[ARCHIVE] co:lab_001

Explore

Teams Home

Partnerships

Every morning the group will discuss what needs to be accomplished that day and what is outstanding to meet the commitments for the event deliverables. Promise holders will lead the teams in identifying outstanding tasks and assigning deadlines.

⁠
Add New Standup
⁠
⁠

⁠

Add New Task

⁠

May 6, 2022

Date

May 6, 2022

Standup

Show hidden columns

⁠

Community team board

Community team board

Not Started

Enhance Discord onboarding flow

Community

Out of the 10 areas find 3 that we could unique drive value

Community

Of those 3, seek an owner for each and hand it off

Community

Huddle up and find 20 DAOs that match focus and values

Community

Join town hall for each of the DAOs and line up meetings with core contributors

Community

Have a Community vote on which DAOs best align

Community

Create one page partnership proposal and send over to contact

Community

Double down on refi summer with IRL initiatives

Community

In Progress

Brainstorm 10 areas that would keep people coming back to the community

Community

⁠

Brainstorming

A number of teams use the ‘Big Rocks’ analogy when deciding on their top priority goals. The core concept is this: if you’re trying to fill a jar, you put the big rocks in first. Then there’s plenty of room for small rocks, sand, etc to fill in the rest. But if you put the sand first, then the small rocks, then the big rocks, the big rocks won’t fit. In the same way, if a team focuses on the Big Rock goals first, it’s more likely they’ll achieve the lower-priority goals.

This doc helps teams decide what those Big Rocks are by using the ‘

$100 exercise⁠

’ to distribute a fictitious $100 across each of the proposed Big Rocks. Add a few top priority company or team goals to the Big Rocks table before inviting the rest of the team to weigh in. The key to this process is for everyone to allocate their $100 privately in Step 2 first, then come together for a brainstorm session to review and discuss the results collectively in Step 3.

Propose a few Big Rocks

When you’re ready to start, click

clear sample data

⁠

and then ‘+ New row’ to add your own Big Rock candidates.

Big Rock name

Why should we consider this Big Rock?

There are no rows in this table

⁠

Invite others to allocate their $$

Each team member should allocate $100 to each of the initiatives and fill in comments. Note that the table below will filter so each person can only see their own allocations. To start, each person should click this button:

⁠

Join the game

⁠

Allocate $

100

⁠

across priorities. You are currently at $

0

⁠

Rank

Person

Priority

Points

Notes

There are no rows in this table

Sum

⁠

Review the results as a team

Now it’s time for the reveal and discussion! Note, don’t unfold this section until everyone finishes their individual allocations. Below you’ll see the average allocations and a sense of the point distribution. You can also use the arrows to the left of each row to drill into the details and see everyone’s comments.

Big Rock name

Why should we consider this Big Rock?

Average

Point distribution

[ ]

There are no rows in this table

⁠

Stakeholder Archetypes

MEMBERS

Value Prop (rewards)

Risks

Vetting Criteria

Process/Timeline Onboarding

Questions:

How much will it cost to stay at Cohere locations?

What are the values? Culture? Principles? Criteria for joining?

What are the risks of a hyper inflated pricing? 10x, 100x

What are the level of membership?

1. Land Leaser (for Cohere location)

Land owners leasing their property (or just a section of their property) to Cohere in exchange for Cohere tokens. 99 year lease.

Questions:

Why this? Versus keeping it independent or going with the traditional route? What am I getting by doing this?

How does the token work?

How does the business model work?

Can I visit the other locations?

Who else is doing this?

What are the rights of use for this land? What will be happening here? How many people?

In what scenarios would the token value go down or stagnate? What is the likelihood of this happening?

Value Prop (rewards)

Token: Redeemable Equity

Liquidity of the hard asset

Economic Model: Be a part of the upside of Cohere

Compliant Security Token

Keep Title (and, in certain cases, keep ancestral land which reduces gentrification) - low risk

World-class team will build world-class venue

Infrastructure Investment and Improvements - We will invest resources to add value to the property/build infrastructure

Increase property value

Ex: Improvements

Increase economy of local area

Increase vitality of the local ecosystem

Increase vitality of the local community

Affiliates: Get access to best-in-class resources, people, knowledge

Risks/Downsides for stakeholder

The commitment:

Land Title Restriction: Can be more challenging to sell the land

first right of refusal to purchase land

Can’t do something else with the land

Token doesn't increase in value

Another party operating on your land (human impact, noise, pollution)

Risks/Downsides for Cohere

Change in land owner

Process/Timeline Onboarding

Feasibility Assessment

Site Visit

Cost Analysis

Vetting Criteria

Location

Access Transportation

Access Construction

Market demand / member demand

Time zone

Weather

Resources (food, water, etc)

Vibe

Relationship

Trust

Brand Integrity

Compatible Land Uses

Internet Access

Climate Change Risk

Political Stability

Ideal Avatar

Ideas...

Wants an intentional community but doesn’t know how to do it (or doesn’t want to invest the time/energy/money)

COHERE QUESTIONS:

2. Land Trust Contributor (Regenerative Community Land Trust)

Value Prop (rewards)

Token: Redeemable Equity: Higher Value than tax deduction

Risks/Downsides for stakeholder

Transfer of the asset

Risks/Downsides for Cohere

Vetting Criteria

Value alignments

Process/Timeline Onboarding

Questions:

Ideal Avatar

3. Cohere Venue Operators (Cohere Team)

Running day to day operations in the specific Cohere way. Can be either employed by Cohere or a separate entity.

Cohere LTD

(Cohere Experience)

Co-working

Co-living

Co-creation: mastermind to come together to share resources, support businesses, grow the DAO, personal development,

Epic Locations

Containers

Health and wellness

Standardized day structure (ex. Momentum)

-Mini Lab (facilitated mastermind/co-working)

-Curated Co-working sessions

-Daily wellness (yoga, meditation, HITT etc.)

-Daily Healthy meals (Cohere Chef)

-volunteer offerings

As you spend your time here, you’re gaining equity.

Who do you need to make this all happen?

Value Prop (rewards for Organization)

Market access

Increased

Risks/Downsides for stakeholder

Risks/Downsides for Cohere

Vetting Criteria

Process/Timeline Onboarding

Questions:

Are the people running the Cohere facility more grassroots or core Cohere or both?

How to systemize the venue operators?

Relationship between the venue and the bio-node? a

Ideal Avatar

4. Cohere Program Operator (Cohere Team or Affiliate Partner)

Residencies, Retreat, Events

Value Prop (rewards for partners)

Access to Cohere facilities/locations (SAM)

Marketing to the Cohere network (SAM)

Increased Equity Value as a shareholder in Cohere

Brand Amplification

Affiliate payouts (when program attendees become Cohere members)

Continuation of living together at Cohere locations

Not needing to finance construction

Value for members:

Discounts

interorganization

In Cohere: ex: stays

Ownership in Cohere

event invites

collaboration potential

job opportunities for within Cohere

“showing up” contributing value in alignment with your passion and building a better world tangible way

education of new tools ex: crypto, DAO, Blockchain

Value Prop (rewards) for Cohere

100% occupancy of Cohere locations

Diversity of offering for Members (education, personal development, experiences)

Vetted recruitment for contractors/employees/bounties

New epic members (vetted referrals)

Deepening bonds for Cohere members / growing of community

Growing the DAO membership, Bounty participants

Informed needs for participants and partners

Risks/Downsides for program stakeholder

Is the facility best suited for the program’s needs?

Control over schedule / availability

Profit margins? Equity considerations

Restrictions on program operations

ex: restaurant vs kitchen

ex: existing facilitators

Risks/Downsides for Cohere

Off-brand / values or intention misalignment

Opportunity cost: Less optionality for members, less time for labs

Liability legally

Facility damage

Add New Standup

Community team board

Brainstorming

Propose a few Big Rocks

Invite others to allocate their $$

Review the results as a team

Stakeholder Archetypes

MEMBERS

1. Land Leaser (for Cohere location)

2. Land Trust Contributor (Regenerative Community Land Trust)

3. Cohere Venue Operators (Cohere Team)

4. Cohere Program Operator (Cohere Team or Affiliate Partner)

5. Fundraising Through Cohere

6. Land Preservation Leaser (no physical location, just the land)

7. Existing Venues

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.

Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (

CtrlP

) instead.

Partnerships

⁠Add New Standup⁠⁠

Brainstorming

Propose a few Big Rocks

Invite others to allocate their $$

Review the results as a team

Stakeholder Archetypes

MEMBERS

1. Land Leaser (for Cohere location)

2. Land Trust Contributor (Regenerative Community Land Trust)

3. Cohere Venue Operators (Cohere Team)

4. Cohere Program Operator (Cohere Team or Affiliate Partner)

⁠
Add New Standup
⁠
⁠