Skip to content
GP/Housing Element Advocacy
General Plan Master Tracking
Housing Elements Tracking
Internal Housing Resources
Email Template
Share
Explore

OLD HE Decision Matrix

Factors to think about:
HE/RHNA Stats
Climate Risks
Equity Issues
Communication and Engagement so far

Points System (each bullet worth one point):
HE History
RHNA numbers
High RHNA numbers (3000+) +2
Medium RHNA numbers (1000+) +1
Low 5th cycle progress (<50%) +1
Climate Risks
Wildfire
Baselevel +1
Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) +2
Sea level rise/flood risk
SLR +2
Minimal/Minor - 0
Moderate/Major +1
Severe/Extreme +2
⁠
https://floodfactor.com/
⁠
⁠
⁠
https://riskfinder.climatecentral.org/place/hercules.ca.us?comparisonType=place&forecastType=NOAA2017_int_p50&level=10&unit=ft&zillowPlaceType=place
⁠
⁠
Equity Issues
High low-wage jobs to housing fit ratio +1
History of NIMBYism +1
High percentage of housing is owner occupied (above 65% +1, below 65% -0)
Communication + Engagement
Transparency and clear, plentiful engagement opportunities 0, +5 clear/have a timeline but not plentiful
How many meetings have they already had? Do they have a dedicated website and clear way to reach out?
Large coalition of advocates engaged 0
Are there other advocates engaged in this city who we could work with or mobilize?

Points justification system
Below 5 - Low engagement
5-7 - Medium engagement
7-10 High engagement
View of Decision Matrix
Key Factors
Sub-Factors
Antioch
Brentwood
Clayton
Concord
Danville
El Cerrito
Hercules
Lafayette
Martinez
Moraga
Oakley
Housing Element History
2
RHNA numbers (+1 or +2)
2
1
0
2
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
Low 5th cycle progress +1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
Climate Risks
2
Wildfire +1/2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
SLR/Flood risk +0/1/2
2
1
1
1
1
0
2
1
1
2
2
Equity Issues
4
Low income/susceptible to displacement +1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
History of NIMBYism +1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
Low percentage of housing is owner occupied +1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Communication and Engagement
2
Transparency and clear, plentiful engagement opportunities +0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
Large coalition of advocates engaged +0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
⁠
Decision Matrix V2
Column 5
Name
Antioch
Clayton
Lafayette
Concord
Housing Element History
2
RHNA numbers (+1 or +2)
2
0
1
2
Low 5th cycle progress +1
1
1
0
1
Climate Risks
2
Wildfire +1/2
1
1
2
​
Flood risk +1/2
2
​
1
​
Equity Issues
3
High low-wage jobs to housing fit ratio +1
0
0
0
​
History of NIMBYism +1
1
1
1
​
High percentage of housing is owner occupied +1
0
1
1
​
Communication and Engagement
2
Transparency and clear, plentiful engagement opportunities +0
1
1
0
​
Large coalition of advocates engaged +0
1
1
0
​
⁠
HE Decision Matrix
Engagement Level
Action
Example (CCC)
Low Engagement
Track meetings in Asana
Send Housing Policy Recommendations Letter when appropriate
Brentwood, El Cerrito
Medium Engagement
Track all meetings in Asana
Send Policy Recommendations Letter when appropriate
Attend meetings and provide public comment
Lamorinda
High Engagement
Track all meetings in Asana
Create/work with community advocate base
Review draft plans and provide public comment
Attend all meetings
Create action alerts for upcoming meetings/surveys
Send Housing Policy Recommendations Letter
Meet with city staff to share our priorities
Partners: enviro partners
Develop individual campaign plan
Antioch, Pittsburg, Unincorporated,
​
​
​
​
​
​
There are no rows in this table
⁠


Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.