Stereotypes, assumptions, media tropes etc
There are many stereotypes, assumption and media tropes about disabled people (like any marginalised community). It’s impossible to list them all but here are some of them:
Helpless Cripple
This stereotype is mainly found in inspiration porn. This disabled person can’t do anything for themself and depends completely on others. Others are expected to pity them and be thankful that they’re abled
This stereotype is problematic because it dehumanises disabled people to point that we only exist for abled to feel better about themselves. Often this leads to ableds over estimating our need or seeing us as a burden
Super Crip
[Image discription: Text that reads “I have Autism what’s your superpower” with puzzle pieces floating around in the colours yellow, red and blue. The words “I have” are in blue, “what’s your” is in yellow and “super power” is is in light blue. The S in “super” is replaced with the superman logo. The word “Autism” is in various colours; A is in black, U is in dark blue, T is in red, I is in yellow, S is in light blue and M is in black.]
TV Tropes: (NB: Although Toph from A:TLB is listed as an example, I don’t believe she’s a true Super Crip) The complete opposite of the helpless cripple; the Super Crip usually portrayed by in fantasy or sci-fi setting. Usually advance technology or magic gives them superpowers that allows them to do everything an abled can and often better.
This may seem like a harmless trope as we don’t in a fantasy or sci-fi world but people often translate this trope to the real world. Of course, in the present at least, disabled people aren’t “cured” nor do we have superpowers, but many ableds believe that we will in the future so there’s no point fighting ableism in the present.
Many ableds also believe that we do have Super Crips in the present. They believe that all Autistic people are savants and certain equipment disabled people use gives them superpowers such as electric wheelchairs. They often look to disabled people who can do cOvertain things better than them, such as paralympics, and believe their disability does not impair them at all. They believe all disabilities can be “cured” with a positive mental attitude. This can applied to all disabled people if they just try hard enough.
All Disabled People Are Asexual
This is a side effect of infantilisation of disabled people. Of course, it is possible for a disabled person to be asexuxal like it is possible for an abled to be asexual. But because sexual attraction is developed during puberty and most countries set an age of consent, infantilisation leads to this stereotype.
Disabled Villain/Disability as an excuse for jerkassy
[Image description: Darth Vader holding a lightsaber]
TV Tropes:
In this trope a disabled person is the villain of the story, or in downplayed examples simply a jerk. Usually these people weren’t born disabled. Becoming disabled is usually their motivate for their villainary or jerkassy. They often became disabled by a fight with one of the good guys. They are motivated by revenge.
Of course disabled people need media representation and that includes portrayal of us as “the bad” guy. But this is often our only portrayal and leads to people being afraid of us. While abled villains/jerks often get complex motivations for being a villain/jerkass, disabled villians/jerkasses motivation usually comes for the sole reason that they’re disabled. Real life disabled villains/jerkasses are villains/jerkasses for the same reasons abled villains/jerkasses are. Their disability/disabilities usually has very little to do with their reason, if any at all.
Kindhearted Simpleton
The kindhearted simpleton is a stereotype about people with learning disabilities. In this stereotype all people with learning disabilities are “good” disabled people. They are agreeable, kind, nice, warmhearted people and wouldn’t heart hurt a fly.
The problem with their stereotype is that they aren’t just people with learning disabilities who happen to be kind. Their kindheartness comes from their learning disability which gives them a childlike nature that causes them to be kind.
Kindhearted simpleton are often pushovers who never stand up from themselves. They often have other stand up for them but it turns out that they didn’t need to, not because they can stand up for themselves but because ableism, being bullied, abused or harassed doesn’t affect them. This can send a message that disabled people are immune to these so we shouldn’t bother fighting them.
White Cis Male Autism
Autism is represented in the media, especially as more people have became aware that it exists. However autism is a spectrum (which means every Autistic person has different Autistic traits) and anyone from any demographic can be Autistic. In the media there is usually only one “type” of Autistic person portrayed. I like to call it “white cis male autism”:
He is male, sometimes the person who has this type of autism is female, but 90% of the time their male He is white, I don’t think I know any examples of Autistic BIPOC He is straight or asexual He has little or no empathy Others dislike being around him finding him awkward weird or even creepy and he dislikes being around most other people He’s extremely introverted, a loner and doesn’t really care about making friends He doesn’t express many emotions, expect when he has a meltdown, he prefers to think more logically than emotionally When he does something sexist, racist, queerphobic, or ableist against someone with a different disability, it’s portrayed that it an Autistic trait and something women, BIPOC, LGBT+ people, people with different disabilities will just have to put up He has a special interest in a STEM subject or a subject most people find boring such as train tables Others have “put up” with him because his autism and SI make him a savant and his skills are need by society
Although WCMA can be possible, it is extremely rare. Here’s why
Traits of WCMA and Their Reality
Overthrowing The Disability
In this trope, a disabled character manages to “overcome” this disability, for example a wheelchair user learning to walk again. This can be a minor plot point or the character’s whole character arc.
The character that manages to “overcome” their disability is usually a “good” disabled person, or learns to be a “good” disabled person as part of their character development. This means that they shut their mouths when being treated unfairly, are passive, kind to everyone and support the professional model of disability. Sometimes they are contrasted with another character who doesn’t manage to overcome their disability. This character is a “bad” disabled person. They can be a generally bad person but they are often only a “bad” disabled person because they stand up for their rights, don’t support the professional model and often support the social model.
Often the character that manages to overthrow their disability wasn’t born disabled. They become disabled as a punishment for being a bad person. The way they learn to “overcome” their disability is by becoming a good person.
Why this trope is problematic depends on how its played. In all cases it reinforces the medical model of disability and the idea that disabled people can be “cured” if they have the right attitude or try hard enough. When the character is a bad person becomes disabled, learns to become a better person then overcomes their disability, it enforces the disabled villain/jerk stereotype and suggests that if disabled people were good enough people they would have overcame their disability by now.
This trope is also against the fight against ableism for two reasons:
The disabled person “overcomes” their disability at the end of the story which suggests that the fight against ableism is pointless as all disabled people can “overcome” their disabilities if they try hard enough
The disabled character who manages to “overcome” their disability is often contrasts with a character who doesn’t. This character is often considered a “bad” disabled person because they are more vocal about disability rights. Obfuscating Disability
In this trope a character who isn’t disabled pretends to have a disability. The motives of this character varies but can include:
So their enemies can underestimate them To access things only disabled people should be able to access such as parking spaces, toilet, extra time in exams So others will care for them
Also it’s often the villain of the story who obfuscates disability, this trope is still problematic. Motivies 1+3 reinforce the “helpless cripple” stereotype. 1-2 suggests that disabled people are treated better in society than ableds. In reality, being disabled makes you part of a marginalised group.
Ableds are obsessed with disabled people “faking”. In UK, to get our benefits and prove we’re “disabled enough” we have to attend an interview, even medical notes are not considered enough. For people with invisible disabilities, they are often harassed by ableds for using disabled exclusive falliacities such as a parking space or toilet.
Language
Many language is considered ableist. This can include words and phrase people use to in place of disability and things they say to disabled people. It’s important to know that ableism is more that just a list of “bad” words/phrases. Ableist language is so integrated into our language that it’s extremely difficult not to use. What language is consider ableist is debated among the disability community.
It can be easy to label any word/phrase with ableist origins as ableist but the word “villain” has classist origins and nobody wants people to stop saying that. Moreover it has completely changed meaning. The same goes for words of ableist origin. I didn’t know until recently that lame was originally a word used to describe someone with a mobility disability.
The following table includes words and phrases that can be considered ableist. It’s important to note that most words here aren’t considered slurs.
https://web.archive.org/web/20080201062625/http://www.bbc.co.uk/ouch/yourspace/worstwords/topten.shtml
Words/Phrases considered ableist
Why can this be considered offensive?
What should be used instead in?
Person First and Identity First Language
Further information
There are usually to ways to refer to a disabled person - person first language (PFL) and identity first language (IFL). Below is a table of the difference between
Person First vs Identity First Language
Arguments for identity first language include:
Arguments for person first language include:
Person first language suggests that people with disabilities are people first
What language a disabled person depends on what disabilities they have.
The following people usually prepare IFL:
People with intellectual and learning disabilities tend to prepare PFL.
In general use IFL by default, expect when referring to people with intellectual/learning disabilities when PFL should be used by default. Individuals tend to have their own preferences and if you aren’t sure, ask them, they will likely appreciate it.