Skip to content
Scoring Rubrics
Assignment 1
Conceptual Planning Assignment
Criteria
Emerging (1-2 points)
Developing (3-4 points)
Proficient (5-6 points)
Exemplary (7-8 points)
Understanding Project Requirements
Limited awareness of project goals; lacks clarity in defining needs
Identifies basic requirements but lacks depth in analysis
Clear understanding of project needs with logical reasoning
Comprehensive identification and insightful analysis of project goals
Site Analysis & Context Study
Minimal research on site conditions; missing contextual elements
Some site considerations present but lacks integration into design
Demonstrates understanding of site constraints; context considered
Deep analysis with strong integration of site factors into the design
Concept Development
Few or vague design ideas presented; lacks originality
Some creative solutions proposed, but lacks cohesiveness
Solid conceptual approach with thoughtful spatial planning
Highly creative, well-developed concepts with strong architectural principles
Sustainability & Innovation
Limited consideration for sustainable and innovative features
Includes some sustainability elements but lacks integration
Thoughtful application of sustainable and innovative strategies
Demonstrates advanced sustainable design thinking with innovative solutions
Evaluation & Refinement
Minimal refinement; lacks justification for design choices
Some revisions made based on feedback but lacks depth
Evidence of refinement with clear rationale for changes
Well-documented improvements demonstrating a strong iterative process
Presentation & Visual Communication
Weak visual representation; lacks clarity in communication
Some effective visuals, but presentation lacks coherence
Clear, engaging presentation with effective communication techniques
Exceptional presentation with polished visuals and strong storytelling
There are no rows in this table
Final Project
Sustainable Design Site Analysis Using BIM
Criteria
Emerging (1-2 points)
Developing (3-4 points)
Proficient (5-6 points)
Exemplary (7-8 points)
Project Selection & Justification
Minimal explanation; lacks relevance to sustainability
Some justification given but lacks depth
Clear rationale for selection with sustainability considerations
Strong justification with insightful sustainability relevance
Data Gathering & Model Development
Limited environmental data collected; inaccurate model
Some environmental data included; model meets basic LOD 100 requirements
Well-integrated data and accurate LOD 100 model
Extensive data integration and precise model with strong analytical foundation
Environmental Analysis
Superficial analysis with limited insights
Some analysis conducted, but lacks interpretation
Thorough analysis with clear interpretation of results
Advanced analysis with deep understanding and impactful insights
Sustainable Design Recommendations
Few or impractical recommendations; little connection to green principles
Some relevant recommendations but lacks feasibility
Well-developed sustainable strategies aligned with green principles
Thoughtful, innovative solutions demonstrating strong sustainability knowledge
Presentation & Visual Communication
Disorganized presentation; lacks clarity and visual appeal
Some structure and visuals but lacks cohesion
Clear, visually engaging presentation with effective communication
Exceptional presentation with compelling storytelling and polished visuals
There are no rows in this table
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.