Main Challenges in Open Science
Lack of centralized storage for grants and projects Inefficient tagging system, making it difficult to find relevant projects Limited opportunities for young scientists to connect with projects due to lack of established credentials Dispersed storage locations for datasets and other open data Inability for scientists to share specialized equipment due to lack of awareness of each other Our Approach (Recommended Feature List)
A marketplace that consolidates: Grants from major platforms Projects and grants that can be directly live on our platform Individuals with specialized skills and equipment Natural language-based matching (based on project descriptions or search queries) Streamlined onboarding for new scientists Cross-platform scoring system Cross-Platform Scoring for Easier Matching (Profile Mockup with Score and Supported Systems)
Our marketplace features a scoring system based on:
Data linked to the ORCID system This allows projects to set a minimum score requirement, thus minimizing spam applications.
Our Matching System (Diagram of Matching Process)
Text cleansing and key phrase extraction (prior to database storage) Key-based data search + search by score Text similarity matching (creation of TF-IDF vectors and calculation of cosine similarity) Leveraging machine learning models for final matching and providing a human-readable summary for the match Reducing Friction for New Scientists (Screen with Test Task and Diagram with Grant Sources)
We aggregate grants from the most popular sources for easy discovery, all in one place. While we don't aim to replace grant organizations, we serve as an additional platform to display their information.
We also embrace open-source culture by incorporating "first good issues" for projects. This allows scientists who may not have sufficient scores to become eligible for a project after resolving these "first good research" tasks that projects can set.
Future Improvements
Utilizing blockchain for an open social graph Empowering the community to build better recommendation algorithms Ensuring reputation transparency Exploring the use of Zk-proofs for incorporating additional resources into scoring systems