using the documents and outside evidence to explain different perspectives
Thesis (1pt)
Responds to the prompt with a historically defensible claim that establishes a line of reasoning.
make a claim that responds to the prompt (does not rephrase/restate)
located in one place (such as introduction or conclusion)
must be specific
Despite [counterargument], because of [evidence 1 and 2], [argument].
Contextualization (1pt)
Describes a broader historical context relevant to the prompt.
historical events, developments, or processes
occuring before, during, or continuing after the time frame
immediate history
specific circumstances of time and place
broader regional, national, or global
4-5 sentences
2-3 vocabulary words (define and connect)
Evidence (3pt)
Supports an argument in response to the prompt using at least four documents.
describe
do not quote
use content to support an argument
connect the evidence to the argument
use the grouped documents
create topic sentences for each part
Extra point:
Uses at least one additional piece of specific historical evidence (beyond that found in the documents) relevant to the argument in response to the prompt.
describe the evidence
more than a phrase or reference
different from the evidence used for contextualization
name it, explain it, connect it
does not need to be in the same time period
Analysis and reasoning (2pt)
For at least two documents, explains how or why the document’s point of view, purpose, historical situation, and/or audience is relevant to an argument.
historical situation (where it sits in larger historical context)
intended audience (for whom the documents was produced)
purpose (what the document was intended to do)
point of view (what they say, why they say it)
Complexity (1pt)
Demonstrates a complex understanding of the historical development that is the focus of the prompt through sophisticated argumentation and/or effective use of evidence.
one of the following:
effectively uses seven documents to support the argument
sources at least four documents
uses documents and evidence beyond the documents to demonstrate understanding of different perspectives
part of the argument
does not need to be woven throughout the response but more than a phrase or reference
can be a counterargument
To succeed
read and understand the question
annotate
time period (16th century = 1500s)
historical thinking skill
compare/contrast
causation
continuity/change over time
read the documents relatively quickly
source (who and to whom)
when in the time period
summarize the main idea with reference to the prompt (how would you answer the prompt with only this document?)