TE: Again, I see it as an act of being creative, you know… pushing the limits of the system. I
suppose all of us, citizens, should be doing that all the time. We do that, I suppose, with
regard to the government – we try to keep them in check… because we want the system to
function better, right? I do believe that if a system is strong, [it] can do with any kind of
challenge, so it’s our responsibility as citizens to continue to challenge the systems… to help
them improve. So, if there’s a system in place, I would always welcome people who
PST1: If you pressure something too much, you’ll break it. […] There’s a difference between
non-conformism and creativity. Those two things are not synonymous.
TE: They don’t have to be.
PST1: Just in this context… this is more non-conformism to me.
TE: Yeah, but again… what can you [possibly] do to this system… There is this no-phone
policy, OK? A student is challenging it. Can it crush the policy? I don’t think it can do anything
to the policy, but it’s a statement. It questions the […] system. […]
PST1 [scoffing]: Does education need this kind of challenge?
TE: Of course! It’s a sign of life: you’re not a robot, doing whatever the system tells you. You
question the system, you push the limits, you say that you don’t agree with the system.
PST4: It’s a sign that students are bored!
TE: And it should be possible [to push the limits in the classroom].
PST1: What do we [teachers] do with it [such contributions]?