Skip to content
Abstraction: Theory and Practice
() Abstract thinking engages broad, conceptual ideas beyond immediate experience.
Definition of Abstraction in Cognition and Reasoning
Abstraction is commonly defined as the cognitive process of identifying and isolating the common features or relationships among multiple things (). In other words, it is the process of deriving general rules or concepts from specific examples or experiences (). The result of abstraction is an abstract concept – a generalized idea that can represent all the individual instances and connect them as members of a group or category (). For example, from observing many different animals like sparrows and parrots, one can abstract the concept “bird” as a general category that captures their shared features (such as having wings or feathers).
Abstraction plays a crucial role in human cognition and reasoning. It allows us to think beyond the concrete and immediate: instead of only dealing with things we can directly see or touch, we can contemplate ideas, patterns, and principles in the abstract. This capacity underpins higher-order thinking such as problem-solving, planning, and creativity (). Abstract reasoning enables us to recognize patterns or underlying principles that aren’t explicitly visible, imagine hypothetical scenarios, and understand concepts like justice, freedom, or love that have no physical form. In fact, abstract thinking is considered a form of higher-order or advanced reasoning – it lets us connect ideas, generalize from experience, and make complex decisions by seeing the “big picture” beyond concrete details () (). For instance, grasping the concept of “freedom” requires abstract thought: one must generalize from various experiences of freedom (in speech, in action, etc.) to understand the core idea, which can have different interpretations and is not tied to any single tangible object (). In sum, abstraction is fundamental to cognition because it reduces complexity and highlights meaning, allowing humans to categorize knowledge, formulate theories, and reason about things we cannot directly observe.
The Core Steps of the Abstraction Process
Abstraction is a process by which the mind moves from specific instances to broader generalities. Though it can happen intuitively, it involves a few core steps: (1) identifying commonalities across different instances, (2) generalizing a concept from those examples, and (3) reducing complexity by stripping away detail while retaining essential information. Each step is discussed below.
Identifying Commonalities Across Different Instances
The first step in abstraction is to examine various specific instances or examples and identify what they have in common. This involves filtering out the differing details and focusing on shared attributes or patterns. In cognitive psychology, this stage is sometimes called observation and abstraction. We look at multiple situations or objects and notice the recurring characteristics among them () (). For example, a young child learning the concept of a “dog” will encounter many individual dogs and start to notice common features – perhaps that they are all four-legged animals that bark. The child begins to abstract the idea of “dog” by isolating these shared features from each particular pet they’ve seen (). Early on, the child might even apply the word “dog” to other four-legged animals like cats, because at first they recognize only the common element of four-leggedness in all these animals (). This illustrates the mind’s attempt to find commonality: even though a cat is not actually a dog, the child’s brain is searching for a shared feature (having four legs) and tentatively grouping creatures by that trait. In more adult terms, identifying commonalities might mean noticing that a series of events all involve a cause-and-effect pattern, or that different math problems can be solved with the same formula. This step lays the groundwork for forming a general concept by highlighting what is essential and repeated across different experiences ().
Generalizing a Concept from Specific Examples
Once common features or relations are identified, the next step is to generalize – to form a general concept or rule that covers all those specific instances. Generalization means that we create a mental category or principle that can be applied broadly, beyond the original examples we started with (). In essence, the mind “connects the dots” between individual cases and abstracts a unifying idea. For example, after observing many instances of dogs and extracting the common features (say, “four-legged, furry, barks”), a child will form a general concept of “dog.” Through generalization, the child learns that any new animal that fits this set of essential features is also likely to be called a dog, even if they haven’t seen that particular breed before (). In cognitive terms, the concept “dog” becomes a mental category under which many specific dogs (a labrador, a poodle, etc.) can be subsumed.
Importantly, generalization enables us to apply what we have learned to new situations. We are not limited to the exact cases we have seen; we can recognize or infer that a new case belongs to an existing abstract category because it shares the defining attributes. A classic example is how we derive scientific concepts: by observing several metals conduct electricity, we abstract the general property “conductivity”. Thereafter, if we encounter a new metal, we expect it to have electrical conductivity because it falls under the general concept of “metal” which we know has that property (). In psychology, this process often involves trial and error and refinement. We might over-generalize at first (as the child did by calling a cat a dog) and then adjust our concept with feedback. With more experience, we learn to refine the abstraction – adding or clarifying criteria so that the general concept accurately covers all and only the appropriate instances () (). In our example, the child eventually learns additional features that distinguish dogs from other four-legged animals (such as dogs bark, or have certain body shapes), and the concept of “dog” becomes more precise, no longer applied to cats (). Thus, generalization is the step where a tentative abstraction solidifies into a usable concept that can be broadly applied.
Reducing Complexity While Retaining Essential Information
A key aspect of abstraction is that it reduces complexity. By its nature, an abstraction omits specific details of individual instances to create a simpler, high-level representation. The goal is to retain only the essential information that is common and relevant, and discard (or ignore) the accidental or inessential details (). In the process of abstraction, information is filtered: what is unique to each example is set aside, and what is shared or fundamental is kept. This simplification makes it easier for our minds to manage and reason about concepts, especially when dealing with a large amount of information.
It’s important to note that when we abstract, we do lose some information – namely, the specific nuances of each instance – but ideally we retain the critical attributes needed to still understand or work with the concept (). A helpful illustration is the relationship between a category and its examples: “ball” is an abstract category, whereas a particular soccer ball is a concrete instance. If we abstract the idea of a “ball” from a specific leather soccer ball, we drop details like the soccer ball’s exact color, material, or design, and keep only the essential properties that define ball-ness (for example: round, bounces, can be thrown) (). By doing this, we’ve reduced the complexity – we no longer think about every aspect of the soccer ball, only the core idea of a ball. This abstract concept of “ball” can then represent many objects (soccer balls, basketballs, tennis balls, etc.) that share those general properties (). The unneeded specifics (like “made of leather” or “black and white pentagon pattern”) are left out because they aren’t essential to the general idea of a ball. In summary, this step of the abstraction process is about simplifying: focusing on what matters for your purposes and ignoring the rest (). Done properly, abstraction strikes a balance between simplicity and informativeness – it yields a concept simple enough to handle easily, but still rich enough in essential features that it remains meaningful and useful across different scenarios.
Cognitive Mechanisms Involved in Abstraction
Abstraction engages several cognitive mechanisms and has been studied from both psychological and neurological perspectives. How do our minds form and manipulate abstract concepts? What parts of the brain are involved? In this section, we explore the processes and theories that explain abstraction, including developmental psychology findings and neural correlates of abstract thinking.
Psychological Perspectives on Abstract Thinking
From a psychological standpoint, the capacity for abstraction is something that develops and can vary across individuals. Developmental psychologists have shown that abstract thinking abilities emerge as children grow. The famous theorist Jean Piaget described how children move from very concrete thinking in early childhood to more abstract thinking in adolescence. In Piaget’s stages of cognitive development, the Formal Operational stage (which begins around age 11 and continues through adulthood) is marked by the ability to think abstractly and hypothetically (). During this stage, children (and then adolescents) become capable of reasoning about situations that are not directly experienced. They can consider “what if” scenarios, understand abstract concepts like morality or algebra, and take the perspective of others in hypothetical terms (). For example, a child in the concrete stage might only understand the concept of justice in terms of a specific story or rule they’ve been told, whereas an adolescent in the formal operational stage can grasp justice as an abstract principle and apply it to novel situations. This developmental progression highlights that the brain’s ability to form abstractions strengthens over time, typically reaching maturity in the teenage years when one can reliably handle logic, hypothetical reasoning, and intangible concepts.
Another way psychologists understand abstraction is through concept formation and categorization. Forming a concept (like “bird” or “tool”) involves abstraction: we encounter various examples and extract their common features into a mental category () (). Cognitive research shows that people often learn concepts by trial and error and by gradually refining their abstractions. Early in learning, we might form a rough category that over-includes or under-includes examples, and with feedback we adjust the boundaries of that category (). This dynamic process uses both memory (to recall specific instances) and inductive reasoning (to infer general rules).
It’s also useful to distinguish abstract thinking vs. concrete thinking. Concrete thinking is tied to what is immediately present and observable – it deals with facts, objects, and literal meanings. Abstract thinking, by contrast, involves going beyond the “here and now” to consider ideas, possibilities, and generalized meanings (). A concrete thinker might remember an event exactly as it happened; an abstract thinker might derive a lesson or principle from that event. Psychologists note that both modes of thought are valuable, but abstract thinking is crucial for flexible problem-solving. In fact, the ability to think abstractly is closely related to what psychologists call fluid intelligence – the capacity to reason through new problems and recognize patterns independent of acquired knowledge. Abstract reasoning is a core component of intelligence tests and is seen as a key strength of human cognition. Research indicates that fluid intelligence (and thus abstract reasoning ability) tends to peak in early to mid-adulthood and then gradually decline with age (). This means young adults often perform best on abstract reasoning tasks, while older adults might find such tasks a bit more challenging as these cognitive skills naturally wane over time ().
It’s important to recognize that not everyone finds abstract thinking easy – there are individual differences and even certain conditions that affect it. For instance, some people with autism spectrum disorder or other developmental/learning conditions have difficulty with abstraction and tend to interpret information very literally or concretely. Psychological studies have documented that conditions like autism, schizophrenia, or traumatic brain injury can limit a person’s abstract reasoning abilities (). Such individuals might excel with concrete facts and details but struggle to infer general principles or understand figurative language. This is not absolute – many can improve their abstract thinking with support – but it highlights that our cognitive machinery for abstraction can be differently tuned from person to person. Awareness of these differences is important, because strategies can then be tailored to help those who think more concretely (we will discuss some techniques in a later section).
Neurological Perspectives on Abstraction
Abstraction is not only a psychological phenomenon; it also has identifiable neural correlates in the brain. Neuroscientific research has shown that abstract thinking relies heavily on the brain’s frontal lobes, particularly the prefrontal cortex, which is the front-most part of the brain responsible for many higher cognitive functions (often called “executive functions”). As tasks or thoughts become more abstract, the brain tends to engage more anterior regions of the prefrontal cortex (i.e. further forward in the frontal lobe) (). In other words, there appears to be a gradient in the frontal lobes: the front tip of the prefrontal cortex (just behind your forehead) is active when we deal with very abstract ideas or rules, whereas more mid-range or posterior regions handle more concrete or simple rules (). This insight comes from brain imaging studies where people might be asked to follow rules at different levels of abstraction; for instance, applying a straightforward concrete rule (like “press a button when you see a circle”) versus a higher-order rule (like “if the previous pattern was increasing, switch the response” which is more abstract). The more anterior frontal regions light up for the higher-level, abstract rules. Thus, the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is intimately involved in abstraction: it helps us form general plans, consider hypotheticals, and suppress irrelevant concrete details in favor of goal-oriented general thinking ().
A specific area in the prefrontal cortex called the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) – essentially the frontmost part of PFC (around Brodmann Area 10) – has been singled out for its role in abstract thought. Studies indicate that the RLPFC is crucial for integrating abstract, self-generated thoughts (). This means when you are pulling ideas from memory or imagination and trying to combine them or see relationships (not just reacting to something you perceive in the moment), this area becomes active. For example, thinking about future events or imagining someone else’s thoughts (both of which are abstract because they are not present or tangible) engages the rostral PFC (). The RLPFC helps you detach from the here-and-now and consider things that are removed in time or are conceptual. It’s also involved when you do relational reasoning, like figuring out analogies or understanding the relationship between different concepts (“A is to B as C is to D” type thinking) (). Notably, this part of the brain continues to mature into adolescence, which aligns with the earlier point that teenagers and young adults improve in abstract thinking – the brain infrastructure supporting it is still developing in those years ().
Neuroscience experiments have even shown that encouraging abstract thinking can change brain activity. One study found that when people used more abstract, generalized strategies to solve problems (as opposed to brute-force concrete strategies), certain brain networks (including those tracking the “value” or relevance of information) became more active to help select what information was important () (). Essentially, the brain seems to have mechanisms to filter and select information during abstraction, echoing the idea of focusing on essentials and ignoring the rest. This is fascinating because it suggests a link between how the brain values information and how we abstract – the brain might be “rewarding” itself for finding a simpler rule or pattern by activating reward-related regions () ().
In summary, abstraction engages a network of cognitive and neural processes: psychologically, it draws on our ability to categorize, generalize, and imagine, and neurologically, it relies on frontal brain systems to orchestrate complex, high-level thinking. When these systems are fully developed and functioning well, we are able to reason abstractly with ease; when they are still developing (in children) or impaired (through injury or disorder), abstract thinking can be a greater challenge. The good news is that, like many cognitive skills, abstract thinking can be practiced and improved. We will next explore practical methods for enhancing abstraction abilities, which can benefit anyone but especially those who find abstract reasoning difficult.
Practical Ways to Improve Abstraction Skills
Abstraction is a skill, and like any skill, it can be developed with practice. Whether you are naturally inclined toward abstract thinking or you struggle with it, there are concrete exercises and techniques that can help train your brain to think more abstractly. In this section, we provide step-by-step exercises and methods to enhance abstraction abilities, as well as specific strategies for individuals who find abstract thinking challenging. We also highlight some tools, frameworks, and mental models that can aid in practicing abstraction.
Exercises and Methods to Train Abstract Thinking
One effective way to improve abstraction is to engage in exercises that force you to recognize patterns, infer general rules, and consider the bigger picture. Below are several practical exercises and methods, presented as steps or techniques, that can strengthen your abstraction skills:
Each of these exercises builds the mental muscles for abstraction in different ways. By combining them – for example, solving puzzles (pattern finding), journaling about “why” questions, reframing daily problems, summarizing reading materials, and playing with analogies – you engage your brain in the full spectrum of abstract thinking practice. Consistency is key: the more regularly you push your mind to generalize and find meaning beyond the concrete, the more natural abstract thinking will become. Remember that abstract thinking can feel challenging at first if you’re not used to it, but with repeated practice, you will likely notice improvement in your ability to grasp complex concepts, learn new material, and solve problems creatively. As one commenter aptly put it, “Our brains develop abstractions when we identify patterns in disparate phenomena. Can't identify those patterns if you don't study the concrete phenomena themselves” () – so by actively studying both concrete details and the patterns that connect them, you are essentially teaching your brain how to abstract.
Techniques for Individuals Who Struggle with Abstract Thinking
If you find abstract thinking especially difficult (for example, if you naturally tend to think in very literal or concrete terms), there are specific techniques that can help bridge the gap to more abstract reasoning. These strategies are also useful for educators or mentors working with concrete thinkers (such as young children or individuals on the autism spectrum). The goal of these techniques is to make abstract ideas more accessible by anchoring them in the concrete and gradually increasing the level of abstraction. Here are some approaches:
For individuals who naturally think more concretely, these techniques serve as a toolkit to build abstraction step by step. The common thread is to always connect abstract ideas back to something tangible or familiar, and then use that as a springboard to climb one notch higher in abstraction. With patience and practice, the gap can be narrowed. It’s also worth noting that concrete thinkers often bring a valuable perspective (attention to detail, practicality), so the goal isn’t to abandon concrete thinking but to add abstract thinking to one’s cognitive repertoire. Using concrete strengths to scaffold abstract skills – like using visuals, examples, and stepwise generalization – can make abstract reasoning much more attainable. Over time, patterns that once had to be explicitly pointed out will begin to “pop out” on their own as your brain adapts to recognizing them.
Tools, Frameworks, and Mental Models to Aid Abstraction
Several tools and mental frameworks have been developed to help people think more abstractly and manage complex information through abstraction. These are like exercises or supports you can use when tackling a problem or learning something new, to ensure you’re engaging your abstract reasoning. Here are a few notable ones:
In using these tools and models, it’s important to remain intentional and reflective. A tool like the ladder of abstraction or a mind map is effective only if you actively engage with it – climb up and down the ladder, or actually analyze the mind map for patterns. Over time, these tools can internalize into habits of mind. You might find that you start automatically chunking information or naturally considering multiple levels of abstraction without explicitly drawing a ladder diagram. That is the ultimate goal: to internalize the frameworks so that your mindset becomes more abstract-friendly. But in the training phase, having the external tool or written framework is extremely helpful, much like training wheels on a bicycle.
Conclusion
Abstraction is both a theoretical concept and a practical skill – it lies at the heart of how we form concepts, solve complex problems, and make sense of a world full of details. The process of abstraction enables us to step back from the noise of particulars and discern the common structure or principle that unites them. In doing so, we reduce complexity to manageable proportions while retaining the essence of meaning. Cognitively, abstraction draws on our brain’s remarkable capacity to detect patterns and relationships, a capacity honed through development and supported by neural networks in the prefrontal cortex. By understanding the steps of abstraction (finding commonalities, generalizing, simplifying) and being mindful of how our minds handle abstract vs. concrete information, we can better appreciate why abstraction is so powerful in reasoning.
On a practical level, abstract thinking is a skill that can be cultivated. Through targeted exercises – from puzzles and “why” questions to mind mapping and analogies – we can train ourselves to think more abstractly and flexibly. The techniques and tools outlined above serve as both practice routines and ongoing supports for abstract thinking. Whether one is a student grappling with a tough concept, a professional tackling a complex project, or an individual who generally thinks in concrete terms, applying these methods can lead to noticeable improvements in the ability to form abstractions and use them effectively. Ultimately, improving abstraction skills enhances overall cognitive abilities: it allows for better problem-solving (seeing the underlying issues), improved communication (articulating the general idea or extracting the key point), and creative thinking (making novel connections between concepts). It’s a journey of learning to see the forest beyond the trees, and with patience and practice, anyone can progress further up the ladder of abstraction. By combining theoretical understanding with practical training, we harness the full power of abstraction in both thought and action, leading to clearer thinking and deeper understanding of the world around us.
Sources:
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.