Explore

Pragmatism in Business Problem Solving

⁠

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/a3a85570-32fc-4c7a-9fb0-3a9241149a0a?preview=1⁠

⁠

Current cards:

Pragmatic Decision Making (Topic)

Pragmatic Problem Solving (Topic)

Pragmatic Solutions (Story)

Here you’re basically doing C → L link: from clarifying problems to choosing where to Leverage (PAERTO, Problem & Impact). Research helps in three ways.

1. Pragmatic Decision Making (Topic)

Ground this in the decision‑making research:

Mintzberg / Cynefin:

Use Cynefin to distinguish Clear, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic problems; pragmatic = matching the decision style to the domain.

Show that SMEs often mis‑label Complex as Clear (over‑simplify), or Clear as Complex (over‑complicate).

Effectuation vs causation in SME strategic decisions:

Research on SMEs shows effectual logic dominates many contexts, but absence of strategy is also common.

Pragmatic decision making = knowing when to use effectual “means‑based” thinking and when to switch to more causal, planned choices.

2. Pragmatic Problem Solving (Topic)

This is where you start to prime Problem & Impact and PAERTO:

Use the root cause clusters from the deep research as examples of real problems:

Diagnosis failure, tacit knowledge loss, abandonment deficit, feedback absence, founder bottleneck, financial opacity.

Link to your monsters:

Hydra = solving symptoms, not root causes.

Chameleon = invisible problems through bad metrics.

Research hook: many strategy “failures” are actually execution and feedback failures; pragmatic problem solving focuses on fixing system causes, not just one‑off events.

3. Pragmatic Solutions (Story)

Use this card to showcase how high‑performing SMEs actually behave, based on the evidence:

From Bridges/SMU and execution research:

Focus on five objectives max; use 90‑day cycles; build review rhythms; maintain “to stop” lists.

From burnout and founder‑time data:

Highlight solutions that protect founder strategic time (simpler portfolio, better delegation, tighter feedback loops).

From OECD scalers:

Show that pragmatic solutions are not big transformations but a series of small, disciplined changes tied to a clear direction.

This card should feel like “this is what it looks like when all the thinking you’ve done in C starts to turn into leverage.”

⁠

If you want, next step could be: pick one card in Column 2 (e.g. “Simplifying Business Models” or “Statistics on Business Model Simplification”) and I can draft a short, research‑backed paragraph + 2–3 diagnostic questions you can paste into your scaffold. Which card would be most helpful to tackle first?

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.

Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (

CtrlP

) instead.