Skip to content

Survey Summary

Number of participants: 120 responses
Date: August 23, 2024
Participants: Calgary UX members, also shared in LinkedIn and other channels.

Participant roles

Forms response chart. Question title: What is your current role?. Number of responses: 118 responses.
Nearly half of the respondents (48.3%) are currently working UX professionals, highlighting a strong presence of active practitioners within the UX field. Additionally, a significant portion (26.3%) of the participants are seeking their next opportunity in UX, suggesting a substantial number of individuals in transition, either between jobs or exploring new career paths within the industry. Students comprise 9.3% of the respondents, reflecting a smaller yet notable group preparing to enter the workforce.

Key Conference Factors

Forms response chart. Question title: How important are the following factors in your decision to attend a UX Design Conference?
. Number of responses: .
Workshops, hands-on sessions, and networking opportunities are the most critical factors in attendees' decisions to participate in a UX design conference. Keynote speakers, the cost of attendance, and the location of the conference are also important considerations but to a slightly lesser degree. The length of the conference and the quality of the venue, while still relevant, are not as pivotal in the decision-making process.
For conference organizers, this data underscores the importance of offering engaging, interactive content and ample networking opportunities, while also considering affordability and logistical convenience to ensure a successful event.

Top topics

Forms response chart. Question title: What topics would you like to see covered at the conference? (Select all that apply)
. Number of responses: 119 responses.
The survey results reveal that the most relevant topics for the conference are:
"Emerging Trends in UX" (73.1%), indicating a strong desire among respondents to stay informed about the latest industry developments.
"AI & Design" (70.6%), reflecting interest in integrating artificial intelligence into design.
"Design Thinking" (68.9%), underscoring the importance of this foundational methodology in DT.
Career development (67.2%)
Application of UX across different industries (67.2%)
UX Research Methods" (61.3%)
Tools and Software for UX Design" (47.1%)

All the rest of the topics with 0.8% were options entered by survey participants.

Conference Ticket

Forms response chart. Question title: 4. How much are you willing to pay for a full 1-day UX Design Conference?
. Number of responses: 118 responses.
The majority of respondents (39%) are willing to pay between $20 and $40 for a full 1-day UX design conference.
The next largest group, 32.2%, is willing to pay between $41 and $60, indicating a moderate increase in price tolerance. A smaller portion of participants, 12.7%, is comfortable with paying $61 to $80, while even fewer are willing to pay between $81 and $100.
The remaining respondents either prefer lower price points. This suggests a wide range of budget sensitivities among potential attendees, with a significant preference for lower to mid-range pricing.

Most attractive additional features

Forms response chart. Question title: 5. What additional features would make you more likely to attend the conference? (Select all that apply)
. Number of responses: 114 responses.
"Early Bird Discounts" are the most compelling feature to increase conference attendance, with 79.8% (91 respondents) selecting this option. "Networking Lunches or Dinners" are also highly valued, with 63.2% (72 respondents) considering them an attractive addition. "Conference Swag" and "Continuing Education Promotions" are moderately appealing, selected by 41.2% (47 respondents) and 36.8% (42 respondents), respectively. Other features like a "Digital Gift Bag" (26.3%) and "Group Discounts" (21.1%) were less influential, while options like "Mentorship Swag" and career development credits were selected by only 0.9% of respondents, indicating minimal impact on attendance decisions.

Summary of Suggestions

Recommended speakers by mentions:

Neo Financial team (4 mentions)
J5 (3 mentions)
Helcim (3 mentions)
Critical Mass (2 mentions)
Tiller Digital Team (2 mentions)
City of Calgary UX team (2 mentions)
Public Eye (2 mentions)
Public Eye (Marc Husted & Morgan Curley)
Benevity (2 mentions)
Clio (1 mention)
Evans Hunt (1 mention)

Recommended speakers by Category:

Companies and Teams:
Critical Mass (2 mentions)
J5 (3 mentions including "J5 design," "J5 team")
Tiller Digital Team (2 mentions, including a specific interest in hearing from the founder)
Clio
Neo Financial team (4 mentions, including individuals and teams)
City of Calgary UX team (2 mentions)
Public Eye (Marc Husted & Morgan Curley, 2 mentions)
Helcim (3 mentions)
Evans Hunt
W21C
Benevity (Product/UX designers/Design teams specifically, 2 mentions)
Individuals:
Sandra Murillo Paz, UX Manager - Nutrien
Margo from InceptionU
Jake Janosik (Neo Financial)
Max Hurd
Julieta Fajardo
Vincent Dansereau
Thomas Alvarez (Chief Product Officer at Goodlayer)
Rodolfo Casagrande (Head of Design at Helcim)
Victor Montalvao
Marcio Bomfim
Preet Singh
Paul Lapkin
Chris Do
Paula Deschamps and Luis Berumen
YouTubers/Online Personalities:
Bring Your Own Laptop (YouTuber)
Interests in Non-Calgary Companies:
Designers from Stripe, Shopify, or Wealthsimple, particularly those working remotely.
General interest in designers succeeding in non-Calgary companies but located in Calgary.
Other Notes:
Interest in learning more about Service Design teams in Calgary.
Any speaker deemed suitable for the event.
Specific interest in hearing perspectives from Tiller Digital's founder on running a successful design business.


Feedback and open suggestions:

Interest in Online Participation:
Multiple respondents expressed a desire for an online streaming option for the event.
Support and Excitement:
There is enthusiasm for the event, with some individuals from outside Calgary, particularly Edmonton, expressing willingness to attend or help with the organization.
Participants are interested in building a UX community that can share and grow together, especially in the context of remote work.
Considerations for Non-Calgary Participants:
Suggestions were made to consider special accommodations or lower rates for attendees from outside Calgary, such as those from Edmonton.
Learning and Collaboration:
Some participants are keen to learn about different design processes, team collaboration, and to hear about challenges and solutions from other designers.
There is also interest in mentor-mentee relationships and learning about the roots and future of UX as a holistic, multi-disciplinary profession.
Local and Global Networking:
Newcomers to Calgary are eager to extend their networking and participate in local events.
There is a suggestion to promote the conference through local Calgary media.
Sustainability Concerns:
A zero-waste approach was suggested, with a focus on reducing unnecessary waste, especially related to swag and event meals.
Event Content and Format:
While AI is a hot topic, some participants feel it has been overemphasized and would prefer a broader range of topics.
Quick, quirky workshops, and smaller group sessions for networking are appreciated and suggested as effective formats for the event.
General Offers to Help:
Several respondents expressed a willingness to be involved in the planning, implementation, or moderation of the event.
Gratitude:
Multiple participants thanked the organizers and expressed appreciation for the efforts being made to host the event.
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.