Updated
2025-01-08
1. Strategic Activity Areas (A–F)
A. Postgraduate training (MSc & PhD) – programmes, courses, supervision, curriculum development B. Research collaboration – joint research, thematic programmes, workshops, networks C. Mobility & exchanges – student, early-career and staff mobility; visits and fellowships D. Infrastructure & resources – computational tools, HPC, library access, shared resources E. Outreach, society & industry engagement – mathematics–society interfaces, industry links, public engagement F. Coordination, governance & network development – coordination, management, strategic development 2. Funder–Activity Alignment Matrix
How to read this matrix
Each row summarises how a specific funder or instrument aligns with CoRE-Math’s six strategic activity areas (A–F). Each column can also be read vertically to identify which funding systems are structurally relevant for a given activity area. Clusters of ● and ◐ indicate areas of strong or partial structural alignment; columns dominated by ○ or — indicate structurally underfunded or weakly supported activity domains.
Cross-cutting patterns that are visible in the matrix
Postgraduate training (A), research collaboration (B), and mobility (C) are structurally supported across multiple funding systems. Shared infrastructure and resources (D) is weakly supported across almost all systems. Outreach and interfaces (E) are supported primarily by foundations and specialist actors. Coordination and network development (F) depend disproportionately on EU and public development instruments.
3. Tiered Activity–Funder Alignment Matrix
How to read this matrix
This matrix reorganises the same alignment assessments by activity area rather than by funder. Each row shows, for a given CoRE-Math activity area (A–F), which funders fall into the ● (core), ◐ (partial), and ○ (peripheral) relevance tiers. It is a derived, synthetic view that makes visible the structural support, concentrations, and gaps across the funding landscape.
The tiered matrix does not introduce new assessments; it is a reorganisation of the detailed matrix intended to surface structural patterns by activity area.
Interpretation of relevance tiers
The symbols used in the alignment matrices indicate how a given funder can realistically relate to a specific CoRE-Math activity area.
● Core fit: The activity area can be the main focus of a CoRE-Math funding initiative with this funder.
◐ Partial fit: The activity area can be supported as part of a broader programme or project, but not as a stand-alone focus.
○ Peripheral fit: The activity area may be supported only in a limited or incidental way.
○ Marginal / opportunistic