Skip to content
Bitcoin->Web3.0 Study
Share
Explore
Background Study Topics

The Price of Tomorrow

Loading…
This book gives an alternate view to the current belief that Economic Growth is centered around creating more and more Jobs. Instead, it propose that the rise of technology shall lead to a future which creates abundance by removing systemic inefficiencies leading to lesser and lesser jobs. The technological abundance alters the demand - supply equilibrium by making supply of goods/services reach theoretical infinity. As a result of this, the price of many goods/services might reach the status of becoming free.
When the GROWTH or CREDIT driven DEMAND meets the TECHNOLOGY driven ABUNDANT SUPPLY, the resultants effects creates
a) Wealth / Income Inequality due to large number of job losses on one end and at the corporations side, Winner takes all effects due to the Network externalities.
b) Inflation of asset prices as increase in money supply chases the demand for assets.
The book made me re-think about my existing knowledge that Govt. Spending through Infrastructure projects generates jobs. Bitcoin, by decentralising the currency effectively robbing the the Govt. of this interventionist role to stimulate economy during the times of recession.
It led me to understand in-depth the two opposing economic philosophies viz., classical / Austrian economics vs Keynesian economics.
FULLTEXT01.pdf
744.5 kB
DiVA portal is a finding tool and an institutional repository for research publications and student theses written at .
Keynes debunked classical economics related fundamental tenet called “Say’s Law”. Say's Law states that at the macro level, aggregate production inevitably creates an equal aggregate demand.
says-law-works-supply-does-create-its-own-demand-11642696693145.pdf
33 kB
The below link explains how Keynes misinterpreted Say’s Law.
Keynes’ hypothesis and greatest fallacy lay in a failure to understand Say’s law. He understood it to mean that recessions were caused by failure of demand.

Say had proposed that recessions were caused by failure in the structure of supply and demand.

What it meant was fairly simple: recession follows production errors. When a producer fails to determine just what a consumer really wants, he continues to make and stockpile goods that cannot be sold at a profit (if at all). It was a common situation in the USSR where goods were estimated to be worth less than the value of the materials used in their manufacture.

As the stockpile increases, producers cut back on production, income (the profit margin) shrinks, and there is less capital available to buy consumption goods. The end result is that consumer spending eventually drops to precipitously low levels.

Keynes did not want to fix capitalism; he wanted to build his own tower. Unfortunately for us all, it is a tower of cards that has repeatedly fallen over in the wind of change due to having been built on a foundation of logical flaws and grossly misrepresenting errors.
Loading…
The above article stresses the importance of “GROSS OUTPUT” against the “GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT” domain another by-product of the Classical Economics school
The Classical School of Economics prevailed roughly from the time of Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations (1776) to the mid-19th century. It focused on the supply side of the economy. Production was the wellspring of prosperity

Say’s message was clear: a demand failure could not cause an economic slump. This message was accepted by virtually every major economist, prior to the publication of Keynes’ The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money in 1936. So, before The General Theory, even though most economists thought business cycles were in the cards, demand failure was not listed as one of the causes of an economic downturn.

All this was overturned by Keynes. Keynes set J.B. Say up as a straw man so that he could remove Say’s ideas from economic discourse and the public’s thinking. Keynes had to do this because his entire theory was based on the analysis of demand failure, and his prescription for putting life back into aggregate demand — namely, a fiscal stimulus (read: lower taxes and/or higher government spending).

Keynes was wildly successful. With the publication of The General Theory,the supply side of the economy almost entirely vanished. It was replaced by aggregate demand, which was faithfully reported in the national income accounts. In consequence, aggregate demand has dominated economic discourse and policy ever since. The structure of the economy — the supply side — is nowhere to be found.
there-is-more-to-j-b-say-than-says-law.pdf
41.6 kB

While infrastructure spending is touted to be a growth driver, we need to be cautious about selection of a particular infrastructure project, as the stated below by Austrian school of economics.
myth-infrastructure-spending.pdf
52.3 kB
The above video illustrates Yuval Noah Harari’s world view that Humans rule the planet earth due to their ability to co-operate at scale and live in dual reality created out of their imagination which serves the need to co-operate at scale. He cites money as one of the examples of the dual reality.
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.