Use this form to generate your Exhibition Review report.
Enter your name in the box at the top. Use the sliders to choose a score for each section below (Organization, Description etc.). When you’re done, click the big green button at the bottom to copy your results Submit your results on the Canvas assignment page. Enter your name:
Organization
A - AB, Excellent
Introduction moves smoothly to the thesis Introduction and/or conclusion summarizes the main points of the paper and restates the thesis statement Each paragraphs has a smooth transition sentences Each paragraph is well-developed and has a central topic that relates to the thesis strong and coherent organization that builds analysis B - B/C, Good
thesis statement is stated in the introduction introduction and/or conclusion summarizes the main points of the paper and restates the thesis statement paragraphs uses some transition sentences each paragraph has a central topic that relates to the thesis C, Developing
thesis statement is stated in the introduction, but may not be obvious introduction and/or conclusion summarizes the main points of the paper and restates the thesis statement paragraphs uses some transition sentences some paragraphs have a central topic that relates to the thesis evidence of organization but doesn’t build the analysis D, Underdeveloped
thesis is not clearly stated in the introduction introduction and/or conclusion may not summarize main points paragraphs may not use transition sentences paragraphs may lack a central topic may lack a logical flow of information little evidence of organization F, Failing
thesis is not clearly stated in the introduction does not have introduction and/or conclusion paragraphs do not use transition sentences paragraphs lack a central topic lacking a logical flow of information no evidence of organization
Your organization score:
Description
A - A/B, Excellent
demonstrates close looking at exhibition and individual artworks ample evidence of art historical terms or knowledge to describe the exhibition and artworks effectively and clearly all applicable aspects of the exhibition have been thoughtfully and thoroughly addressed B - B/C, Good
demonstrates close looking at exhibition and individual artworks evidence of art historical terms or knowledge to describe the exhibition and artworks effectively and clearly all applicable formal aspects of the exhibition have been addressed, but may be lacking in detail. C, Developing
demonstrates some close looking at the exhibition and artworks some evidence of art historical terms or knowledge to describe the exhibition and artworks applicable aspects of the exhibition are addressed adequately but may be lacking in details or fails to address individual artworks in depth D, Underdeveloped
demonstrates little looking at the exhibition and artworks little evidence of art historical terms or knowledge to describe the exhibition and artwork some applicable aspects of the exhibition are addressed but may be lacking in details or fails to address individual artworks in depth F, Failing
little to no evidence of close looking shows little to no evidence of art historical terms or knowledge to describe the exhibition and/or artwork some applicable exhibition and artworks are addressed but lacking in details
Your description score:
Thesis and Analysis
A - AB, Excellent
thesis is thoroughly argued with examples reflects thoughtful analysis of the exhibition as a whole, including exhibition texts, curatorial intent, installation, and any larger significance uses specific observation and documentary evidence to substantiate analysis paper has a well-developed balance of descriptive elements and original discussion, ideas and/or opinions B - B/C, Good
thesis is supported with examples reflects thoughtful analysis of the exhibition as a whole, including exhibition texts, curatorial intent, installation, and any larger significance uses some specific observation and documentary evidence to substantiate analysis paper has a balance of descriptive elements, original discussion, ideas and/or opinions, but may rely more on description rather than on analysis. C, Developing
thesis may lack evidence of a thoughtful analysis of the work reflects some analysis of the exhibition as a whole, but may be lacking analysis of certain elements of exhibition texts, curatorial intent, installation, and any larger significance uses observation and documentary evidence to substantiate analysis, but may be lacking in detail paper has a balance of descriptive elements with original discussion, ideas and/or opinions of the student, but may rely more on description rather than on analysis. D, Underdeveloped
thesis statement may be too broad, to narrow, or unclear and may not be supported with examples reflects little analysis of the exhibition as a whole, lacking analysis of certain elements of exhibition texts, curatorial intent, installation, and any larger significance uses observation and documentary evidence to substantiate analysis, but lacks detail relies too heavily on descriptive elements, rather than original discussion, ideas and/or opinions by the student F, Failing
reflects no analysis of the exhibition as a whole, lacking analysis of certain elements of exhibition texts, curatorial intent, installation, and any larger significance uses no specific observation and documentary evidence to substantiate analysis relies too heavily on descriptive elements, rather than original discussion, ideas and/or opinions by the student
Your thesis and analysis score:
Clarity and Conventions
A - AB, Excellent
very few if any grammar issues language is evocative and specific no evidence of monotonous, superfluous, mechanical, or repetitive language very little/none of the language is informal very few to no type-os and errors B - B/C, Good
language is evocative and specific very little of the language is monotonous, mechanical, or repetitive very little of the language is informal C, Developing
language is somewhat specific some of the language may be monotonous, superfluous, mechanical, or repetitive little of the language is informal D, Underdeveloped
unprofessional appearance: different fonts, ink issues, etc. language is somewhat specific language may be monotonous, superfluous, mechanical, or repetitive frequent type-os and errors F, Failing
unprofessional appearance: different fonts, ink issues, etc. significant grammar issues language is lacking in specificity language is often monotonous, mechanical, superfluous, or repetitive significant type-os and errors
Your clarity and conventions score:
Format
A - AB, Excellent
title of artwork is always italicized student has included an image of the artwork(s) with correct label B - B/C, Good
title is always italicized student has included an image of the artwork(s) with correct label C, Developing
title is always italicized student has included an image of the artwork(s), but label is missing some information D, Underdeveloped
may have incorrect margin size page requirements may not be met, or are close title may not be italicized student has not included any images F, Failing
page requirements not met student has not included an image of the artwork
Revision and Peer Review
Check the box if you participated in peer review and used feedback to make revisions.
Final Score:
Clarity and conventions: Revision and Peer Review:
🚨 IMPORTANT! 🚨
Submit Your Results
Click this 👇 button, and your results will be copied to the clipboard.
