Skip to content

6M view and KRs

Process Flow

image.png
Compliance KRs 4
Problem arm
Sub KRs
Status
Priority
Details
Tentative timeline - WIP
Required manpower
Primary owner
Old inflow cleanup: New brand/illegal class additions , brand state change cleanup
Analytics model to flag historical PIDs related to the Suraksha list update
QC optimization to free up agents for old inflow cleanup
Refining inflow for manual QC
Adding a confidence score for brand flaggings to be used as a lever to QC / skip
Currently the DS models and manual QC is indexed towards new inflow leading to ~25% of escalations which come from existing inflow
We have added 21 agents to run the current ops tasks and the focus of QC is mostly on the new inflow. We are trying to optimize the inflow so that agents freed up can be utilized for old inflow clean up. ()
Refining inflow for QC - eliminating SSCATs and alternate keywords leading to high FPs
Analytics model to do OCR, Keyword matches, image matches on all live PIDs which get mapped to a new Suraksha addition
Confidence score will be provided by DS for all the image based models. For the text based models, source based precisions will be used as confidence score
June Week 3
Business DS
Repeat offence treatment
Brand & illegal repeat identification and catalog upload block
Undertaking process to be set up and aligned category KAMs
Selective price edit enablement (V2)
55-60% of the leakage is coming from the repeated sellers
Filter out for P0 suppliers who are 100% fake in nature with thresholds on frequency, # & % of deactivations on pareto basis covering atleast 90% of brand infringements. (~6K P0 suppliers, ~51 lakh live listings )
Check for the false positives in P0 identification and minimize the same
Explore manual QC of P0 suppliers overall listings (~51 lakh live listings) to avoid any leakages
June Week 1
TBD - Optimization of the list is yet to be picked
Business Product
View based dipstick
Checking for view share of non compliant listings across major real estates on platform
Identifying the reasons for leakage and sending providing feedback to DS team, manual QC team
View dipstick and instrumentation on admin
Calculating the # of DoD non compliant listings across search, PDP, FY feed (REs contribute to 90+% of views)
Checking the view share these listings gathered on platform before deactivation
Identifying the reason for leakage and providing feedback for DS retraining
Current inflow : 1.7L PIDs, agents: 72 (required : 85)
W4 June
13 agents
Business
Ops agent accuracy improvements
Minimize agent errors by audit and possibility of revising agents targets
Align on targets for the error rates for agents
Providing continuous feedback and training for low performers
Currently 24% of escalations are coming from agent errors over the last 3 months so we are aiming to make the QC process more efficient to avoid any further leakages ()
Business
Old flow: Monthly live listings cleanup
Monthly QC of all listings on platform (comes at a cost of ~8000 dollars/run)
Optimizing for manual QC bandwidth
From the last run the inflow count is ~30 lakh PIDs which needed ~52 agents for 15 days to QC which is not feasible so inflow optimization to be figured
June Week 2/3
TBD (Check for overlap and keyword stuffing impact)
Business
Inflow guardrail
Compliance gating v1 - Keyword based
Suraksha list cleanup - Business + Product KR
~5% view dipstick leakage from new inflow
23rd Jun
Product
Inflow guardrail
Compliance gating v2 - Image based
Same as above
Product
Process leakage reduction - Automation
Direct deactivations from DS output via tech events
Strengthening DS feedback loop from view dipstick process
~20% of view share leakage is from DS identified cases not getting deactivated
To accurately track the NS and move some manual dependency to tech
Also setup instrumentation for DS feedback loop
8th Jun
Product
Edit guardrail
Extending compliance gating v1 to all edit flows (Seller self serve + Admin)
Cases where sellers edit and add fake images for old listings, E.g - Driddle escalation for Mamaearth
Product
Inflow guardrail
Hygiene - Not allowing special characters in upload and edit flows
Esclataions like Ray+Bin / M@M@ E@rth are currently not detected since -
Alternative keyword coverage is not comprehensive
Sellers find out new means using special characters
~21st May
Validation failure lift? and listings drop?? LBYS DROP - Check metric
Product
Better coverage / False positive reduction
Fixing the precision and recall metrics for all DS models
Integrating manual QC / reactivation feedback loops to improve flagging accuracy
Improving model recall to 90% and precision to 75%
Recall stands at ~90% while precision stands at ~75% as per DS, Ops + BAs needs to update the computation for revising the reported numbers Currently the feedback from manual qc comes with a lag of 12 days. Need the feedback to be as near real time as possible
TBD
DS
Selective QC support (to reduce manual OC effort)
Adding a confidence score for brand flaggings to be used as a lever to QC / skip
Confidence score will be provided for all the image based models. For the text based models, source based precisions will be used as confidence score
TBD
DS
Admin fraud aversion
Setting up admin panel RBAC for core cataloging flows - Deactivations / Reactivations and hidden collection tagging - Done
Setting up admin panel RBAC for other flows -
Flagged post technotask fraud, to update the size
Legal
Ensuring completeness of critical compliance attributes
Fill rate exercise done for MRP / COO / Manufacturer details
Prioritisation of other attributes for fill-rate to be aligned with legal -
Tech and product support in setting up these attributes and driving on panel nudges for seller’s action - Done
June Week 1
Legal
Ensuring correctness of critical compliance details
MRP - To be picked for solutioning
Brand authorisation - To be picked for solutioning Competition resource
Any other attribute - To be mapped from legal
TBA
Legal
Seller agreement instrumentation
Use seller signature to save Seller - Meesho agreement
Legal
There are no rows in this table
Kaizen metrics:
Core Metric: Non-Compliant Branded Listings Weekly View Share
image.png
The view-based dipstick process has been scaled up from mall brands to the complete Suraksha list Apr 15 onwards. Spike in the view-share trend (NorthStar) and number of deactivated products can be attributed to the increased coverage.
Calculation methodology:
View share overall % = # total views of the leaked PIDS/#total platform views

Core Metric: Non-Compliant Illegal Listings Weekly View Share
image.png
There was a spike in May Week 1 due to addition of ~700 new drugs/illegal classes/keywords. Illegal view share is not stabilized similar to brand due to frequent bulk additions and the nature of keywords. (Eg: money, sex, ling, knife, ipl etc)
Calculation methodology:
View share overall % = # total views of the leaked PIDS/#total platform views
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.