Skip to content
[ARCHIVE] co:lab_001
Global Execution
Collaborator Profiles
Doc Meta Data
Cohere Harvest Day 5/20
Cross Doc Membership Applications
More
Share
Explore
Teams Home

icon picker
NFT

Every morning the group will discuss what needs to be accomplished that day and what is outstanding to meet the commitments for the event deliverables. Promise holders will lead the teams in identifying outstanding tasks and assigning deadlines.

⁠
Add New Standup
⁠
⁠

⁠
Add New Task
⁠
⁠
Search
May 6, 2022
Date
May 6, 2022
Standup

Show hidden columns
⁠


NFT team board
14
In Progress
7
NFT Metadata & Traits
Open
NFT
Genesis NFT Utility
MA
Marcus AM
Open
Open
NFT
Establish the quantity, tiers and pricing of the Genesis NFTs
MA
Marcus AM
Open
NFT
Develop and write-up a marketing strategy for Genesis NFTs
MA
Marcus AM
Open
NFT
Develop a minting mechanism for the Genesis NFTs and set up the minting page (with credit card minting)
MA
Marcus AM
Open
NFT
Figure out the best tech for the Genesis NFTs (chain, NFT type, smart contracts)
MA
Marcus AM
NFT
NFT
Not Started
6
Research top NFT projects and identify their “secret sauce”
MA
Marcus AM
NFT
Develop and write out the use of proceeds for the Genesis NFTs (impact-funds, DAO OS development, construction contributions)
MA
Marcus AM
NFT
Clarify and write-up the legal framework Genesis NFTs
MA
Marcus AM
NFT
Propose NFT artwork that fits into the Cohere ethos
MA
Marcus AM
May 4, 2022
Open
NFT
Develop a greenlist strategy and how we reward contributors and early belivevers in Cohere
MA
Marcus AM
Open
NFT
Establish the appropriate relationship with Genesis NFTs and DAO Governance
MA
Marcus AM
Open
NFT
⁠

Brainstorming

A number of teams use the ‘Big Rocks’ analogy when deciding on their top priority goals. The core concept is this: if you’re trying to fill a jar, you put the big rocks in first. Then there’s plenty of room for small rocks, sand, etc to fill in the rest. But if you put the sand first, then the small rocks, then the big rocks, the big rocks won’t fit. In the same way, if a team focuses on the Big Rock goals first, it’s more likely they’ll achieve the lower-priority goals.
This doc helps teams decide what those Big Rocks are by using the ‘
$100 exercise
⁠
’ to distribute a fictitious $100 across each of the proposed Big Rocks. Add a few top priority company or team goals to the Big Rocks table before inviting the rest of the team to weigh in. The key to this process is for everyone to allocate their $100 privately in Step 2 first, then come together for a brainstorm session to review and discuss the results collectively in Step 3.

Propose a few Big Rocks

When you’re ready to start, click
clear sample data
⁠
and then ‘+ New row’ to add your own Big Rock candidates.
Big Rock name
Why should we consider this Big Rock?
1
​
​
There are no rows in this table
⁠
⁠

Invite others to allocate their $$

Each team member should allocate $100 to each of the initiatives and fill in comments. Note that the table below will filter so each person can only see their own allocations. To start, each person should click this button:
⁠
Join the game
⁠
⁠
Allocate $
100
⁠
across priorities. You are currently at $
0
⁠
.
Rank
Person
Priority
Points
Notes
There are no rows in this table
0
Sum
⁠
⁠

Review the results as a team

Now it’s time for the reveal and discussion! Note, don’t unfold this section until everyone finishes their individual allocations. Below you’ll see the average allocations and a sense of the point distribution. You can also use the arrows to the left of each row to drill into the details and see everyone’s comments.
Big Rock name
Why should we consider this Big Rock?
Average
Point distribution
1
​
​
​
[  ]
There are no rows in this table
⁠



Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.