Skip to content
Gallery
Final Project - Product Documentation
Stage
Product Discovery #1
More
Share
Explore
Product Discovery #1

icon picker
Identify Problem Space

Problem space ​What's the problem that your target audience face when they want to accomplish their job?
Problem Space
Types
Values
1
User outcome What is the end benefit your target audience want?
Efficient Candidate Evaluation:
Desired Benefit: Recruiters want a platform that streamlines the candidate evaluation process.
End Benefit: The ability to efficiently and effectively assess the skills, qualifications, and suitability of candidates for EdTech positions.
Improved Hiring Process:
Desired Benefit: Recruiters seek a solution that improves the overall hiring process.
End Benefit: A more streamlined and optimized hiring process that reduces the time and effort required to identify and hire qualified candidates.
Tailored Solutions to EdTech Needs:
Desired Benefit: Recruiters want tools specifically designed to meet the unique needs of EdTech hiring.
End Benefit: Access to a platform that understands the intricacies of hiring within the EdTech sector, providing tailored features and functionalities.
Cost and Time Savings:
Desired Benefit: Recruiters are interested in a platform that saves both time and costs associated with hiring.
End Benefit: Reduction in recruitment-related expenses and a significant decrease in the time required to fill open positions.
Enhanced Candidate Interaction:
Desired Benefit: Recruiters and candidates want improved interaction and communication during the hiring process.
End Benefit: A platform that facilitates smoother communication, ensuring that recruiters can better understand candidates' skills, abilities, and cultural fit.
Effective Skill Identification:
Desired Benefit: Recruiters find it challenging to identify candidates' skills and abilities.
End Benefit: The platform assists recruiters in effectively identifying and assessing the specific skills and competencies of candidates, leading to more informed hiring decisions.
Minimized Wasted Time and Costs:
Desired Benefit: Both recruiters and candidates want to minimize wasted time and costs associated with inefficient hiring processes.
End Benefit: A platform that reduces time wastage and costs, ensuring a more productive and cost-effective recruitment process.
2
User motivation ​Why would the user want to achieve the end benefit?
Achieving Operational Efficiency:
Why: Recruiters aim to streamline the candidate evaluation process and improve the overall hiring workflow.
Reason: Operational efficiency leads to time savings and enables recruiters to focus on strategic aspects of talent acquisition, enhancing the overall effectiveness of the recruitment process.
Gaining a Competitive Edge:
Why: Recruiters seek a platform that offers tailored solutions to EdTech needs.
Reason: Having tools and features specifically designed for the EdTech sector allows recruiters to gain a competitive edge by addressing industry-specific challenges and staying ahead in talent acquisition.
Resource Optimization:
Why: Reducing costs and time associated with hiring is a key objective for recruiters.
Reason: Resource optimization is crucial for small to medium-sized businesses, and minimizing recruitment-related expenses and time investments contributes to overall cost-effectiveness.
Enhancing Candidate Experience:
Why: Improving candidate interaction is essential for creating a positive candidate experience.
Reason: A positive candidate experience enhances the employer brand, attracts top talent, and fosters long-term relationships with potential hires, contributing to the overall success of the recruitment process.
Facilitating Informed Decision-Making:
Why: Effectively identifying and assessing candidate skills is crucial for making informed hiring decisions.
Reason: Recruiters want a platform that provides insights into candidates' competencies, ensuring that hiring decisions are based on a comprehensive understanding of each candidate's abilities.
Reducing Wasted Efforts:
Why: Minimizing wasted time and costs is a priority for recruiters.
Reason: A platform that reduces inefficiencies and wastage allows recruiters to focus on high-priority tasks, contributing to a more productive and cost-effective hiring process.
3
Status quo ​What solutions do people use now? What’s their current workflow?
Job Boards and Posting Platforms:
Current Solution: Recruiters often leverage popular job boards and posting platforms to advertise open positions in the EdTech sector.
Workflow: They create job listings, specify requirements, and publish them on platforms like LinkedIn, Indeed, or specialized EdTech job boards.
Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS):
Current Solution: Many recruiters use ATS to manage the recruitment process, including receiving applications, tracking candidates' progress, and storing applicant data.
Workflow: Recruiters post job openings, collect applications, and manage candidate interactions within the ATS.
Social Media Recruitment:
Current Solution: Recruiters utilize social media platforms, such as LinkedIn and Twitter, for sourcing and engaging with potential candidates.
Workflow: They actively participate in professional groups, share job openings, and connect with candidates through social media channels.
Networking and Industry Events:
Current Solution: Recruiters attend industry-specific events, conferences, and networking sessions to connect with potential candidates.
Workflow: They participate in events, host recruitment booths, and engage with professionals to build a network of potential hires.
In-House Recruitment Platforms:
Current Solution: Some companies develop or use in-house recruitment platforms to manage their hiring processes.
Workflow: Recruiters use these platforms to post jobs, manage applications, and collaborate with hiring teams.
Traditional Interview Methods:
Current Solution: Recruiters often conduct traditional interviews (in-person or virtual) to assess candidates' skills and suitability for EdTech positions.
Workflow: After shortlisting candidates, recruiters schedule interviews and assess applicants based on their qualifications and performance.
Skills Assessments and Testing:
Current Solution: Recruiters may use skills assessments and testing platforms to evaluate candidates' technical and job-specific skills.
Workflow: Candidates complete assessments or tests that measure their proficiency in relevant EdTech skills.
Collaboration Tools for Hiring Teams:
Current Solution: Recruiters collaborate with hiring teams using communication and collaboration tools.
Workflow: They use tools like Slack, Microsoft Teams, or project management platforms to streamline communication and coordination among team members involved in the hiring process.
4
Gaps with the current solution ​What frustrations do users have with the status quo?
Tedious and Time-Consuming Processes:
Frustration: The traditional hiring process can be slow and time-consuming, involving manual tasks such as sifting through numerous resumes and coordinating multiple rounds of interviews.
Impact: This frustrates recruiters as it delays the overall recruitment timeline and hinders their ability to quickly fill open positions.
High Volume of Irrelevant Applications:
Frustration: Recruiters often receive a high volume of applications, many of which may not be well-matched for the specific EdTech roles.
Impact: Sorting through irrelevant applications consumes valuable time and resources, leading to frustration and inefficiency in the screening process.
Difficulty in Assessing Technical Skills:
Frustration: Assessing candidates' technical skills, especially in the EdTech sector, can be challenging through traditional methods.
Impact: Recruiters may struggle to accurately evaluate candidates' abilities, leading to potential mismatches between job requirements and candidate skills.
Limited Visibility into Candidate Capabilities:
Frustration: Recruiters may find it challenging to gain a comprehensive understanding of candidates' capabilities beyond what is presented on resumes.
Impact: This limitation can result in a lack of clarity about a candidate's true potential and suitability for EdTech roles.
Ineffective Collaboration Within Hiring Teams:
Frustration: Coordinating and collaborating with hiring teams can be inefficient, especially when using disparate tools or outdated communication methods.
Impact: Lack of effective collaboration may lead to delays, miscommunication, and a disjointed hiring process.
Limited Access to a Diverse Talent Pool:
Frustration: Recruiters may struggle to access a diverse pool of candidates, impacting efforts to enhance diversity within the EdTech workforce.
Impact: Limited access to diverse talent can hinder organizational goals related to inclusion and representation.
Inability to Showcase Candidate Skills Effectively:
Frustration: Candidates may find it challenging to effectively showcase their skills and abilities to recruiters, especially when relying on traditional resumes.
Impact: This frustration can lead to missed opportunities for recruiters to identify and leverage candidates' full potential.
Lack of Personalized Recruitment Solutions:
Frustration: Recruiters may feel limited by one-size-fits-all recruitment solutions that do not address the specific needs and challenges of the EdTech sector.
Impact: This frustration can result in a mismatch between the features offered by existing platforms and the unique requirements of EdTech recruitment.
5
Problem space
Recruiters and hiring teams in the EdTech sector face challenges related to inefficiencies, skill assessment, collaboration, diversity, and personalized recruitment solutions. The problem space encompasses the need for a more streamlined, effective, and tailored hiring platform that addresses these specific pain points, ultimately improving the EdTech recruitment experience for both recruiters and candidates.
There are no rows in this table
⁠

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.