Skip to content

Meeting Notes

All Meeting List
All Meeting List
Meeting Title
Team
Date
Action Items
Action Items List
Add action item
Notes
Specs
Meeting with Bea
1/27/2026
New GS Team structure
Service Delivery
Service Excellence
Service Optimization
Special Services


Open
DJI L3 updates
1/23/2026
Open
1on1 with Paulina
1/21/2026
Open
DJI L3 sensor Kickoff
1/8/2026
This involves both lidar and photogrammetry as the sensor contains both.
2 rgb sensors side by side at an angle 100mp each, customers have an option to downsample it to 25
it’s only 25 or 100mp
no testing yet from our team
only compatible with DJI m400
we have to obtain the downsampled and original resolution surveys for photogrammetry
we probbaly need to prioritize the downsampled data since we price uploads via megapixels
upload pipelines for photog and lidar would be separate for now
schedule would be finalize after the existing sprint
Open
Lidar sensor research kickoff
1/8/2026
This is about processing lidar data from different vendors.
De risk processing lidar data from different sensors
goal is to relay to processing squad what would it take to accept lidar from different companies
Basically we have companies that wants to partner with us where in theyll give us a license for their propriety software
Processing datasets without RGB classes are good to go with the intensity data
no companies are doing the one stop shop for now
announcements would be posted
Sample risk
Most customers accustomed to photog are not good with creating GCPs, only AP s are known to be distinguishable using intensity
Open
1 on 1 With Paulina
1/7/2026
Try to teach geosupers asap on how to drone onboarding
Open
Survey61 Sensor kickoff
1/6/2026
Survey61 QA
Survey61 QA
Survey61 sensor meeting , slack:
New version of ILX-LR1, full frame
New exif tag, body and camera serial number written in the images, we can now detect everything we need for credit stuff
Testing datasets will be provided by Wingtra
Compatible with Gen2, but not heard when or how
Wingtra is not yet ready for data collection, so this week is the expected timeline for datasets
Shared folder for datasets
(collab folder)
3-5cm accuracy expectations
Wingtra is chasing the Jan 14 event so this is probably the expected date of ingestion of data inside Propeller
First few weeks, would wingtra doing demo with customers and data gathering. opening the uploader for them is priority
Nothing should be changed from past onboardings, data wise
Open
Standup Meeting
12/22/2025
Louie will process the datasets for georference testing
Check Linux capability of cloud compare
Check z-values using the rasterized version
Check if the pipeline can work with non-aeropoint GCP markers
Gaussian Splatting exploration on going. Viz needs some sample datasets to send to iTwin
DJI terra can do gaussian splatting but only for DJI images
Open
10/27/2025
Post the questions for Wingtrahub processing, Post the standard deviation for Wingtra Ray x Map61 as well
Post the questions for Wingtrahub processing
Post the standard deviation for Wingtra Ray x Map61 as well
Open
10/22/2025
IF800 - try p4r rolling shutter, IF800 - try m3e rolling shutter
IF800 - try p4r rolling shutter
IF800 - try m3e rolling shutter
try p4r rolling shutter try m3e rolling shutter
try a more basic approach for smart oblique. Like if there are combinations of nadir and oblique then it's smart oblique
Open
10/21/2025
FPC is doing good atm. Confusion matrix shows that FPC is matching Louie’s manual classification.
Freefly Astro is still waiting for DCL
we are now on sprint 6.1 continue doing stuff
Open
10/21/2025
No conclusion for the increasing amount KP method from PCN
datasupport will be the new support mail of DS
Open
10/20/2025
Test using different optimizations for IF800 to remove the warping
Test using different optimizations for IF800 to remove the warping
Shared the bug to Tim for if800 and consulted some of the findings for if800
Open
Disable GCP check with Jono
10/2/2025
1200 pqs case conditions needed: - must have atleast 1 marker - high accuracy - one of the the gcps

pqs that can be tested - use pq_validation_snapshot_markers to find GCPs with less than 4 gcps after bullseye - filter these further by finding PQs that had more thatn 60% after bullseye
no disabled gcp means that they are legit and needs the improved coverage check
Open
DS Seniors
9/23/2025
Bea mentioned the shuffled MRK, processing squad is going to message DJI about the bug but our team has workaround.
Open
9/16/2025
find m3e surveys, how big of a problem is this. sizing the problem
so we can then do a workshop with ben adn allan team.
Open
Jono consultation
7/23/2025
Talked with Jono about the GCP research tool
Wont make it to the latest sand items but I need to make sure to finish it as soon as possible
re-consider the centrality check might be no need for this one
Tap the team if we need to automate stuff using new threshold
Continue the dataset accuracy degradation test

Open
Intl foot instructions from Tim
7/23/2025
Go to this sheet and let check if the usft versions are correctly converted to intl foot

check wkt, proj 4 and press save if there are no issues.
Open
7/1/2025
Follow up RGF93
Follow up RGF93
Weekly Standup Notes:
EHC with AI
Try improving the LLMs with text.
Check if we are overwhelming the LLM.
Open
6/11/2025
June 12 - meeting with skydio will finalize how they communicate their fw changes to propeller
They agreed to always send the changes first before publicised the updates
Open
6/3/2025
Map 61 Catchup
June 24 Deadline
Propeller demo unit is good to go for flying, wingtra will contribute too starting wednesday
Will wait for test datasets for now
Open
5/20/2025
MAP61 Kickoff
Nikki will be a new part of our team for MAP61 integration
Map61 will fall to the 3-5cm tier. Focal length is a bit different.
Not affected by the RGB61 slow mechanical shutter
Not much engineering work for DCL team
Open
5/20/2025
Share EHC with AI progress to Georesearch coda
Share EHC with AI progress to Georesearch coda
Open
5/20/2025
Update the M4E smart oblique card
Update the M4E smart oblique card
DS Seniors weekly
All published sites will now do WGS84
Open
5/15/2025
Monitor CEI datasets
Monitor CEI datasets
Skydio x10 Catchup
Beta is running slowly but we’ll proceed until we get 12 datasets
Whole skydio tests hopefully ends this end of May
Hopefully 3 datasets from different processing method (rtk,ppk,standard)
V100L-93 is already on our DCL
Skydio Tracking
Iza will encourage JMB and Carl to submit PPK datasets
Still waiting for Skydio team to give more details about the graph
CEI datasets will be from our Skydio unit
When doing RTK, it’s always just connect to VRS network. Will try to match ppk processing to RTK corrections used
New FW version will be used on CEI datasets
Processing results might result to 0% in default, already fixed
DCL can now accept V100L-93 and optimization implemented as well
Pricing 1 pager and M4E comparison doc to be launched nextweek
Open
5/14/2025
Explore EHC with AI again, Upload PQs in staging
Explore EHC with AI again
Upload PQs in staging
Weekly Catchup
Louie’s gonna focus now on lidar georeferencing UI
FLAI not working is not due to the FLAI but only due to the dataset
No dock 2 with propeller ppk since it does not output mrk or bin files
For the georesearch project EHC with AI, split the things first by chunk and see if ai can do it for us.
Open
5/12/2025
Try reprocessing PQs in staging for autodisable GCP test
Try reprocessing PQs in staging for autodisable GCP test
Auto-Disable GCP Meeting

Numbers are good, setting it as a fallback would be alright. Just need to test it in actual if this will work.
Try reprocessing PQs in staging - check if autopen GDs are legit enough - try in staging by putting 'processinginstaging true' then resubmit - try if these will auto pass EHC by just letting autopen results
Open
5/6/2025
Regular GeoResearch Catchup
Fast orthomosaic research is ongoing
KEA customer have HTGVRD heights, we just need some new test points
Open
5/6/2025
Clean up DS portals,
Clean up DS portals
DS Seniors Weekly
Clean up DS portals
Open
5/6/2025
Skydio x10 customer but not with the camera onboarded
Skydio did not supply the unit as well
From Whit, this camera has the same specs as the one we onboarded
FMI has one but not the camera we onboarded
DCL almost the same stuff so we would be doing light QA for this one
FMI won’t have a base M4E/M3E dataset QA would be tricky
If FMI can fly PPK, we’ll process RTK too or vice versa
MAP61 will be moved for now to prioritize skydio beta
Drone squad - DCL ap capture related
Processing squad - optimization and camera settings in metashape
Open
4/30/2025
Inspect fix focus datasets for Skydio
Inspect fix focus datasets for Skydio
Skydio X10 Meeting
How do we detect if the customer uses the non recommended fix focus mode?
How should we handle datasets with comparison issues in QA customers that used less than two gcps? (CSEs will be aware for them to recommend 2-3 gcps)

Iza
Gonna open Skydio for beta this week
Beta would be used to determine what will happen to skydio
When can we open beta?

Whit
Skydio team was happy with 3 to 5cm accuracy
V100L the one without IR, still same with photogrammetry but realized that without that module, it had vibrations due to the weight reduction
Already talking with sales team, lots of beta testers interested. Skydio will help to give us testers
Only 2 portals yet that used skydio x10, but there’s actually 5

Anthony
No shifts if corrections are just the same
Slider settings can now be slided to strict
Only skydio for now will use the ppk-processing, there will be plans to put all drones here but for now other drones should only use ap-processing
Not sure if qinertia can really be used with skydio
We wont need to add surveys to launch darkly anymore, maybe this week or next week.

Tim
LEts not block customers and check the beta results how would we implement the recommended 2-3 gcps



Open
4/30/2025
Discuss the new GCP threshold to Anthony
Discuss the new GCP threshold to Anthony
DS Research Projects Road Map
Gist is to rank all ideas so we know where to start researching
Discuss the why, and how to do these ideas
Run through with Louie and Tim regarding the ideas, check appetite fesaibilty
Open
4/29/2025
Continue monitoring the M4E GPS timeline with team capture
Continue monitoring the M4E GPS timeline with team capture
No major updates other than we need to discuss research priorities tomorrow.
Open
4/29/2025
DS Seniors Weekly
CX/CY is only applicable for highly bad values like 100++, Patrick will discuss this in tech seniors
Export step for point cloud density is still on the works
Open
4/22/2025
Need to check or raise in JIra the geotags in metashape, Add GCP Project in ideas page
Need to check or raise in JIra the geotags in metashape
Add GCP Project in ideas page
Skydio datasets using fix focus always have 0.1ft vertical shift

M4E really skips the 2nd image but it’s normal behavior
Need to check or raise in JIra the geotags in metashape


Open
4/22/2025
Ultra high density point cloud
0.1ft point spacing is too dense and even lidar can’t support that density
Weird that datasets before are only blocked in webify terrain not in export step
the issue is not on the size since early datasets pushed through export step despite being a 92gpix dataset


Open
4/16/2025
Meeting with Skydio
Allan
<30 SNR from the PPK files
Aircraft shadowing might be a thing, GPS antenna not protruding as much in the drone body.
Beidou data points arent that being helpful


Francis James
Good to hear about the SNR analysis since internally what they did is to test if the drone can get good reception
Trajectory action plotter - auto slows down the drone

Whit
Our demo unit is on latest beta release while skydios is in an alpha version with better RS compensation

Scott
Marketing efforts would be a collab with Skydio and Propeller

Open
4/15/2025
Look for more things to check in Skydio x10, Add aspect ratio to camera list, Create a table for devs about camera settings
Look for more things to check in Skydio x10
Add aspect ratio to camera list
Create a table for devs about camera settings
The launch darkly is giving off different results to our OG pipeline.
Aspect ratio would be helpful too, iso settings
Open
4/15/2025
Just discussed some updates and DS seniors asked if there are other stuff we need to discuss in the DS meeting tomorrow.
Big news about changing base stations, discussed a lot of suggestions on how we can accelerate changing the base. Allan will discuss this with Alan and capture team.
Open
4/15/2025
SBFs of skydio should be tested in qinertia. Send some samples to Alan.
SBFs of skydio should be tested in qinertia. Send some samples to Alan.
Meeting with Allan about PPK processing engine.
SBFs of skydio should be tested in qinertia. Send some samples to Alan.
Open
4/8/2025
Creating Geoid units in the AP front-end
Creating Geoid units in the AP front-end
Geoid 12b is not showing the correct EPSG codes for ft-us and intl-ft
we have to make geoid objects with their own units just like horizontal
we have to duplicate geoids and create geoids with their respective units and EPSG codes
name - webserver
display name - frontend

Open
10/1/2024
Talked about escalation summaries
There will be an escalation week reporter to summarize things.
Upcoming Anzu Uploads
We’ll now received Anzu datasets this week, quite manual but we’ll know the clients who will upload
Anzu will likely have 5 to 10cm accuracy (Moderate) threshold due to its consistency results
Raptor camera is the manufacturer name in metashape
Specialists should post in #anzu-raptor-integration channel and tag seniors for problematic Anzu datasets
Vidoc datasets
Problematic orientation problem should be processed with this
camera manufacturer is written as vzone.iphone15
datasets flight should be regrouped properly to get lower errors
Seniors should be the one to handle
Knowledge base will be published soon
Wingtra RGB61 SISO cases
2/3cm gives lower surface difference using propeller ppk workflow but even lower with 5cm camera accuracy
Theres a significant and consistent PPK elevation discrepancy between ppk workflow vs wingtrahub
Wingtrahub first, but if all else fails try the loosening to 5cm or 2/3cm cam accuracy
Open
9/19/2024
Lite cycle training
Lite cycle training
Open
8/7/2024
review matrix and let mark know he dont need to be 3 all the time
matrix style - it’s already q3 lets have a look in your matrix
well be looking at this more so dapat wag mag focus too much
make matrix jobert and mads
no need to send bea all the time the matrix;
Open
7/30/2024
how accurate drones are? #2
how accurate drones are? #2
automate different settings upload
When L2 is being tested
In general, for drone test. Find the best output with diff settings such as:
GCPs are okay
compared to different accuracies
what optimization to use for best results
dewarp on or off
for now, we have more experience so we have actually lesser tests required
for example for m3e, given a focal length we can advise immediately what flying height to use.
specs research and customer uploads are done prior accepting new drones

Current problems:
Data required from customers for testing
requirements
cases
drone to benchmark drone
drone to GCPs
Dashboard for evaluating
Processing request to processing request is preferred over processing attempt vs processing attempt
Automation for processing test sessions
devs hopefully can do this
Tim have worked on with this with Anthony with the different image versions
Local metashape batch processing might be an option but may produce more manual labor
Streamline the accuracy evaluation
currently we do manual checking of dem to dem comparison and GCP surface differences


Open
7/26/2024
airwallex might be rolling out slowly
no more offset for public holidays, holiday=no pasok dapat
Jopat’s ot behavior recommend him the 4days to have minimum of 2days off
make sure hes not getting burned out

Open
6/25/2024
DCL Validation meeting with GQA+Devs
DCL Validation meeting with GQA+Devs
Here is the Google Sheet document containing the additional PPK flight validations:
For each validation, we need to answer the following questions:
What does the validation represent?
How does the validation help the customer?
Should we show the validation in the uploader for the customer to see?
Should the validation be shown to the customer in the Processing Report? Or should it only be visible to specialists (i.e. only be used for troubleshooting)

Other Notes:
We already have this
image.png
But the goal is to have this to the uploader
SBF_FILE_CONTAINS_RECEIVER_SETUP_MESSAGE - wingtra, for gps data is bad. maybe we should bracket this as GPS Data issues.
for wingtra - check image count, continuous images, images below match sbf
Should be blocked totally, recommend customers to refly/upload as standard accuracy.
nothing we can do about this
image.png
Should be warnings but we probably have to downgrade to lower settings
help articles is gonna be provided to avoid these in the future
still possible to process these can also pass automated steps but will likely be blocked in EHC.
Possible to automate this to lenient/skip qa
image.png
Open
6/18/2024
Focal Reviews
Focal Reviews
Supervisors Rating
Business Understanding
Consistent Initiative
Supervising
Seniors Tasks (Escalations, 1on1s, SOP stuff)


Open
5/30/2024
Bob things

Open
5/29/2024
Refresher for perf review
Refresher for perf review
image.png
compa ratio is how far they are in the middle point, higher compa = their in the below of the midpoint
image.png
image.png

image.png
image.png
we can share where they are in the midpoint

image.png
dont back to back the reviews
Open
5/7/2024
Detailed comms meeting
Detailed comms meeting
will ask SLs who’s gonna send the detailed EHC updates
Bea will ask carrie what to do on surge affected delayed datasets

Open
5/1/2024

Open
4/29/2024
Oks na smart tasking
Disabling qa SOP
Add pqs para mas malinaw
Add more specific cases GEO SUPERS
Optimal machines for big datasets -
@Ernest Chua
will check the EHC SOP stuff for escalation, prioritize the attempts not the SLA
commenting in JIRA doesnt do anything

Open
4/22/2024
New template bout released problematic current will be released
Checking special attention
. Soon, we dont need to check anymore for special attention clients or not since we’ll base everything to customer tiers.
a unified wrap up system will be implemented
capture time must not be edited for pcn datasets
Waiting for approval ang Autel XL705 comms
long running steps will be moved to other channels
tag cse and am for reprocesisng requests for clients with expired licenses

Open
4/22/2024
Context capture research update - Ben and Tim are working on this, can be downloaded for 7 days
doesnt support RS compensation
doesnt have camera calibration for M3E
dewarping on off cant be processed accurately
needs to separate the chunk manually
cannot meet the 0.1ft GCP surface error
Skydio and whisper will now be accepted soon in our uploader

Open
4/15/2024
Intercom performance dashboard with Marco
Intercom performance dashboard with Marco
Teammate filter means, noted or replied
date filter in the main report page will be the one to be used
additive filtering in the reports
segments are for advanced reports
table drill in can see all of the specialist activities
it is tabled by actions done for convos
saan papasok ang mga newsstand templates sent by specialists?
Random qa of convos can be randomized yung drill in
csat is also a good measure, csat score - conversations started is fairer
csat scores can be edited by scrubbing, undeserved scores can be adjusted
newsstand templates cannot be counted to specialists since is set to be received as a customer

Open
4/11/2024
Learnings
side projects are not the main impacts
avoid comparing direct reporst to others
but if a comparison happens, we connect the matrix that even though he’s over performing in one area being a balanced specialists is more important
Def not neede to be exceeding expectation before a promotion
achieving is a good rating for promotion
minor sop negligence should not be a major thing during reviews
exceeding expectations should only be given to “damn this is whole package specialist”
Diana is achieving since she’s one of the highest model at the moment fpr the geo2 role

Open
4/2/2024
Restart step will be available to anyone
Tuesday meetings will be moved to 7:30am to 8:30am
Open
4/1/2024

Open
3/26/2024
Mandatory performance review part 2
Mandatory performance review part 2
More helping team for the upcoming hard conversations

Conversation Preps
Scoring
Understand the indicator scores - know the right meaning of each performance level for each role
Performance tools relevant to their role - matrix can be used as a reference for this, job descriptions for each role
Compensation
Compensation calculations - peeps on a higher salary band must understand that theyll get lower increase compared to others
Propeller’s compensation philosophy - for sad peeps for their increase, we must have a good foundation of the philosophy of paying according to market price of the position not cost of living
Other questions:
Can we get the exact math of the compensations and present it to direct reports? we dont publish the exact percentages for each cell since it will change yearly realistically. We dont want people to be bogged down with the percentages
Salary pro rata calculation PH
Next increase will be on July.
image.png
Conversation Structure
Discussion around performance and share feedback (~80%)
Indicator score and why (~10%)
Increacse effective july 1 (~10%)
Possible additional: answering questions or concerns
Give time for hard questions since it’s better to answer on the spot
How to answer difficult questions, dos and donts
image.png
What to share? Salary bands
Highlight the midpoint not the cap since the mdpoint is the one used in the salary calculation.
image.png
A specialist can actually be on top of the band
Different scenarios
image.png
Just ask more context on why did they think it should be higher.
What if response is i really did great well pero bakit yun lang
repeat something back to them first: “okay cool, we are in agreement and that we align in the feedback it’s just that the amount of increase that you are not agreeing with” just to tell them that you understand them
then go to solution mode: “this performance thing is actually a better system than the previous one” and insert that the philosophy is like this or that
image.png
Start with thank you for raising that, can you help me a little more to understand further why you think you are exceeding?
I worked my ass of for the last few months I think I’m really exceeding
lean towards using the JD and matrices and legit description of the performance indicators
image.png
Ask how similar their role in propeller to other tech companies (not so good since super specific agad)
just repeat the issue for clarification
thanks so much for raising this, do you mind if ask more questions regarding that role etc etc. to learn more for that company
discovery question you might ask: “remember the training we had, do you remember how the salaries are calculated? if you forgot already then yeah I can explain it to you
avoid using almost the cap, just tell you’re very far from the midpoint.
for these conversations swaying the conversations to promotions might be a good one to satisfy the direct report
Calibration Conversations
image.png
image.png

image.png

image.png
know the concern
is it because the outcome? because of the system
is it because they are wanting a salary range to meet their expenses, needs or something?

there’s a chance that a specialist will raise that I need more increase because of the tax bracketing
just be prepared and tell them that the company do not think about this when it comes to salary
countries have different bracketing and it’s impossible for propeller to accomodate all of that
Annual is not reaching the inflation
cost of labor is what we are paying not the cost of living
can we show the market research results? just say that we are doing benchmarkin
For peeps that wants to compare their perf to others, just redirect them that looking at the important idicators like reviews and indicators.

Open
3/25/2024
Thoughts:
Lidar Assignment
Yep, the current rotation I think will suffice. We seniors are fully aware that lidar is still under development and not yet a regular upload from our customer so I can assure that these concerns will always be considered during reviews.
Not sure about Nance’s concern
Can we exclude APs in GD to lessen troubleshooting time if the rest of the APs/Propeller PPK tags agree?
We advertise them as high quality products so we just cant push datasets without even trying to fix them. We only troubleshoot lang naman if we think that the LQ dont make sense. But for easy cases na obviously obstructed, di naman na natin pinoprocess further.
Open
3/25/2024
M3E customer using v1 were advised already
Watch out for M3E escalations that have issues with static alignment
LEt CSE handle comms for m3e datasets using APV1 only, let them sway the customer to buy v2
Open
3/20/2024
Poke myryl for all hands
Tell lorie.
Poke myryl for all hands
Tell lorie.
NEw perf review
all anniv after march 31 will be done with the new perf
high perf rating before is equal to achieving now
soon we’ll be receiving notifs in bob to review self and other peeps based on this
Jobert and Mads
achieving as a junior
juniors used to receive the entry of new position, but now for jobert and mads, they get a bump to 41k which is higher than the performance jump
lore will get a salary upgrade to 41k due to the changes effective march 1, no backpay will be given but there will be an additional adjustment this perf review
but in the future, any position jump will land to the base salary band

10hrs shifts
3 days will be the transition period
make sure to do manual hour counting in sling whenever someone leaves
DS Q1 goals
Team css new hires
ds requests and csr audit
Smart tasking
OFfice budget for Ozzy, better not charge the recent purchases

Open
3/19/2024
Efficiency Notes
Ernest
Alternating scheduling for the escalation
Tech challenge slack improvements and coda tables c/o Pete

Sandra
Not sure kung workable siya before kasi onti pa
For specialist, weekly meeting squad leads.
Metabase dashboard for supervisees

Improvement notes:
Utilize ds-escalator channel, avoid posting questions in geo-supers chat better put it on the channel


Direct Report Discussion
Topic 2: Discuss one (each) recent challenging conversation with a report and how it went. Some questions you can ask each other:
How did the conversation go from your perspective?
What were the main points discussed during the conversation?
How did the employee respond to the feedback or concerns raised?
Did you feel like the employee understood the expectations or issues discussed? Why/Why not?
What strategies did you use to manage any emotions or tensions during the conversation?
Were there any specific areas where you found it challenging to communicate effectively?
How do you plan to follow up with the employee after this conversation?
What lessons did you learn from this conversation that you can apply to future interactions or similar situations?

Sandra
if invlove ang emotions, case with Aly since Gus got promoted
q1 - needs to relay that gus will be promoted, reaction: nalungkot kasi super close nila ni gus
consulted gus, not sure kung dahil na promote Gus or di siya yung napiling squad lead
q2 - reacted negatively by checking offboarding steps and look for other work
madalas siya mag sick leave

Open
3/18/2024
DS Seniors monday meeting
DS Seniors monday meeting

Open
3/18/2024
Zeke’s hosting
Zeke’s hosting
Few peeps are getting worried since annual reviews are coming but still cant get a lot of experience from lidar datasets due to scarcity
peeps that havent experienced real datasets will still be the assigned person next shift
Regardless of the customer subscription tier, pushback moving datasets to other sites with mismatching CRS.
Open
3/18/2024
APV1 is not that compatible to M3E, specifically for the known point method (0% ppk fixes)
Hayley will discuss this with CSEs
Ezra’s gd pass but bad ehc result issue due to loosened cam accuracy
original variance sometimes can result to better alignment instead of static 0.05/0.15
for escalations, try using variance values too as an attempt,
Multiple PQs attached in one AP survey, Zeke will submit a feature request
outdoor and indoor images uploaded together
better recommend to not upload the indoor dataset


Open
3/12/2024
Catchup for 3 weeks in AU
Catchup for 3 weeks in AU
Changes email will be shown in the processing report instead of emailing the customers manually
The Smart tracker review
Single export workflow - rely solely on Megatron for CRS things, remove dependency to metashape
+1 day filter in the control room. all steps that are running more than 1 day will now be filtered
pqs accepted and submitted will not appear in the control room anymore
New control room reprocessing tool RESTART STEP (rerun with resources with or without a custom image_id)
AI tools in the control room.
Summarize
Adjusting the tone
Rephrasing
Expand
Article Generation
Lidar new workflow training
We now accept L2 datasets in the portal. but CS/HS are still on hold due to bugs
New metashape 2.0.3, lots of terms have been changed
Some of the important redash queries are now being transferred to metabase
Renewal owner is now displated in newsstand as well
Accurate datum transformation between any projection in the datums IRENET95 <> ETRS89, base stations can now be used with either the two crs for sites containing either the said CRS
Fin AI for intercom will soon do the refilter requests more efficiently
M3E and L2 optimization parameters now use fixed static values 0.05/0.15meters in metashape
Control room will now refresh automatically every 3 mins, switching to other tabs will refresh control room too
Stockpile verification can now be requested in the uploader
no need to check credits for reprocessing requests
lone aeropoint template is now up
Blank template will have deletable subject instead of Propeller Aero Data Success Team
Lidar georef workflow, will be done by Nikki
Sop for delay emails, will update by gus
Lidar conversations now have a category in intercom
M3e camera troubleshooting, last resort na yung x10, x5. Static values 0.05/0.15 should now be used for problematic datasets
ds request type lidar channel questions
For gcps with high errors, uncheck retaining the markers
confidence filter used can only be check in GD
Loosening cam accuracy for ppkrtk
10m variances meaning it was just uploaded as HA even though no post processing was done
for m3e ppk/rtk, same troubleshooting can be done
best to WFC pa din most times
Ortho should now be done in terra for lidar datasets
all eyes are on lidarturn around time so please escalate asap
avoid requesting for additional gcps from a csvfor lone aeropoint/gcps surveys to avoid more work for specialists, better reupload.
any issues are assumed to be caused by different qa settings which is wrong e.g. vertical shift
remove projections for lq AP but for normal accuracy, leave projections for custom gcps with high errors
RElease ehcs that have issues of shift due to crs change with emails, no need to WFC since it’s already specified that changing CRS will result to inacuracies

Open
2/12/2024
+1 day steps is better to just prompt in ds request instead of filtering
L2 will use static variance, 5cm for xy, 10 cm for z
L2 release is deferred til next week
REfresh tags with enlarge variances will be in the future

Open
2/12/2024
tell lorie bout the WFA
101 sessions for myryl
tell lorie bout the WFA
101 sessions for myryl
Open
1/31/2024
Manager mandatory meeting
Manager mandatory meeting
image.png
image.png
in April, peeps will write reviews for peers. Everyone will have peer reviews now with this system.
for seniors, write reviews. then in june, with carrie and bea + your superviseees

Performance indicators
tool to indicate team members performance
5 point system uses words now. Achieving is the middle. But it’s really good. 55% of the company will probably have this.
image.png
message pete or cc for consultation, but indicator wise, she’s been inconsistent so developing.
given that you probably already have a heads up, the goal is for her to not be surprised if she gets a developing perfomance compared to achieving
image.png
whenever your review, review them based on their role’s expectation
Calibrations
image.png
image.png
Annual increases
uses compa ratio, basically it helps people that are in the lowest band of the salary range if theyre setting new standard
image.png
image.png
Open
1/29/2024
for moderate and lenient to be reprocessed to strict QA. ds should still reprocess but show some slight resistance
if only 1 sl refrain taking lidar for sl, for GS2 if may meeting dont assign lidar to them

Open
1/23/2024
M3E/L2 Camera accuracy potential change
sometimes variance are too tight, sometimes not
Tim’s currently doing some test to know the best fixed loosening
L2 Lidar files details
Tim’s just looking for details for each files just to know what are they
need for documentation
Will follow up with louie and Tox
Janina messaged Jan
we prio crs request for survey clients
if there’s no potential with HW customers we might do it but not priority
so they can still legit request but not a prio
Surface error for large dataset is still ongoing discussion since 20cm is too high for strict

Open
1/16/2024
CRS requests from hardware only customer should be handled by cse or hardware team. For DS side, no difference in handling. We should forward the discussion to CSE team for them to decide if it’s worth doing for HW only customers.
Lidar troubleshooting guide/coda, fabs agree to have a document, will start a coda, maybe next week. (Jan 22 week) (Related)
Using x10, x5 camera accuracy for M3M as long as it’s already converted to variance in metashape just like M3E, it’s okay.
Scale processing team crossed out the “Force lenient on unsupported drones” not sure what did they mean
For us to reach 80% passing rate surface difference error for large datasets, we must set threshold to 10cm. However, this is too big of a jump so we are now waiting if we can set it to just 10cm instead.
Adding a CSR to use the same base station is not yet possible. It’s up to capture team when. But for the churn risk customer, I think the dataset shift is probably due to extended mode since this greatly affects the value of AP captures.
EGM 2008 Iraq - published but with 7mm tranformation error
GSD95 - published too but with 2mm transforamation error, currently suspended
Samuel’s asking if he can just directly add CRS, not feasible since we need to test points in metashape using DS team tools. Instead, he just have to fill out the crs admin page.
Add ETRS 89 to IRENET95 to authority links so that sites with IRENET95 can use PCN
Lidar troubleshooting, holes in the DSM might be caused by noise points. Each point has GPS time, so we removed points using time ranges.


Open
1/15/2024
Check Lidar Template made by Allan
Check Lidar Template made by Allan
Onboarding moved to 9:30 am this Wednesday
Open
1/15/2024

Open
put a feature request for the generateterrain boundary bug that isnt essential
put a feature request for the generateterrain boundary bug that isnt essential
put a feature request for the generateterrain boundary bug that isnt essential

Open
AP capture troubleshooting will continue but CSE will be the one to do workaround. Auto rejecting due to short capture time is not advisable anymore
Limit reprocessing request for parallel flights if in EHC, for GD, open discussion for now

Open
Open
There are no rows in this table


Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.