Planned Integration Strategy
1. API-First Architecture
Leverage RESTful or GraphQL APIs to connect with external tools (e.g., Gnosis Safe for treasury, Ceramic/DID for identity, Notion/Wiki-style platforms for knowledge). Use Supabase/PostgREST or a middleware layer to route internal holonic events (e.g., proposal approved) to external endpoints. 2. Webhook + Event Triggers
Implement event-driven logic via Supabase or an event bus (e.g., n8n, Hasura, or custom Pub/Sub) to push updates based on system state changes: Proposal passed → trigger treasury disbursement Holon created → sync with identity provider Governance cycle completed → archive knowledge snapshot 3. Modular Integration Layer
Define an integration schema where each external system maps to a core holonic function: Treasury = Resource allocation (Gnosis Safe, Stripe, Coordinape, etc.) Identity = Role access, permissions (DIDs, WalletConnect, 3ID, etc.) Knowledge = Contextual memory + proposal lineage (e.g., Notion, Logseq, or custom markdown stores)
4. Tenant-Based Configuration
Allow each tenant to configure their own integrations via the admin interface: API keys, webhooks, endpoints, and sync settings Role-based permissions for who can connect/trigger external systems 5. Semantic Mapping & Metadata
Structure metadata in the database so external systems can link to internal holonic IDs (e.g., proposal_id, holon_id). Use tags, URIs, or decentralized indexes for linking internal actions to external records (e.g., IPFS/Arweave snapshots of decisions). 6. Security & Permissions
All integrations must respect the tenant-based access control layer. Use scoped tokens or OAuth flows for secure, role-restricted communication with external systems. 🧠 Example Flow
A proposal to fund a contributor is approved → the system triggers a webhook to Gnosis Safe → funds are sent → a transaction receipt is linked back to the proposal → the identity layer logs it under the contributor’s profile → the knowledge system updates the contribution record.
Would you like this formalized into a Phase 2 Integration Plan section or turned into a visual flow diagram for stakeholder presentation?
Full-Stack Interoperability Strategy