Skip to content
Paste highlights
Paste highlights
Delete Rows
Raw highlights
Highlights
1
Yellow highlight | Location: 747
2
After four months of hearings in 1931, the commission ruled weight-based rates illegal. Although it found the container to be “a commendable piece of equipment,” the commission said that the railroads could not charge less to carry a container than to carry the equivalent weight of the most expensive commodity inside the container. With that ruling, containers no longer made economic sense on the rails.
3
4
5
Blue highlight | Location: 1,170
6
Malcom McLean’s fundamental insight, commonplace today but quite radical in the 1950s, was that the shipping industry’s business was moving cargo, not sailing ships.
7
8
9
Yellow highlight | Location: 1,322
10
Containerization, he concluded, “would appear to present the fortunate circumstance of a promising initial course of action offering the option of going as far as desired and stopping at any point that prudent planning dictates.”
11
12
13
Yellow highlight | Location: 1,416
14
The experience of Grace Line offered a graphic warning. Grace had won a $7 million government subsidy to convert two vessels into containerships and spent another $3 million on chassis, forklifts, and 1,500 aluminum containers, only to have longshoremen in Venezuela refuse to handle its highly publicized ships. Having badly misjudged the politics and the economics of container shipping, it would eventually sell the ships to Sea-Land at a loss. As a Grace executive noted ruefully, “The concept was valid, but the timing was wrong.”
15
16
17
Yellow highlight | Location: 1,500
18
Neither city had much besides canned tuna to ship out in containers, but providing container service earned McLean the goodwill of Teodoro Moscoso, the creator of Operation Bootstrap and a powerful figure in Puerto Rico’s economic development.
19
20
21
Yellow highlight | Location: 1,746
22
There might not even be a transit shed, the most expensive part of pier construction.
23
24
25
Yellow highlight | Location: 1,807
26
For their part, Tobin and King were now convinced that the container was the future, and the Port Authority lost interest in taking over city piers that would never have the acreage or transport connections for containers. Although the Port Authority was proceeding with plans to turn twenty-seven outmoded piers in Brooklyn into twelve modern ones, the agency understood that it was in a race to recover its investment before container shipping made the reconstructed piers obsolete.
27
28
29
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,434
30
Longshore families, now receiving stable incomes, were free to move from tough waterfront neighborhoods to comfortable suburbs, dealing a blow to the class solidarity that came from isolation.
31
32
33
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,441
34
Despite these discontents, the longshore unions’ tenacious resistance to automation appeared to establish the principle that long-term workers deserved to be treated humanely as businesses embraced innovations that would eliminate their jobs. That principle was ultimately accepted in very few parts of the American economy and was never codified in law. Years of bargaining by two very different union leaders made the longshore industry a rare exception, in which employers that profited from automation were forced to share the benefits with the individuals whose work was automated away.
35
36
37
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,472
38
Marad’s desire to set common standards was supported by the Navy, which had the right to commandeer subsidized ships in the event of war and worried that a merchant fleet using incompatible container systems would complicate logistics.
39
40
41
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,485
42
The railway precedent suggested that ship lines might eventually make their container systems compatible without a government dictate. Yet the analogy is misleading. The gauge that became “standard” on railways had no particular technical superiority, and standardization had almost no economic implications;
43
44
45
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,502
46
If government agencies in those days had made it a routine practice to conduct cost-benefit studies, most likely the entire process of container standardization would never have begun.
47
48
49
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,541
50
The specifics mattered less: within the limits set by state laws, trucks and railroads could accommodate almost any length and weight. The maritime interests that were influential in the Marad committees, in contrast, cared greatly about the specifics. A ship built with cells for 27-foot containers could not easily be redesigned to carry 35-foot containers.
51
52
53
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,720
54
The cart, however, had gotten ahead of the horse: the ISO container committee had agreed on what the corner fitting should look like without defining all of the loads and stresses it should be able to withstand. Starting in the autumn of 1965, dozens of ship lines and leasing companies began ordering containers with fittings based on the design that had worked for Sea-Land’s operations but had never been tested under other conditions.
55
56
57
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,771
58
He was followed by Sea-Land’s chief engineer, Ron Katims, who called for the subcommittee to recognize 35-foot containers as well. Sea-Land’s containers, the subcommittee was told, tended to hit weight limits long before they were filled to physical capacity, so 40-foot containers would not in practice hold more freight than 35-footers.
59
60
61
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,977
62
Freight forwarders took advantage of the rate difference, arranging to consolidate smaller shipments into full carloads, for which they could demand lower rail rates.
63
64
65
Yellow highlight | Location: 3,037
66
Behind the scenes, though, the prerequisites for the container revolution were falling into place. Dock labor costs were poised to fall massively thanks to union agreements on both coasts. International agreements were in place on standards for container sizes and lifting methods, even if few containers yet met those standards. Wharves designed for container handling were on the way. Manufacturers had learned to organize their factories so that they could save money by shipping large loads in single units to take advantage of containerization. Railroads, truckers, and freight forwarders had grown familiar with switching trailers and containers from one conveyance to another to move what was now being called “intermodal” freight. Regulators were cautiously encouraging competition so that carriers could pass some of the cost savings from containerization on to their customers. Only one crucial ingredient was missing: ships.
67
68
69
Yellow highlight | Location: 3,414
70
The army instructed its depots to stop combining shipments that would need to be sorted in Vietnam and to abide by the Three Cs: one container, one customer, one commodity.
71
72
73
Yellow highlight | Location: 3,503
74
With its ship operating costs fully covered by its military contracts for Vietnam, Sea-Land was guaranteed to make money no matter how little cargo it picked up in Japan.
75
76
77
Yellow highlight | Location: 3,538
78
By the late 1950s, the lesson for public officials already was clear. As container shipping expanded, maritime traffic would be drawn to a small number of very large ports.
79
80
81
Yellow highlight | Location: 3,601
82
Nutter dreamed up a lease very different from the norm of so many cents per ton: Sea-Land would pay a minimum fee high enough to cover the cost of building its terminal and would pay more as its tonnage rose, but beyond a certain point there would be no additional charge. That “mini-max” provision gave Sea-Land an incentive to pump cargo through Oakland, because once its tonnage exceeded the upper limit, its average port cost per ton would plummet.
83
84
85
Yellow highlight | Location: 3,634
86
As early as 1966, though, public officials in Seattle were sensing that their remote city, with little industry, might be able to develop a new economy based on distribution rather than on factories.
87
88
89
Yellow highlight | Location: 3,637
90
“Commodity distribution has grown out of the dependent sector to link production and consumption,” port planner Ting-Li Cho wrote presciently. “It has become an independent sector that, in return, determines the economy of production and consumption.”
91
92
93
Yellow highlight | Location: 3,650
94
Seattle began no fewer than three new terminals with no tenants in place, driven by a new imperative: if the supply of terminal space was not adequate to meet the demand for container shipping, the ships might go somewhere else.
95
96
97
Yellow highlight | Location: 3,701
98
The emerging economics of container shipping meant that the laggards faced potentially serious consequences. The newly built containerships coming on the scene in the late 1960s carried far more cargo than the vessels they supplanted; even if the total amount of cargo grew, fewer voyages would be required. Shipowners wanted to keep their ships under way to recover the high construction cost, so they preferred that each voyage involve only one or two stops on either side of the ocean rather than four or five.
99
100
101
Yellow highlight | Location: 3,997
102
Sea-Land was a conference carrier in the Pacific, charging the same rates as its competitors. The SL-7s’ faster transit time would help Sea-Land attract cargo, and other carriers, bound by the conference agreement, would not be able to drop their rates in response.
103
104
105
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,085
106
In the 1950s and 1960s, though, a temporary imbalance between the amount of space on breakbulk ships and the amount of general cargo usually was not a fatal problem. The war-surplus ships that filled most merchant fleets had been acquired for little or nothing, so shipowners were not saddled with huge mortgage payments. Their main expenses—cargo handling, fees for the use of docks, pay for crews, fuel—were operating costs. If business was bad, the shipowner could lay the vessel up and most of the costs would go away. The economics of container shipping were fundamentally different. The huge sums borrowed to buy ships, containers, and chassis required regular payments of interest and principal.
107
108
109
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,094
110
In container shipping, quite unlike breakbulk, overcapacity would not diminish as owners temporarily idled their ships. Instead, rates would fall as carriers struggled to win every available box, and overcapacity would persist until the demand for shipping space eventually caught up with the supply.
111
112
113
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,200
114
The hundreds of containerships built in the first half of the 1970s had been designed for the world of the late 1960s. High speed was important because of the closure of the Suez Canal in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, which forced ship traffic between Europe and Asia and Australia to take a much longer route around the tip of Africa. High fuel consumption—the inevitable result of high speed—did not much matter, because oil was cheap. The world of the mid-1970s was totally different.
115
116
117
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,262
118
A round-the-world route, McLean thought, would solve one of the industry’s inherent problems, the imbalanced flow of freight that left some ships sailing full in one direction and half-empty in the other. The new vessels would have the lowest construction cost per container slot of any vessel in the world and the lowest operating costs per container as well.
119
120
121
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,295
122
By the 1980s, new ships holding the equivalent of 4,200 20-foot containers could move a ton of cargo at 40 percent less than could a ship built for 3,000 containers and at one-third the cost of a vessel designed for 1,800.
123
124
125
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,356
126
Entire technologies, such as on-dock rail, proved to be sinkholes: ports that laid train tracks on the docks, so that cranes could transfer cargo directly from ships to waiting railcars, learned that the time required to move the train forward as the crane loaded each railcar delayed ships and reduced productivity.
127
128
129
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,371
130
Unlike government agencies, the private port operators had no imperative to expand for the sake of local economic development; they could insist on long-term contracts, backed by banks or by collateral, to assure that they would recover whatever investments they made. Governments retreated to the role of landlords, renting out waterfront land to private companies. By the end of the twentieth century, nearly half the world’s trade in containers would be passing through privately controlled ports.
131
132
133
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,523
134
Quite unlike either breakbulk ships or first-generation containerships, though, the second-generation ships came with obligations payable regardless of the business situation.
135
136
137
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,535
138
A global recession would hit shipowners twice over: the lack of freight would cause their fixed cost per container to increase at the same time as it would weaken their ability to hold rates at profitable levels.
139
140
141
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,626
142
Many nonfreight costs undoubtedly fell with the growth of container shipping. Packing full containers at the factory eliminated the need for custom-made wooden crates to protect merchandise from theft or damage. The container itself served as a mobile warehouse, so the traditional costs of storage in transit warehouses fell away. Cargo theft dropped sharply, and claims of damage to goods in transit fell by up to 95 percent;
143
144
145
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,678
146
In industry, the traffic department, housed in the back of the plant near the loading dock, would be given whatever the manufacturing department produced, with instructions to ship it. A tariff clerk, his desk piled high with the freight classification guidelines of various liner conferences, trucking conferences, and railroads, would try to describe the cargo in whatever way brought the lowest rate. An export manager would then call ship lines to select a vessel, balancing the desire for fast delivery with the need to keep from becoming too dependent on a particular carrier. With decentralized organizations and fairly primitive computer systems, even large, relatively sophisticated multinational corporations could end up paying dramatically different prices for the same type of cargo, depending on what the tariff clerk and the export manager could accomplish. “In some cases we’d pay $1,600 for a 40-foot container in the North Atlantic, and in other cases we’d be paying $8,000 for the same container,” recalled a former chemical-industry executive.
147
148
149
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,776
150
In July 1983, American President Lines sponsored the first experimental train composed only of the new double-stack cars. Within months, ship lines and railroads had negotiated ten-year contracts under which dedicated double-stack container trains would speed imports from Seattle, Oakland, and Long Beach directly to specially designed freight yards in the Midwest.
151
152
153
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,802
154
When American President Lines studied the matter a few years later, it concluded that freight rates from Asia to North America had fallen 40 to 60 percent because of the container. Between 1966 and 1990, economists Daniel M. Bernhofen, Zouheir El-Sahli, and Richard Kneller reported in 2013, the container was more than twice as important in increasing the flow of international trade among the wealthy countries as governments’ efforts to eliminate formal trade barriers. The box made the world economy much, much bigger.
155
156
157
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,855
158
In 2014, inventories in the United States were perhaps $1.2 trillion lower than they would have been had they stayed at the level of the 1980s, relative to sales.
159
160
161
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,872
162
The globalization of the late twentieth century took on quite a different character. International trade was no longer dominated by essential raw materials or finished products. Fewer than one-third of the containers imported through Southern California in 1998 contained consumer goods. Most of the rest were links in global supply chains, carrying what economists call “intermediate goods,” factory inputs that have been partially processed in one place and will be processed further someplace else.
163
164
165
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,923
166
If high shipping costs, high port costs, and long waiting times do not leave a country at an economic disadvantage, a cargo imbalance might.
167
168
169
Yellow highlight | Location: 4,930
170
In 2014, U.S. farmers exported more than 50,000 40-foot boxes loaded with soybeans, a commodity long deemed unsuitable for shipping in containers.
171
172
173
Yellow highlight | Location: 5,051
174
The giant vessels’ size required ocean terminals to load and discharge more boxes but made it harder for them to do so. Their added width—as many as 23 containers abreast—meant that a crane took longer to move the average box from ship to shore, while their lack of additional length left terminals no room to move more cranes alongside to handle the additional cargo. The net result was longer port calls, wiping out some of the saving gained from greater efficiency at sea.
175
176
177
Yellow highlight | Location: 5,074
178
If labor-intensive manufacturing shifts from an increasingly expensive China to lower-cost countries in South Asia or Africa, more America-bound ships may sail through the newly widened Suez Canal and cross the Atlantic rather than the Pacific, depriving the Panama Canal of traffic.
179
180
181
Yellow highlight | Location: 5,107
182
At first, the system did not run smoothly: the veteran crane drivers, it turned out, relied partly on sound to get their bearings, and working in silence hurt their accuracy. Once microphones were installed on the cranes and speakers placed in the control room so the operators could hear every clang and whir, the tempo returned to normal.
183
184
185
Yellow highlight | Location: 5,150
186
With several distribution centers at a single location, often owned by a single developer, a logistics cluster could support better transportation infrastructure and more frequent service than any single distribution center could have hoped for.
187
188
189
Yellow highlight | Location: 5,285
190
If a containership ever reaches Malacca-Max, the maximum size for a vessel able to pass through the straits, it will be more than a quarter mile long and 210 feet wide, with its bottom at least 55 feet below the waterline. It may be uneconomical to build, because its width could require a structure of thicker steel, reducing cargo space. If such a vessel should sink, it could take nearly $2 billion of cargo with it.
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
There are no rows in this table
143
Count
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.