JavaScript required
We’re sorry, but Coda doesn’t work properly without JavaScript enabled.
Skip to content
Rams Kitchen - Research
From available published research
Risks, Effects & Mitigations
Limitations and Boundaries
Considerations
Users
Batching Heuristics
More
Share
Explore
Limitations and Boundaries
1. Technology & Infrastructure
Web-only app
: Employees must have access to a device + internet → excludes those without.
No hardware integration
: Kitchen doesn’t have smart printers/kiosks → Ram has to manage via a laptop/tablet.
Limited automation
: System groups orders but doesn’t physically automate cooking.
2. Human Factors
Learning curve for Ram
: He’s used to manual order-taking; shifting to a digital dashboard requires training.
Employee adoption
: Some employees may resist using the app (habitual to direct verbal orders).
Fallback needed
: If an employee forgets to pre-order, Ram must still accept walk-ins, causing hybrid workflow.
3. Operational Constraints
Peak time crunch
: Even with batching, cooking time is finite → software can optimize, but not eliminate delays.
Customization overload
: Too many customization combinations may complicate UI & overwhelm Ram.
Payment handling
: Digital payments assumed, but if internet fails, UPI/card might fail → manual fallback needed.
4. Business Limitations
Scale mismatch
: System works for 300 employees; may not scale efficiently if company doubles to 600+ without upgrades.
Cost sensitivity
: Ram may not want to invest in costly hardware/software → must stay lightweight.
No delivery model
: Only supports on-site pickup, no delivery to desks.
5. UX & Design Constraints
Small-screen usability
: Ram may use a tablet or small laptop → dashboard must be optimized for medium screens, not just widescreen.
Clutter risk
: Too many orders in queue can overwhelm UI if not well-grouped.
Real-time sync
: If updates lag (network issues), employees may see inaccurate statuses.
6. Edge Cases
Overdue handling
: If Ram misses marking orders as Ready, employees may not get notified on time.
Payment failures
: Order marked as placed but payment not received → creates reconciliation issues.
Walk-in chaos
: Employees who don’t use the app still add strain → hybrid system isn’t 100% clean.
📱 Device Context & Usage Scenarios – Ram’s Kitchen
1. Employees (Ordering)
Likely Device:
Personal smartphones (Android/iOS).
Reason:
Work laptops may have firewall restrictions → external web apps blocked. Phones are always available, faster for casual actions.
Implication for Design:
Ordering flow must be
mobile-first
(responsive, touch-friendly UI).
Minimal text entry (use
taps, dropdowns, radio buttons
for customization).
Keep payment flow simple → UPI integration, mobile wallets.
Push
mobile notifications
(or WhatsApp/SMS fallback) for “Order Ready” alerts.
2. Ram (Dashboard)
Likely Device:
Tablet or Laptop.
Reason:
Needs
wider view
to scan multiple orders, batch cooking stats, and status management. Phones would feel cramped.
Implication for Design:
Dashboard designed for
larger screen real estate
.
Table-based layout
(orders in rows/columns).
Side panel for Batch Cooking, bottom bar for Stats → easier on widescreen.
Clear
touch-friendly buttons
if Ram prefers a tablet in the kitchen.
3. Ram’s Helper/Employee (Optional Role)
Likely Device:
Mid-range smartphone.
Role:
Assist with marking orders as
Ready
, managing handovers, logging walk-ins.
Implication for Design:
Provide a
“Lightweight Companion App”
or
mobile-friendly dashboard
.
Limited functions: view current orders, mark as ready, log manual walk-ins.
Keep UI
super simple
→ large buttons, minimal data shown.
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
Ctrl
P
) instead.