Imagine an online interactive encyclopedia of 30 conceptual structures for formulating absolutes. An interface illustrates them with 3,000 examples, historical and contemporary, representing diverse thinkers, disciplines and cultures. A community fluent in this language of wisdom - 300 researchers, activists, independent thinkers - scientifically documents human experience and investigates the laws of life. Sir John Templeton’s dream comes true.
Scientific advances in the life sciences have led to Active Inference, a theoretical framework for the free energy principle, which is a law of life introduced in 2006 by neuroscientist Karl Friston. The free energy principle asserts that the human brain, indeed, any living system minimizes surprise, the difference between internal models and external realities. These concepts are understood in terms of Bayesian statistics and thermodynamics, with applications to AI, robotics, psychology and sociology. Systems learn, updating models, or create, adjusting environments. As Jesus taught, what you find is what you love, and what you believe is what happens.
Are we, and systems like us, simply fooling ourselves? The free energy principle is admittedly not falsifiable. It is both descriptive and normative. Similarly, Templeton declared that laws of life enforce themselves yet we may learn them or not and choose to live by them or not. How can we ever agree on laws of life, biological or spiritual, as absolute truths? We can first introspect the basic stances that we choose from, the conceptual structures they constitute, the constraints on our imaginations which, pragmatically, are absolute.
Andrius Kulikauskas has developed a method of introspection which distinguishes three levels of awareness. Our Unconscious knows answers, our Conscious asks questions, and our Consciousness relates them with investigations. Templeton likewise distinguished our brains, our minds which control them, and the laws of life which our minds may embrace. Kulikauskas has us set aside answers and questions and focus on the underlying perspectives we may take. “Building character” supposes free will but also fate. “Learning” leverages a cycle of taking a stand, following through and reflecting. “Discovering your life’s purpose” presumes four levels of knowledge - whether, what, how, why. Kulikauskas has collected evidence for 30 such structures of perspectives. He will author articles describing each structure. We start with them in our search for absolutes.
Daniel Friedman of the Active Inference Institute will organize a supportive team to collect examples illustrating these and additional stuctures. In the first year, Friedman will design a knowledge system, recruit enthusiasts and organize training. 5 of the most adept enthusiasts will help Kulikauskas train 25 project leaders and 125 contributors, all modestly funded. They will include experts in Active Inference (linking life sciences), advanced mathematics (versed in absolute truth) and ecological thinking (grounding morality). The Institute attracts life scientists, physicists, engineers, philosophers, mathematicians, entrepreneurs, educators, coders, activists and artists.
In the second year, each project leader will lead a small team in a creative project to demonstrate fluency with these structures in their own worldview or scientific theory. The project may be an academic article, popular exposition, navigational tool, visualization, AI innovation, experiment, game, tutorial, campaign, video, podcast, art exhibit, short story etc. Project leaders will advise on the validity of the conceptual structures.
The third year will focus on whatever resonates, facilitating participation by unpaid enthusiasts as they contribute more examples, foster transcultural discourse on absolutes, and provide feedback on validity. Friedman and Kulikauskas will review what was learned and develop further investigations with interested participants.