Internal Housing Resources

icon picker
OLD HE Decision Matrix

Factors to think about:
HE/RHNA Stats
Climate Risks
Equity Issues
Communication and Engagement so far

Points System (each bullet worth one point):
HE History
RHNA numbers
High RHNA numbers (3000+) +2
Medium RHNA numbers (1000+) +1
Low 5th cycle progress (<50%) +1
Climate Risks
Wildfire
Baselevel +1
Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) +2
Sea level rise/flood risk
SLR +2
Minimal/Minor - 0
Moderate/Major +1
Severe/Extreme +2
Equity Issues
High low-wage jobs to housing fit ratio +1
History of NIMBYism +1
High percentage of housing is owner occupied (above 65% +1, below 65% -0)
Communication + Engagement
Transparency and clear, plentiful engagement opportunities 0, +5 clear/have a timeline but not plentiful
How many meetings have they already had? Do they have a dedicated website and clear way to reach out?
Large coalition of advocates engaged 0
Are there other advocates engaged in this city who we could work with or mobilize?

Points justification system
Below 5 - Low engagement
5-7 - Medium engagement
7-10 High engagement
View of Decision Matrix
3
Key Factors
Sub-Factors
Antioch
Brentwood
Clayton
Concord
Danville
El Cerrito
Hercules
Lafayette
Martinez
Moraga
Oakley
Housing Element History
2
RHNA numbers (+1 or +2)
2
1
0
2
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
Low 5th cycle progress +1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
Sum
1
Sum
1
Sum
3
Sum
2
Sum
1
Sum
0
Sum
1
Sum
2
Sum
2
Sum
1
Sum
Climate Risks
2
Wildfire +1/2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
SLR/Flood risk +0/1/2
2
1
1
1
1
0
2
1
1
2
2
3
Sum
2
Sum
2
Sum
2
Sum
3
Sum
2
Sum
3
Sum
3
Sum
3
Sum
4
Sum
3
Sum
Equity Issues
4
Low income/susceptible to displacement +1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
History of NIMBYism +1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
Low percentage of housing is owner occupied +1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
Sum
1
Sum
1
Sum
2
Sum
1
Sum
2
Sum
0
Sum
1
Sum
0
Sum
1
Sum
2
Sum
Communication and Engagement
2
Transparency and clear, plentiful engagement opportunities +0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
Large coalition of advocates engaged +0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
2
Sum
2
Sum
2
Sum
1
Sum
2
Sum
2
Sum
2
Sum
0
Sum
2
Sum
1
Sum
2
Sum
11
Sum
6
Sum
6
Sum
8
Sum
8
Sum
7
Sum
5
Sum
5
Sum
7
Sum
8
Sum
8
Sum
Decision Matrix V2
Column 5
Name
Antioch
Clayton
Lafayette
Concord
Housing Element History
2
RHNA numbers (+1 or +2)
2
0
1
2
Low 5th cycle progress +1
1
1
0
1
3
Sum
1
Sum
1
Sum
3
Sum
Climate Risks
2
Wildfire +1/2
1
1
2
Flood risk +1/2
2
1
3
Sum
1
Sum
3
Sum
0
Sum
Equity Issues
3
High low-wage jobs to housing fit ratio +1
0
0
0
History of NIMBYism +1
1
1
1
High percentage of housing is owner occupied +1
0
1
1
1
Sum
2
Sum
2
Sum
0
Sum
Communication and Engagement
2
Transparency and clear, plentiful engagement opportunities +0
1
1
0
Large coalition of advocates engaged +0
1
1
0
2
Sum
2
Sum
0
Sum
0
Sum
9
Sum
6
Sum
6
Sum
3
Sum
HE Decision Matrix
3
Engagement Level
Action
Example (CCC)
1
Low Engagement
Track meetings in Asana
Send Housing Policy Recommendations Letter when appropriate
Brentwood, El Cerrito
2
Medium Engagement
Track all meetings in Asana
Send Policy Recommendations Letter when appropriate
Attend meetings and provide public comment
Lamorinda
3
High Engagement
Track all meetings in Asana
Create/work with community advocate base
Review draft plans and provide public comment
Attend all meetings
Create action alerts for upcoming meetings/surveys
Send Housing Policy Recommendations Letter
Meet with city staff to share our priorities
Partners: enviro partners
Develop individual campaign plan
Antioch, Pittsburg, Unincorporated,
4
5
There are no rows in this table


Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.