Skip to content

Final Presentation

Date: 27th February 2025
Time: 2.00pm to 4.30pm
Venue: Critique Room 407, Level 4, Block 11, Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur
Program
Time
Program
Venue
1.40 pm
Lunch + Briefing
Level 5 Block 11
2.30 pm
Presentation Start
Room 407
4.00 pm
Wrap up session
Room 407
4.30 pm
Tea
Level 5 Block 11
5.00 pm
End of session
There are no rows in this table
Table that this table is a view of has been deleted. Click to delete the table.
Final Presentation Panels


Scoring Rubric

View of Final Presentation Rubric
Criteria
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
Note
Concept
Concept and program for the selected route
Showing too little evidence that the concept developed suit the project's objectives
Satisfactory evidence/s that a suitable/ appropriate concept has been developed and can be identified. Some major design issues identified.
Good evidence/s that a suitable/ appropriate concept has been developed properly shown. Some minor design issues identified.
Outstanding evidence/s that a suitable/ appropriate concept has been developed and well explained by the student. Very minor design issues identified.
Introspection Matrix
Design narratives, sketches and montage to describe how the design is responding to a few urban design issues.
The 3 urban considerations were selected, attempt to develop identified but not yet properly done
The 3 urban considerations were selected, properly developed with clear direction in achieving them
The 3 urban design consideration has been successfully developed and well incorporated in the design
The 3 urban design consideration has been excellently developed, well communicated and well incorporated in the design
Site Planning:
To develop proper site plan that shows proper respond to the site context and as much as possible fulfill the planning guideline requirements
Showing too little evidence that the site planning, circulation and wayfinding have been properly developed and informative enough in explaining the design.
Satisfactory evidence/s that the site planning, circulation and wayfinding have been properly developed and informative enough in explaining the design. A few of design requirements are fulfilled yet major planning design issues identified.
Good evidence/s that site planning, circulation and wayfinding have been maturedly developed and informative in explaining the design. The design requirements are mostly fulfilled. Minor planning design issues identified.
Outstanding evidence/s that the site planning, circulation and wayfinding have been maturedly developed and outstandingly informative in explaining the design. Very minor planning design issues identified.
Floor Plans and Section:
To develop a set of floor plans that shows the layout of the buildings that shows integration between department, circulation, building services and structure.
Showing too little evidence that the floor plans and sections has been properly developed and informative enough in explaining the design.
Satisfactory evidence/s that the the floor plans and sections has been properly developed and informative enough in explaining the design. A few of design requirements are fulfilled yet major design/drawing issues identified.
Good evidence/s that the floor plans and sections has been maturedly developed and informative in explaining the design. The design requirements are mostly fulfilled. Minor design/drawing issues identified.
Outstanding evidence/s that the floor plans and sections has been maturedly developed and outstandingly informative in explaining the design. Very minor design/drawing issues identified.
Technical and Detail Drawings/Model:
To develop a technical drawings/models that show the detail of the construction and the integration of building material to internal and external environmental services
Showing too little evidence that the technical drawings/models have been properly developed and informative enough in explaining the technicality of the design.
Satisfactory evidence/s that the technical drawings/models have been properly developed and informative enough in explaining the technicality of design. A few of technical design requirements are fulfilled yet major design/drawing issues identified.
Good evidence/s that the technical drawings/models have been maturedly developed and informative in explaining the technicality of the design. The technical design requirements are mostly fulfilled. Minor design/drawing issues identified.
Outstanding evidence/s that the technical drawings/models have been excellently developed and outstandingly informative in explaining the technicality of the design. Very minor technical design/drawing issues identified.
3D Drawings and BIM
To utilise the 3D CAD/BIM capabilities in design process and production
Showing too little evidence that 3D CAD/BIM has been utilised in design process and communication drawings production.
Satisfactory evidence/s that hat 3D CAD/BIM has been utilised in design process and communication drawings production. The digital model can be utilised in understanding and explaining about the design from a few design perspectives.
Good evidence/s that hat 3D CAD/BIM has been utilised in design process and communication drawings production. The digital model has been well utilised in understanding and explaining about the design from various design perspectives.
Outstanding evidence/s that hat BIM has been utilised in design process and communication drawings production. The digital model has been fully utilised in understanding and explaining about the design from various design perspectives. The 3D drawing is very informative and outstandingly interesting.
Model (Physical or Virtual):
To develop a typical construction system for the building with integration with the structure and services
Showing too little evidence that the integration criteria has been developed.
Satisfactory evidence/s that the integration criteria has been developed can be identified. Some major technical design issues identified.
Good evidence/s that the integration criteria has been developed shown. Some minor technical design issues identified.
Outstanding evidence/s that the integration criteria has been developed properly well explained by the student. Very minor technical design issues identified.
There are no rows in this table

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.