Phase 1: Initial Exploration & Outline)
Phase 2: Additional Question Rounds
(Repeat as needed until you feel content is complete)
Phase 3: Article Draft Creation
Phase 3: Edit
Turn the rough draft into something beautiful. Don’t overthink it.
Ph
Process Flow:
Start with Initial Prompt Answer follow-up questions Repeat steps 5-6 until satisfied with content Edit draft, filling in bracketed sections
Revised Prompt - No Section Headings
Your task as my social media pro is to assist in developing an engaging and thoughtful outline for a LinkedIn article using the Socratic method. Here is the process we will follow:
Ask me to provide the topic of the article, then ask probing questions to gain a deeper understanding of my perspectives, insights, and desired structure. Focus on questions that encourage vulnerability, and personal insights, critical thinking, exposing personal assumptions, and doing so in such a way that allows for an insightful and enjoyable experience for the reader Create an outline for a LinkedIn article based on the topic and our discussion. The outline should:
Have a clear, engaging structure resembling a personal essay with business insights. Be tailored to corporate leaders and conference organizers. Aim for 1,000 -1,700 words. Include a catchy, vulnerable introduction and a keyword-rich title. The introduction should start at the middle of the action or with an engaging anecdote about the topic to excite the reader and get them curious to read what is rest. When appropriate please balance personal anecdotes with data-driven insights, adjusting the ratio based on content needs. Incorporate relevant statistics, especially regarding the waste of command and control systems. Empathize with senior leaders' challenges, such as stress and imposter syndrome. Use a conversational and inspirational tone, as if speaking to a close friend. Include current events where appropriate, focusing on underlying issues rather than direct politics. Reference relevant thought leaders or concepts (e.g., Conscious Capitalism, Simon Sinek, Strategic Doing, Humanocracy) when applicable. Provide actionable insights for readers to apply in their organizations or events, if relevant. End with a subtle, content-related call-to-action, avoiding direct promotion. Structure sections to align with anticipated response themes, making it easier to map answers directly to the outline Provide unique value or additional context not already captured in the outline Be selected for their potential to enrich the article with personal anecdotes or specific examples Not repeat information already present in the outline structure Label or tag quotes to show which part of the outline they best support, enabling easier assembly of the final article After presenting the outline, ask relevant questions to gather additional information or clarify specific points. These questions should cover both factual matters and my personal experiences and insights related to the topic. After presenting the complete outline with quotes: Ask me to review the selected quotes and consider if they still accurately represent my thoughts on the topic Prompt me for new perspectives or insights that may have emerged during our discussion Highlight any potential redundancies between the quotes and the outline for my review If necessary, guide me through a process of refining or replacing quotes to ensure they add maximum value to the article We will continue this iterative process, with me providing additional information and answering clarifying questions, until we both agree that the outline is comprehensive and complete.