Speaker to Writer Framework

Phase 1: Initial Exploration & Outline)


Outline Prompt
Name
Your task as my social media pro is to assist in developing an engaging and thoughtful outline for a LinkedIn article using the Socratic method. Here is the process we will follow:
Ask me to provide the topic of the article, then ask probing questions to gain a deeper understanding of my perspectives, insights, and desired structure. Focus on questions that encourage vulnerability and personal insights, critical thinking, and exposing personal assumptions.
Create an outline for a LinkedIn article based on the topic and our discussion. The outline should:
Have a clear, engaging structure resembling a personal essay with business insights.
Be tailored to corporate leaders and conference organizers.
Aim for 1,000 -1,700 words.
Include a catchy, vulnerable introduction and a keyword-rich title under 50 characters.
Balance personal anecdotes with data-driven insights, adjusting the ratio based on content needs.
Incorporate relevant statistics, especially regarding the waste of command and control systems.
Empathize with senior leaders' challenges, such as stress and imposter syndrome.
Use a conversational and inspirational tone, as if speaking to a close friend.
Suggest places for potential multimedia elements.
Include current events where appropriate, focusing on underlying issues rather than direct politics.
Reference relevant thought leaders or concepts (e.g., Conscious Capitalism, Simon Sinek, Strategic Doing, Humanocracy) when applicable.
Provide actionable insights for readers to apply in their organizations or events, if relevant.
End with a subtle, content-related call-to-action, avoiding direct promotion.
Structure sections to align with anticipated response themes, making it easier to map answers directly to the outline
After each section of the outline, include a subsection titled 'Key Insights' that lists 1-3 relevant quotes from my responses to the probing questions. These quotes should:
Provide unique value or additional context not already captured in the outline
Be selected for their potential to enrich the article with personal anecdotes or specific examples
Not repeat information already present in the outline structure
Label or tag quotes to show which part of the outline they best support, enabling easier assembly of the final article
After presenting the outline, ask relevant questions to gather additional information or clarify specific points. These questions should cover both factual matters and my personal experiences and insights related to the topic.
After presenting the complete outline with quotes:
Ask me to review the selected quotes and consider if they still accurately represent my thoughts on the topic
Prompt me for new perspectives or insights that may have emerged during our discussion
Highlight any potential redundancies between the quotes and the outline for my review
If necessary, guide me through a process of refining or replacing quotes to ensure they add maximum value to the article
We will continue this iterative process, with me providing additional information and answering clarifying questions, until we both agree that the outline is comprehensive and complete.
There are no rows in this table

Phase 2: Additional Question Rounds

(Repeat as needed until you feel content is complete)

Phase 3: Article Draft Creation

First Draft Prompt:
Final Draft Prompt:
Using the outline provided and my responses to your questions, please create a first draft of the article following these strict guidelines: 1. Content Usage: * Use my exact words and phrases from the responses as the primary content * Only make minimal edits to my words for tense agreement and basic flow * Never paraphrase or "enhance" my language * Keep my casual tone and conversational style intact 2. Transitions and Connections: * Where two pieces of my content need connection, use minimal linking phrases * Mark all added connecting language in {curly brackets} to distinguish it from my original words * Keep these connections as simple and brief as possible 3. Gaps and Additions: * Where additional content is needed, insert [BRACKETS WITH SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS], such as: - [ADD: Specific example of success with distributed leadership] - [NEED: Transition linking personal experience to organizational impact] - [CONSIDER: Brief mention of relevant current event] * Never fill gaps with generic content or business jargon 4. Statistics and References: * Only use statistics and references I specifically mentioned in my responses * If additional data would strengthen a point, note this in [brackets] 5. Structure: * Follow the outline's flow but don't force my words to fit if they naturally go elsewhere * Prioritize the authenticity of my voice over rigid adherence to structure Please format the draft to clearly distinguish between: - My original words (plain text) - Minimal connecting language {in curly brackets} - Required additions and notes [IN BRACKETS] This will allow me to quickly edit the draft while maintaining my authentic voice and insights.
There are no rows in this table

Phase 3: Edit

Turn the rough draft into something beautiful. Don’t overthink it.

Ph

Process Flow:

Start with Initial Prompt
Provide topic
Answer questions
Review outline
Answer follow-up questions
Review updated outline
Repeat steps 5-6 until satisfied with content
Use Final Draft Prompt
Edit draft, filling in bracketed sections

Revised Prompt - No Section Headings
Your task as my social media pro is to assist in developing an engaging and thoughtful outline for a LinkedIn article using the Socratic method. Here is the process we will follow:
Ask me to provide the topic of the article, then ask probing questions to gain a deeper understanding of my perspectives, insights, and desired structure. Focus on questions that encourage vulnerability, and personal insights, critical thinking, exposing personal assumptions, and doing so in such a way that allows for an insightful and enjoyable experience for the reader
Create an outline for a LinkedIn article based on the topic and our discussion. The outline should:

Have a clear, engaging structure resembling a personal essay with business insights.
Be tailored to corporate leaders and conference organizers.
Aim for 1,000 -1,700 words.
Include a catchy, vulnerable introduction and a keyword-rich title. The introduction should start at the middle of the action or with an engaging anecdote about the topic to excite the reader and get them curious to read what is rest.
When appropriate please balance personal anecdotes with data-driven insights, adjusting the ratio based on content needs.
Incorporate relevant statistics, especially regarding the waste of command and control systems.
Empathize with senior leaders' challenges, such as stress and imposter syndrome.
Use a conversational and inspirational tone, as if speaking to a close friend.
Include current events where appropriate, focusing on underlying issues rather than direct politics.
Reference relevant thought leaders or concepts (e.g., Conscious Capitalism, Simon Sinek, Strategic Doing, Humanocracy) when applicable.
Provide actionable insights for readers to apply in their organizations or events, if relevant.
End with a subtle, content-related call-to-action, avoiding direct promotion.
Structure sections to align with anticipated response themes, making it easier to map answers directly to the outline
Provide unique value or additional context not already captured in the outline
Be selected for their potential to enrich the article with personal anecdotes or specific examples
Not repeat information already present in the outline structure
Label or tag quotes to show which part of the outline they best support, enabling easier assembly of the final article
After presenting the outline, ask relevant questions to gather additional information or clarify specific points. These questions should cover both factual matters and my personal experiences and insights related to the topic.
After presenting the complete outline with quotes:
Ask me to review the selected quotes and consider if they still accurately represent my thoughts on the topic
Prompt me for new perspectives or insights that may have emerged during our discussion
Highlight any potential redundancies between the quotes and the outline for my review
If necessary, guide me through a process of refining or replacing quotes to ensure they add maximum value to the article
We will continue this iterative process, with me providing additional information and answering clarifying questions, until we both agree that the outline is comprehensive and complete.
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.