Skip to content
Gallery
Evaluator OS 2024
Home: One Stop Shop for Evaluators
All IOM evaluation Budget
Categories
Activity Detail
Date Controls
Nav Bar
Template Evaluation Matrix
Share
Explore

Template Evaluation Matrix

Template Evaluation Matrix
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
Column 4
Column 5
Column 6
Column 7
Column 8
Column 9
Column 10
Column 11
Column 12
Column 13
Column 14
Column 15
Column 16
Column 17
1
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
1. Relevance: Is the intervention doing the right things?
2
1.1. Are the activities and products of the project compatible with the desired outcomes and objective?
· Are the objectives and outcomes of the project well supported by the indicators? · Is there any gap or issue in the logical framework?
· Quality and alignment of the indicators to support the objectives and outcomes. · All of the results can be measured through SMART/gender-sensitive indicators.
X
X
3
1.2. Does the project still meet the needs of the beneficiaries of the project?
·       What were the needs of the beneficiaries at the onset of the project? · Did the context/needs evolve over time? · Did the project adjust to meet the needs?
· Quality of the initial needs’ assessment. ·       Capacity of the project to adequately adjust to meet the needs of beneficiaires, as reflected in needs analysis, changes in activities, targets, tools, approaches.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4
1.3.    Does the project align with and contribute to national strategies?
·       Which national strategies and prioritiesdoes the project address or align with? · Did the project contribute to changes in this area?
· National strategies and priorities related to the project’s thematic are well known. · Examples of the way the project influenced or contributed to strategies.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
5
1.4.    To what extent have the benefits been adapted to local needs?
·       How was the project adapted to local needs? · Does the project has a regional focus?
· Examples of the ways local needs were considered for project adaption (ex. GoN needs; needs of VoTs; awareness).
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
6
1.5. To what extent have local stakeholders/beneficiaries been consulted and involved in the implementation to improve ownership, accountability, efficiency?
· What are the mechanisms in place to foster participation/consultations? · How was the project adapted based on the feedback received from partners and beneficiaries in Niger? · Did the stakeholders and beneficiaries feel involved in the project’s implementation?
· Participation and consultation were well integrated as part of the project life cycle. ·       Examples of ways participation improved ownership, accountability, and efficiency (ex. active contributions to the NRM). · Extent to which the stakeholders and beneficiaries felt involved in the project.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
7
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
2. Coherence: How well does the intervention fit?
8
2.1.     To what extent does the project create synergies and links between other interventions implemented by IOM in the same thematic area?
·       This project builds on a previous project implemented by IOM (2010-2015). How complementary are these two projects? · Are there other similar projects within IOM Niger? If so, how does IOM ensure projects’ complementarity? · Are there other, similar projects in the region? If so, did the teams exchange on shared challenges, lessons learned, etc.?
· Examples of synergies between projects and incremental changes over time (e.g. similar results; use of lessons learned, etc.) · Coordination and communications mechanisms are in place to manage similar projects and avoid overlaps. · Discussions took place with the RO and other COs to share experiences, learnings.
X
X
X
X
9
2.2.     To what extent are the interventions aligned with SDG target 10.7, the GCM and other relevant human rights treaties?
·       Which SDG and GCM Objectives are most relevant in the framework of this project? · How does the project support these? · How does the project incorporate human rights considerations into interventions?
· References to relevant SDGs, GCM or human rights treaties in documents. · Existence of guidance and protocols to uphold the human rights of beneficiaries? · Integration of gender-sensitive approach.
X
X
X
X
10
2.3.     To what extent does the project create synergies and linkages between government and the donor community interventions in the same thematic area?
·       How was the project coordinated with other non-IOM projects conducted within the same thematic area? · What were the outcomes of these synergies and links?
· Extent to which the PMU is aware services in Niger (e.g. complementarity with shelters operated by the (DRPF/PE)). · Existence of coordination/information-sharing mechanisms with GoN and CSOs involved in the same thematic area. ·       Examples of synergies created to improve the outcomes of all the interventions.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X[BP1]
There are no rows in this table
⁠
Template Evlauation Matrix
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
Column 4
Column 5
Column 6
Column 7
Column 8
Column 9
Column 10
Column 11
Column 12
Column 13
Column 14
Column 15
Column 16
Column 17
Column 18
Column 19
Column 20
Column 21
Column 22
Column 23
1
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
3. Effectiveness: Is the intervention achieving its objectives?
2
3.1.    Were the outputs and outcomes of the project achieved in accordance with established plans?
· What are the project results? · If changes were made to the targets over the course of the project, explain why? ·       How do the outputs contribute to the achievement of the outcomes/objectives?
·       Extent to which the targets were reached within the timelines scheduled. · Changes made to the targets were discussed and agreed with the donor.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
3
3.2.    Are the targeted beneficiaries satisfied with the services provided?
·       Are VoTs satisfied with the assistance provided under outcome 1 (see Annex 6) · Are the rep. of governmental institutions satisfied with the activities conducted under outcome 2 (see Annex 6)? · Are key informants from communities satisfied with the activities conducted under outcome 3 (see Annex 6)?
· General satisfaction of beneficiaries (quantitative and qualitative feedback, incl. suggestions, lessons learned, etc.) · Existence of monitoring reports, qualitative interviews with beneficiaries.
X
X
X
4
3.3. What are the main factors influencing the achievement of the expected results of the project?
· What factors impacted the implementation of this project the most? · How did these factors influence the course of the project? To what extent?
· Understanding of the project contexts and risks, reflected in reports and interviews. · Diversity of the factors enumerated (e.g. internal, external).
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
5
3.4. To what extent has the project adapted or can it adapt to the changing external situation to ensure that direct effects are met?
·       Were the initial assumptions appropriate? · What was learned during the implementation of the project? · How did the project change or adapt?
· Assumptions helped navigate changes. · Coordination and reporting mechanisms allow for discussions on changes. · Extent to which the changes contributed to achieve results or mitigate risks.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
6
3.5.    Have the expected results in the project document had unintended positive effects?
·       Are there positive outcomes of the project activities outside of what is measured through the logframe? · How can these positive outcomes be amplified or maintained?
·       Ability of the project to positively impact sector/stakeholders/issue beyond the activities directly implemented.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
7
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
4. Efficiency: How well are resources being used?
8
4.1.    Did the project implementation strategy demonstrate increased efficiency compared to other implementation strategies?
·       Do you think the project team structure and way of working contributed to the efficient management of the project? ·       When and how were monitoring and evaluation activities carried out? · With regards to the project’s implementation strategy, what was key for its success? What did not work well?
· Use of standard project management tools and coordination mechanisms. · Examples of ways the M&E informs decisions and implementation. · AAP was discussed and incorporated. ·       Examples of ways in which the project’s implementation strategy was successful.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
9
4.2.    To what extent have resources (funds, technical skills and time) been converted into results?
·       Were the project objectives reached out with the budget, staff and time initially dedicated to the project? If not, why? · Did the project require a cost or non-cost extension? If so, why? · Did the project require a budget reallocation? If so, why?
· Cost-benefit analysis of the results. · Extent of the financial monitoring done as part of the project life cycle. ·       Extent of the budgetary changes requested, and quality of the justifications provided.
X
X
X
X
X
10
4.3.    To what extent were activities carried out as planned?
·       Was the project implemented as per the initial workplan? If not, why?
· Ability of the PMU to anticipate problems and delays to reduce impact on project. · Use of standard project management tools and coordination mechanisms.
X
X
X
X
X
11
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
5. Impact: What difference does the intervention make?
12
5.1.    What are the positive / negative and intended / unintended effects of the project?
·       What change do you observe after the project implementation in terms of identification, protection, assistance to VoTs and awareness of trafficking? · Do you observe other positive or negative unexpected changes after the project implementation?
· Evidence of increased access to protection and assistance for VoTs (studies). · Evidence of increased prosecution and awareness of trafficking (studies). ·       Impacts listed by KIIs and reports (positive/negative, intended/unintended).
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
13
5.2.    Were timely measures taken mitigate unintended negative effects?
·       Is there a risks matrix for this project? What was done to mitigate internal and external risks throughout the project?
· Extent of the mitigation and risks management efforts made to ensure achievement of outputs/outcomes.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
14
5.3.    Does the impact come from project activities, external factors, or both?
·       Do you feel the project will have a lasting impact on the fight against trafficking and the protection of VoTs in Niger? Explain. · What other projects or developments have contributed to these changes?
· External sources discussing the impact and contribution of this project/other projects. · Satisfaction of beneficiaries and partners with regards to the results of the project. · Extent to which stakeholders feel the project will have a lasting impact in Niger
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
15
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
6. Sustainability: Will the benefits last?
16
6.1.    Will the benefits of the project continue after the end of the project?
·       How did you ensure that results will last? · What are the most critical elements for the project’s outcomes to last? · Is there a need for a next project? If so, has it been discussed (ex. funding).
· Project reports and mechanisms define how the activities will be continued. ·       Existence of formalized, functioning mechanisms for partners to continue to support the objectives of the project.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
17
6.2. Is the project supported by local institutions and integrated into local social and cultural structures?
· How did the project foster the involvement of local institutions or CSOs in support of the project’s objectives? · With regards to awareness raising, did the project build on existing structures, and was continuation discussed?
· Level of institutionalization of the committees/networks involved in project (e.g. nb. of meetings, reports, activities).
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
18
6.3.    Do the project partners have sufficient capacity (technical, financial, managerial) to continue to provide the benefits / services of the project?
·       Do the partners feel prepared and equipped to continue to support these objectives after the end of the project? · Did the institutional partners earmark resources to continue the activities? If so, what will continue? What might stop?
·       Level of resources and preparation of the partners responsible to pursue activities. · Value of the staff and resources earmarked to maintain assistance beyond the project.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X[BP2]
There are no rows in this table
⁠
⁠
⁠
[1]
⁠
Authorities include relevant governmental stakeholders (e.g. with mandates related to the thematic area of the project) that did not directly benefit from the project.
⁠
[2]
⁠
Partners include any organisation that has been involved in the project, including as an implementation partner and beneficiary of trainings/capacity-building (e.g. Objectives 1 and 2).
⁠
[3]
⁠
Beneficiaries include victims of trafficking assisted by the project (e.g. objective 1), as well as community partners who were reached though sensitization activities (e.g. Objective 3).
⁠
⁠
⁠
⁠
[BP1]
⁠
Mijenjati u odnosu na nas TOR, nas Proposal i sve detalje
⁠
⁠
⁠
[BP2]
⁠
Mijenjati u odnosu na nas TOR, nas Proposal i sve detalje
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.