major participants: Germany, Italy, Belgium, United States, Japan
minor participants: Spain, Portugal
Informal control
Europeans preferred informal control
no wholesale colonial takeover
economic penetration
occasional military intervention
reasons
cheaper
less likely to provoke wars
sometimes invoked conquest/colonial rule when necessary
Construction of empires
Using moments of weakness
used to strengthen control
“Each global drought was the green light for an imperialist landrush” (scholar talking about climatic instability of that caused monsoons in Asia, Africa to repeatedly fail)
1877: drought in Africa coincided with British success in taking over Zulu independence
late 1880s: famine in Ethiopia coincided with Italian efforts to subdue Horn of Africa
Military threat and force
increasingly in 19th: Europe possessed overwhelming advantages in firepower
recently invented repeating rifles, machine guns
often fought long and hard to create new empires (wars of conquest)
prevailed almost everywhere due to technological advantage
Peoples
all kinds of peoples lost political sovereignty and freedom of action
gathering and hunting bands (Australia)
agricultural village societies, chiefdoms (Pacific islands, parts of Africa)
pastoralists (Sahara, Central Asia)
states large and small
India
Southeast Asia
sometimes exchange of one set of foreign rulers for another (e.g. Hindus ruled by Muslim Mughals)
Colonial conquest
Interaction with European trading firms
trading firms authorized to conduct military operations, exercise political and administrative control over large areas
South Asia (e.g. India)
British East India Company played leading role (not government)
facilitated and invited by concurrent events
fragmentation of Mughal Empire
absence of overall sense of cultural or political unity
no clear-cut plan; evolved slowly as local authorities and European traders made/unmade alliances
Indonesia
Dutch
small and rival states
no clear-cut plan; some areas remained independent until early 20th
Africa
colonial conquest came later, during later 19th
more abrupt, deliberate than India, Indonesia
scramble for Africa
began with Berlin Conference of 1884-1885
organized by Otto van Bismarck, first chancellor of Germany
hoped that Europeans would claim lands and avoid wars among themselves
Africans could not resist Europeans’ weapons and professional armies; most African autonomy/self-governance ended
Europeans divided with little regard to ethnic and linguistic divisions
by 1914: only Liberia, Ethiopia outside European control
half-dozen European powers partitioned entire continent among themselves (1875-1900)
European leaders were surprised by own intensity of rivalries, speed with which they acquired huge territories
extensive process
endless but peaceful negotiations among Great Powers about who gets what
military action to make control effective
French took 16 years *1882-1898) to fully conquer recently-created West African empire led by Samori Toure
most difficult to subdue: decentralized societies without formal state structure
no central authority to negotiate or defeat
village-by-village conquest against resistance
South Africa: difficult for British
Battle of Isandlwana, 1879: British defeated by Zulu army
Boer War, 1899-1902: Boers (white descendants of earlier Dutch settlers in South Africa) fought but eventually succumbed to British
Pacific Oceania
Europeans, Americans attracted during 18th
exploration
scientific curiosity
missionary impulse for conversion
economic interests
sperm whale oil
coconut oil
guano
mineral nitrates, phosphates
sandalwood
competitive annexations of all of Oceania’s islands
Britain
France
Netherlands
Germany
United States
Australia
Chile
Disease
Australia, New Zealand were more similar to earlier colonization of North America
accompanied by large-scale European settlement and diseases
became settler colonies; “neo-European”
Polynesia, Amazonia, Siberia
disease wiped out peoples that lacked immunities
in Africa, Asia, most regions had broadly similar disease environment; less susceptible