In Vitro Toxicity Testing Market Share and Key Players are Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (US), Covance (US), Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (US), GE Healthcare (US), and others

The global research report, recently added by Value Market Research, is entailed of various market parameters including market outlook, share, trends, growth, value and factors that are currently influencing the market dynamics. The report discloses forecast for the period 2021-2028 based on the historical data. Additionally, this report also maps the recent strategic developments of key players along with their market share.
The research report also covers the comprehensive profiles of the key players in the market and an in-depth view of the competitive landscape worldwide. The major players in the in vitro toxicity testing market include Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (US), Covance (US), Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (US), GE Healthcare (US), Eurofins Scientific SE (Luxembourg), Merck KGaA (Germany), Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (US), Catalent, Inc. (US), Cyprotex (UK), SGS S.A. (Switzerland), QIAGEN N.V. (Germany), Promega Corporation (US), Gentronix Limited (UK), BioIVT (US), and MB Research Laboratories (US). This section consists of a holistic view of the competitive landscape that includes various strategic developments such as key mergers & acquisitions, future capacities, partnerships, financial overviews, collaborations, new product developments, new product launches, and other developments.
The growth in technological advancement to evaluate drug safety, the upsurge in consumer goods safety, the increase in ranking and screening of potential drugs, and the rise in the number of in-vitro tests conducted are key industry drivers for in-vitro toxicology testing. In addition, increased investment in research and development and opposition to animal testing prompted in-vitro toxicology testing. However, the government's stringent regulations and a lack of professionals are significant barriers to in-vitro testing.
The research report covers Porter’s Five Forces Model, Market Attractiveness Analysis, and Value Chain analysis. These tools help to get a clear picture of the industry’s structure and evaluate the competition attractiveness at a global level. Additionally, these tools also give an inclusive assessment of each segment in the global market of in vitro toxicity testing. The growth and trends of in vitro toxicity testing industry provide a holistic approach to this study.
This section of the in vitro toxicity testing market report provides detailed data on the segments at country and regional level, thereby assisting the strategist in identifying the target demographics for the respective product or services with the upcoming opportunities.
By Product & Service
· Covid Impact
· Consumables
· Assays (Bacterial Toxicity Assays, Enzyme Toxicity Assays, Cell-Based Elisa & Western Blots, Receptor-Binding Assays, Tissue Culture Assays, Other Assays)
· Equipment
· Software
· Services
By Method
· Cellular Assays
· Biochemical Assays
· In Silico Models
· Ex Vivo Models
By Toxicity Endpoint & Test
· Skin Irritation, Corrosion, & Sensitization
· Genotoxicity Testing
· Cytotoxicity Testing
· Ocular Toxicity
· Organ Toxicity
· Phototoxicity Testing
· Dermal Toxicity
· Other Toxicity Endpoints & Tests
By Industry
· Covid Impact
· Pharmaceuticals & Biopharmaceuticals
· Cosmetic & Household Products
· Food
· Chemicals
By Technology
· Cell Culture Technologies
· High-Throughput Technologies
· Toxicogenomics
Regional Analysis
This section covers the regional outlook, which accentuates current and future demand for the In Vitro Toxicity Testing market across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa. Further, the report focuses on demand, estimation, and forecast for individual application segments across all the prominent regions.
Browse Global In Vitro Toxicity Testing Market Research Report with detailed TOC at
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
) instead.