Skip to content

8/22/24 Meeting


Copy of Copy of Meeting Topics
Name
Topic
Notes
Resolution/Action
Resolved?
Shipping Cadence
Proposal to Update Selling Plan from:
Today - 25 → 30 days
Proposed - 25 → Monthly ()

Business Case:
Aligns Supplements w/ Testing Cadence for Members
Improvement for Failed Payments - Billed on same date every month
Streamlines reporting (some months can have 2 orders, others can have 0)

Trade Off:
Some new subscriptions may run out of supplements if they (1) take their supplements daily, (2) never miss a day, and (3) stay retained without pauses/skips for 5+ months.
Garret’s Highlevel thoughts:
If we do monthly (30 or 31 days), it will erode buffer within 6-10 months
Customers who take on a daily basis, will be impacted by this and they tend to be the most vocal (E.g., Harold)
Customer who have excess supply aren’t off by a few days they are off by an entire box - suggesting that a change like this won’t solve their issue
Customers who start on 29, 30 or 31st of a month will have an odd experience in Feb since it only has 28 days
Competitors such as Seed (28-30 renewal), Nutrafol (30 day), AG1 (30 day) are doing “monthly” on a 30 day cadence
Next steps:
keep status quo
Figure out how to reconfigure membership
Align on change to shipping candence for fidelitone
Recurring test kit as part of membership
Remind me — when do I add this to subscription v. not? Should all memberships have this variant?
Test Kits are auto added - CSA shouldn’t add them.
In progress — some open questions for the team/Fidelitone to help inform policy
@Matt Schwartz
@Kyle Humphries
- read + add comments - let’s schedule a time for key topics.
Referral Discounts
Referral codes haven’t been working for customers, so CSAs are having to retroactively issue a refund
Impacts reporting
@Shayna Lans
could you list examples?
Shayna: 3 examples I’ve seen where code does not work due to multiple attempts or suspected fraudulent activity
Order #64142
Failed payment - to cancel or leave customers paused?
Current Logic:
When a customer has a failed payment, they get 3 billing attempts before their subscription is put on pause.

Tradeoff:
how this impacts reporting.

Pros for Pause:
These customers did not intend on cancelling

Pros for Canceling them:
Can get placed in cancelation flows automatically
Status quo - let’s keep it until we bring it up holistically.
Action Plans / Check-Ins access post pause
Recommendation:
Deprioritize until we figure out what to do with membership.
Amplify reformulation
When Amplify reformulation goes live:
Existing customers who are active, paused, skipped will be migrated from Legacy Amplify > to reformulated Amplify
Existing customers with cancelled subscriptions won’t be migrated
All new purchases and subscription changes going forward will include reformulated Amplify

Align with CS to ensure that legacy Amplify isn’t included when cancelled customers are reactivated
Per discussion with Shayna:
CS reactivates cancelled members when:
Customer win-backs which occur within 7 days of cancellation
CS reactivates plans when communicating directly with customers
Aligned on solution:
When CS reactivates cancelled subscriptions including legacy Amplify via Seal, remove legacy Amplify product and replace with reformulated Amplify
Shayna expects this to be an edge case more than 7 days after the Amplify reformulation launch
Align on updated
Align across teams on updates vs
Miscellaneous Follow-Ups
Reactivation behavior — How did testing go? Are we ready to push this to production / update macros?
Random date — Oct. 20. v. Nov. 20 for reactivation?
Barcode already registered error message — timing?
Test kit only — bug fix in progress — update?
New email for new customers?
Reactivation - waiting on Seal’s investigation.
Barcode error - pushed into prod on Thurs
TKO - Nick investigating
New email - do not do this.
There are no rows in this table


Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.