the candidate's ideas are not sufficiently extended and supported. The response lacks focus and precision, with some supporting arguments and evidence being less relevant or inadequate.
Strengths:
The candidate attempts to discuss the disadvantages of products having a short lifecycle, showing some understanding of the prompt.
The essay includes some relevant examples, such as fast fashion and new iPhones, which could be developed further.
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate needs to clearly state their position and develop their main ideas more fully, providing more relevant examples and evidence to support their arguments.
The response lacks coherence and cohesion, with paragraphs not flowing logically. The candidate should work on improving the structure and connections between paragraphs.
The essay could benefit from more precise and focused language, avoiding repetitive and unclear statements.
Word Count: The essay meets the minimum word count of 250 words. However, the content could be expanded and developed further to provide a more comprehensive response.
Overall Assessment: The essay's Task Response requires improvement in terms of clarity, coherence, and development of main ideas. The candidate should focus on providing more relevant examples, improving the structure and language, and clearly stating their position to achieve a higher band score.

Coherence and Cohesion

Score: 5
Evaluation:
After carefully reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I have assessed the Coherence and Cohesion of the essay.
The organization of information in the response is somewhat evident, but it lacks a clear overview statement and a logical progression of ideas. The candidate jumps between different ideas and points without a clear connection, making it difficult to follow the argument.
The use of cohesive devices is limited and sometimes inaccurate. The candidate relies heavily on simple conjunctions like "and" and "but" without using more sophisticated linking words and phrases. There is also a lack of reference and substitution, leading to some repetition and unclear relationships between ideas.
The clarity and ease of understanding throughout the response are affected by the lack of cohesion and coherence. The information is not presented in a way that is easy to follow and comprehend, making it challenging for the reader to understand the candidate's argument.
Based on the official IELTS band descriptors, I have assigned a score of 5 for Coherence and Cohesion. The candidate's response shows some organization, but it lacks a clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices.
Strengths:
The candidate attempts to address both parts of the question, discussing the advantages and disadvantages of products having a short lifecycle.
There are some clear and concise sentences that convey the candidate's ideas, such as "Design cavities in the products, can cut costs, generate more sales, contribute higher taxes and bring joy to consumers."
The candidate tries to use some discourse markers, like "Moreover" and "In conclusion," to signal the relationships between ideas.
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate needs to work on creating a clear overview statement and a logical progression of ideas. This can be achieved by using transition words and phrases to connect sentences and paragraphs.
The use of cohesive devices needs to be improved. The candidate should learn to use a range of linking words, pronouns, and synonyms to connect ideas within and between sentences and paragraphs.
The candidate should focus on using more precise and concise language to convey their ideas. This will help to improve the clarity and ease of understanding throughout the response.
Adherence to suggested paragraph structure:
The candidate's response does not follow a clear paragraph structure. The ideas are not organized into clear body paragraphs, and the introduction and conclusion are not well-defined. This affects the overall Coherence and Cohesion of the response.
Overall Assessment:
The candidate's response shows some effort to address the topic, but it lacks coherence and cohesion

Lexical Resources

Score: 5
Evaluation:
After carefully reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I have evaluated the Lexical Resource of the essay based on the IELTS criteria.
The candidate's response demonstrates a limited range of vocabulary, with some repetition of words and phrases. While there are attempts to use less common lexical items, such as "design cavities" and "planned deprication," these are not always used accurately or appropriately. The essay also lacks precision in word choice, with errors in spelling and word formation, such as "deplicts" instead of "depletes" and "Asnd" instead of "And."
The candidate's ability to convey precise meaning through their choice of words and phrases is limited, with some ambiguity and vagueness in the expression of ideas. There is also a lack of idiomatic expressions, colloquialisms, or subject-specific terminology, which would enhance the lexical resource of the essay.
Strengths:
The candidate has attempted to use some less common lexical items, such as "design cavities" and "planned deprication," which shows an effort to expand their vocabulary.
The essay demonstrates some awareness of style and collocation, with attempts to use phrases such as "generate more sales" and "bring joy to consumers."
The candidate has tried to use synonyms, such as "higher taxes" and "increased business incomes," to avoid repetition.
Areas for improvement:
The candidate needs to work on expanding their vocabulary range to include more precise and accurate words and phrases. This can be achieved through reading and learning from various sources.
The essay would benefit from more idiomatic expressions, colloquialisms, or subject-specific terminology to enhance its lexical resource.
The candidate should focus on improving their spelling and word formation skills to reduce errors and enhance the overall clarity of the essay.
The candidate's ability to paraphrase the language from the prompt is limited, with some repetition of words and phrases. To improve, the candidate should practice paraphrasing and using synonyms to express ideas more effectively.
Overall, the essay's Lexical Resource is limited, with some attempts to use less common lexical items and demonstrate awareness of style and collocation. However, there are errors in spelling and word formation, and a lack of precision in word choice. With practice and improvement in these areas, the candidate can enhance their Lexical Resource and achieve a higher band score.

Grammar and Acurracy

Score: 5
Evaluation:
After carefully reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I have evaluated the Grammatical Range and Accuracy of the essay.
The candidate has attempted to use a variety of sentence structures, including simple, compound, and complex sentences. However, the range of structures is limited, and flexibility is restricted. The essay lacks a broad grammatical repertoire, with repetitive sentence structures and limited use of subordinate clauses.
In terms of accuracy, the essay is marred by frequent grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement errors, incorrect use of verb tenses, and faulty sentence construction. These errors often impede understanding and communication. For example, "Design cavities in the products, can cut costs, generate more sales, contribute higher taxes and bring joy to consumers" is a run-on sentence with multiple errors.
The candidate has attempted to use complex grammatical structures, such as conditional sentences, but these are often faulty and impede meaning. Error-free sentences are infrequent, and punctuation is often faulty or inadequate.
Strengths:
The candidate has attempted to use a variety of sentence structures, indicating an awareness of the importance of grammatical range.
Some sentences, such as "Producers then is viewed unethical and it damages their brand," demonstrate an understanding of complex grammatical structures, although they are often flawed.
Areas for Improvement:
The candidate needs to work on constructing correct and effective sentences to convey meaning. This can be achieved by practicing sentence construction and focusing on grammatical accuracy.
The candidate should focus on using a broader range of grammatical structures, including subordinate clauses and conditional sentences, to improve flexibility and control.
The candidate needs to improve punctuation, ensuring that it is accurate and effective in conveying meaning.
The candidate's ability to maintain grammatical control in longer, more complex sentences is limited, and errors often impede understanding. To improve, the candidate should focus on constructing correct and effective sentences, using a broader range of grammatical structures, and improving punctuation.
Overall, the essay's Grammatical Range and Accuracy are limited, with frequent errors impeding understanding and communication. However, with practice and focus on grammatical accuracy, the candidate can improve their skills and achieve a higher band score.
- Grammar and Spelling mistakes
I'm happy to help you with reviewing your essay!
After carefully reading through your essay, I've identified some misspelled words and grammatical errors. Here's a detailed feedback to help you improve your language usage:
Misspelled words:
"deplicts" should be spelled as "depletes" ( Verb: to reduce or exhaust the supply of something)
"cavities" should be replaced with "design flaws" or "built-in obsolescence" in the context of the sentence. While "cavities" is a correctly spelled word, it doesn't fit the intended meaning.
"medicie" should be spelled as "medicine" (Noun: the science or practice of the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of disease)
"Asnd" should be spelled as "And" (Conjunction: used to connect words, phrases, or clauses)
"seeming" should be replaced with "apparent" or "superficial" in the context of the sentence, to convey the intended meaning.
Grammatical errors:
"The products lifecycle currently became rather short" should be rephrased as "The product lifecycle has become increasingly short" to correct the subject-verb agreement and tense consistency.
"Design cavities in the products, can cut costs, generate more sales, contribute higher taxes and bring joy to consumers." is a comma splice. It should be broken into two separate sentences or rephrased using a conjunction to connect the clauses.
"However, such designed flaws contributes to more waste, deplicts resources driving the costs higher in the long run and cause frustration among consumers to be forced spend more and more money" contains a subject-verb agreement error. It should be rephrased as "However, such design flaws contribute to more waste, deplete resources, drive costs higher in the long run, and cause frustration among consumers who are forced to spend more and more money."
"Planned deprication and breakings of various products drives economy to insane growth rates" contains a subject-verb agreement error. It should be rephrased as "Planned obsolescence and the breakage of various products drive the economy to insane growth rates."
"which finally would exhaust all natural resources, which in turn would mean even higher prices for supplies and materials." is a sentence fragment. It should be connected to the previous sentence using a conjunction or rephrased

Task 2 Band Score: 5.0 / 9

Here is the most repeated words in your essay

0
Top 5 Most Repeated Words
0

Recommended Synonyms of the repeated words

More:
Additional
Further
Increased
Consumers:
Buyers
Customers
Patrons
Producers:
Manufacturers
Suppliers
Creators
Higher:
Greater
Increased
Elevated
Taxes:
Levies
Duties
Impositions

Rewriting your essay

Here is a rewritten version of the essay:
The trend of products having a short lifespan has become increasingly prevalent in today's consumerist society. In my opinion, this phenomenon has more disadvantages than advantages for both manufacturers and consumers. While designing products with a limited lifespan can reduce production costs, boost sales, and generate higher taxes, it also leads to significant drawbacks.
On the one hand, this practice contributes to a culture of disposability, resulting in excessive waste and depletion of natural resources. This, in turn, drives up production costs in the long run and causes frustration among consumers, who are forced to spend more money on frequent replacements. Moreover, this approach can tarnish the reputation of manufacturers, who are seen as prioritizing profits over sustainability.
Furthermore, the rapid obsolescence of products fuels an economy driven by growth at all costs, exhausting natural resources and leading to higher prices for raw materials. This cycle of consumption and waste only adds to consumers' anxiety, as they feel pressured to continuously purchase new products to keep up with the latest trends. Ultimately, this approach can damage the brand image of manufacturers and undermine trust between consumers and producers.
While it is true that the constant cycle of consumption can generate higher taxes, which can be used to support vital public services such as healthcare and education, the long-term consequences of this approach far outweigh any short-term benefits. In conclusion, the trend of designing products with a short lifespan is a dangerous practice that has more disadvantages than advantages for both producers and consumers.
Number of Words: 261

If you find this service helpful, you can support my efforts by buying me a coffee. ☕️ ❤️

- 6.5-6.625? (0verall 6.5 for task 1 and task 2)

Writing

6.5

INDICATIVE Writing BAND SCORE AND FEEDBACK

Writing: Task Two

WRITING: TASK TWO - TASK RESPONSE (25%) - 7?

You can support your main ideas with details and examples, although these might be too general and lack focus. All parts of the task are covered.

WRITING: TASK TWO - COHERENCE AND COHESION (25%) - 7?

Your writing is well-organised and leads logically to its conclusion. Every paragraph has one main topic. You can use a variety of linking words, with some over- or under-used.

WRITING: TASK TWO - LEXICAL RESOURCE (25%) - 6?

You have enough vocabulary to answer the question. You try to use some less common words. You make some spelling mistakes, but the reader can still understand.

WRITING: TASK TWO - GRAMMATICAL RANGE AND ACCURACY (25%) - 6-6.5?

You are able to use a variety of complex sentences, and many of your sentences are correct. However you still make a few mistakes with grammar and punctuation.

MARKER FEEDBACK

You make errors with articles (a, an, the)
You make errors with subject/verb agreement
You make errors with prepositions (for, at, on, to)
Make sure you check your spelling
Make sure you extend your response more fully

HOW TO IMPROVE

Practise writing to give information and make arguments. Make sure you cover all the points that need to be covered, providing supporting ideas and details. Reread your work and see if you can make your points clearer. Is the ordering of your ideas logical? Sometimes, rearranging them can make things clearer. You can also try joining up or separating sentences, using the right connecting devices, and changing where you divide your paragraphs. Continue to develop your vocabulary. Words can be similar in meaning but differ in formality, in their tone, and in their implications. Focus on learning the best words to use for the writing task, the situation, and what you want to say. Challenge yourself by producing sentences that are more complex. If you make mistakes with them, don't worry too much; just check and see how you can fix them.

Task 2, Art for society and individuals, Double questions essay - 6

task
Music and other arts seem to be features of every society.
In what ways are music and other arts important for societies and for individuals?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
essay text
Any human culture creates and admires some sort of musical and artistic expressions. Art can help communities to preserve and pass their collective wisdom to new generations, and process collective traumas. As for individuals it can help to understand their emotions and fulfill need for creativity.
Since ancient time art of storytelling through singing and dancing helped to save history of tribes. Music especially well connects with our body and helps to memorise vast knowledge. For instance, dances of several african tribes helped to pass to future generations important peculiarities of animals they hunted as well as, the lifehacks on the hunting process itself. Another major function of music and other types of art is to help reflect on a society's experience and history. Written forms of arts especially helpful in this regard, major soviet dissedent authors helped to reflect on the Soviet era.
Human experience can be hard and arts can help to express various feelings and emotions. Something in the way birds sing their throat out in a mating seasons, people also tend to choose different musical instruments and songs to express their love to one another. Also, arts can help to express deep need in a creative realisation of own thoughts and ideas. I have found myself oftentimes in a desperate need of creating something new in a way that I ideated it. For instance, I've written poetry to have some fun and riddle with words.
In conclusion, art means so much for every single people and various groups. For societies it helps to carry on their collective knowledge, as well as process their experiences. At the same time, individuals can find music and arts helpful for dealing with emotions and expressing their need in creative outlet.
Please wait a few seconds until the evaluation appears

Task Response

Score: 6
Evaluation:
The candidate's response addresses the prompt, discussing the importance of music and other arts for societies and individuals. However, the response lacks depth and clarity in some areas.
The candidate presents a clear position, stating that art helps communities preserve collective wisdom, process collective traumas, and understand emotions. They also provide some relevant examples, such as the role of storytelling in ancient tribes and the expression of emotions through music. However, the supporting ideas and examples are not fully developed, and some paragraphs lack clear connections.
The response could be improved by providing more specific and detailed examples to support the main ideas. Additionally, the candidate could benefit from clearer transitions between paragraphs and more precise language to convey their ideas.
Strengths:
The candidate presents a clear position and attempts to support it with examples.
They provide some relevant examples from their own knowledge or experience.
The response is well-structured and easy to follow.
Areas for improvement:
The candidate could provide more specific and detailed examples to support their main ideas.
They could improve the coherence and cohesion of the response by using clearer transitions between paragraphs.
The language could be more precise and concise to convey the ideas more effectively.
The essay meets the minimum word count of 250 words, but some paragraphs could be expanded to provide more depth and detail.
Overall, the candidate's Task Response is adequate, but it lacks depth and clarity in some areas. With more development and support of main ideas, the response could be more effective in addressing the prompt.

Coherence and Cohesion

Score: 6
Evaluation:
After carefully reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I analyzed the organization of information in the response. The essay attempts to address both parts of the question, discussing the importance of music and other arts for societies and individuals. However, the organization of ideas could be improved. The candidate jumps between different ideas without a clear logical progression, making it difficult to follow at times.
The use of cohesive devices is limited, and there is some repetition of ideas. The candidate uses transitional phrases such as "Also" and "For instance," but they are not used consistently throughout the essay. The paragraphing is not always logical, and some paragraphs seem to lack a clear topic sentence.
The clarity and ease of understanding throughout the response are affected by the organization and cohesion issues. The candidate's message can be followed, but it requires some effort from the reader.
Based on the official IELTS band descriptors, I would give this essay a score of 6 for Coherence and Cohesion. The candidate's organization of information is generally coherent, but there are some lapses in coherence and cohesion. The use of cohesive devices is limited, and the paragraphing is not always effective.
Strengths:
The candidate attempts to address both parts of the question, showing some understanding of the topic.
The essay includes some relevant examples from the candidate's own knowledge or experience, which adds some depth to the discussion.
The candidate's writing is generally clear, and the reader can follow the main ideas.
Areas for improvement:
The candidate needs to work on organizing their ideas more logically and clearly. This could be achieved by creating an outline before writing the essay.
The use of cohesive devices needs to be improved. The candidate could practice using a range of transitional phrases and pronouns to connect ideas more smoothly.
The paragraphing needs to be revised to ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence and that the ideas are logically sequenced.
The response does not strictly adhere to the suggested paragraph structure for Academic Writing Task 2. The introduction is not clear, and the overview statement is missing. The body paragraphs are not well-defined, and the conclusion is not summary-like. This lack of structure affects the overall Coherence and Cohesion of the essay.
Overall, the candidate's Coherence and Cohesion need improvement. The essay lacks a clear logical progression, and the use of cohesive devices is limited. However, with some revision and practice, the candidate can enhance their Coherence and Cohesion and achieve a higher

Lexical Resources

Score: 6
Evaluation:**
After reviewing the essay, I have identified both strengths and weaknesses in the candidate's Lexical Resource.
Range and variety of vocabulary: The candidate has used a range of general words, including some topic-specific items (e.g., "collective wisdom," "traumas," "creative realisation"). However, the vocabulary is not particularly diverse, and there is some repetition of words and phrases.
Accuracy and appropriateness of vocabulary: The candidate has generally used vocabulary accurately and appropriately, although there are some minor errors (e.g., "dissedent" instead of "dissident," "ideated" instead of "conceived"). The word choice is often simple and lacks precision.
Use of less common lexical items: The candidate has not demonstrated a significant ability to use less common lexical items, idiomatic expressions, or subject-specific terminology.
Conveying precise meaning: The candidate has struggled to convey precise meaning through their choice of words and phrases. The language is often vague, and the ideas are not expressed clearly and specifically.
Strengths:
The candidate has used some topic-specific vocabulary, such as "collective wisdom" and "traumas," which shows an attempt to engage with the topic.
The essay contains some simple, yet effective, metaphors (e.g., "something in the way birds sing their throat out in a mating seasons, people also tend to choose different musical instruments and songs to express their love to one another").
The candidate has attempted to use synonyms to avoid repetition, although this is not always successful.
Areas for improvement:
The candidate should work on expanding their vocabulary range to include more precise and nuanced words and phrases.
The candidate needs to improve their ability to use less common lexical items, idiomatic expressions, and subject-specific terminology to enhance the sophistication of their language.
The candidate should focus on conveying precise meaning through their choice of words and phrases, avoiding vagueness and ambiguity.
Paraphrasing and repetition: The candidate has not effectively paraphrased the language from the prompt, and there is some repetition of words and phrases throughout the essay.
Overall assessment: The candidate's Lexical Resource is generally adequate but limited. While they have attempted to engage with the topic and use some topic-specific vocabulary, the

Grammar and Acurracy

Score: 6
Evaluation:
After carefully reviewing the essay prompt and the candidate's response, I have assessed the Grammatical Range and Accuracy of the essay.
The candidate demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but flexibility is limited. There are examples of more complex structures, such as "Since ancient time art of storytelling through singing and dancing helped to save history of tribes" and "Another major function of music and other types of art is to help reflect on a society's experience and history." However, these structures are not consistently accurate, and errors in grammar and punctuation occur.
The candidate's ability to use complex grammatical structures is limited, and there are instances of faulty constructions, such as "Music especially well connects with our body and helps to memorise vast knowledge" and "I have found myself oftentimes in a desperate need of creating something new in a way that I ideated it." These errors may cause some difficulty for the reader.
Despite these limitations, the candidate is able to produce some error-free sentences, and punctuation is generally well-managed. However, grammatical errors are frequent, and some may impede communication.
Strengths:
The candidate attempts to use a variety of sentence structures, including complex ones.
There are some error-free sentences that demonstrate good control over grammar and punctuation.
The candidate is able to convey meaning despite grammatical errors.
Areas for improvement:
The candidate should work on improving the accuracy of complex sentence structures, such as using correct verb tenses and subject-verb agreement.
There is a need to reduce the frequency of grammatical errors, such as incorrect use of prepositions and verb forms.
The candidate should practice using punctuation more effectively, such as using commas to separate clauses and items in lists.
The candidate's ability to maintain grammatical control in longer, more complex sentences is limited, and errors often impede understanding. To improve, the candidate should focus on refining their grammatical skills, particularly in using complex sentence structures accurately and effectively.
Overall, the essay demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures and frequent errors, which impede communication. However, with practice and refinement, the candidate can improve their Grammatical Range and Accuracy to achieve a higher band score.
- Grammar and Spelling mistakes
I've carefully reviewed the essay and identified some grammatical errors and suggestions for improvement. Here's my feedback:
Error 1: Original sentence: "Any human culture creates and admires some sort of musical and artistic expressions." Corrected sentence: "Any human culture creates and admires some sort of musical and artistic expressions." (No grammatical error, but a suggestion for improvement: Consider using a more specific and concise phrase, such as "all human cultures" instead of "any human culture".)
Error 2: Original sentence: "Art can help communities to preserve and pass their collective wisdom to new generations, and process collective traumas." Corrected sentence: "Art can help communities preserve and pass on their collective wisdom to new generations, and process collective traumas." (Error: unnecessary "to" before "preserve".)
Error 3: Original sentence: "As for individuals it can help to understand their emotions and fulfill need for creativity." Corrected sentence: "As for individuals, it can help them understand their emotions and fulfill their need for creativity." (Error: missing comma after "individuals", and "them" instead of "to" for clarity.)
Error 4: Original sentence: "Since ancient time art of storytelling through singing and dancing helped to save history of tribes." Corrected sentence: "Since ancient times, the art of storytelling through singing and dancing has helped to save the history of tribes." (Error: "time" should be "times", and "has helped" instead of "helped" for verb tense consistency.)
Error 5: Original sentence: "Music especially well connects with our body and helps to memorise vast knowledge." Corrected sentence: "Music, especially, connects well with our bodies and helps us memorize vast knowledge." (Error: comma placement, and "bodies" instead of "body" for subject-verb agreement.)
Error 6: Original sentence: "For instance, dances of several african tribes helped to pass to future generations important peculiarities of animals they hunted as well as, the lifehacks on the hunting process itself." Corrected sentence: "For instance, the dances of several African tribes helped pass on important peculiarities of animals they hunted, as well as lifehacks on the hunting process itself." (Error: capitalization of "African", comma placement, and unnecessary "to" before "future generations".)
Error 7: Original sentence: "Another major function of

Task 2 Band Score: 6.0 / 9

Here is the most repeated words in your essay

image.jpeg failed to upload
Top 5 Most Repeated Words
image.png failed to upload

Recommended Synonyms of the repeated words

Help:
Assist
Support
Aid
Art:
Creativity
Culture
Imagery
Need:
Requirement
Desire
Craving
Arts:
Creative expressions
Cultural heritage
Aesthetic pursuits
Collective:
Shared
Unified
Communal

Rewriting your essay

Here is a rewritten version of the essay:
Music and other arts are integral components of every culture, playing a vital role in preserving collective wisdom, processing collective traumas, and fulfilling individuals' emotional and creative needs. Throughout history, artistic expressions have helped societies pass down their heritage to future generations.
For instance, the ancient art of storytelling through singing and dancing has been instrumental in preserving the history of tribes. Music, in particular, has a unique ability to connect with our bodies, making it an effective tool for memorizing vast amounts of knowledge. For example, traditional dances in African tribes have helped pass down crucial information about the animals they hunted, as well as valuable life hacks for the hunting process. Furthermore, written forms of art have enabled societies to reflect on their experiences and history, as seen in the works of prominent Soviet dissident authors who reflected on the Soviet era.
On an individual level, arts provide an outlet for expressing complex emotions and fulfilling the need for creative realization. Just as birds sing to express their feelings, humans use various musical instruments and songs to convey their emotions, particularly in romantic relationships. I, too, have found solace in creative expression, often turning to poetry to have fun and experiment with words. By engaging in creative activities, individuals can channel their thoughts and emotions into something tangible.
In conclusion, music and arts are essential for societies, enabling them to preserve collective knowledge and process experiences. On an individual level, they provide a valuable means of emotional expression and creative fulfillment. As a universal language, arts have the power to transcend cultural boundaries, speaking directly to our hearts and minds.
Number of Words: 280

If you find this service helpful, you can support my efforts by buying me a coffee. ☕️ ❤️

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.