Skip to content
Move-ins increased (15 in Jan vs. 12 in Dec), move-outs slightly up.Net rentals improved to +7 in Jan.Occupancy rose from ~93% to ~94%.Revenue held steady, slight drop (~$700).Move-ins rose to 15, move-outs dropped to 11.Net rentals increased to +4.Occupancy stayed around 88%.Revenue dipped by ~$2,200.
Leasing Activity: Cocoa saw increased move-ins in January (15, up from 12 in Dec) along with a slight uptick in move-outs (8, up from 7). This resulted in a net gain of 7 rentals in Jan, improving from a net gain of 5 in Dec.Occupancy: The occupancy rate improved from approximately 93% in December to 94% in January, reflecting an increase from 260 to 264 occupied units out of 280. This is about a +1 percentage point rise in occupancy month-over-month.Revenue: Actual revenue remained roughly flat. Cocoa collected about $93.5k in January compared to $94.2k in December, a slight decrease of ~$700 (≈0.8% drop) despite the higher occupancy. This suggests revenue was essentially steady month-over-month.
Leasing Activity: Coleman experienced higher move-ins in January (15, up from 13 in Dec) while move-outs declined (11 in Jan, down from 12). This led to a net rental gain of 4 in Jan (versus a net gain of 1 in Dec), indicating improved tenant retention and growth.Occupancy: The occupancy rate held steady at approximately 88% in both months. Coleman had 242 occupied units at the end of January vs. 243 in December, so effectively no significant change in occupancy level month-over-month.Revenue: Actual revenue dipped slightly. Coleman collected about $46.4k in January, down from $48.6k in December. This ~$2.2k decline (roughly –4.6%) occurred despite similar occupancy, suggesting possible rate differences or timing of payments.
250129 OSG Meeting Notes
View of Agenda
Done
Search
Done
Topic
Notes
Date
Added by
Check walk in traffic
Thu, Oct 30
Covered parking demand
Thu, Oct 30
gross profit is not matching EOM reports in financials
Thu, Jan 29
There are no rows in this table
Cocoa:
Coleman:
Overall: Cocoa showed better leasing momentum and occupancy growth. Coleman improved in leasing but saw a slight revenue drop.
Performance Update: Cocoa and Coleman (Dec 2025 vs Jan 2026)
This report provides a performance update for the Cocoa and Coleman properties, comparing key operational metrics from December 2025 to January 2026. The metrics analyzed include move-ins, move-outs, net rentals (move-ins minus move-outs), actual occupancy rate, and actual revenue. The tables below break down these metrics by property and month, followed by a summary of month-over-month changes.
Cocoa Property Performance
Cocoa – Key Metrics (Dec 2025 vs Jan 2026):
Table 1
Metric
December 2025
January 2026
MoM Change (Jan – Dec)
Move-Ins
12
15
+3
Move-Outs
7
8
+1
Net Rentals
5 (net gain)
7 (net gain)
+2
Occupancy Rate
~93% (260 of 280 units)
~94% (264 of 280 units)
+~1 pp
Actual Revenue
$94,231 (collected)
$93,517 (collected)
–$714
There are no rows in this table
Highlights for Cocoa:
Coleman Property Performance
Coleman – Key Metrics (Dec 2025 vs Jan 2026):
Table 4
Metric
December 2025
January 2026
MoM Change (Jan – Dec)
Move-Ins
13
15
+2
Move-Outs
12
11
–1
Net Rentals
1 (net gain)
4 (net gain)
+3
Occupancy Rate
~88% (243 of 275 units)
~88% (242 of 275 units)
~0 pp
Actual Revenue
$48,586 (collected)
$46,352 (collected)
–$2,234
There are no rows in this table
Highlights for Coleman:
Overall, Cocoa showed stronger leasing momentum going into January with increased move-ins and higher occupancy, while Coleman's occupancy remained flat with modest improvement in net rentals. Both properties' revenues were relatively stable, with Cocoa essentially flat and Coleman seeing a slight drop in January. The month-over-month changes are summarized in the tables above for a clear comparison of December 2025 vs. January 2026 performance per property.
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.