Skip to content
Gallery
OSWIM: Offshore Wind Impacts and Monitoring Hub
Share
Explore
Habitats and Ecosystems (HE)

icon picker
Resources

Table D
Search
Bang-et-al._2019
Bang, J.; Ma, C.; Tarantino, E.; Vela, A.; Yamane, D. (2019). Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Floating Offshore Wind Energy in California. Report by University of California Santa Barbara.
Boatman-et-al._2020
Comparative Study of Aerial Survey Techniques (AT-22-03)
Farr-et-al._2021
Farr, H., Ruttenberg, B., Walter, R. K., Wang, Y. H., & White, C. (2021). Potential environmental effects of deepwater floating offshore wind energy facilities. Ocean & Coastal Management, 207, 105611.
Floeter-et-al._2017
Floeter, J., van Beusekom, J.E., Auch, D., Callies, U., Carpenter, J., Dudeck, T., Eberle, S., Eckhardt, A., Gloe, D., Hänselmann, K. and Hufnagl, M., 2017. Pelagic effects of offshore wind farm foundations in the stratified North Sea. Progress in Oceanography, 156, pp.154-173.
ICF_2020
ICF. 2020. Comparison of Environmental Effects from Different Offshore Wind Turbine Foundations. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Headquarters, Sterling, VA. OCS Study BOEM 2020-041. 42 pp
Kordan-et-al._2024
Kordan, M.; Yakan, S. (2024). The effect of offshore wind farms on the variation of the phytoplankton population. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 69 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103358
Point-Blue-et-al._2024
Rockwood, R.C., L. Salas, J. Howar, N. Nur and J. Jahncke. 2024. Using Available Data and Information to Identify Offshore Wind Energy Areas Off the California Coast. Unpublished Report to the California Ocean Protection Council. Point Blue Conservation Science (Contribution No. 12758). 95 pp.
Raghukumar-et-al._2022
Raghukumar, K.; Chartrand, C.; Chang, G.; Cheung, L.; Roberts, J. (2022). Effect of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines on Atmospheric Circulation in California. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.863995
Raghukumar-et-al._2024
Raghukumar, Kaus, Tim Nelson, Grace Chang, Chris Chartrand, Lawrence Cheung, Jesse Roberts, Michael Jacox, and Jerome Fiechter. 2020. A Numerical Modeling Framework to Evaluate Effects of Offshore Wind Farms on California’s Coastal Upwelling Ecosystem. Publication Number: CEC-500-2024-006.
Reeb-et-al._2022
Development of Computer Simulations to Assess Entanglement Risk to Whales and Leatherback Sea Turtles in Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Moorings, Cables, and Associated Derelict Fishing Gear Offshore California (PC-19-x07)
Rockwood-et-al._2024
Rockwood, R.C., L. Salas, J. Howar, N. Nur and J. Jahncke. 2024. Using Available Data and Information to Identify Offshore Wind Energy Areas Off the California Coast. Unpublished Report to the California Ocean Protection Council. Point Blue Conservation Science (Contribution No. 12758). 95 pp.
Rueda-Bayona-et-al._2022
Rueda-Bayona, J. G., Eras, J. J. C., & Chaparro, T. R. (2022). Impacts generated by the materials used in offshore wind technology on Human Health, Natural Environment and Resources. Energy, 261, 125223.
Schroeder-et-al._2023
The Environmental Status of Artificial Structures Offshore California (PC-20-02)
SEER-Benthic-Disturbance-et-al._2022
(SEER) U.S. Offshore Wind Synthesis of Environmental Effects Research. 2022. Benthic Disturbance from Offshore Wind Foundations, Anchors, and Cables. Report by National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy, Wind Energy Technologies Office. Available at https://tethys.pnnl.gov/seer.
SEER-New-Structures-et-al._2022
(SEER) U.S. Offshore Wind Synthesis of Environmental Effects Research. 2022. Introduction of New Offshore Wind Farm Structures: Effects on Fish Ecology. Report by National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy, Wind Energy Technologies Office. Available at https://tethys.pnnl.gov/seer.
SEER-Vessel-Collision-et-al._2022
(SEER) U.S. Offshore Wind Synthesis of Environmental Effects Research. 2022. Presence of Vessels: Effects of Vessel Collision on Marine Life. Report by National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy, Wind Energy Technologies Office. Available at https://tethys.pnnl.gov/seer.
Siedersleben-et-al._2018
Siedersleben, S. K., Lundquist, J. K., Platis, A., Bange, J., Bärfuss, K., Lampert, A., ... & Emeis, S. (2018). Micrometeorological impacts of offshore wind farms as seen in observations and simulations. Environmental Research Letters, 13(12), 124012.
Wang-et-al._2022
https://database.rwsc.org/details?recordId=rect0U7t5CgF9mHiW
Wang-et-al._2023
Wang, L., Wang, B., Cen, W., Xu, R., Huang, Y., Zhang, X., ... & Zhang, Y. (2023). Ecological impacts of the expansion of offshore wind farms on trophic level species of marine food chain. Journal of Environmental Sciences.
Watson-et-al._2024
Watson, S. C., Somerfield, P. J., Lemasson, A. J., Knights, A. M., Edwards-Jones, A., Nunes, J., ... & Beaumont, N. J. (2024). The global impact of offshore wind farms on ecosystem services. Ocean & Coastal Management, 249, 107023.
Bang-et-al._2019
Full citation
Bang, J.; Ma, C.; Tarantino, E.; Vela, A.; Yamane, D. (2019). Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Floating Offshore Wind Energy in California. Report by University of California Santa Barbara.
Literature Type
Scientific paper
Research Question
What are the lifecycle GHG emissions associated with FOSW in CA?
Monitoring Method
Labroatory experimnet
Technology
Impact source/Stressor
Ecosystems (atmospheric)
Development Phase
Operation and Maintenance
Receptor
Ecosystems (Atmospheric)
Geographic Area
California
Spatial Scale
Humbolt, Morro Bay WEA
Temporal Scale
multi-year
Main Findings
-1 MWh of electricity through floating offshore wind power generates ~15kg CO2-equivalent GHG emissions over its life cycle, which is comparable with the literature for conceptual floating offshore wind turbine models. -Monte Carlo simulation establishes a 90% confidence interval range of emissions from 11.60 to 25.04kg CO2-equivalent

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.