UNHRC Background Guide
This background guide will prepare delegates for the upcoming United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) session on "The Impact of Global Economic Systems on Human Rights and the Role of Free Trade in Addressing Poverty and Inequality." The purpose of this guide is to provide delegates with essential context, key issues, and critical questions to consider regarding the complex relationship between economic systems, trade policies, and human rights. In the following sections, we will examine the historical context of global economic structures, analyse the human rights implications of current trade practices, explore case studies illustrating both positive and negative impacts, and outline potential policy approaches for the UNHRC to consider. By engaging with this material, delegates will be equipped to engage in substantive debate and develop innovative solutions to address poverty and inequality through a human rights lens.
Historical Overview
The relationship between global economic systems and human rights has been shaped by centuries of evolving economic theories, international policies, and geopolitical events. This overview will examine key historical developments that have influenced how economic structures impact human rights, with a focus on free trade, poverty, and inequality.
The modern global economic system has its roots in the industrial revolution of the 18th and 19th centuries, which saw rapid technological advances and the rise of capitalism as the dominant economic model in much of the world. During this period, issues of workers' rights and economic exploitation came to the forefront, leading to early labour movements and the beginnings of economic human rights concepts.
The aftermath of World War II marked a pivotal moment in the development of both the global economic order and human rights frameworks. The 1944 Bretton Woods Conference established key international financial institutions like the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF), aiming to promote global economic stability and development. Concurrently, the founding of the United Nations in 1945 and the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 set new standards for human rights, including economic and social rights.
The post-war era saw the rise of competing economic ideologies, with the capitalist "free world" led by the United States promoting free market policies, while the Soviet-led communist bloc advocated for centrally planned economies. This ideological divide significantly impacted global economic policies and human rights discussions throughout the Cold War period.
In the 1980s and 1990s, neoliberal economic policies gained prominence globally, emphasizing deregulation, privatization, and free trade. The Washington Consensus, a set of economic policy prescriptions promoted by institutions like the IMF and World Bank, became influential in shaping economic reforms in developing countries. While these policies aimed to stimulate economic growth, critics argued they often exacerbated inequality and negatively impacted social rights.
The establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995 marked a significant step in promoting global free trade. The WTO's rules and agreements have since played a crucial role in shaping international trade policies, with ongoing debates about their impact on human rights and development.
The United Nations has taken several actions to address the intersection of economic systems and human rights. In 1966, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights was adopted, recognizing rights such as the right to work, fair wages, and an adequate standard of living. The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, endorsed in 2011, provided a framework for assessing and addressing the human rights impacts of business activities.
In 2015, the UN adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, including 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that explicitly link economic development with human rights and social progress. Goal 8, for instance, focuses on promoting inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all.
Recent years have seen increased scrutiny of global supply chains and their impact on human rights, leading to initiatives like the UN Global Compact and various industry-specific standards. The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted the interconnectedness of global economic systems and their effects on human rights, sparking renewed debates about economic inequality, social safety nets, and the resilience of global supply chains.
Throughout this history, the UN Human Rights Council and its predecessor, the Commission on Human Rights, have played a crucial role in monitoring and addressing the human rights impacts of economic policies. This has included appointing Special Rapporteurs on topics such as extreme poverty and human rights, and the right to development.
As the global community continues to grapple with issues of economic inequality, sustainable development, and human rights in an increasingly interconnected world, understanding this historical context is crucial for addressing current challenges and shaping future policies.
Current Status
The global economic landscape continues to be shaped by increasing interconnectedness through trade and technology, while also grappling with rising inequality both within and between nations. Free trade agreements and economic globalization have accelerated in recent decades, with proponents arguing they promote growth and lift people out of poverty. However, critics contend that the benefits are unevenly distributed and that current systems exacerbate human rights issues in many developing countries.
Global Economic Conditions
The world economy has experienced volatility in recent years, with the COVID-19 pandemic causing major disruptions to trade, supply chains, and labour markets. While some countries have seen robust recoveries, many developing nations continue to struggle with slow growth, high debt burdens, and limited fiscal space to address poverty and human rights concerns. According to the World Bank, global growth is projected to slow from 5.5% in 2021 to 4.1% in 2022 and 3.2% in 2023 as pent-up demand dissipates and fiscal and monetary support is unwound across the world.
Income inequality remains a pressing issue, with the richest 1% of the global population owning 43.4% of the world's wealth according to Credit Suisse's 2021 Global Wealth Report. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated existing inequalities, with the World Bank estimating that up to 124 million people were pushed into extreme poverty in 2020 as a result of the crisis.
Recent Developments
Several major trade agreements have been negotiated or implemented in recent years, including:
The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which replaced NAFTA in 2020 The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), signed in 2020 by 15 Asia-Pacific nations The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), which began trading in 2021 These agreements aim to reduce trade barriers and promote economic integration, though their impacts on human rights and inequality remain subjects of debate.
The ongoing US-China trade tensions have disrupted global trade patterns and supply chains. Tariffs and other trade restrictions between the world's two largest economies have had ripple effects across industries and countries.
The United Nations' 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, particularly SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), provides a framework for addressing poverty and inequality in the context of sustainable development.
Key Stakeholders
Major players shaping the intersection of global economic systems and human rights include:
International Organizations:
World Trade Organization (WTO) regulates international trade and arbitrates trade disputes International Monetary Fund (IMF) promotes global financial stability and monetary cooperation World Bank provides financial and technical assistance to developing countries United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) promotes development-friendly integration of developing countries into the world economy National Governments:
G7 countries are highly industrialized nations that play a significant role in global economic governance BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) are major emerging economies with growing influence Least Developed Countries (LDCs) are 46 low-income countries facing severe structural impediments to sustainable development Non-Governmental Organizations:
Oxfam International advocates for poverty reduction and economic justice Human Rights Watch investigates and reports on human rights abuses globally Transparency International combats global corruption and promotes transparency Multinational Corporations: Major companies like Apple, Walmart, and Amazon have significant influence on global supply chains and labour practices.
Human Rights Concerns
Key Human Rights Issues Linked to Global Economic Systems
Persistent concerns over unsafe working conditions, unfair wages, and lack of freedom of association in global supply chains. Exploitation of workers, including instances of forced labour and inadequate workplace safety. Right to an Adequate Standard of Living: Economic inequality and poverty hinder access to basic necessities such as food, housing, and healthcare. Food insecurity and malnutrition exacerbated by global agricultural policies and trade practices. Economic activities contribute to environmental degradation, impacting communities’ access to clean air, water, and a healthy environment. Large-scale resource extraction projects often result in displacement and environmental harm. Development projects and resource extraction infringe on indigenous lands and cultural heritage. Violations of indigenous peoples' rights remain prevalent in the pursuit of economic development. Uneven economic growth and trade imbalances hinder sustainable development in many countries, particularly in developing regions. Access to Essential Services: Disparities in healthcare, education, and social services disproportionately affect marginalized populations, particularly in developing countries. The digital divide and unequal access to technology limit economic opportunities for vulnerable communities. The UNHRC faces the challenge of balancing the benefits of free trade and economic growth with the imperative to protect human rights, particularly for vulnerable populations. The goal is to develop policies and frameworks that leverage global economic systems to reduce poverty and inequality while upholding human rights principles.
The role of free trade in addressing poverty and inequality remains contentious. Proponents highlight its potential to drive economic growth and create opportunities, while critics emphasize its risks of exacerbating inequality and undermining labour standards. The UNHRC plays a vital role in monitoring these dynamics and ensuring that global economic policies align with international human rights standards.
Guiding Questions:
How have different global economic systems and trade policies impacted human rights, both positively and negatively? What specific examples illustrate these impacts? To what extent can free trade agreements and policies help address poverty and inequality? What are the potential drawbacks or limitations of relying on free trade to achieve these goals? How can nations balance the pursuit of economic growth and development with the protection of human rights? What role should international organizations play in this balancing act? What responsibilities, if any, do multinational corporations have in upholding human rights standards within global supply chains and business operations? How can these responsibilities be effectively enforced? How might technological advancements and automation in the global economy affect human rights, particularly labour rights and economic inequality? What policy responses could help mitigate potential negative impacts? In what ways could reforming or restructuring current global economic institutions and systems help better protect human rights and reduce inequality? What specific changes might be most impactful? Country Positions:
Developed countries generally advocate for free trade and open markets as drivers of economic growth and poverty reduction. They argue that globalization and trade liberalization create opportunities that can improve human rights outcomes.
Developing countries often express concerns about the uneven impacts of global economic systems. Many call for reforms to trade rules and financial institutions to better address their development needs and reduce inequality between nations.
Emerging economies like China and India tend to support aspects of the current global economic order that have enabled their growth, while also pushing for a greater voice in international economic governance.
Civil society groups frequently criticize the negative human rights impacts of unrestricted free trade and corporate globalization. They advocate for stronger labor and environmental protections in trade agreements, as well as debt relief and increased aid for developing countries.
Delegates are encouraged to review the full rules of procedure document provided separately and to seek clarification from the chair if needed.
External Resources
For further research on the impact of global economic systems on human rights and the role of free trade in addressing poverty and inequality, delegates are encouraged to consult the following resources:
United Nations Reports and Documents:
1. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. (2011). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations "Protect, Respect and Remedy" Framework.
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf
2. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2021). Trade and Development Report 2021: From Recovery to Resilience: The Development Dimension.
https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tdr2021_en.pdf
Scholarly Articles:
3. Rodrik, D. (2018). What Do Trade Agreements Really Do?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2), 73-90.
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.32.2.73
4. Stiglitz, J. E. (2017). The overselling of globalization. Business Economics, 52(3), 129-137.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s11369-017-0047-z
Think Tank and NGO Reports:
5. Oxfam International. (2022). Inequality Kills: The unparalleled action needed to combat unprecedented inequality in the wake of COVID-19.
https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/621341/bp-inequality-kills-170122-en.pdf
6. Peterson Institute for International Economics. (2020). How Trade Affects Labor Market Outcomes.
https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/how-trade-affects-labor-market-outcomes
News and Analysis:
7. The Economist. (2021). "Special Report: The New World Disorder." October 9, 2021.
https://www.economist.com/special-report/2021/10/09/the-new-world-disorder
These resources provide a diverse range of perspectives on the complex relationship between global economic systems, human rights, free trade, poverty, and inequality. Delegates are encouraged to critically analyse these sources and seek additional information to develop a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
Visual Aids:
1. Timeline of Key Economic Globalization Events
A chronological timeline highlighting major milestones in economic globalization from the 1940s to present day. This would include events like the establishment of the Bretton Woods system, creation of GATT/WTO, rise of multinational corporations, and key free trade agreements.
2. Global Income Inequality Infographic
An infographic visually representing global wealth distribution and income inequality across countries and regions. This could use icons or charts to show the stark differences between the richest and poorest populations globally.
3. Chart: Trade Openness vs. Poverty Reduction
A scatter plot or line graph showing the correlation between countries' trade openness (e.g. trade as % of GDP) and poverty reduction over time. This would help illustrate the potential impacts of free trade on addressing poverty in developing nations.