Skip to content

260218 Meeting Notes


View 4 of Agenda 2
Search
Done
Topic
Notes
Date
Added by
A big thing would be to focus on any lease ups stats this month and the plan to keep getting new tenants.
Thu, Sep 18
An update on the ad spend ROI would be great too.
Thu, Sep 18
Review rates at both Verona and Ocean City make adjustments to drive rental growth
@Larissa Fincher
Thu, Sep 18
Auctions contributed mostly to vacates
Thu, Sep 18
Aggressive Promo
@Andrew Aue
Thu, Nov 20
Rate Review
@Larissa Fincher
Thu, Nov 20
Track Cube Smart
@Andrew Aue
Thu, Nov 20
There are no rows in this table

2026 YTD Performance Summary

(Financials through Jan 2026; Operations as of Feb 17, 2026)

1. Portfolio Financial Performance (January Close)

NOI:
$43,778 actual vs $46,189 budget (–$2,411 / –5.2%)
Key takeaway: The NOI miss is not broad-based operational weakness. It is largely driven by a $14,824 insurance expense posted at Pampa, which appears to be a one-time or annual timing item (needs GL confirmation).

Property Highlights

Ocean City: +$1,517 over budget NOI (+7%)
Verona: +$3,048 over budget NOI (+21.9%)
Amarillo: Beating NOI budget due to lower expenses despite revenue softness
Pampa: Under budget primarily due to insurance expense timing
Without the insurance spike, the portfolio would have been much closer to (or at) budget.

2. Occupancy & Rental Activity

Portfolio Occupancy (Feb 17):
73.1% gross
82.1% rentable
The main constraint is unrentable inventory (136 units total) — especially:
Amarillo: 85 unrentable units
This is suppressing both occupancy and revenue more than demand alone.
Net Rentals YTD (Jan 1–Feb 17):
43 move-ins
80 move-outs
–37 net units
All four properties are negative YTD, indicating early-year churn/retention pressure.

3. Delinquency (Biggest Operational Risk)

Portfolio delinquency >30 days:
$41,632 = 52.2% of rent roll
The issue is not recent slippage — it is aged balances:
51% of delinquency >30 is over 360 days old
Amarillo and Pampa are driving the majority

Property Risk Snapshot

Amarillo: 190% of rent roll delinquent (>30 days), 88% over 360 days
Pampa: 101% of rent roll delinquent (>30 days)
Ocean City: 2.1% (healthy)
Verona: 13.8% (manageable, mostly early-stage)
This is primarily a process and lien cadence issue, not a new performance deterioration.

4. Six-Month Trend

January was:
The highest revenue month
The highest NOI month in the past six months
Also showed the expense spike (insurance timing)
Ocean City and Verona are providing stable NOI. Amarillo and Pampa represent the largest upside if operational issues are corrected.

Bottom-Line Owner Talking Points

Financially: Slight NOI miss in January, primarily due to insurance timing at Pampa — not structural weakness.
Occupancy: Acceptable on a rentable basis, but suppressed by unrentable units.
Net Rentals: Negative YTD — retention and churn need attention.
Delinquency: Largest operational risk; heavily aged balances requiring structured resolution.
Biggest Immediate Value Levers:
Return unrentable units to service (especially Amarillo)
Accelerate lien/auction cadence on aged delinquency
Improve retention to reverse negative net rentals

2026 YTD Performance Update for Managed Properties

(Financials YTD through January 2026 close; Operations snapshot as of February 17, 2026)

Executive summary

Portfolio performance for January 2026 (most recent closed month in the accounting exports provided) was slightly behind budget on NOI, with the miss largely explained by a single one-time-looking expense posting at Pampa (insurance). Operationally, occupancy is acceptable at the portfolio level but is being dragged down by a high count of unrentable units (especially Amarillo), while delinquency over 30-days is concentrated in very aged balances (especially >360 days).
Portfolio highlights to use with owners:
NOI (Jan 2026): 43,777.90 vs budget 46,188.60 (−2,410.70 / −5.2%). Revenue was slightly under budget and expenses slightly over budget.
Primary driver of variance: Pampa posted 14,823.65 of insurance expense in January, which explains most of the portfolio NOI shortfall vs budget (this looks like an annual/one-time posting rather than a recurring monthly run-rate item, but should be confirmed in the GL).
Occupancy (as-of Feb 17): Gross occupied 73.1% portfolio-wide; rentable occupied 82.1%, with unrentable inventory a key limiter (portfolio unrentable units = 136; Amarillo alone reports 85 unrentable units).
Net rental change (leases started minus ended), Fiscal YTD (Jan 1–Feb 17): −37 units portfolio-wide (43 move-ins vs 80 move-outs), indicating early-year demand/retention pressure.
Delinquency >30 days (as-of Feb 17): 41,631.68 = 52.2% of rent roll, and >360-day balances represent ~51% of delinquency >30 at the portfolio level—this is a collections/process issue more than a “recent slip” issue.

Portfolio financial performance vs 2026 budget

Scope: Accounting statements provided appear to include January 2026 financials (P&L) for all four properties, plus trailing-12 detail to support trend context. Budget sources vary by property (see “Data sources, gaps, and assumptions”). Currency is not explicitly labeled in the files; figures are presented as provided.

Portfolio summary table

Sign convention shown as Actual − Budget (Revenue/NOI: positive = favorable; Expense: positive = unfavorable).
Table 1
Property
Rev Act
Rev Bud
Rev Var $
Rev Var %
Exp Act
Exp Bud
Exp Var $
Exp Var %
NOI Act
NOI Bud
NOI Var $
NOI Var %
Amarillo
9,246.19
10,174.83
-928.64
-9.1%
8,574.41
11,895.41
-3,321
-27.9%
671.78
-1,720.59
2,392.37
n/m
Ocean City
32,166.23
32,849.16
-682.93
-2.1%
8,998.53
11,198.91
-2,200.38
-19.6%
23,167.7
21,650.25
1,517.45
7.0%
Pampa
19,600.7
21,372.77
-1,772.07
-8.3%
16,650.9
9,054.46
7,596.44
83.9%
2,949.8
12,318.31
-9,368.51
-76.1%
Verona
24,011.54
22,556.1
1,455.44
6.5%
7,022.92
8,615.48
-1,592.56
-18.5%
16,988.62
13,940.62
3,048
21.9%
Portfolio
85,024.66
86,952.86
-1,928.2
-2.2%
41,246.76
40,764.26
482.5
1.2%
43,777.9
46,188.6
-2,410.7
-5.2%
There are no rows in this table
Owner-ready interpretation:
The portfolio NOI miss (−2.4k) is not broad-based weakness. It is heavily driven by Pampa’s expense spike with otherwise solid NOI generation at Ocean City and Verona.
Ocean City and Verona are producing strong NOI vs budget in January (favorable variances of +1.5k and +3.0k, respectively).
Pampa is materially under budget NOI on paper, but the expense variance appears dominated by an insurance expense posting that is likely non-recurring in-month (needs confirmation).

Property-level variance drivers and recommended actions

This section is written to be read aloud quickly: what happened, why it happened, and what you’re doing next.

Amarillo

January financials: NOI 671.78 vs budget −1,720.59 (improvement +2,392.37). Revenue is under budget (−9.1%) but expenses are well under the budget model (−27.9%). The budget appears to include heavier “setup/initial” costs than actual January spend.
Operational flags (as-of Feb 17):
Occupancy: 128 live occupied / 275 total units = 46.5% gross, but 67.4% rentable due to 85 unrentable units (a major constraint on physical and revenue occupancy).
Net rentals (Fiscal YTD): 5 move-ins − 22 move-outs = −17 units (demand/retention pressure).
Delinquency >30: 21,411.10 = 190.0% of rent roll; ~88% of delinquency >30 is >360 days, indicating aged unresolved balances.
Recommended actions (next 30 days):
Unrentable unit recovery plan: identify root causes of the 85 unrentable units (damage, delinquency status, offline inventory, lock cuts, etc.), prioritize quick-turn repairs, and set weekly targets for units returned to rentable status.
Aged delinquency blitz (>360 days): accelerate lien/auction workflow, resolve legacy balances, and consider write-off policy alignment where collection probability is low (after confirming legal/ownership requirements).
Retention + fill: because net rentals are negative YTD, tighten follow-up on leads, increase conversion tactics, and revisit street rate vs competitor positioning once unrentables are addressed (inventory first, pricing second).

Ocean City

January financials: NOI 23,167.70 vs budget 21,650.25 (+1,517.45 / +7.0%).
Revenue is slightly under budget (−682.93) largely because Parking Revenue is budgeted but not recorded in January, and fee income (late fees) under-ran budget, while rent income exceeded budget.
Expenses are significantly under budget (−2,200.38) despite advertising being over budget, suggesting several budgeted expenses did not hit in January (timing/classification/payer differences to confirm).
Operational snapshot (as-of Feb 17):
Occupancy: 74.4% gross, 75.9% rentable (only 6 unrentable units).
Net rentals (Fiscal YTD): −4 units (7 move-ins, 11 move-outs).
Delinquency >30: 639.80 = 2.1% of rent roll, concentrated in 31–60 days (early-stage, manageable).
Recommended actions:
Parking revenue validation: confirm whether parking product is active, priced, and being billed; if it exists operationally, ensure it’s being recorded consistently; if not, reforecast to remove budgeted parking until implemented.
Advertising ROI check: advertising ran high in January; confirm CAC vs move-ins and rebalance channels accordingly (especially since net rentals are negative YTD).
Delinquency early intervention: maintain low delinquency by tightening 31–60 day outreach before it ages.

Pampa

January financials: NOI 2,949.80 vs budget 12,318.31 (−9,368.51 / −76.1%). Revenue is under budget (−8.3%), but the main issue is expenses over budget by +7,596.44.
The accounting detail shows Insurance Expense of 14,823.65 recorded in January, which overwhelmingly explains the expense variance and NOI miss. This looks like an annual or one-off posting timing issue rather than a structural cost problem, but should be confirmed in the GL.
Operational snapshot (as-of Feb 17):
Occupancy: 82.0% gross, 89.7% rentable (31 unrentable units).
Net rentals (Fiscal YTD): −9 units (16 move-ins, 25 move-outs).
Delinquency >30: 16,711.00 = 100.6% of rent roll, with the largest concentration in 181–360 days (40% of delinquency >30), plus additional very aged balances.
Recommended actions:
Normalize reporting for owners: confirm whether the insurance payment is annual; if yes, present “NOI before annual insurance timing” alongside GAAP/cash-basis reporting, and implement a monthly accrual view for budget comparison.
Collections + lien cadence: delinquency levels indicate a backlog; implement a strict weekly schedule for notices/overlocks/auctions and track units returned to paying status or vacated for re-rent.
Unrentable review: validate why 31 units are unrentable and expedite returns to service.

Verona

January financials: NOI 16,988.62 vs budget 13,940.62 (+3,048.00 / +21.9%) driven by both revenue outperformance (+6.5%) and expense control (−18.5%).
Operational snapshot (as-of Feb 17):
Occupancy: 85.1% gross, 89.2% rentable (14 unrentable units).
Net rentals (Fiscal YTD): −7 units (15 move-ins, 22 move-outs).
Delinquency >30: 2,869.78 = 13.8% of rent roll, concentrated in 31–60 days (44% of delinquency >30), suggesting a “prevent aging” opportunity.
Recommended actions:
Protect strong NOI: keep expense discipline, but check whether any budgeted seasonal/quarterly costs are pending (to avoid later surprises).
Delinquency prevention: focus on 31–60 day accounts; early action should materially reduce >90 day aging.
Address net rentals: with net units down YTD, evaluate churn drivers (pricing moves, service issues, competitor offers) and adjust retention messaging.

Operating metrics and owner-facing scoreboard

Note: These operating metrics come from the Management Summary dated February 17, 2026 with “Fiscal YTD” counts through that date. Delinquency >30 is derived from the aging buckets and expressed as a % of the report’s “Actual Occupied Rate” (used as a rent roll proxy).

Property and portfolio operating summary

Table 2
Property
Units
Occupied (live)
Occ % (gross)
Occ % (rentable)
Move-ins YTD
Move-outs YTD
Net rentals YTD
Rent roll (as-of)
Delinq >30 (as-of)
Delinq >30 % rent roll
Aging concentration
Amarillo
275
128
46.5%
67.4%
5
22
-17
11,268.4
21,411.1
190%
> 360 days (88%)
Ocean City
297
221
74.4%
75.9%
7
11
-4
31,065.4
639.8
2.1%
31 - 60 days (100%)
Pampa
362
297
82%
89.7%
16
25
-9
16,611
16,711
100.6%
181 - 360 days (40%)
Verona
302
257
85.1%
89.2%
15
22
-7
20,762.64
2,869.78
13.8%
31 - 60 days (44%)
Portfolio
1,236
903
73.1%
82.1%
43
80
-37
79,707.44
41,631.68
52.2%
> 360 days (51%)
There are no rows in this table
Owner-ready talking points from the table:
Occupancy is constrained by unrentables more than lack of demand (portfolio rentable occupancy 82.1% vs gross 73.1%).
Net rentals are negative across all properties YTD, suggesting a churn/retention issue early in the year.
Delinquency is the biggest operational risk, especially at Amarillo and Pampa, and it is mostly very aged, which demands a process-driven resolution plan.

Six-month financial trend

The six-month view uses the trailing-12-month schedules (T12) in the accounting exports. For properties that began reporting later (e.g., Amarillo/Pampa), earlier months may be effectively zero/blank in the export and therefore appear lower in the portfolio aggregation.

Portfolio last 6 months (actuals)

Table 3
Month
Revenue
Expense
NOI
Aug 2025
48,720
22,615
26,104
Sep 2025
54,008
20,930
33,079
Oct 2025
54,350
16,227
38,123
Nov 2025
64,418
32,209
32,209
Dec 2025
63,928
31,565
32,363
Jan 2026
85,025
41,247
43,778
There are no rows in this table
Interpretation for owners:
January step-up reflects the portfolio’s strongest month in this six-month window on both revenue and NOI, but the expense spike is also visible (largely driven by Pampa’s insurance posting and any other annual/semi-annual items).
Ocean City + Verona provide stable base NOI; Amarillo and Pampa are the primary operational upside/downside levers (unrentables + delinquency).

Data sources, gaps, and assumptions

Primary sources used (as provided)

Accounting exports (actuals):
01 2026 Financials Amarillo.xlsx (Profit & Loss; T12)
01 2026 Financials Ocean City.xlsx (Profit and Loss; T12; Budget vs. Actuals)
01 2026 Financials Pampa.xlsx (Profit & Loss; T12)
01 2026 Financials Verona.xlsx (Profit and Loss; T12)
Budget sources:
Budget - Amarillo Storage Center (J&B Self Storage).xlsx (Expanded Budget)
Budget - Pampa (Previously American).xlsx (Expanded Budget)
2026 Verona Storage .xlsx (Budget - Verona)
Ocean City budget was taken directly from 01 2026 Financials Ocean City.xlsx → Budget vs. Actuals
Property management / operational report:
Management Summary - Consolidated - 2026-02-17 through 2026-02-17.xlsx (Consolidated + property tabs)

Data gaps (important to disclose to owners)

Bank statements were not provided, so cash verification and deposit timing reconciliation were not performed.
Rent rolls were not provided, so delinquency is stated as the management summary’s % of “Actual Occupied Rate” (used as rent roll proxy), rather than a reconciled rent roll total.
Prior-month operational snapshots were not provided, so true month-over-month trends for occupancy and delinquency cannot be shown beyond what is embedded in the Feb 17 management summary as-of view.

Key assumptions applied in this report

Financial YTD is treated as January 1–January 31, 2026 because January is the most recent complete month of financial statements provided.
Operational YTD (“Fiscal YTD”) is treated as January 1–February 17, 2026, per the management summary column header.
Delinquency >30 is calculated as the sum of aging buckets 31–60, 61–90, 91–120, 121–180, 181–360, and >360 days from the management summary; % of rent roll uses “Actual Occupied Rate” from the same report as the denominator.
Budget comparability: Amarillo and Pampa budgets are drawn from underwriting-style expanded models (monthly projections) and may not match accounting classifications perfectly; comparisons are therefore made at the total Revenue / total Expense / NOI level only.

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.