Contributors: Nikolai Auclair (PIC), Mason Cramer (VO), Hailey Manuel (Notetaker)
Flight Date: Tuesday, September 9th
Flight Time: 15:20 to 16:00
Location: William H. Daniel Turfgrass Research and Diagnostic Center
Airspace: Class D (LAANC approval through another UAS class)
Mission Objectives:
Use Skydio 2D Mapping skill to collect orthomosaic data Compare nadir vs angled camera image capture Collect data using lawnmower and crosshatch flight patterns Practice overlap, gimbal tilt, and surface detail capture Study Area
Address: 1340 Cherry Ln, West Lafayette, IN 47907 (Turf Farm) 🔴 Red Rectangle – lawnmower pattern at 200 ft 🔵 Blue Rectangle – crosshatch with perimeter at 75 ft Airspace Notes: KLAF Class D; team operated under a shared LAANC authorization with another UAS class
Figure 1: Flight Boundaries
On-Site Conditions & Hazards
Winds: 7 mph gusting to 14 mph from SW Observed Wind: Light wind at surface Trees within the flight boundary Heavy overhead aircraft traffic (but above 200 ft ceiling) Another UAS class operating in same airspace; team waited ~40 minutes before launch Methods
Pre-Flight Checklist:
App updated, aircraft inspected, SD card formatted, battery levels checked Hailey – Notetaker / Logistics Launch site established along the gravel edge of the field Failsafe settings confirmed via Enterprise app (Home Point, RTH altitude)
Flight 1: Red Rectangle (200 ft Nadir)
Flight Height: 200 ft AGL Gimbal: 90° (straight down) Overlap: 80% front & side Fully automated via Skydio Enterprise App No sensing floor/ceiling or geofence used
Figure 2: Screenshot of the First Lawnmower Pattern Flight
Flight 2: Blue Rectangle (75 ft Crosshatch + Perimeter)
Pattern: Crosshatch + Perimeter Overlap: 80% front & side Enhanced surface detail collection (especially around cars and small structures) No sensing floor/ceiling or geofence used
Figure 3: Screenshot of the Second Crosshatch Flight
Data Collection Summary
Flight 1 images are optimal for 2D orthomosaic reconstruction Flight 2 images may support basic 3D structure generation due to gimbal tilt and lower altitude Small building in center of 75 ft flight zone provides a good candidate for evaluating photogrammetric software
Deliverables
554 images total with full overlap and varied gimbal settings Clean datasets prepared for photogrammetric stitching Weather and site hazard notes logged Screenshots of mission planning and flight path embedded Next step: process both image sets using photogrammetry software like Pix4D or WebODM