Skip to content

GLS October 2025 YoY

GLS Portfolio Summary – October 2025

📦 Rental Activity

Move-ins: 24
Move-outs: 22
Net Rentals: +2
Greenville: –1 net
Taylors: +3 net

📞 Lead Activity

Total Leads: 50 (18 Greenville, 32 Taylors)
Conversion Rate: 48% overall
Top Sources:
Call Center: 50%
Storagely (online): 38%
Drive-by and Website: 10%

🏢 Occupancy (as of Oct 31, 2025)

Greenville: 72.3%
Taylors: 86.4%
Total Portfolio: 76.8%
YoY occupancy up slightly from Oct 2024 (+0.7 pts)

💰 Revenue & Gross Potential

Table 10
Column 1
Oct 2025 Actual
Oct 2024 Actual
YoY Change
Gross Potential (2025)
Greenville
$24,687
$23,770
3.9%
$19,350
Taylors
$27,756
$24,625
12.7%
$22,029
Total GLS
$52,443
$48,395
8.4%
$41,379
There are no rows in this table
Economic occupancy exceeded 100% due to effective rate increases
GLS_Revenue_Comparison_Oct2025.png

📤 Move-Out Reasons

Top reason: No longer needed storage (10)
6 units vacated via auction (delinquency)
Only 1 cited “price too high”
output (10).png

📈 Rate Increases

112 customers received rent increases
+$1,700/month added across portfolio
Average increase: ~10%
GLS_Rate_Increases_Oct2025.png

Storage Depot GLS Portfolio – October 2025 Performance Update

Move Activity (October 2025)

Total move-ins and move-outs for each GLS facility in October 2025 are summarized below, along with net rentals (move-ins minus move-outs):
Table 7
Facility
Move-Ins
Move-Outs
Net Rentals
Greenville (GLS)
7
8
–1
Taylors (GLS)
17
14
+3
GLS Portfolio Total
24
22
+2
There are no rows in this table
Greenville saw 7 new move-ins and 8 move-outs, resulting in a net loss of 1 unit. Taylors had 17 move-ins against 14 move-outs, for a net gain of 3 units. Overall, the GLS portfolio gained 2 net rentals in October.

Lead Activity (October 2025)

Across the GLS portfolio, there were 50 total leads (inquiries) during October 2025. The overall conversion rate (move-ins divided by leads) was about 48%. By facility: Greenville converted ~39% of its leads (7 of 18) and Taylors converted ~53% (17 of 32).
Lead Sources: The majority of inquiries came through phone calls and online listings. Key lead sources included:
Call Center: 25 leads (50% of total) originated via calls to the sales center.
Online Aggregator (Storagely): 19 leads (38%) came from Storagely online listings (including those that reached out via call center).
Drive-By: 4 walk-in leads (8%) were attributed to drive-by traffic (all at the Taylors site).
Sparefoot: 1 lead (2%) came through the Sparefoot online platform.
Website (Online Rental Portal): 1 lead (2%) originated from the storEDGE online rental center.
Taylors captured all of the drive-by and website leads (reflecting its local visibility), whereas Greenville’s leads were exclusively via the call center or online sources.

Occupancy (End of October 2025)

Unit occupancy at month-end remained healthy for the GLS portfolio:
Greenville: 224 of 310 units occupied (72.3% unit occupancy).
Taylors: 127 of 147 units occupied (86.4% unit occupancy).
Overall GLS Portfolio: 76.8% unit occupancy (351 of 457 total units).
Year-over-year, Greenville’s occupancy was essentially flat (around 72% in Oct 2024 and 2025), while Taylors improved from ~84.4% to 86.4%. The combined portfolio occupancy rose slightly (by roughly 0.7 percentage points YoY).

Revenue Performance (October 2025 vs October 2024)

Actual rental revenue in October 2025 was up year-over-year for both facilities, despite lower posted rate potentials. The table below shows actual revenue vs. gross potential (at 100% occupancy at standard rates) for October 2025, and a comparison to October 2024:
Table 8
Facility
Oct 2024 Actual Revenue
Oct 2025 Actual Revenue
YoY Change
Oct 2025 Gross Potential
Greenville
$23,770 (actual)
$24,687 (actual)
3.9%
$19,350
Taylors
$24,625 (actual)
$27,756 (actual)
12.7%
$22,029
GLS Total
$48,395
$52,443
8.4%
$41,379
There are no rows in this table
Greenville: Collected ~$24.7K in October 2025, up ~4% from ~$23.8K in October 2024. Its gross potential for the month (if 100% occupied at standard rates) was about $19.35K. Notably, actual revenue exceeded the standard-rate potential (indicative of rate increases beyond standard rates for existing tenants).
Taylors: Collected ~$27.8K in October 2025, a ~13% increase over the ~$24.6K in October 2024. Gross potential revenue was ~$22.03K, so actual rent collected was also above the base potential.
Overall, the GLS portfolio’s October 2025 revenue of ~$52.4K was about 8% higher than the ~$48.4K achieved in October 2024. Both facilities are yielding economic occupancy rates above 100% (actual revenue divided by standard potential), thanks to aggressive rate management.

Move-Out Reasons (October 2025)

A total of 22 tenants moved out of GLS facilities in October. The reasons recorded for move-outs were tracked, with the counts by facility shown below:
Table 9
Move-Out Reason
Greenville
Taylors
Total
Don't need storage anymore
3
7
10
Auction (delinquency)
4
2
6
Vacated without notice
1
1
2
Moving (relocation)
0
1
1
Price is too high
0
1
1
There are no rows in this table
The most common move-out reason was simply not needing storage anymore (10 tenants), followed by delinquency auctions (6 tenants). A couple of tenants left without giving notice, and only one cited high price as the reason for vacating. These trends were fairly consistent across the two facilities, with Taylors having a higher count of “not needed” move-outs.

Rate Increase Summary (October 2025)

October saw a significant number of in-place rent increases for existing customers in the GLS portfolio:
Customers with Rate Increases: 112 total existing tenants had rent rate increases implemented during October 2025 (approximately 84 at Greenville and 28 at Taylors). This excludes new move-ins who simply started at market rates. (In total, 137 rent changes were recorded including new rentals.)
Total Added Monthly Rent: These October increases are generating roughly +$1,700 in combined monthly rent across the portfolio (approximate aggregate increase).
Average Increase %: The average rent bump was about 10% per affected customer. Many longstanding tenants saw mid-single-digit to 10% increases, while some newer tenants received larger first-time adjustments (in some cases 15%+ if they started on an introductory rate).
Overall, aggressive revenue management is evident: by raising rates on 112 existing tenants in one month, both facilities have driven actual revenues above standard rental projections. This strategy contributed to the strong year-over-year revenue growth in October 2025, while occupancy remained relatively steady.

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.