Skip to content
My ecomasters dashboard
Deutsch
How I study
AuDHD & Co
Career
Erasmus Traineership Dec'26-Feb'27 https://www.sverkerastromfoundation.se/
Grading + Studying
Lectures AFECO
Holistic life
For FUN
AI Prompts for studying
My ecomasters dashboard
Organization stuff Uni
utility-concepts-table
DEMED Sustainable Trade Law
Nuanced thinking
Bookmarks
Михаил Ефимович Николаев
Share
Explore

Final inspection

Summary The meeting focused on providing feedback and grades for a group's academic work, including a handout, interview guide, presentation, and report. • The group received an overall grade of 1.7. • The presentation received a 1.0, while the interview guide received a 2.0. • Feedback was given on the interview guide, suggesting simpler phrasing for questions. • The report's strengths included the literature review and coding process explanation. • Areas for improvement in the report included the discussion section and avoiding direct quotes. • The group's overall red line and differentiation of sections in the report were praised.
⁠
Meeting recording 23
Recording
Show speakers 00:00
It's only you?
Show speakers 00:02
because nobody reacted.
Show speakers 00:04
So I don't think that either time is not like right for them or what.
Show speakers 00:10
But Max wanted to?
Show speakers 00:12
Yeah, he was here an hour ago.
Show speakers 00:14
But he didn't like answer to any messages like before that.
Show speakers 00:18
Oh, okay.
Show speakers 00:18
I mean, excuse me.
Show speakers 00:20
Yeah.
Show speakers 00:20
So I don't think that he's fine.
Show speakers 00:23
Thank you also for your e-mail.
Show speakers 00:24
I haven't replied yet.
Show speakers 00:26
Thank you.
Show speakers 00:27
Okay.
Show speakers 00:27
Thank you.
Show speakers 00:31
Yeah, maybe we can start.
Show speakers 00:36
So overall that the grade consists of the handout 10%, handout the interview guide, and is it 10% interview guide?
Show speakers 00:50
Yeah, and then the presentation 20.
Show speakers 00:53
Sixty percent was the report, and so, overall, I think all of you have a really good grade.
Show speakers 01:03
We've had a 1.7, yeah, and we also have, I'm so sorry for being late.
Show speakers 01:09
I thought you won't come.
Show speakers 01:11
Yes, of course.
Show speakers 01:13
Yeah, so we just summarized like the grade consists of the interview of the literature with your handout, the interview guide.
Show speakers 01:21
Both 10%, the final presentation was 20%, and the report was 60%.
Show speakers 01:26
You did really well.
Show speakers 01:29
You had a 1.7 in Hogo, I believe, right?
Show speakers 01:32
Yeah.
Show speakers 01:32
Why not 1.0?
Show speakers 01:35
The best question.
Show speakers 01:38
So you had 1.0 for the presentation, but the other part not.
Show speakers 01:44
We have some small things you could improve.
Show speakers 01:47
So yeah, for so let's start with the interview.
Show speakers 01:51
I just need to make sure I give you the feedback for the right group.
Show speakers 01:54
We are #9.
Show speakers 01:56
We are #9.
Show speakers 01:57
Yeah, so I have the interview guide here.
Show speakers 02:01
So I wrote down, yeah, just...
Show speakers 02:08
A very small thing.
Show speakers 02:09
So all of this was done really well.
Show speakers 02:11
We really liked the demographic question, how you phrased it, and the icebreaker questions was really nice.
Show speakers 02:16
And just like a small comment, like this is not included, but like it is conducted by researchers at the University of Bonn.
Show speakers 02:24
So you guys were the researchers.
Show speakers 02:26
So you were the researchers, right?
Show speakers 02:29
Just like as a small comment.
Show speakers 02:30
Like this is something, if you talk to someone,
Show speakers 02:33
If you talk to the participant.
Show speakers 02:35
By us.
Show speakers 02:36
Yeah.
Show speakers 02:37
So we are the researchers.
Show speakers 02:39
So researchers are like the third party.
Show speakers 02:42
So for example, if you're doing quantitative study and you write that in the beginning, this study is conducted by researchers of the university of 1, then it makes sense because you're not in direct exchange with the interviewees.
Show speakers 02:55
Okay, I did the quantitative one before and therefore in my head race made sense, but yeah, if I'm in direct contact with the person, something...
Show speakers 03:03
Because then they don't know, you are in this role, you are the researcher, right?
Show speakers 03:08
Like, yeah, no need to talk in like third parties here.
Show speakers 03:13
Yeah, in general, we think you phrased the questions well, the topics and the subtopics were really well developed.
Show speakers 03:24
And then also this is also some feedback we gave to several others.
Show speakers 03:30
So some questions were maybe like a bit like complicatedly formulated.
Show speakers 03:35
So how do you perceive the ability of you and your flatmates to monitor food edibility in your fridge?
Show speakers 03:40
And so one thing is to phrase a really concise research question, but if you talk to people who have no background in agricultural or food or economics,
Show speakers 03:51
And people might be thrown off a bit, or if you also had problems with understanding the question, so good, then you actually experience it, because they're like, What do you actually mean?
Show speakers 04:03
So, one thing is to have a more abstract research question, but then have really tangible questions that tackle this research question, but have them formulated in a...
Show speakers 04:13
Easy way.
Show speakers 04:14
So, for example, and subsequent questions, like the follow-up question was also like complicated.
Show speakers 04:19
How do you perceive the usefulness and efficiency of the system?
Show speakers 04:22
What system?
Show speakers 04:23
How you organize the French?
Show speakers 04:25
Like, you can really, you know, like formulate this in a more tangible, easy way.
Show speakers 04:30
So, for example, here, what kind of food, like I just...
Show speakers 04:34
formulate this as an example.
Show speakers 04:36
What kind of food is considered in your experience not edible anymore?
Show speakers 04:39
You could just write maybe like, how do you, what did I write?
Show speakers 04:44
How do you decide when food is no longer safe to eat?
Show speakers 04:48
Like really try to formulate it understandable.
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.