Auto-Quorum & Vote Resolution Engine

Purpose: The Auto-Quorum & Vote Resolution Engine automates the finalization of proposal outcomes based on quorum thresholds and vote logic, reducing manual overhead and enabling scalable, responsive decision-making across holonic governance structures.

⁠

🔧 Core Capabilities

Dynamic Resolution of Proposals Once a proposal enters the voting cycle, the engine continuously monitors incoming votes and calculates outcomes in real time, based on preconfigured quorum and approval thresholds.

Supabase Logic:

Vote Aggregation: Each proposal aggregates votes into a vote_totals field. The engine calculates these values per proposal_id.

Quorum Threshold Checks:

Example: quorum_required = 60%

Logic: IF vote_count ≥ quorum_required → proceed to outcome evaluation

Vote Weighting (Optional):

Token-based or reputation-based weighting may be applied to individual votes.

Weighted outcomes are calculated as: weighted_approval = SUM(vote_weight WHERE vote = YES) / total_weight

Automated Status Update:

If quorum is met and approval threshold exceeded → status = Approved

If quorum is met but threshold not met → status = Rejected

If quorum not met by deadline → status = Expired or Pending Review

⁠

🔄 Automation Outcomes

Reduces friction in proposal resolution across distributed teams or coalitions

Ensures consistency and integrity in vote evaluation

Enables real-time governance without requiring constant manual oversight

Allows transparency into the decision logic, providing auditability and trust

⁠

🔮 Future Enhancements

To support increasingly complex governance models, the engine is designed for extensibility:

Weighted Voting Systems Assign custom weights based on tokens, roles, or contribution scores.

Quadratic Voting Support Allow voters to express the strength of their preference with diminishing returns.

Token-Based Quorum Rules Require a specific token pool threshold (e.g., x% of total supply) to validate votes.

Multi-Layer Voting Integration Enable cascading decisions across nested holonic layers (e.g., local → regional → global).

Conditional Proposal Logic Trigger dependent workflows or resource allocations based on vote outcomes.

⁠

🧠 Strategic Role in the Holonic System

This engine is a core component of the Intelligent Governance Layer, translating deliberative outcomes into system state changes. By embedding programmable governance logic directly into the operational fabric of the dashboard, it allows holons to make and implement decisions with speed, clarity, and structural coherence.

⁠

Would you like a visual logic diagram for this engine’s evaluation process (e.g., vote → quorum → outcome) or an interactive simulation that demonstrates various voting models?

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.

Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (

CtrlP

) instead.