Explore

Journal Entry 05/01/2025

Fathers Side

Early Idealization and Emotional Withdrawal

Growing up with my nanny and aunt on my father's side, I was initially adored and spoiled. They worshipped me in a way that felt like I was being sanctified—always referred to as a literal angel. For the first several years of my life, I received a lot of material things, attention, and love, and was even entered into beauty pageant competitions. These early experiences deeply imprinted the idea that worthiness, belonging, and love were tied to being special, beautiful, adored, and even deified .

As I grew older and naturally began to express more autonomy—developing desires, attitudes, or traits outside of their idealized image of me—their adoration began to fade. While love may still have been present in some ways, the overt praise and material generosity declined. This shift was emotionally disorienting. It wasn’t just about receiving fewer gifts; it was about losing my place as the favored one, which felt like a loss of identity and value. I no longer felt truly seen, cherished, or chosen.

Materialism as a Proxy for Love and Worth

I witnessed my aunt continue to receive lavish attention and gifts—shopping trips where thousands were spent on her—while I received little or sometimes nothing. Over time, I internalized the message that material abundance was tied to worthiness. When I didn’t receive those things, it felt like rejection, not just lack. It formed a subconscious belief that my value was transactional: to be loved is to be provided for materially.

This was compounded when I turned to my mother and was met with dismissive responses like “I’m broke,” “I can’t,” or “You’ll have to wait.” These repeated rejections, from both maternal and paternal sides, created a double-bind: my needs weren’t acknowledged anywhere, reinforcing the belief that I was invisible or unworthy.

The Breaking Point: “You’re Just the Granddaughter”

This left me feeling heartbroken often and was further solidified when, after expressing my hurt, my aunt told me, “You’re just the granddaughter.” That moment shattered the illusion of closeness and revealed the hierarchy I hadn’t seen clearly before. Love in my family system, I realized, was conditional and role-based—it could be revoked. The emotional confusion, grief, and rage from this moment echoed throughout my later relationships.

Modeling and Internalizing Feminine Power Distortions

As I matured, I began to observe the more complex, often unspoken dynamics between the women in my family. My aunt used her beauty and sexuality to gain power and material comfort—what I now recognize as transactional and manipulative seduction. My mother, by contrast, also depended on men for survival, but lacked the aesthetic privilege to leverage it in the same way. Beneath their interactions lay a subtle undercurrent of envy and resentment—a grief in my mother over what she lacked.

I remember times when, during visits to my aunt’s house, she would ask me to leave for several hours so that the man she was sleeping with—exchanging sex for money or material possessions—could come over and get his needs met. I was just a child. Being dismissed so casually, made to feel in the way of her transactions, added another layer of confusion and emotional pain. It reinforced the belief that a woman's worth was measured by what she could offer men sexually—while my presence, my needs, and my safety were rendered invisible, secondary, or expendable.

My aunt wielded her beauty to exploit the emotional fragility of men, while men exploited my mother’s instability to assert control over her vulnerability. These mirrored distortions of feminine power—one as predator, the other as prey—taught me that women either used their sexuality to dominate, or surrendered it in exchange for survival. I absorbed the belief that men were the gatekeepers of love, resources, and protection. To be safe or successful, I thought I had to either align with male power or defend myself against it.

These two opposing expressions of feminine power left a deeply confusing imprint. From their examples, I unconsciously learned that being a woman meant performing, manipulating, or sacrificing in order to stay safe or secure connection. So when I began to assert my own power in relationships, it often emerged through control or dominance—reactive survival strategies inherited from the very dynamics I had internalized.

The Mirror: Your Own Power Strategies

Eventually, I began to act from these imprints. When my nanny no longer gave to me as she once did, I found myself using coercion, dominance, and even shame to get what I wanted. This wasn’t cruelty—it was a learned response to emotional abandonment. I was trying to reclaim agency, to not feel powerless. But in doing so, I mirrored the very behaviors I had once been hurt by.

My Father and Grandparents: Masculine Absence and Emotional Disruption

My father was rarely present. I saw him only occasionally, and he played little role in my daily life. His absence left a gap where masculine stability should have been. From what I know of my grandparents’ relationship, my grandfather cheated early in their marriage. In response, my grandmother—who didn’t believe in divorce—refused further intimacy but stayed with him, remaining deeply devoted and unconditionally loving.

My grandfather, a longtime alcoholic, was often emotionally volatile—expressing his unprocessed pain through judgment and shame, particularly toward family. Over time, his words lost their weight, and few truly listened, which only deepened his sense of powerlessness and disconnection. Though the men often sought control through emotional dominance, the women quietly resisted. They followed their own instincts, made independent choices, and refused to be entirely defined by male authority. My grandmother, for example, upheld the appearance of traditional loyalty—honoring the societal contract of marriage and maintaining family unity despite the emotional cost. Yet behind that facade, she forged her own path, rising to financial success at a time when such achievement was rare for women. These early dynamics shaped my understanding of masculinity as both emotionally unsafe and socially privileged—while the women embodied a more complex power: one that navigated survival through a blend of outward obedience and inner sovereignty.

Core Wounds Identified

Love is conditional and hierarchical

Material things = proof of worth

Authentic self-expression leads to loss of favor

Femininity must be managed, manipulated, or masked to be safe

Rejection leads to rage or control as a defense

Core Healing Themes

Reclaiming unconditional self-worth, beyond performance or appearance

Rewriting feminine power from objectification to sovereignty

Healing the inner child’s grief over emotional abandonment

Integrating shadow expressions of power (coercion, manipulation) with compassion

Opening to love that is mutual, conscious, and not earned through sacrifice

I am not just healing my story—I am ending a cycle.

⁠

Part 2 Emotional Imprint from Nanny & Aunt Dynamic

1. Observed Favoritism and Emotional Displacement

Watching your nanny continue to worship and spoil your aunt, while gradually withdrawing that same energy from you, likely left you feeling abandoned, confused, and replaced.

You internalized the belief that love and attention are given to those who meet certain aesthetic, material, or performance standards.

It wasn't just that love was withheld—it was visibly redirected elsewhere, deepening the wound of unworthiness.

2. Materialism as a Proxy for Love

In this system, high-quality material things weren’t just gifts—they were currency for worthiness and belonging.

When you didn’t receive them, it wasn’t just about not having—it became a personal judgment: “I’m not worthy of this… so I must not be enough.”

A fear formed: If I don’t have these things, I won’t be accepted, seen, or loved.

3. Rooted Core Beliefs

“My value depends on what I have or how I’m seen.”

“If someone else is favored, there’s less love for me.”

“I must keep up appearances to avoid rejection.”

“To belong, I must be exceptional, beautiful, or impressive.”

⁠

Identity Conflict

This creates a split between the authentic self (the one who just wants to be loved for who you are) and the adapted self (the one who strives, performs, or self-deprecates to stay in favor). The ache of watching someone else receive what you used to, without understanding why, forms an early template of competition, lack, and longing.

What you’re bringing forward here is not just an event—it’s a core rupture in your sense of identity, belonging, and worth. It carries grief, confusion, betrayal, and an emotional loss of innocence: realizing that love can be unequal, conditional, and hierarchical, even in family.

Core Memory: The Shopping Experience & Emotional Displacement

Emotional Disparity in Real Time

Repeatedly going shopping and watching lavish amounts of money spent on your aunt while you received one item—or nothing—wasn’t just unfair: it was emotionally disorienting.

You had once been idealized, loved, and worshipped. To be reduced to "just the granddaughter" shattered that image and the emotional safety it had given you.

That sentence—“you’re just the granddaughter”—wasn’t just a boundary being drawn. It was a dismissal of the deep bond you thought you shared and an abrupt repositioning of your worth.

Double Bind Between Maternal and Paternal Sides

You sought comfort from your mother, but her frequent blocks (“I’m broke,” “You’ll have to wait”) mirrored the denial you were already feeling from your father’s side.

No safe harbor existed for your needs to land. What you desired wasn’t just material—it was confirmation that you mattered equally, that your existence held the same value.

Internal Impact

This emotional contradiction—once being adored, then dismissed—instilled deep confusion about your place in the family system.

A belief formed: “My worth is temporary and conditional. It can be revoked.”

Rage emerged not just as a reaction, but as a cry against emotional erasure.

You began to associate money, gifts, and attention with love, not because you were materialistic, but because it was the only way love was proven in your environment.

Masculine Dynamics: Absence, Power, and Emotional Insecurity

Father’s Absence & Unmet Masculine Stability

Your father's physical and emotional absence created a void where dependable masculine presence and guidance should have existed.

His lack of involvement left you craving a male figure who could offer structure, protection, or acknowledgment—yet none came.

Grandfather’s Behavior & Impact

Your grandfather’s infidelity and emotional volatility created an unstable emotional environment, especially for your grandmother.

Though she remained loyal and loving, the dynamic taught you that women must endure emotional suffering in silence to preserve family unity.

His alcoholism, judgment, and emotional volatility likely instilled an early fear of masculine authority—perceived as dominating, emotionally unsafe, and ultimately disempowering.

Subconscious Beliefs Formed:

“Masculine presence is unpredictable, unreliable, and often unsafe.”

Even powerful women are expected to absorb emotional pain in relationships to preserve harmony and avoid conflict.

“Emotional abuse is tolerable if love still exists—it’s just part of the dynamic.”

“I can’t depend on masculine energy for protection—I have to become my own protector.”

Chakra Imbalances (Expanded):

Root Chakra – Deep instability around male protection and familial structure

Sacral Chakra – Worthiness, desires, and emotional sensitivity denied

Solar Plexus Chakra – Powerlessness, rage, and identity confusion

Heart Chakra – Grief tied to emotionally unavailable men, love entangled with suffering

Throat Chakra – Difficulty speaking truth about male figures without guilt or fear

Pattern Recognition: Femininity, Power, and Survival

1. The Split Models of Feminine Power

On one side, your aunt weaponized beauty and sexuality—not as intimacy, but as control. She modeled a version of power rooted in external validation, manipulation, and material gain.

On the other hand, my mother’s femininity was shaped by dependency and emotional depletion. She used her sexuality and caretaking as survival strategies—offering herself in exchange for the foundation and stability she lacked. In doing so, she became entangled in codependent dynamics, often consumed or controlled by the very men who held the power she depended on to feel safe.

In your nervous system, feminine power became linked with either manipulation or martyrdom.

2. Unconscious Programming Around Power & Value

You likely absorbed the belief that:

Beauty equals power.

Sexuality equals currency.

Vulnerability invites exploitation.

Masculine attention is the gatekeeper of love, value, and security.

And perhaps, deep down, neither model felt safe—but both felt like templates you had to choose between.

3. Relational Dynamics You Inherited

Your feminine role models taught power through performance or submission.

Both were stuck in survival strategies shaped by patriarchy, trauma, and scarcity.

Watching one be envied and the other preyed upon created internalized confusion about what kind of woman is safe, worthy, or lovable.

⁠

✦ Deep Emotional Imprints

Heart Chakra: Conflicted love for both mother and aunt, grief over how love was distorted.

Solar Plexus: Confusion and tension around personal power, self-worth, and identity.

Sacral Chakra: Mistrust of sexual energy, conflicting desires for expression and protection.

Throat Chakra: Difficulty naming truth around feminine manipulation, shame, and pain.

⁠

✦ Emerging Awareness:

You are now seeing through the illusion—and this is profound. You’re the one in the lineage saying:

“I no longer equate femininity with seduction, martyrdom, or performance. I want something real, whole, and integrated.”

This is the breaking of the cycle. You’re not here to reject your mother or your aunt—but to honor the survival strategies they embodied while transcending the distorted archetypes that shaped them. You are reclaiming a feminine power rooted in truth, not transaction—in radiance, not self-erasure.

You are choosing a new path—one where intimacy is mutual, power is shared, and expression is sovereign. This is the return to the sacred feminine—undefended, unperformed, and unapologetically whole.

⁠

How This Shaped My Relationship to Vulnerability and IntimacyHow This Shaped My Relationship to Vulnerability and Intimacy

The early experiences with my aunt and nanny on my father’s side gave me a warped template of what intimacy and worthiness looked like. I was adored, idealized, and materially spoiled—so long as I reflected back to them the image they projected onto me: perfect, angelic, beautiful. The early idealization I experienced from my nanny and aunt offered a sense of emotional safety and admiration— and that love felt magical at first, but as soon as I began to express autonomy, it was quietly withdrawn. In this, I learned a dangerous emotional logic: vulnerability and aythenticity leads to disapproval, disconnection, or erasure.

But the moment I began expressing my own autonomy—my thoughts, my desires, my individuality—that adoration began to fade. Without explanation or repair, I felt emotionally replaced and invisibilized. I internalized the belief that I had to earn closeness through compliance, beauty, or behavior. Vulnerability didn’t lead to connection—it led to emotional exile. This created an imprint in my nervous system: that authenticity is dangerous, and that to stay loved, I must remain pleasing, compliant, or extraordinary.

Worse, there was no emotional safety net to catch me when that idealization disappeared. My father’s absence added another dimension to this: the masculine was not only emotionally unavailable, it was barely present. I was missing a mirror of masculine support and protection. What replaced him were distorted masculine energies—volatile, judgmental, and emotionally unsafe. Between the conditional affection from my aunt and nanny and the emotional absence or dysfunction of the men, I learned that both masculine and feminine forms of intimacy were conditional, unsafe, or inaccessible.

Because of these patterns, vulnerability and intimacy have often felt like traps—arenas where I would either be used, judged, or ultimately discarded. I might begin to open up, but if the environment doesn’t feel emotionally attuned or reciprocal, I quickly retreat into performance or control.

These patterns took root in my nervous system and began shaping how I related to intimacy and connection. I learned to:

Learned to equate my worth with how well I performed or lived up to others’ ideals—especially in relationships marked by conditional approval.

Fear rejection if I express emotional needs, flaws, or vulnerability

Associate emotional closeness with the risk of being replaced, demoted, or quietly pushed out when I no longer perform.

Use control or withdrawal to avoid the helplessness of not feeling chosen or protected

Fear that once I stop meeting expectations, love and closeness will quietly disappear—just as it did when I stopped being their “perfect girl.”

As a result, I developed protective mechanisms that mirrored these wounds:

Use distance or control to protect myself from the ache of not being chosen—of losing closeness without explanation or repair.

Withholding vulnerability because it was never welcomed, protected, or understood

Performing strength—especially with men—to feel safe, valued, or in control

Over-identifying with independence while quietly longing for steady, unconditional closeness

These patterns were not signs of dysfunction—they were intelligent adaptations. But they came at a cost: the inability to fully trust, receive, or rest in love without vigilance. My nervous system had been trained to brace for disappointment, to perform instead of reveal, and to protect instead of lean in.

But with clarity comes the opportunity for repair. I am now reorienting my nervous system toward a different truth: that love is not a reward for perfection, and intimacy does not require self-betrayal. Vulnerability is not weakness—it is the threshold of real connection. The child in me who had to earn her place is now learning that she never had to in the first place. She was always worthy. And she still is.

Now, with awareness, comes healing. I am learning that:

Intimacy does not require self-abandonment.

Vulnerability is not a liability—it is the doorway to real connection.

Masculine energy can be safe, present, and nourishing—when healed and embodied.

I don’t need to perform to be loved. I can just be.

This is my repair process. I am creating new neural pathways where trust, tenderness, and shared emotional presence can take root—not because I’ve earned it, but because I am worthy of it. I am breaking the legacy of conditionality. I am returning to a form of love that includes my wholeness, not just my performance.

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.

Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (

CtrlP

) instead.