Does keeping the same points system for RHNA numbers for Sonoma make sense since the population/RHNA is less? Factors to think about:
Communication and Engagement so far
Points System (each bullet worth one point):
High RHNA numbers (3000+) +2 Medium RHNA numbers (1000+) +1 Low 5th cycle progress (<50%) +1 Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) +2 Sea level rise/flood risk High low-wage jobs to housing fit ratio or UC displacement index +1 High percentage of housing is owner occupied (above 65% +1, below 65% -0) Communication + Engagement Transparency and clear, plentiful engagement opportunities 0, +5 clear/have a timeline but not plentiful How many meetings have they already had? Do they have a dedicated website and clear way to reach out? Large coalition of advocates engaged 0 Are there other advocates engaged in this city who we could work with or mobilize?
Points justification system
Below 5 - Low engagement
5-6 - Medium engagement
7-10 High engagement
Sonoma Engagement Strategy
Healdsburg: site analysis ongoing until April January - April 2022, Prepare initial Housing Element Analysis May/June 2022, Community Open House April: planning commission meeting Contact from city - more community advocacy in few weeks Not much on housing element End of 2021 community engagement efforts Post community letters on the website City Council Visioning Materials/ guiding principles today follow-up with potential partners Community alternatives discussions Not a lot of community engagement thus far, or a lot of info about timeline touch base with Gen H, and re-assess with more information