Skip to content
Gallery
OSWIM: Offshore Wind Impacts and Monitoring Hub
Share
Explore
Refrences

icon picker
Literature Database


=
Search
Ahlen-et-al._2009
Ahlén, I., Baagøe, H. J., & Bach, L. (2009). Behavior of Scandinavian bats during migration and foraging at sea. Journal of Mammalogy, 90(6), 1318-1323.
Bang-et-al._2019
Bang, J.; Ma, C.; Tarantino, E.; Vela, A.; Yamane, D. (2019). Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Floating Offshore Wind Energy in California. Report by University of California Santa Barbara.
Bell-et-al._2020
Bell, A.; von der Au, M.; Regnery, J.; Schmid, M.; Meermann, B.; Reifferscheid, G.; Ternes, T.; Buchinger, S. (2020). Does galvanic cathodic protection by aluminum anodes impact marine organisms?. Environmental Sciences Europe , 32(157).
Benhemma-Le Gall-et-al._2021
Gall, B. L., Graham, I. M., Merchant, N. D., & Thompson, P. M. (2021). Broad-Scale Responses of Harbor Porpoises to Pile-Driving and Vessel Activities During Offshore Windfarm Construction. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 735.
Boatman-et-al._2020
Comparative Study of Aerial Survey Techniques (AT-22-03)
Brodie-et-al._2021
Brodie, J.; Kohut, J.; Zemeckis, D. (2021). Identifying Ecological Metrics and Sampling Strategies for Baseline Monitoring During Offshore Wind Development
Calambokidis-et-al._2024
Calambokidis J, Kratofil MA, Palacios DM, Lagerquist BA, Schorr GS, Hanson MB, Baird RW, Forney KA, Becker EA, Rockwood RC and Hazen EL (2024) Biologically Important Areas II for cetaceans within U.S. and adjacent waters - West Coast Region. Front. Mar. Sci. 11:1283231. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1283231
creation: JD on February 20, 2024
Duffy-et-al._2023
Duffy, O.; Chumbinho, R.; Coca, I.; Breslin, J. (2023). Impact of geophysical and geotechnical site investigation surveys on fish and shellfish (Report No. BD00722001). Report by BlueWise Marine. Report for Wind Energy Ireland.
Ellison-et-al._2011
Ellison WT., Southall BL, Clark CW, Frankel AF. 2012. A new context-based approach to assess marine mammal behavioral responses to anthropogenic sounds. Conservation Biology. 26:21-28.
Farr-et-al._2021
Farr, H., Ruttenberg, B., Walter, R. K., Wang, Y. H., & White, C. (2021). Potential environmental effects of deepwater floating offshore wind energy facilities. Ocean & Coastal Management, 207, 105611.
Floeter-et-al._2017
Floeter, J., van Beusekom, J.E., Auch, D., Callies, U., Carpenter, J., Dudeck, T., Eberle, S., Eckhardt, A., Gloe, D., Hänselmann, K. and Hufnagl, M., 2017. Pelagic effects of offshore wind farm foundations in the stratified North Sea. Progress in Oceanography, 156, pp.154-173.
Harnois-et-al._2015
Harnois, V.; Smith, H.; Benjamins, S.; Johanning, L. (2015). Assessment of Entanglement Risk to Marine Megafauna due to Offshore Renewable Energy Mooring Systems. International Journal of Marine Energy, 11, 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijome.2015.04.001
Harsanyi-et-al._2022
Harsanyi, P.; Scott, K.; Easton, B.; Ortiz, G.; Chapman, E.; Piper, A.; Rochas, C.; Lyndon, A. (2022). The Effects of Anthropogenic Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) on the Early Development of Two Commercially Important Crustaceans, European Lobster, Homarus gammarus (L.) and Edible Crab, Cancer pagurus (L.). Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(5), 18.
Hesestetun-et-al.2023
Hestetun, J.; Ray, J.; Murvoll, K.; Kjølhamar, A.; Dahlgren, T. (2023). Environmental DNA reveals spatial patterns of fish and plankton diversity at a floating offshore wind farm. Environmental DNA, Early View, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.450
Holdman-et-al._2023
Holdman, A.; Tregenza, N.; Van Parijs, S.; DeAngelis, A. (2023). Acoustic ecology of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) between two U.S. offshore wind energy areas. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 0, 1-11.https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsad150https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsad150
Hutchinson-et-al._2023
Hutchison, Z.; Gill, A.; Sigray, P.; He, H.; King, J. (2020). Anthropogenic electromagnetic fields (EMF) influence the behaviour of bottom-dwelling marine species. Scientific Reports, 10, 4219 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60793-x
ICF_2020
ICF. 2020. Comparison of Environmental Effects from Different Offshore Wind Turbine Foundations. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Headquarters, Sterling, VA. OCS Study BOEM 2020-041. 42 pp
Karama-et-al._2021
Karama, K. S., Matsushita, Y., Inoue, M., Kojima, K., Tone, K., Nakamura, I., & Kawabe, R. (2021). Movement pattern of red seabream Pagrus major and yellowtail Seriola quinqueradiata around Offshore Wind Turbine and the neighboring habitats in the waters near Goto Islands, Japan. Aquaculture and Fisheries, 6(3), 300-308.
Klinck-et-al._2015
Klinck, H.; Fregosi, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Turpin, A.; Mellinger, D.; Erofeev, A.; Barth, J.; Shearman, R.; Jafarmardar, K.; Stelzer, R. (2015). Mobile Autonomous Platforms for Passive-Acoustic Monitoring of High-frequency. Paper presented at World Robotic Sailing championship and International Robotic Sailing Conference, Åland Islands.
Kordan-et-al._2024
Kordan, M.; Yakan, S. (2024). The effect of offshore wind farms on the variation of the phytoplankton population. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 69 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103358
Michel-et-al._2024
Michel, M.; Guichard, B.; Béesau, J.; Samaran, F. (2024). Passive acoustic monitoring for assessing marine mammals population in European waters: Workshop conclusions and perspectives. Paper presented at 34th Annual Conference of the European Cetacean Society, Galicia, Spain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105983
Mooney-et-al._2020
Mooney, T.; Andersson, M.; Stanley, J. (2020). Acoustic Impacts of Offshore Wind Energy on Fishery Resources: An Evolving Source and Varied Effects Across a Wind Farm’s Lifetime. Oceanography, 33(4), 82-95. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2020.408
Pereksta-et-al._2022
Birds, Bats, and Beyond: Networked Wildlife Tracking along the Pacific Coast of the U.S. (PC‐22‐03)
Pereksta-et-al._2022
Seabird and Marine Mammal Surveys Near Potential Renewable Energy Sites Offshore Central and Southern California (PC-17-01)
Pereksta-et-al._2023
Offshore Acoustic Bat Study along the California Coastline (PC-19-03)
Peschko-et-al._2020
Peschko, V., Mercker, M., & Garthe, S. (2020). Telemetry reveals strong effects of offshore wind farms on behaviour and habitat use of common guillemots (Uria aalge) during the breeding season. Marine Biology, 167(8), 1-13.
Point-Blue-et-al._2024
Rockwood, R.C., L. Salas, J. Howar, N. Nur and J. Jahncke. 2024. Using Available Data and Information to Identify Offshore Wind Energy Areas Off the California Coast. Unpublished Report to the California Ocean Protection Council. Point Blue Conservation Science (Contribution No. 12758). 95 pp.
Preschko-et-al._2020b
Peschko, V., Mendel, B., Müller, S., Markones, N., Mercker, M. and Garthe, S., 2020. Effects of offshore windfarms on seabird abundance: Strong effects in spring and in the breeding season. Marine Environmental Research, 162, p.105157.
purpose: list of citations found
Putman-et-al._2018
Putman, N.; Scanlan, M.; Pollock, A.; O'Neil, J.; Couture, R.; Stoner, J.; Quinn, T.; Lohmann, K.; Noakes, D. (2018). Geomagnetic field influences upward movement of young Chinook salmon emerging from nests. Biology Letters, 14(2)
Raghukumar-et-al._2022
Raghukumar, K.; Chartrand, C.; Chang, G.; Cheung, L.; Roberts, J. (2022). Effect of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines on Atmospheric Circulation in California. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.863995
Raghukumar-et-al._2024
Raghukumar, Kaus, Tim Nelson, Grace Chang, Chris Chartrand, Lawrence Cheung, Jesse Roberts, Michael Jacox, and Jerome Fiechter. 2020. A Numerical Modeling Framework to Evaluate Effects of Offshore Wind Farms on California’s Coastal Upwelling Ecosystem. Publication Number: CEC-500-2024-006.
Reeb-et-al._2022
Characterization of the Distribution, Movements, and Foraging Habitat of Endangered Leatherback Turtles in Designated Critical Habitat off the U.S. West Coast (PC-23-04)
Reeb-et-al._2022
Development of Computer Simulations to Assess Entanglement Risk to Whales and Leatherback Sea Turtles in Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Moorings, Cables, and Associated Derelict Fishing Gear Offshore California (PC-19-x07)
related documents: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yigrSVWF0Z2J2hxzZmHJHCjvii85NHyEMmuw1zCFOnY/edit?usp=drive_link
Reubens-et-al._2013
Reubens, J.T., Vandendriessche, S., Zenner, A.N., Degraer, S. and Vincx, M., 2013. Offshore wind farms as productive sites or ecological traps for gadoid fishes?–Impact on growth, condition index and diet composition. Marine environmental research, 90, pp.66-74.
Risch-et-al._2023
Risch, D.; Favill, G.; Marmo, B.; van Geel, N.; Benjamins, S.; Thompson, P.; Wittich, A.; Wilson, B. (2023). Characterisation of underwater operational noise of two types of floating offshore wind turbines. Report by Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS). Report for Supergen Offshore Renewable Energy Hub.
Rockwood-et-al._2020
Rockwood, R.; Adams, J.; Silber, G.; Jahncke, J. (2020). Estimating effectiveness of speed reduction measures for decreasing whale-strike mortality in a high-risk region. Endangered Species Research, 43, 145–166.
Rockwood-et-al._2024
Rockwood, R.C., L. Salas, J. Howar, N. Nur and J. Jahncke. 2024. Using Available Data and Information to Identify Offshore Wind Energy Areas Off the California Coast. Unpublished Report to the California Ocean Protection Council. Point Blue Conservation Science (Contribution No. 12758). 95 pp.
Rueda-Bayona-et-al._2022
Rueda-Bayona, J. G., Eras, J. J. C., & Chaparro, T. R. (2022). Impacts generated by the materials used in offshore wind technology on Human Health, Natural Environment and Resources. Energy, 261, 125223.
Schroeder-et-al._2023
The Environmental Status of Artificial Structures Offshore California (PC-20-02)
SEER-Benthic-Disturbance-et-al._2022
(SEER) U.S. Offshore Wind Synthesis of Environmental Effects Research. 2022. Benthic Disturbance from Offshore Wind Foundations, Anchors, and Cables. Report by National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy, Wind Energy Technologies Office. Available at https://tethys.pnnl.gov/seer.
SEER-EMF-et-al._2022
(SEER) U.S. Offshore Wind Synthesis of Environmental Effects Research. 2022. Presence of Vessels: Effects of Vessel Collision on Marine Life. Report by National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy, Wind Energy Technologies Office. Available at https://tethys.pnnl.gov/seer.
SEER-Entagelment-et-al._2022
(SEER) U.S. Offshore Wind Synthesis of Environmental Effects Research. 2022. Risk to Marine Life from Marine Debris & Floating Offshore Wind Cable Systems. Report by National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy, Wind Energy Technologies Office. Available at https://tethys.pnnl.gov/seer.
SEER-New-Structures-et-al._2022
(SEER) U.S. Offshore Wind Synthesis of Environmental Effects Research. 2022. Introduction of New Offshore Wind Farm Structures: Effects on Fish Ecology. Report by National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy, Wind Energy Technologies Office. Available at https://tethys.pnnl.gov/seer.
SEER-Vessel-Collision-et-al._2022
(SEER) U.S. Offshore Wind Synthesis of Environmental Effects Research. 2022. Presence of Vessels: Effects of Vessel Collision on Marine Life. Report by National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy, Wind Energy Technologies Office. Available at https://tethys.pnnl.gov/seer.
Siedersleben-et-al._2018
Siedersleben, S. K., Lundquist, J. K., Platis, A., Bange, J., Bärfuss, K., Lampert, A., ... & Emeis, S. (2018). Micrometeorological impacts of offshore wind farms as seen in observations and simulations. Environmental Research Letters, 13(12), 124012.
Slavik-et-al._2019
Slavik, K., Lemmen, C., Zhang, W., Kerimoglu, O., Klingbeil, K. and Wirtz, K.W., 2019. The large-scale impact of offshore wind farm structures on pelagic primary productivity in the southern North Sea. Hydrobiologia, 845(1), pp.35-53.
Thomsen-et-al._2023
Thomsen, F.; Stober, U.; Sarnocinska-Kot, J. (2023). Hearing Impact on Marine Mammals Due to Underwater Sound from Future Wind Farms. The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life, , 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10417-6_163-1
Vallejo-et-al._2017
Vallejo, G.C., Grellier, K., Nelson, E.J., McGregor, R.M., Canning, S.J., Caryl, F.M. and McLean, N., 2017. Responses of two marine top predators to an offshore wind farm. Ecology and Evolution, 7(21), pp.8698-8708.
Vineyard-et-al._2024
https://database.rwsc.org/details?recordId=rec9n8dXej1kB6i3F
Wang-et-al._2022
https://database.rwsc.org/details?recordId=rect0U7t5CgF9mHiW
Wang-et-al._2023
Wang, L., Wang, B., Cen, W., Xu, R., Huang, Y., Zhang, X., ... & Zhang, Y. (2023). Ecological impacts of the expansion of offshore wind farms on trophic level species of marine food chain. Journal of Environmental Sciences.
Watson-et-al._2024
Watson, S. C., Somerfield, P. J., Lemasson, A. J., Knights, A. M., Edwards-Jones, A., Nunes, J., ... & Beaumont, N. J. (2024). The global impact of offshore wind farms on ecosystem services. Ocean & Coastal Management, 249, 107023.
Wesier-et-al._2024
Weiser, E.; Overton, C.; Douglas, D.; Casazza, M.; Flint, P. (2024). Geese migrating over the Pacific Ocean select altitudes coinciding with offshore wind turbine blades. Journal of Applied Ecology, Early View https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14612
Wilber-et-al._2017
Wilber, D. H., Carey, D. A., & Griffin, M. (2018). Flatfish habitat use near North America's first offshore wind farm. Journal of Sea Research, 139, 24-32.
Wyman-et-al._2018
Wyman, M. T., Klimley, A. P., Battleson, R. D., Agosta, T. V., Chapman, E. D., Haverkamp, P. J., ... & Kavet, R. (2018). Behavioral responses by migrating juvenile salmonids to a subsea high-voltage DC power cable. Marine Biology, 165(8), 1-15.
Ahlen-et-al._2009
Full citation
Ahlén, I., Baagøe, H. J., & Bach, L. (2009). Behavior of Scandinavian bats during migration and foraging at sea. Journal of Mammalogy, 90(6), 1318-1323.
Literature Type
Scientific paper
Research Question
What is the behavior of migrating and foraging bats at sea?
Monitoring Method
Survey
Technology
-Portable incandescent spotlights and a Raytheon Palm IR PRO infrared thermal imaging camera -Handheld and automated ultrasound detectors
Impact source/Stressor
Avoidence
Development Phase
Operation and Maintenance
Receptor
Birds and Bats
Geographic Area
Europe
Spatial Scale
Coastal areas and islands of the Scandinavian Peninsula and islands of southern Sweden and Denmark (approximately 54u–57uN and 11u–19uE
Temporal Scale
months - years
Main Findings
-The finding that bats sometimes land on artificial structures at sea suggests they use behaviors rarely observed on land. -Because bats generally migrate at low altitudes, we expect that accidents with wind turbines are probably not frequent during migration itself. It is when bats stop over and forage for insects that are accumulated around the wind turbines that accidents become more likely. -During certain weather conditions insects are attracted to turbines and other objects at sea such as ships, lighthouses, and bridges. The problem is likely to be most serious when wind turbines are located in areas where many bats are passing and foraging. This can be in sea areas just offshore from important departure points but it can also be in areas on land with landscape structures and habitats that attract or funnel large numbers of breeding or migrating bats.




Load content from www.slc.ca.gov?
Loading external content may reveal information to 3rd parties. Learn more
Allow
Loading…
Load content from database.rwsc.org?
Loading external content may reveal information to 3rd parties. Learn more
Allow
Load content from ukerc.rl.ac.uk?
Loading external content may reveal information to 3rd parties. Learn more
Allow
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.