Skip to content
Where is knowledge?What kind of knowledge is it?How valuable and risky is it?What deserves our attention now?
People: Hidden experts, cultural stewards, process owners.Processes: Knowledge-dependent workflows, bottlenecks, knowledge deserts.Systems: Databases, documents, spreadsheets—are they used or orphaned?
Socialization (Tacit–Tacit): Apprenticeship, immersion, intuition.Externalization (Tacit–Explicit): Diaries, guides, storytelling.Combination (Explicit–Explicit): Reports, databases, manuals.Internalization (Explicit–Tacit): Learning, simulation, embodied knowledge.
High-Critical, High-Change: Urgent conversion and frequent review (e.g., compliance policies).Low-Critical, Low-Change: Archive or document once, then monitor.
Vulnerability: If this person leaves, what dies with them?Obsolescence: When was this last validated?Dependency: How many rely on this to work?
Strategic: Does this shape where we’re going?Operational: Does this grease the daily wheels?Innovative: Does this feed the future?
Systems Thinking
- Pages
Share
Explore
Knowledge Management
The Hidden Currents of Knowledge: A Systems View of Organizational Intelligence
Chapter: Mapping the Mind of the Machine – Frameworks and Mental Models for Strategic Knowledge Conversion
In the vast, humming machinery of modern organizations, knowledge is the silent current that flows between cogs, sparks decisions, and powers growth. But like any current, it is invisible unless made visible—systematized, mapped, and shaped. Most leaders assume knowledge resides in documents, databases, or dashboards. But this is an illusion. Real knowledge lives in transitions—between people, between systems, between the tacit and the explicit.
Donella Meadows once wrote,
“The least obvious part of the system, its function or purpose, is often the most crucial.”
In the same spirit, we must stop treating knowledge as a static asset and start treating it as a dynamic system with stocks, flows, vulnerabilities, and feedback loops.
This chapter explores the architecture of organizational knowledge through four essential questions:
Each question is a lens. Together, they offer a map—a system for working with systems of thought.
I. Finding the Invisible: Frameworks for Identifying Knowledge
1. The Knowledge Mapping Framework
Purpose: To trace where critical knowledge flows or stalls across the organization.
Like tracing the roots of a forest, knowledge mapping reveals which people are reservoirs of wisdom, which processes are fed by insight, and which systems are stagnant. Use visual tools—flowcharts, mind maps—to expose the bloodstream of your organization. Look for:
2. The Knowledge Value Chain (KVC)
Purpose: To trace the value creation arc of knowledge—from acquisition to impact.
Every organization is a value engine. The Knowledge Value Chain forces us to ask: how does insight translate to impact? At each stage—acquisition, storage, distribution, application—we must ask not only “what” but “why.”
Why is this knowledge kept?
Why does it matter?
II. The Shape of Knowing: Mental Models for Classifying Knowledge
1. The Tacit–Explicit Matrix (Nonaka’s SECI Model)
A map of transformation.
Nonaka’s quadrants offer a transformation map:
A wise system architect classifies knowledge not by format, but by flow: what moves where, and who can use it?
2. Criticality–Stability Matrix
A compass for navigating urgency.
Plot knowledge on two axes: how critical it is, and how fast it changes.
This matrix ensures we do not confuse noise for signal.
III. The Risk of Forgetting: Frameworks for Assessing Knowledge
1. Knowledge Risk Assessment (KRA)
What happens if this disappears tomorrow?
KRA asks three terrifying questions:
Knowledge is not just an asset. It is a liability if forgotten.
2. Knowledge Impact Assessment (KIA)
What value does this enable?
Score knowledge on three axes:
What gets measured gets remembered.
IV. The Signal from the Noise: Mental Models for Prioritizing Conversion
1. The Eisenhower Matrix
Not all urgencies are equal.
Prioritize knowledge work by importance vs. urgency:
Urgent
Not Urgent
Important
Do now: Critical and expiring knowledge.
Schedule: Cultural norms, best practices.
Not Important
Delegate: Quick documentation.
Ignore: Archive for future review.
There are no rows in this table
2. Pareto Principle (80/20 Rule)
The few pieces of knowledge that matter most.
Roughly 20% of knowledge assets produce 80% of decisions, impact, or innovation. Find these keystones. Convert them first.
3. MoSCoW Prioritization
Must, Should, Could, Won’t (for now).
In collaborative settings, apply MoSCoW to align stakeholders and sequence your knowledge capture roadmap.
Closing Reflection: Toward Knowledge Ecology
Knowledge is not a library. It is a living forest—growing, decaying, regenerating. To design an organization’s knowledge system is to become an ecological steward.
As Peter Senge wrote,
“The only sustainable competitive advantage is an organization’s ability to learn faster than the competition.”
But learning must be captured. And conversion must be intentional.
So build maps. Track flows. Assess risks. Prioritize wisely.
You are not just building a knowledge base. You are tending a cognitive ecosystem—one that must feed innovation, not just remember history.
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.