2) 4-minute phone call version (tight script)
“Hey — quick share. I’m seeing Alithea as something bigger than the typical ‘mime’ frame. It’s movement theatre: ensemble, choreographic, multidisciplinary embodied storytelling, plus the education lineage and the Wichita State adjacency.
The reason I’m reaching out is the arts landscape is getting harder — funding cycles, attention fragmentation — but there’s also an opportunity: the world is increasingly hungry for embodied intelligence. Nonverbal communication, believable movement for digital media, motion capture acting, even education and wellness-adjacent embodiment work. That’s all in Alithea’s wheelhouse — it’s just not always packaged in a way partners and funders can immediately understand.
My thesis is: Alithea has a unique ‘movement grammar’ — a teachable, transferable language of embodied storytelling. The move isn’t a giant pivot or moonshot partnerships. It’s building lightweight infrastructure that captures what you already do so it becomes legible, repeatable, and fundable.
Long-term, I see three plausible directions: one is a preservation/authority lane — gathering artifacts and lineage. Two is applied partnerships — mocap, XR/AR, animation, robotics human-feel, etc. Three is scaling education with clearer curriculum and outcomes. But I’m not asking you to pick that today.
Instead, I want to propose a low-risk Phase 1 wedge: a 30-day ‘ops + knowledge backbone’ MVP — basically a simple dashboard and dataset that tracks people, partners, grants, works, and artifacts, plus a light intake process with permissions status. It reduces scramble and creates optionality for the other lanes.
If you’re open, the next step is one working session: I ask questions, we map what exists, we pick the wedge, and define what success looks like. Then I come back with a 30/60/90/365 roadmap and a couple pilot options.
Does that feel aligned? And what part feels exciting vs heavy?”