Q3

icon picker
8/7/2023

Monday - 10:30 CT - 11:30 CT

info

Meeting Date:
8/7/2023

Attendees:
@Christa A. Stephens
,
@Trevor J. Glisch
,
@Daniel T. Anderson
,
@Michelle Helmholz
,
@Todd R. Chamberlain
Action Items 18
Done
Task
Owner
Due date
Created Date
1
Update TechJays Vendor AGR to reflect changes
Michelle Helmholz
8/9/2023
8/7/2023
2
Follow-up with Aloa’s issues in Repo access
Trevor J. Glisch
8/10/2023
8/7/2023
No results from filter

Agenda

Announcements & Reminders
KnowBe4 Training: Due 8/22
TechJays update: Terminating Kowsik at end of August & rolling Suganya into Maintenance Agreement; Dawei sent for review today
Aloa access to Repo for code reviews
image.png
Priority Changes / Escalations
Inventory to Equipment Issues
Discussion topics
Update on FW phase-out
Make a decision at the end of the Sprint — Add to August 21 agenda
Team Charters (share progress/discuss communication plan)
Experience, Data, and Software Team Charters by November 10th
Q2 CSAT Review & updates ()
Scheduling a follow-up for Thursday
Standards Documentation (Do we need any more on how to create/implement standards)
Are we building an iterative model in how we work?
Design > Dev Handoffs process is critical but concerns are silo-ing ourselves and ultimately creating noise/re-work
Our ability to make aligned tweaks while in the development process
How do we get far enough to start dev but have practices that allow for design/dev/data to make tweaks to structures, designs, apis
^ but also, how do we prevent the scope from changing/expanding so much that we never “complete” the work?
How can we do a better job of clearly defining the scope earlier in the process?
Sprint Backlog & Graveyard Boards in Asana
There is a LOT of work that has been on our radar & dropped off over the last few months. We need to review and make sure nothing critical is falling through the cracks. Also, determine a path forward for managing backlog.
Two kinds of backlog items - what we’ve agreed to do, but don’t have time for right now, and what we haven’t even agreed to do, yet. Should these be managed the same way, or differently?
This brings up a good point on “How much is too much” for our workload. Until we scale back on commitments we wont ever get to backlog items.
Application-based roadmaps ()
flow example
Management Fee Update
Go over what has been communicated to BU Leaders
Impact to the team & discuss options for rollout plan
Figma Dev Mode
Any additional feedback/thoughts after Kaitlyn’s demo on Thursday?
Follow-up from Trevor’s Standards Meeting
1Password Updates
image.png
Project Executing Strategy
Project Owner
Status updates expectations
Dev Lead
Design Lead
Data Lead
Bill Quality User Stories
Bill Quality Views

Process Changes Action Items
Christa is reformatting BU Coda Docs to be centered around Applications (instead of Project Phases)
Trevor is working on BR > Footprint Roadmap
Dan is going to outline expectations for a Data Lead Role that is assigned on an Epic
Other Open Action Items List 16
Done
Task
Owner
Due date
1
ETS Bulk Added > Touchbase with Brandon on expected time frame
Trevor J. Glisch
12/18/2023
2
Front-end: Temp to perm(?)
Trevor J. Glisch
3
4
Service Picks > Attach any Vendor after it has been submitted
Michelle Helmholz
No results from filter

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.