Split Equity

Partime-cofounder

Balancing Equity and Commitment: How to Handle a Part-Time Cofounder in a Funded Startup
In the startup world, hearing about equal equity splits among co-founders is common. However, this approach doesn’t work for part-time co-founders.
This article explores the reasons why equal equity rarely works for part-time co-founders and offers a data-driven approach for determining a fair equity amount. As well as three key factors that co-founders should consider when determining equity splits: time spent on the startup, unique value added to the business, and the economic opportunity cost.
By using this approach, co-founders can avoid conflicts and resentment and ensure that the equity split reflects each member’s value and commitment to the company.
The Challenges of Part-Time Co-founders: Why Equal Equity Rarely Works
Part-time co-founders who work for equity face significant challenges in startups. Studies show that, on average, part-time own 20-30% less equity in startups than their full-time counterparts. There are a few reasons why equal equity splits rarely work for part-time co-founders:
4 Reasons Why 50/50 Equity Split Rarely Works for Part-Time Co-Founders
Time commitment
Startups require an immense time commitment to be successful, often 60-80 hours a week or more. Part-time co-founders simply can’t match the time their full-time counterparts put in, which means they contribute less value overall. Their equity should reflect this reality.
Opportunity cost
Full-time co-founders are sacrificing salary and career opportunities to focus on the startup. Part-time co-founders still have their primary jobs and careers, so they are making a different level of sacrifice. Their equity should account for their lower opportunity cost.
Value added
In addition to their time and effort, full-time co-founders can build more relationships, get more done, and drive more progress. This means that they add more value to the fledgling company. Part-time co-founders won’t add as much value in a limited time commitment, which would justify them receiving less equity.
Replaceability It’s hard to replace someone who makes a startup their sole focus and priority. They know the ins and outs of the business and become the go-to source for information. On the other hand, part-time co-founders can only focus as much as their other responsibilities allow, making them more replaceable.
While part-time co-founders deserve equity for their contributions, equal equity splits are difficult to justify for the above reasons. Startups need to determine the equity in a data-driven way based on each co-founder’s value, time, opportunity cost, and replaceability. Otherwise, resentment and conflict can emerge. They are balancing equity and commitment for the good of the startup.


CÒN PHẢI COI TIẾP




Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.