Skip to content
Gallery
YodaAI Evaluation Template
Configuration
Step 1: Questionnaire for Completion
Step 2: Compiled Analysis
Example: RFP Rating Analysis
Suggested Improvements
More
Share
Explore

icon picker
Example: RFP Rating Analysis

Final Vendor Recommendation (AI-Enabled)

Based on the evaluations provided, it is recommended to choose Company 1 as the vendor. While they did not score as high in differentiation against competitors or cost relative to budget, their overall presentation was impressive and professional, their approach to the project was well thought-out and effective, and they demonstrated strong capabilities and solutions to meet our needs. Additionally, their credibility and readiness to mobilize make them a strong contender for partnership. While there were areas of improvement identified in the overall presentation and capabilities and solutions metrics, the vendor's approach is strong and shows promise. The vendor's readiness to mobilize and capabilities/solutions may need improvement, but their cost is reasonable and within budget, and their overall presentation is satisfactory.
⁠
Summary of Vendor Ratings from All Evaluators
Subject
Aggregate Score
Score by Metric Group
AI-Enabled Sentiment Score
AI-Enabled Comment Summary
Company 1
1
Overall presentation: 4.5/5 Approach: 4.6/5 Capabilities and solutions: 4.2/5 Differentiation against competitors: 3/5 Credibility: 4.1/5 Readiness to mobilize: 4/5 Cost relative to budget: 3/5
The vendor's overall presentation was impressive and professional.
Their approach to the project was well thought-out and effective.
They demonstrated strong capabilities and solutions to meet our needs.
While they may not have scored as high in differentiation against competitors and cost relative to budget, their credibility and readiness to mobilize make them a strong contender.
Company 2
1
Overall presentation: 2/5 Approach: 3.1/5 Capabilities and solutions: 2.6/5 Differentiation against competitors: 2.8/5 Credibility: 3.6/5 Readiness to mobilize: 2.8/5 Cost relative to budget: 3/5
Areas of improvement identified in overall presentation and capabilities and solutions metrics.
Approach and differentiation against competitors metrics scored below average.
Credibility metric scored above average, indicating potential for partnership.
Cost relative to budget metric scored average.
Company 3
1
Overall presentation: 3.1/5 Approach: 4.1/5 Capabilities and solutions: 2.9/5 Differentiation against competitors: 3.2/5 Credibility: 3.6/5 Readiness to mobilize: 2.3/5 Cost relative to budget: 4.1/5
The vendor's approach is strong and shows promise.
The vendor's credibility and overall presentation are acceptable.
The vendor's readiness to mobilize and capabilities/solutions need improvement.
Vendor 4
1
Overall presentation: 4.1/5 Approach: 3.9/5 Capabilities and solutions: 4.6/5 Differentiation against competitors: 4.1/5 Credibility: 3.7/5 Readiness to mobilize: 4.2/5 Cost relative to budget: 4.4/5
Vendor demonstrates strong capabilities and solutions.
Vendor's cost is reasonable and within budget.
Vendor's overall presentation is satisfactory.
⁠

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.