nurturing an understanding of the cosmos at least partially at odds with traditional Christian thinking
while some Europeans were actively attempting to spread the Christian faith to distant corners of the world
makers of Europe’s Scientific Revolution
vast intellectual and cultural transformation
took place between mid-16th and early 18th
no longer relied on external authority
Bible
Church
speculations of ancient philosophers
received wisdom of cultural tradition
knowledge acquired through rational inquiry based on evidence
those who created this revolution saw themselves as departing radically from older ways of thinking
Copernicus from Poland
Galileo from Italy
Descartes from France
Newton from England
Impact
early modern Europe
fundamentally altered ideas about place of humankind within cosmos
sharply challenged teachings and authority of Church
subsequently eroded religious belief and practice in West (particularly among well-educated)
science also used to legitimize gender and racial inequalities
gave new support to old ideas about natural inferiority of women and enslaved people
science fostered marvels of modern production and horrors of modern means of destruction
when married to technological innovation of Industrial Revolution
by 20th: so widespread that it lost its association with European culture
became chief marker of global modernity
became universal worldview
open to all who could accept its premises and techniques
like Buddhism, Christianity, Islam
Why Europe?
Favorable conditions
historical development as reinvigorated, fragmented civilization
by 12th/13th: legal system guaranteeing measure of independence
for a variety of institutions
Church
towns and cities
guilds
professional associations
universities
based on the idea of a “corporation”
collective group of people
treated as unit (single person) with certain rights to regulate and control its own members
Autonomy of emerging universities
1215: University of Paris recognized as “corporation of masters and scholars”
could admit and expel students
could establish courses of instruction
could grant a “license to teach” to its faculty
universities became “neutral zones of intellectual autonomy”
scholars could pursue studies
relative freedom from dictates of church or state authorities
study of natural order began to slowly separate from philosophy and theology, gain distinct identity
“core of readings and lectures that were basically scientific”
drew heavily on Aristotle’s writings
only recently available to Western Europeans
major figures often trained in and affiliated with these universities
Contrast to other areas
madrassas (Islamic colleges): Quranic studies and religious law held central place
philosophy, natural science viewed with considerable suspicion
Quran held all wisdom; scientific thinking challenged it
earlier openness increasingly replaced by disdain for scientific, philosophical inquiry
seemed to only lead to uncertainty and confusion
“May God protect us from useless knowledge”
China: did not permit independent institutions of higher learning where scholars could have relative freedom
emphasized humanistic, moral texts of classical Confucianism
Could draw on other cultures
especially Islamic world (major role in birth of European “natural philosophy” between 1000 and 1500)
medical texts
astronomical research
translations of Greek classics
16th-18th: center of massive new exchange of information
became aware of lands, peoples, plants, animals, societies, religions from around the world
shook older ways of thinking, opened way to new conceptions
uncertainties (skepticism about established views) provided fertile cultural ground for emergence of modern science
Reformation also contributed
challenge to authority
encouragement of mass literacy
affirmation of secular professions
Science as cultural revolution
before Scientific Revolutions: educated Europeans had ancient view of the world
earth was stationary and at center of universe
around earth revolved sun, moon, stars in ten spheres of transparent crystal
coincided with religious outlook of Catholic Church
attention of entire universe centered on earth and human inhabitants
God’s plan for salvation on earth
universe of divine purpose
angels guided hierarchically arranged heavenly bodies along way
God watched over whole from realm beyond spheres
Scientific Revolution fundamentally challenged this understanding
Nicolaus Copernicus
Polish mathematician and astronomer
1543: published book On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres
first to argue for sun-centered universe
“at the middle of all things lies the sun”, earth and other planets revolved around it
earth no longer unique or at obvious center of God’s attention
Expansion of ideas
early 17th: Johannas Kepler (German mathematician): planets followed elliptical orbits, not perfect circles
1609: Galileo (Italian): developed improved telescope, undermined established understandings of cosmos
some began to discuss idea of unlimited universe
humankind just mere speck of dust in unimaginable vastness
Sir Isaac Newton
English; 1642-1727
culmination of Scientific Revolution: modern laws of motion and mechanics
remained unchallenged until 20th
concept of universal gravitation
“all bodies whatsoever are endowed with a principle of mutual gravitation”
heavens and earth not so different (not separate and distinct)
motion of cannonball/falling of apple same natural laws as orbiting planets
Physical universe understanding
universe no longer propelled by supernatural forces
functioned on its own according to scientific principles that could be described mathematically
machine that regulated itself (did not need God nor angels to operate)
knowledge of universe could be achieved through human reason
observation, deduction, experimentation
did not need ancient authorities or divine revelation
Human body understanding
dissections of cadavers and animals
doctors and scientists could describe human body with much greater accuracy
understood circulation of blood throughout body
heart no longer mysterious center of heat, passions
just another machine
Gender
almost entirely male
women largely excluded from universities
a few aristocratic women could participate informally in scientific networks
Margaret Cavendish (1623-1673): married to Duke of Newcastle
wrote six scientific texts
only 17th-century Englishwoman to attend session of Royal Society of London (created to foster scientific learning)
Germany: number of women took part in astronomical work as assistants to husband/brothers
Maria Winkelman: discovered previously unknown comet (husband took credit)
after husband’s death: sought to continue work in Berlin Academy of Sciences but was refused
Christianity
Opposition from Catholic Church
teachings and authority under attack
Italian philosopher Giordano Bruno
proclaimed infinite universe, many worlds
burned at the stake in 1600
Galileo compelled by Church to renounce belief that earth moved in orbit, rotated on axis
Compatibility
none of the early scientists rejected Christianity
Copernicus
published his famous book with the support of several leading Catholic churchmen
dedicated book to pope
Galileo
proclaimed compatibility of science and faith
lack of diplomacy in dealing with church leaders in part responsible for his quarrel with the church
Newton
serious biblical scholar
saw no inherent contradiction between his ideas and belief in God
scientists sought to accommodate religion
scientists and Church leaders learned to coexist through a kind of compartmentalization
science prevailed in its limited sphere of describing the physical universe
religion was arbiter of truth about ultimate questions
human salvation
righteous behavior
larger purposes of life
Galileo and telescope
Background
Scientific Revolution: idea that knowledge of how the universe worked was acquired through a combination of careful observations, controlled experiments, formulation of general laws in mathematical terms
new scientific instruments capable of making precise observations underpinned important breakthrough
telescope: first produced in early 17th by Dutch eyeglass makers
Galileo
telescope: used by Italian mathematician and astronomer Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
used it to observe the night sky
created own telescope (improved on previous designs)
months later, made a series of discoveries that called into question well-established understandings of the cosmos
notion that no imperfection or change marred the heavenly bodies
craters on the moon
sunspots moving across the face of the sun
finite universe of traditional astronomy
moons of Jupiter
many new stars
irrefutable evidence of a cosmos unlike that described by traditional authorities
Transformation of debate
discoveries were readily grasped
anyone could confirm their veracity with their own telescope
heralded by many in scientific community
Christoph Clavius (Church’s leading astronomer in Rome)
he was correct when he theorized that the sun, not the earth, was the center of the solar system
could not be definitely proven
Galileo began to study other phenomena (e.g. tides) to prove that the earth is in motion
Church
initially silent on Galileo’s astronomical observations
warned him to refrain from teaching or promoting Copernicus’s ideas (condemned)
Galileo published (with what he thought was the consent of the Church) a book sympathetic to Copernicus’s sun-centric system
1632: tried by Roman Inquisition
court charged with maintaining orthodoxy
convicted of teaching doctrines against the Church
recanted beliefs
69 years old: sentenced to house arrest
Question of knowledge
“What does it mean, ‘to know something’?”
fundamentally at stake in the trial
relationship between scientific knowledge and other forms of knowledge (divine revelation, mythical experience)
1992: Pope John Paull II called it a “sad misunderstanding” but has ongoing resonance because “the underlying problems of this case concern both the nature of science and the message of faith”
declared scientific and religious knowledge to be compatible
Galileo expressed similar notions earlier
Science and enlightenment
Scientific Revolution spread to wider European public during 18th